Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Election

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue May 30, 2017 6:03 pm

Former White House press officer Boris Epshteyn questioned in Russia probe
By BRIAN ROSS MATTHEW MOSK PETE MADDEN May 30, 2017, 5:25 PM ET

The Congressional investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election continues to grow, as yet another Trump associate, Boris Epshteyn, has acknowledged that he has received a request for information from lawmakers.

Epshteyn, a Trump campaign adviser who briefly served in the White House press office, confirmed to ABC News that he has received a lengthy list of questions from the House Intelligence Committee. His lawyer provided a brief statement to ABC News.

"Like many others, Mr. Epshteyn has received a broad, preliminary request for information from the House Intelligence Committee. This is a voluntary request. Mr. Epshteyn has not been subpoenaed nor do we anticipate that he will be. We have reached out to the Committee wth several follow up questions and we are awaiting their response in order to better understand what information they are seeking and whether Mr. Epshteyn is able to reasonably provide it."

The Trump associate, 34, most recently served as the special assistant to the president in charge of surrogate operations before leaving his post in March.

The White House offered no explanation for his abrupt departure. Although a senior Trump administration official initially told ABC News that they were “exploring opportunities within the administration” for Epshteyn, he has since joined the conservative-leaning Sinclair Broadcasting as a political analyst.

Epshteyn grew up in Moscow and met Trump’s son Eric at Georgetown University, where he received his law degree. Following the campaign, he served as senior adviser to the Trump-Pence transition team and director of communications for the Presidential Inaugural Committee before joining the White House press office.

A frequent on-air guest during the campaign, he became well-known for combative television appearances and friction with reporters behind the scenes.

In a recent interview with Bill Maher, Epshteyn sparred with the progressive political commentator about whether Russia meddled in the election.

“You would have to ask Russia if they tried to meddle … Whether there was an attempt at meddling, again, how would I know?” Epshteyn said. “Again, if you have a problem with how the president is handling his foreign policy, you can speak at the ballot box in three and a half years.”

Epshteyn appears to be the sixth Trump associate whose activities are being examined in the rapidly widening Congressional investigation.

Gen. Michael Flynn, who served briefly as Trump’s National Security Adviser, is the only person of interest to receive a subpoena for records. Flynn has declined to provide them, citing his Fifth Amendment rights.

Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, informal advisor Roger Stone, and former foreign policy adviser Carter Page have also been asked by lawmakers to voluntarily hand over relevant records. All three have said that they are cooperating with the investigation.

ABC News reported on Tuesday that Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney, has also been asked “to provide information and testimony” about his contacts with Russian officials. Cohen told ABC News he “declined to participate” because “the request was poorly phrased, overly broad and not capable of being answered,” but denied that he has any links to Russia.

Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, could also be asked to testify. In an interview with ABC News’ Martha Raddatz, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, has called for a review of Kushner’s security clearance following reports that he sought to establish a “backchannel” with Russian officials.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-ho ... d=47731166



Boris "Source E" Epshteyn is a Russian spy and a flight risk.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby Iamwhomiam » Tue May 30, 2017 10:57 pm

Everyone of the older fuggers will die before sentencing; Trump will claim immunity from prosecution and the surviving younger fuggers will be pardoned by the next Republican President.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed May 31, 2017 8:21 am

Jared Kushner's charmed life is about to come to a screeching halt
Walter Shapiro
Now that he is ensnared in an FBI investigation, his life in the coming months and maybe years will be a study in misery

‘Did he think a secret back channel was like a small boy’s tin-can telephone?’ Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Monday 29 May 2017 09.20 EDT Last modified on Tuesday 30 May 2017 10.00 EDT
Perhaps Jared Kushner really believed that his New York real estate skills set him up to bring peace to the Middle East, solve the opioid crisis, run a government Swat team of business experts and protect his father-in-law from disloyal White House advisers. And that he could do it all while observing the Sabbath and reserving enough time for family ski vacations with Ivanka and their three children.

Or maybe Kushner just calculated that all the hype surrounding his White House role was a not-to-be-missed family branding opportunity. After all, the Washington Post recently watched as his sister, Nicole Kushner Meyer, hawked American visas in Beijing to would-be Chinese investors in a troubled Kushner New Jersey real estate development.

But in all his fantasies about conquering Washington at Donald Trump’s side, Kushner undoubtedly never imagined being ensnared in an FBI investigation.

All that changed, of course, when news broke late last week that Kushner had discussed opening up a secret back channel to Moscow last December in a Trump Tower meeting with the ubiquitous Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Let’s put the most charitable interpretation possible on the facts that have emerged about Kushner.

The bizarre suggestion to use the Russian communications system to secretly link the Trump transition team and the Kremlin could have come from Michael Flynn, the star-crossed former national security adviser who was also at the meeting.

Kushner, in his naivete about government, may also not have remembered that Barack Obama was still president and in charge of all negotiations with Russia. And it was an innocent oversight that Kushner failed to mention his talk with Kislyak on his government security clearance form.


Trump mulls shakeup as Kelly says 'back channel' talks are 'a good thing'
Read more
Even under the benign theory that Kushner thought a secret back channel was like a small boy’s tin-can telephone, his life in the coming months and maybe years will be a study in misery. He will probably spend more time with his personal lawyer, Clinton justice department veteran Jamie Gorelick, than with Ivanka or his children. Whether it is an appearance under oath on Capitol Hill or the inevitable FBI interview, every sentence Kushner utters will bring with it possible legal jeopardy.

Kushner may have once thought that he established his tough-guy credentials when he stared down angry creditors and impatient bankers over his ill-timed 2007 purchase of a $1.8bn Fifth Avenue office building. But the worst thing that can happen to an over-leveraged real estate investor (as Trump himself knows well) is bankruptcy. When the FBI and special prosecutor Robert Mueller get involved, the penalties can theoretically involve steel bars locking behind you.

That ominous sound is familiar to Kushner from his weekly visits more than a decade ago to his real estate mogul father, Charles, in federal prison in Alabama. The then US attorney Chris Christie (the ironies of Trump World abound) successfully prosecuted Charles Kushner in 2005 for tax evasion, witness tampering and unlawful campaign contributions. The Jared Kushner coming-of-age story pivots around a loyal son taking over the New Jersey-based real estate firm when his father was a guest of the government.

Now the presidential son-in-law may be worrying in his late-night moments that family history may be repeating itself. He may put on a brave front in public and encourage the current rumors that he and Ivanka are tiring of Washington, but for Kushner the high adventure of a senior White House post ended abruptly during last week’s European grand tour.

If Jared and Ivanka do return to New York – either voluntarily or as part of a White House legal strategy – their departure will accentuate Trump’s fate as the loneliest man in Washington. Trapped in the trappings of a White House that he can’t demolish to build something grander, Trump is surrounded by aides like Reince Priebus and HR McMaster whom he neither fully trusts nor feels comfortable with.

All White Houses go through a phase when the familiar faces from the campaign and the Inauguration have disappeared from burnout and a desire to cash in. That is when a president looks around at his senior staff and asks himself: “Who are these guys? Why am I surrounded by strangers?”

Usually that moment comes sometime in a president’s second term. For Trump, the exodus may occur before his first summer in the Oval Office is over.

The Kushner news reminds me of the saddest person I ever saw coming out of the White House. It was a Clinton administration official, shuffling along with his downcast eyes focused on the sidewalk, who had been caught up in the exaggerated first-term scandal known as Whitewater.

There in his familial loyalty to Donald Trump goes Jared Kushner, who is learning a hard lesson about Washington, back channels to the Russians and the FBI.

Walter Shapiro is a Roll Call columnist, a lecturer in political science at Yale and a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ching-halt



NEARLY HALF OF DONALD TRUMP'S TWITTER FOLLOWERS ARE FAKE ACCOUNTS AND BOTS
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-tw ... ake-617873


Image

JΞSŦΞR ✪ ΔCŦUΔL³³º¹‏
@th3j35t3r
Follow
More
@realDonaldTrump << account has gained over 5 million followers in less than 3 days. Mostly bots. He's getting ready for something.


Image

Image

James Comey in early talks with special counsel Mueller on Russia testimony, memos
Kevin Johnson and Erin Kelly , USA TODAY Published 5:29 p.m. ET May 30, 2017 | Updated 0 minutes ago


WASHINGTON — The negotiations over James Comey's testimony have begun.

The former FBI director who was fired by President Trump has started preliminary discussions with special counsel Robert Mueller about his intention to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee about his communications with the president, as part of the panel’s ongoing inquiry into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, USA TODAY has learned.

A close associate of Comey who is not authorized to comment publicly said Tuesday that Mueller is not expected to block the former director from appearing before the Senate panel. However, that appearance would occur only after Comey is fully debriefed for the federal investigation, the source said.

The panel previously announced that Comey, abruptly dismissed earlier this month as he was running the FBI's Russia investigation, agreed to testify following the Memorial Day holiday. No date has been set.

But there were questions about whether the four congressional committees running concurrent investigations into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election would be able to secure public testimony and documents from Comey and other witnesses now that Mueller has been appointed.

Mueller, a former FBI director succeeded by Comey in 2013, was appointed to take over the FBI's wide-ranging Russia inquiry earlier this month after Comey's firing. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced Mueller's selection a day after it was disclosed that Comey maintained a secret file documenting his communications with the president.

Comey's notes include his account of his Feb. 14, encounter with Trump in which he says the president urged him to back off the examination of former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Flynn had been fired the day before for lying to other administration officials about his communications with Russia ambassador Sergey Kislyak before the inauguration.

Now, lawmakers want access to Comey and his memos, contributing to mounting tension between interests of lawmakers who are urging a public airing of Russia's interference — and Mueller, a prosecutor who might worry that any disclosure of potential evidence could damage an ongoing criminal investigation.

Public testimony could become even more important as the Russia controversies continue to dominate the news cycles in Washington — especially when it comes to determining Trump's motives when firing his FBI director four months into his term.

In the days after firing Comey, Trump called Russia investigation a "made-up story" and said in an interview with NBC News that it was indeed on his mind when he fired the FBI chief. That contradicted his administration's previous assertions — and even his own widely disseminated termination letter to Comey — stating the dismissal was based on the recommendations of Justice Department leadership, who objected to his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

As special counsel, Mueller's investigative authority includes whether attempts were made to obstruct the federal inquiry.

The person familiar with Comey's contacts with Mueller said that while discussions between the two have only been preliminary, there appeared to be an understanding of the need for public testimony from Comey.

There also was agreement on the need for Mueller's team to be fully briefed before Comey provided public testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Last week, Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the Republican chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which also has sought Comey's testimony, canceled a scheduled hearing, saying Comey needed to consult with Mueller before offering any public comment.

The discussions involving Comey and Mueller come as at least two of the four congressional committees investigating Russia interference appeared to ramp up their activities. Michael Cohen, Trump's outspoken personal lawyer, acknowledged Tuesday that he is resisting a request from congressional investigators seeking information from him about possible contacts with Russia.

Cohen's name surfaced last year in an unsubstantiated dossier prepared by a former British intelligence agent, alleging that the lawyer attended a meeting in Prague to discuss Russia's targeting of Democrats for hacking operations.

"To date, there has not been a single witness, document or piece of evidence linking me to this fake Russian conspiracy,'' Cohen said in a text message to USA TODAY. "This is not surprising to me because there is none! I declined the invitation (by the Senate and House Intelligence panels) to participate as the request was poorly phrased, overly broad and not capable of being answered.''

Cohen is the second Trump associate to refuse cooperation with congressional investigating committees. Earlier this month, Flynn rejected a subpoena from the Senate Intelligence Committee, asserting his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Last week, the committee issued two new subpoenas to Flynn's businesses and is seeking a response by early next week.

A third associate, Carter Page, an ex-foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump's campaign, told USA TODAY on Tuesday that he no longer plans to testify publicly before the House Intelligence Committee in June as part of the panel's investigation of Russian interference in last year's election. Page had announced just last week that he planned to testify, in part because he wanted to rebut statements made in a public hearing a week ago by former CIA Director John Brennan. The ex-CIA chief told the panel he had "unresolved questions" about whether Russia had been successful in getting Trump campaign officials to act on its behalf.

Asked whether he was prohibited from rebutting Brennan's testimony, Page replied in a text message, "That sounds like a credible theory."

Meanwhile, former Trump campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn, who served briefly in the White House press office, confirmed Tuesday through his attorney that he has received "a broad, preliminary request for information" from the House Intelligence Committee and has asked committee officials some questions to "better understand what information they are seeking" and whether he "is able to reasonably provide it."

Separately, White House spokesman Sean Spicer declined to address the uncertainty surrounding top Trump adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Kushner, according to a person familiar with the FBI investigation, has drawn the scrutiny of federal investigators related to his contacts with Russian officials prior to the inauguration.

Spicer specifically refused to comment on disclosures that Kushner sought to establish a back-channel of communications with the Kremlin, which were first reported by The Washington Post. Kushner, according to the report, was open to using Russian communication facilities to open that line.

Also Tuesday, Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, formally requested that Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers produce any personal notes of their communications with Trump in which the president may have urged them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of possible collusion involving the campaign and Russia.

Last week, Coats declined to address any such encounter during testimony before a Senate panel.

Trump has also hired a personal lawyer to handle any matters related to the ongoing Russia investigations. Last week, former senator Joe Lieberman withdrew from consideration as the next FBI director, citing Trump's hiring of Marc Kasowitz to represent him in the Russia inquiry as a conflict of interest
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 102316468/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed May 31, 2017 11:19 am

Donald Trump’s White House Communications Director secretly resigned the day after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed
By Bill Palmer
Updated: 11:59 pm EDT Tue May 30, 2017 | 2
Home » Politics

Donald Trump’s White House announced today that Communications Director Mike Dubke had resigned. No reason was given, and the timing – the first weekday after a holiday weekend and the first weekday after the end of Trump’s overseas trip – stood out as odd. But it’s since been revealed that Dubke actually resigned twelve days ago, and agreed to keep it quiet until now. And that difference in dates means everything.



Dubke, who served as Sean Spicer’s boss for a few months, resigned on May 18th, according to today’s reporting (source: link). Why is that date important? The afternoon before, on May 17th, Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed to take over the Trump-Russia investigation. That means Dubke, who was a late arrival to the White House to begin with, heard the news about Mueller and promptly resigned the next day.



There is nothing to suggest that Dubke, who was not a part of the Trump campaign, was involved in the Russia scandal in any way. But what is clear is that the minute a Special Counsel was appointed, he decided the ship was sinking and he immediately wanted off. The White House Communications Director handles communications strategy behind closed doors, as portrayed by the fictional Toby Ziegler from the West Wing. Dubke would have been in charge of crafting the White House message about Donald Trump’s Russia scandal, and in light of the Special Counsel, simply didn’t want to deal with how much more ridiculous that failed attempt at messaging was going to get.



Either that, or Dubke decided that the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller meant that Donald Trump and his administration are doomed for sure, and it’s just a matter of time. Either way, he won’t be the last rat off the sinking ship
http://www.palmerreport.com/politics/du ... ller/3179/



Sorry. On Kushner, There’s No Innocent Explanation

By JOSH MARSHALL Published MAY 31, 2017 9:43 AM

The title of this post is, I confess, rather dramatic and declarative. I’ve written elsewhere about possible ‘innocent explanations’ of the Trump/Russia story, particularly Donald Trump’s role in it. I will leave that all-encompassing question aside for the moment. Here I’m talking about Jared Kushner’s attempt to set up a secure line of communication to Moscow, as well as meeting with the head of that government-backed Russian bank.

In commentary on these revelations we’re hearing a variety of possible explanations. The first was that this was an attempt to hold confidential discussions over Syria. As we’ve discussed, that’s very hard to believe. There are plenty of ways to have those conversations, plenty of ways to get detailed briefings on whats happening in country. None of them involve or require what Kushner was trying to do.


In the last 48 hours, we’ve increasingly heard it suggested that the issue was Kushner’s naïveté or inexperience in government. Perhaps he simply didn’t realize that this would be a problem. Let’s call this the ‘naive Jared’ theory. Like the Syria back channel it simply does not add up. I would say it’s absurd on its face. But if you don’t buy that, remember that Mike Flynn was there too when this was discussed. Flynn was a retired three star general who had spent his entire adult life in service and risen to near the very pinnacle of the US military. We may find out many things about Michael Flynn. But not one of them will be that he lacked the most basic understanding of how the US government or security apparatus worked. So the naïveté argument is ruled out.

There’s one other argument that gets tossed around a lot now and seems widely believed even though I think there’s little to no basis for it. Even if it’s paranoid or weird or suspicious it’s now treated as a given that the Trump Team was wary of being monitored by the Obama administration. But is there really any evidence of that? Not really. If anything, the Obama team – operating largely at the then-President’s direction – seemed fairly accommodating. If you remember incidents like the call to the President of Taiwan, the Trump team’s attitude toward the outgoing Obama administration seemed most characterized by indifference. They ignored established channels but they didn’t try to hide anything. In any case, why would they even care? The Obama administration would be gone within a month. Most things could wait. If they couldn’t wait, again, who cares? They were leaving. There’s really nothing they could do. Worried about holdovers? They can be fired on day one. Just have replacements ready. Or don’t. It just didn’t matter and evidence at the time showed little sign they cared.

The idea that the Trumpers were afraid of being surveilled by the Obama team is something we’ve now projected back onto the transition because of things that happened months later – specifically, President Trump’s early March claim that Obama had “wire-tapped” him in 2016.

The idea that Kushner and Flynn would use Russian secure communications facilities to set up a secure channel to Moscow is so inexplicable and beyond the pal that it almost beggars the imagination. Critically, this key part of the story has not been disputed by the White House. The only possible explanation of this effort is that Flynn and Kushner (perhaps others, but at least them) wanted to discuss topics that would not only be hidden from Obama administration political appointees but from everyone in the US government – people who would continue to make up the government long after the Obama team was gone.

There’s simply no innocent explanation for that. Not naivete, no fear of Obama snooping, not plausible deniability. The only explanation for that level of secrecy and security, that level of collaboration with an adversary foreign power is that they were doing something wrong, something that had to stay secret. What it was I don’t know. It wasn’t innocent.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/sor ... xplanation


THE RIGHT WING
Does Vladimir Putin Really Own Donald Trump? It’s More Likely than You Think
Kompromat is the name of the Russian game—and to win the White House, Trump may have unwittingly been played.
By Cody Cain / Salon May 28, 2017

Imagine the moment when Vladimir Putin first learned that his Russian hackers had struck gold by obtaining the emails of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Shots of vodka all around, singing, dancing and hurling empty glasses into the fireplace. Then Putin rubs his palms together and begins to scheme: “How best to use this information?”

One obvious ploy would be to secretly approach Donald Trump’s campaign and demand a ransom in exchange for the public release of Podesta’s hacked emails.

Imagine the reaction from Trump: “Absolutely not! I would never compromise my honor and integrity. I would rather lose this election than win in an underhanded manner.”

Ha ha ha! Yeah right.

Trump, of course, would have done anything to have those emails released. “Name your price,” would far more likely have been his response.

The Russians would have instructed Trump that all he needed to do was just take a more friendly position toward Russia. Do not criticize Russia or Putin, and advocate for better relations between the United States and Russia. And once Trump becomes president, he would then need to help lift the sanctions against Russia for invading Crimea.

“That’s it? That’s all I gotta do?” Trump would have exclaimed in delight. “Done!”

The art of the deal.

But, of course, there is just one little catch that Trump is too dimwitted to have appreciated. By collaborating with Russia, he becomes compromised.

Compromising a targeted person is a standard technique employed by the Russian intelligence agency. There is even a Russian word for it, “Kompromat.” Once Russia obtains compromising information, Russia then exerts control over its target through blackmail. If the target does not do as Russia instructs, then Russia will disclose the compromising information to ruin the life of the target.

Trump’s situation, the extent of the compromise is enormous. Russia could easily prove to the world that Trump collaborated with Russia during the campaign, and this would result in Trump’s immediate impeachment. This means that Putin possesses the power to instantly end Trump’s presidency whenever he pleases.This is tremendous power. Trump knows full well that if he does not follow Putin’s orders, then Trump’s rule is over.

And now that Trump is compromised, Putin need not stick to the terms of the original deal. Instead, Putin is free to make new demands. In fact, Putin could make any demands his little black heart desires. Trump has no choice but to obey. Bam! Putin owns Trump. The art of the blunder.

Of course we do not know for certain that this situation transpired. But it is highly plausible. If the compromise did in fact occur, this would certainly explain a lot. It explains the bizarre behavior of Trump steadfastly refusing to criticize Putin or Russia. No wonder – he can’t. It explains the reasons for the extensive secret contacts between Trump associates and Russia, and why they have repeatedly lied about it.It explains why the Trump camp seemed to know in advance exactly when Podesta’s hacked emails would be released.

It explains why Trump has appointed senior officials who have extensive ties to Russia, like his now-fired national security adviser, Michael Flynn; the secretary of state, Rex Tillerson; and the attorney general, Jeff Sessions. A compromised attorney general is especially notable because this would permit Russian crime to infiltrate the United States without prosecution.

It also explains the current approach of the FBI in its investigation into Trump’s Russian connections. The FBI seems to be focused on two suspects: Trump’s fired campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and Flynn. (As we learned this week, the list may also include Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.) These two characters are key because if the Russians contacted the Trump campaign with an offer to collaborate, they may well have communicated through one or both of these figures due to their pre-existing Russian connections. The FBI now seems to be squeezing these two men by uncovering unrelated financial crimes they may have committed, in order to threaten them with lengthy jail sentences unless they fully disclose all they know about Trump’s arrangements with Russia.

The pieces of the puzzle seem to fall into place under the scenario that Trump has been compromised by Putin.

If Putin has in fact pulled off the caper of the century by compromising the president of the United States, then Trump, the “great dealmaker,” will go down in history for the greatest bungled deal of all time.
http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/does ... -you-think
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed May 31, 2017 1:42 pm

CNN: Comey To Testify Publicly That Trump Pressured Him To End Flynn Probe

FBI Director James Comey testifies as the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence holds its first public hearing on allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the murky web of contacts between President Donald Trump's campaign and Russia, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, March 20, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
By CAITLIN MACNEAL Published MAY 31, 2017 1:31 PM
Ousted FBI Director James Comey plans to testify in public that President Donald Trump pressured him to quash the bureau’s investigation into Trump’s former national security adviser, CNN reported Wednesday afternoon, citing a “source close to the issue.”

Comey’s testimony could come as early as next week, but a date has not been finalized, according to CNN. The Senate Intelligence Committee’s co-chairs previously announced that they expected Comey to testify in public before the panel.

The New York Times reported earlier this month that Trump had asked Comey to shut down the FBI investigation into Michael Flynn the day after Flynn was ousted from his post as national security adviser. Comey documented the conversation in a contemporaneous memo that was shared with his inner circle at the bureau, according to the report.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/c ... ssia-probe
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed May 31, 2017 7:38 pm

House Intel Committee Approves Subpoenas For Flynn, Cohen

By ALLEGRA KIRKLAND Published MAY 31, 2017 5:13 PM
The House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday approved subpoenas for former national security adviser Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, as part of their investigation into Russia’s election interference. The committee also approved subpoenas for the two Trump allies’ companies, Flynn Intel Group LLC and Michael D. Cohen & Associates PC.

Read the bipartisan statement from Reps. Mike Conaway (R-TX) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) below:



As part of our ongoing investigation into Russian active measures during the 2016 campaign, today we approved subpoenas for several individuals for testimony, personal documents and business records. We hope and expect that anyone called to testify or provide documents will comply with that request, so that we may gain all the information within the scope of our investigation. We will continue to pursue this investigation wherever the facts may lead.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/h ... hael-cohen


Donald Trump’s defense of Carter Page is beyond suspicious
By Bill Palmer
Updated: 4:26 pm EDT Wed May 31, 2017 | 0
Home » Opinion

Donald Trump, or rather the handler who has begun loosely impersonating him (link) on his Twitter account, decided to launch into a detailed defense today of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The trouble: the tweets about Page revealed details about their relationship that may have done more harm than good for both Page and Trump.

Here’s what Trump’s Twitter account posted this morning across two consecutive tweets (link): ‘So now it is reported that the Democrats, who have excoriated Carter Page about Russia, don’t want him to testify. He blows away their case against him & now wants to clear his name by showing “the false or misleading testimony by James Comey, John Brennan…’ Witch Hunt!”

For starters, Trump doesn’t know words like “excoriated” to begin with, so this clearly seems to have been posted by the handler now running his Twitter account. It also appears to have been in response to this morning’s misleading Fox News segment which incorrectly claimed that Carter Page wants to testify before Congress, but the Democrats aren’t allowing him. But here’s the catch: Donald Trump has long claimed that he doesn’t even know Page, and that Page’s role in the campaign was minimal to nonexistent.

In fact, since the Russia scandal exploded, the Trump campaign has planted stories in friendly outlets like Fox News which claimed that the campaign had been cease and desisting Carter Page because he was overstating the role he’d played in the campaign (link). Yet now Trump is claiming to be familiar enough with Page to know what he’s going to testify about, and to know that it’s going to “blow away” the case being built against the Trump campaign in the Russia investigation. How could Donald Trump possibly know this? Three possibilities come to mind.



The first, and seemingly most likely, is that Trump (or his new Twitter handler) is simply bluffing, and has no idea how Carter Page might testify. The second is that Trump and Page did indeed know each other well enough during the campaign that Trump is now confident he knows what Page will say. The third, and most dire, is that Trump knows precisely how Page will testify because he’s coerced him. But any way you slice it, Trump’s tweets about Page today only serve to cast suspicion on them both.
http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/pag ... ious/3194/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed May 31, 2017 8:07 pm

Trump administration moves to return Russian compounds in Maryland and New York
Russian compounds in Maryland and New York shut down
View Photos Two luxury retreats, in Centreville, Md., and Oyster Bay, N.Y., where Russian diplomats have gone for decades to play tennis, sail and swim, were shut down by the Obama administration in retaliation for Moscow’s alleged hacking in the presidential election.
By Karen DeYoung and Adam Entous May 31 at 7:16 PM
The Trump administration is moving toward handing back to Russia two diplomatic compounds, near New York City and on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, from which its officials were ejected in late December as punishment for Moscow’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Then-President Barack Obama said Dec. 29 that the compounds were being “used by Russian personnel for intelligence-related purposes,” and gave Russia 24 hours to vacate them. Separately, Obama expelled from the United States what he said were 35 Russian “intelligence operatives.”

Early last month, the Trump administration told the Russians it would consider turning the properties back over to them if Moscow would lift its freeze, imposed in 2014 in retaliation for U.S. sanctions related to Ukraine, on construction of a new U.S. consulate on a certain parcel of land in St. Petersburg.

Two days later, the U.S. position changed. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak at a meeting in Washington, that the United States had dropped any linkage between the compounds and the consulate, according to several people with knowledge of the exchanges.

In Moscow on Wednesday, Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov said Russia was “taking into account the difficult internal political situation for the current administration,” but retained the option to reciprocate for what he called the “expropriation” of Russian property, “if these steps are not somehow adjusted by the U.S. side,” the news outlet Sputnik reported.

A Russian-owned compound in Maryland is being shut down after the Obama administration says it was being used for intelligence-related purposes. (WUSA 9)
Senior Tillerson adviser R. C. Hammond said that “the U.S. and Russia have reached no agreements.” He said the next senior level meeting between the two governments, below the secretary of state level, will be in June in St. Petersburg.

Before making a final decision on allowing the Russians to reoccupy the compounds, the administration is examining possible restrictions on Russian activities there, including removing the diplomatic immunity the properties previously enjoyed. Without immunity, the facilities would be treated as any other buildings in the United States and would not be barred to entry by U.S. law enforcement, according to people who spoke on the condition anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic matters.

Any concessions to Moscow could prove controversial while administration and former Trump campaign officials are under congressional and special counsel investigation for alleged ties to Russia.

Changes in the administration’s official posture toward the compounds come as Russian media recently suggested that Kislyak, about to leave Washington after serving as ambassador since 2008, may be proposed by the Kremlin to head a new position as U.N. undersecretary general for counterterrorism.

Kislyak, who met and spoke during the campaign and transition with President Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn, Trump’s White House adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and others, is known to be interested in the post. His replacement as ambassador, current Deputy Foreign Minister Anatoly Antonov, was confirmed last month by the Russian Duma, or parliament. Officials in Moscow said Russian President Vladi­mir Putin will officially inform Trump of the new ambassador when the two meet in July, at the Group of 20 summit in Hamburg. It will be Trump’s first meeting with Putin as president.

The U.N. General Assembly must first approve establishment of the counterterrorism slot, part of a larger U.N. reorganization and the first new post at that level for decades.

A fence encloses an estate in the village of Upper Brookville in the town of Oyster Bay, N.Y., on Long Island on Dec. 30, 2016. (Alexander F. Yuan/Associated Press)
Russia will almost certainly claim the slot as the only member of the five permanent members of the Security Council without one of its nationals in a senior U.N. position. Jeffrey Feltman, a former senior U.S. diplomat, is currently undersecretary-general for political affairs; comparable jobs for peacekeeping, humanitarian affairs and economic affairs are held, respectively, by nationals from France, Britain and China.

Secretary General António Guterres will decide who fills the new job, although both Russia and the United States are expected to make their views known.

Kislyak has repeatedly rejected descriptions of him in the U.S. media as a spy. Asked whether U.S. intelligence considered him to be one, James R. Clapper Jr., the former director of national intelligence, told CNN Sunday that, “Given the fact that he oversees a very aggressive intelligence operation in this country — the Russians have more intelligence operatives than any other nation that is represented in this country, still even after we got rid of 35 of them — and so to suggest that he is somehow separate or oblivious to that is a bit much.”

The Russian compounds — a 14-acre estate on Long Island, and several buildings on secluded acreage along the Corsica River on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — have been in Russian possession since the days of the Soviet Union. According to a Maryland deed in 1995, the former USSR transferred ownership of the Maryland property to the Russian Federation in 1995, for a payment of one dollar.

Russia said it used the facilities, both of which had diplomatic immunity, for rest and recreation for embassy and U.N., employees, and to hold official events. But U.S. officials dating back to the Reagan administration, based on aerial and other surveillance, had long believed they were also being used for intelligence purposes.

Last year, when Russian security services began harassing U.S. officials in Moscow — including slashed tires, home break-ins and, at one point tackling and throwing to the ground a U.S. embassy official entering through the front of the embassy — the Obama administration threatened to close the compounds, former Obama officials said.

In meetings to protest the treatment, the Obama administration said that it would do so unless the harassment stopped, and Moscow dropped its freeze on construction of a new consulate to replace the one in St. Petersburg, considered largely unusable because of Russian spying equipment installed there. Russia had earlier blocked U.S. use of a parcel of land and construction guarantees in the city when sanctions were imposed after its military intervention in Ukraine and annexation of Crimea.

The threat of closing the compounds was not pursued. In late December, after U.S. intelligence said there had been election meddling, and in response to the ongoing harassment in Moscow, Obama ordered the compounds closed and diplomats expelled. “We had no intention of ever giving them back,” a former senior Obama official said of the compounds.

Trump, then at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, appeared to disparage the Obama administration sanctions, telling reporters, “I think we ought to get on with our lives.”

Surprisingly, Russia did not respond. It later emerged that Flynn, in a phone conversation with Kislyak, had advised against retaliation and indicated that U.S. policy would change under the Trump administration.

The Kremlin made clear that the compound issue was at the top of its bilateral agenda. Russia repeatedly denounced what it called the “seizure” of the properties as an illegal violation of diplomatic treaties.

On May 8, the U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs, Thomas Shannon, traveled to New York to meet with his Russian counterpart, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov on what the State Department described as “a range of bilateral issues” and what Russia called “irritants” and “grievances.”

Ryabkov brought up the compounds, while Shannon raised St. Petersburg and harassment, suggesting that they deal with the operation of their diplomats and facilities in each others’ countries separate from policy issues such as Syria, and proposing that they clear the decks with a compromise.

Russia refused, saying that the compound issue was a hostile act that deserved no reciprocal action to resolve, and had to be dealt with before other diplomatic problems could be addressed. In an interview with Tass, Ryabkov said Moscow was alarmed that Washington “carries on working out certain issues in its traditional manner, particularly concerning Russia’s diplomatic property in the states of Maryland and New York.”

Two days later in Washington, Tillerson told Lavrov that the United States would no longer link the compounds to the issue of St. Petersburg.

Immediately after their May 10 meeting at the State Department, Tillerson escorted Lavrov and Kislyak to the Oval Office. There, they held a private meeting with Trump. The night before the president had fired FBI Director James B. Comey, who was then heading an FBI investigation of the Russia ties.

Comey, Trump told the Russians, was a “real nut job,” and his removal had “taken off” the Russia-related pressure the president was under, the New York Times reported. Later in May, the Justice Department appointed former FBI director Robert S. Mueller III as special counsel to oversee the federal investigation.

In a news conference at the Russian Embassy after his meetings with Tillerson and Trump, Lavrov said of the compound closures, “Everyone, in particular the Trump administration, is aware that those actions were illegal.”

“The dialogue between Russia and the U.S. is now free from the ideology that characterized it under the Barack Obama administration,” he said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... d8d43c3472
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed May 31, 2017 10:04 pm

First on CNN: Sources: Congress investigating another possible Sessions-Kislyak meeting
By Jim Sciutto, Jamie Gangel, Shimon Prokupecz and Marshall Cohen, CNN
Updated 8:21 PM ET, Wed May 31, 2017
Sources: Congress probing another possible Sessions meeting

Washington (CNN)Congressional investigators are examining whether Attorney General Jeff Sessions had an additional private meeting with Russia's ambassador during the presidential campaign, according to Republican and Democratic Hill sources and intelligence officials briefed on the investigation.

Investigators on the Hill are requesting additional information, including schedules from Sessions, a source with knowledge tells CNN. They are focusing on whether such a meeting took place April 27, 2016, at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC, where then-candidate Donald Trump was delivering his first major foreign policy address. Prior to the speech, then-Sen. Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak attended a small VIP reception with organizers, diplomats and others.
In addition to congressional investigators, the FBI is seeking to determine the extent of interactions the Trump campaign team may have had with Russia's ambassador during the event as part of its broader counterintelligence investigation of Russian interference in the election. The FBI is looking into whether there was an additional private meeting at the Mayflower the same day, sources said. Neither Hill nor FBI investigators have yet concluded whether a private meeting took place -- and acknowledge that it is possible any additional meeting was incidental.

House Russia investigators subpoena Flynn, Cohen

"The Department of Justice appointed special counsel to assume responsibility for this matter," Department of Justice spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement to CNN. "We will allow him to do his job. It is unfortunate that anonymous sources whose credibility will never face public scrutiny are continuously trying to hinder that process by peddling false stories to the mainstream media. The facts haven't changed; the then-Senator did not have any private or side conversations with any Russian officials at the Mayflower Hotel."
Sessions has previously failed to disclose meetings with Russian officials. During his confirmation hearing on January 10, Sessions testified that he "did not have any communications with the Russians" during the campaign. He also said in a written statement submitted to the Senate judiciary committee that he was not in contact with anyone linked to the Russian government during the election.
Those answers became problematic for Sessions when reports emerged in March that he did have two meetings with Kislyak during the campaign -- one at the Republican National Convention in July and one in his Senate office in September. Sessions conceded that the meetings happened but insisted they were part of his Senate duties and had nothing to do with the campaign. Nonetheless, Sessions was forced to recuse himself from the Russia investigation.

Asked at a news conference on March 2 whether there were any other meetings with Russians besides those two, Sessions told reporters, "I don't believe so -- you know, we meet a lot of people -- I don't believe so."
Later that week, when Sessions updated his sworn testimony to the Senate judiciary committee, he acknowledged the two meetings with Kislyak but did not mention any encounter at the Mayflower Hotel.
"I do not recall any discussions with the Russian ambassador, or any other representative of the Russian government, regarding the political campaign on these occasions or any other occasion," Sessions wrote.
CNN reported last week that Sessions didn't list the two Kislyak meetings that he disclosed in March on the security forms he submitted this year. Flores said the FBI employee who helped Sessions fill out the forms instructed him to exclude foreign meetings that he considered to be part of his official Senate duties.

First on CNN: AG Sessions did not disclose Russia meetings in security clearance form, DOJ says

Russia was already trying to help Trump before the Mayflower Hotel speech, according to a US intelligence community assessment released in January. The report concluded that by March 2016, Kremlin-backed news outlets began supporting Trump and Russian military intelligence had kicked off its election-related cyber operations.
One day before the speech, Trump won commanding primary victories in five Northeast states, cementing his front-runner status and putting him on a track to secure the bitterly contested Republican nomination.
In the speech, Trump stressed his "America first" message and talked about the fight against terrorism. He offered an olive branch to the Kremlin in line with his comments throughout the campaign -- but out of step with much of the US foreign policy establishment and all of his fellow presidential hopefuls.
"We desire to live peacefully and in friendship with Russia and China," Trump said in his remarks. "We have serious differences with these two nations, and must regard them with open eyes. But we are not bound to be adversaries. We should seek common ground based on shared interests. Russia, for instance, has also seen the horror of Islamic terrorism. I believe an easing of tensions and improved relations with Russia -- from a position of strength -- is possible."
Kislyak listened to the speech from the front row.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/31/politics/ ... index.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby 8bitagent » Thu Jun 01, 2017 4:14 am

I've been a lifelong progressive and was one of the first on RI to point out the evil of Putin era Russia,
but by now Im sick to death of hearing this kvetching hysteria over Trump and Russia.
Seriously the mainstream media and liberal are sounding like cold war Mccarthy era numbskulls

Image
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby norton ash » Thu Jun 01, 2017 11:34 am

Because there's no evidence at all that Trump and his whole circle aren't in bed with Putin, right, 8bit?
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Jun 01, 2017 3:04 pm

Franken: I Asked FBI If Sessions Had More Russian Meetings (VIDEO)
By MATT SHUHAM Published JUNE 1, 2017 10:55 AM

Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) said Wednesday that he had asked the FBI whether Attorney General Jeff Sessions met more frequently than he admitted with Russian officials during the 2016 campaign

Franken — whose question to Sessions during his confirmation hearing in January prompted Sessions to say, incorrectly, “I did not have communications with the Russians” during the campaign— said the attorney general’s letter correcting that testimony in March was “very unsatisfactory.”

The senator told MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell Wednesday night that he and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who is also on the Judiciary Committee, had even sent a letter to then-FBI Director James Comey, “asking him and the FBI to investigate whether in fact Sessions had met other times with Russians, including this meeting that we’re talking about in the Mayflower.”

Franken was referring to a CNN report Wednesday that congressional investigators were investigating whether Sessions may have had a third meeting with the Russian ambassador to the United States during the 2016 campaign — in addition to the two he admitted to in the letter correcting his testimony.

CNN cited unnamed “Republican and Democratic Hill sources and intelligence officials briefed on the investigation.”

CNN reported that Kislyak and Sessions attended a VIP reception at the Mayflower, where Trump was delivering a foreign policy address in April 2016, but also that the FBI was investigating whether there was an additional, private meeting between the two that day.

On Thursday morning, Leahy released three letters that he and Franken sent to the FBI in March, April and May, the first two to Comey and the last to the bureau’s acting director, Andrew McCabe. The first asked Comey to investigate “all contacts the Russian ambassador, or any other Russian officials, may have had with Attorney General Sessions or with his staff, and whether any laws were broken in the course of those contacts or in any subsequent discussion of whether they occurred.”

“We served with the Attorney General in the Senate and on the Judiciary Committee for many years,” Leahy and Franken wrote in a statement accompanying the release. “We know he would not tolerate dishonesty if he were in our shoes. If it is determined that the Attorney General still has not been truthful with Congress and the American people about his contacts with Russian officials during the campaign, he needs to resign.”

“It had been characterized one way, but we had some reason to believe that that wasn’t the case,” Franken told O’Donnell Wednesday, referring to the gathering at the Mayflower. “It had been described in a way that he could plausibly say ‘I don’t remember that.’ But what’s coming out today I believe is that that may not be the case. And if this the true, that would be extremely disturbing.”

Franken added: “Our office has been in contact with the FBI on this. And they said they were crafting a response to us. It sounded to us that something was about to break on this.” He said that he wasn’t surprised at how the story had developed publicly.

Later on in the interview, Franken returned to Sessions’ letter correcting his testimony.

“Sen. Sessions’ letter to us was insulting our intelligence when he said why he didn’t do this,” he said, referring to Sessions’ failure to disclose the meetings with the Russian ambassador. “It actually contradicted his own explanations in the press conference.”

Watch below via MSNBC:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... UEhrm7nIXk
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/f ... a-meetings
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Jun 01, 2017 8:09 pm

Did Trump, Kushner, Sessions Have An Undisclosed Meeting With Russian?
by KEN DILANIAN

The FBI and Congress are examining a campaign event last spring during which Donald Trump, Jeff Sessions and Jared Kushner were in a small gathering with Russian ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak and other diplomats at Washington's Mayflower Hotel, multiple U.S. officials told NBC News.

Five current and former U.S. officials said they are aware of classified intelligence suggesting there was some sort of private encounter between Trump and his aides and the Russian envoy, despite a heated denial from Sessions, who has already come under fire for failing to disclose two separate contacts with Kislyak. Kushner also denied through a spokesman that he met privately with Kislyak that day.

Play Franken breaks news on addt'l reported Sessions-Kislyak meeting Facebook TwitterEmbed
Franken breaks news on addt'l reported Sessions-Kislyak meeting 6:20
The officials acknowledged to NBC News that the evidence does not amount to proof, and they have declined to provide details about it.

"The Department of Justice appointed special counsel to assume responsibility for this matter," Department of Justice spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement. "We will allow him to do his job. It is unfortunate that anonymous sources whose credibility will never face public scrutiny are continuously trying to hinder that process by peddling false stories to the mainstream media. The facts haven't changed; the then-Senator did not have any private or side conversations with any Russian officials at the Mayflower Hotel."

CNN reported Wednesday about the investigative interest in the Mayflower event, which took place on April 27, 2016. NBC News has been discussing the matter with knowledgeable sources for weeks, seeking more clarity about why Congressional investigators believe there may have been a private meeting.

Image: Sergey Kislyak, Russia's ambassador to the U.S.
Sergey Kislyak, Russia's ambassador to the U.S. speaks with reporters following his address on the Syrian situation, on Sept. 6, 2013, at the Center for the National Interest in Washington. Cliff Owen / AP, file
A U.S. official with knowledge of the matter told NBC News that the FBI also is scrutinizing the Mayflower event, which was sponsored by a pro-Russian think tank. The official said the FBI is interested in who was at the event and what was said, in the context of the counter-intelligence investigation into Russian election meddling. That official said there was no indication the bureau is zeroing in on Sessions.

Sen. Al Franken, D.-Minnesota, who originally questioned Sessions about his Russian contacts during a confirmation hearing for Sessions' appointment as attorney general, discussed the matter Wednesday night on MSNBC's The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell

"It had been characterized one way, but we had some reason to believe that wasn't the case," Franken said about the event. "It had been described in a way that he could say, 'I don't remember that.'"

It has long been known that Trump briefly met Ambassador Kislyak that day at a VIP reception shortly before he gave a foreign policy address at the hotel. But witnesses said it wasn't a private meeting, and White House officials dismissed it as inconsequential.

Play A.G. Sessions Recuses Self From Trump Campaign-Related Investigations Facebook TwitterEmbed
A.G. Sessions Recuses Self From Trump Campaign-Related Investigations 2:10
"Mr. Trump warmly greeted Mr. Kislyak and three other foreign ambassadors who came to the reception," the Wall Street Journal reported in May 2016.

Kushner and Sessions were also in the room, contemporaneous news reports say. Sessions' aides have insisted he did not speak to Kislyak.

Congress is investigating the credibility of intelligence seeming to contradict that account, current and former U.S. officials say. And Franken, in a March letter to the FBI with Judiciary Committee Democrat Patrick Leahy, asked the bureau to investigate any contacts between Sessions and Russian officials, and to brief him on the results. He has not yet received an answer, an aide said.

Click Here To Read The Letter

The FBI investigation into Russian election interference is now supervised by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and Sessions is walled off from it, having recused himself.

In March, the Center for National Interest, the right-leaning, Russia-linked group that hosted the event, said that the receiving line "moved quickly and any conversations with Mr. Trump in that setting were inherently brief and could not be private. Our recollection is that the interaction between Mr. Trump and Ambassador Kislyak was limited to the polite exchange of pleasantries appropriate on such occasions."

Image: Donald Trump
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump gives a thumbs up after a foreign policy speech at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, Wednesday, April 27, 2016. Trump's highly anticipated foreign policy speech Wednesday will test whether the Republican presidential front-runner, known for his raucous rallies and eyebrow-raising statements, can present a more presidential persona as he works to unite the GOP establishment behind him. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) Evan Vucci / AP
Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation after it emerged that he had met twice with Kislyak after telling senators under oath during his confirmation hearing that he had not met with Russian officials about the Trump campaign.

"In retrospect," Sessions told reporters, "I should have slowed down and said, 'But I did meet one Russian official a couple of times, and that would be the ambassador.'"

Lawmakers involved in the Russia investigation would not discuss the April meeting.

"I can't comment on any of that," Sen. Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence committee, told NBC News.

"Can't talk about it," said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, a member of the committee.

In a little noticed portion of a March congressional hearing on the Russia investigation, Rep. Mike Quigley, a Chicago Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, accused Sessions of having committed perjury about an alleged undisclosed third meeting in April.

He noted that Sessions had failed to disclose meetings with Kislyak in July and September, during a time the Russians were "hacking and dumping" stolen emails in the election campaign.

He added, "Unfortunately, what we're reading now is that there was a third meeting as early as April of last year in Washington, D.C., a meeting at which Candidate Trump was present and the Russian ambassador was present. At some point in time, this goes well beyond an innocent, under the best of circumstances, 'Oh I forgot' sort of thing, or `That doesn't count.' When you correct your testimony in front of the United States Senate, you're still under oath and you're swearing to the American people that what you're saying is true. Well, the third time is well beyond that and is quite simply, perjury."

Sen. King Comments on Sessions' Recusal From Russia Investigation 4:39

Quigley said he could not discuss the basis of his remarks about the April event, other than to say he wasn't relying solely on news reports.

Any confirmation of a private meeting with Kislyak in April would raise a host of questions, most particularly for Sessions.

April 2016 is when officials at the Democratic National Committee first noticed suspicious activity on their network — activity they would later learn was part of a Russian hack.

At Sessions' confirmation hearing in January, Sen. Franken asked him, "If there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions replied: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

In March, the Washington Post reported that Sessions had met twice with Kislyak — once in the senator's office in September, and once in July at a Heritage Foundation event.

On March 2, at a news conference announcing his recusal from the Russia investigation, Sessions said: "I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign. And the idea that I was part of a quote, 'continuing exchange of information' during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government is totally false."

He acknowledged, however, that the two meetings reported by the Post had occurred. He said he didn't recall much of what was discussed. He said he took the meetings as a senator, not a Trump adviser.

A reporter asked if he recalled meeting with Kislyak any other times.

"I don't recall having met him," Sessions answered. "It's possible — I'm on the Armed Services Committee and things happen, but I don't recall having met him before those two meetings."
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/did ... an-n767096
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:06 pm

“Please, my God, can’t you stop this?”


How the Trump administration’s secret efforts to ease Russia sanctions fell short

Michael Isikoff
Chief Investigative Correspondent
Yahoo NewsJune 1, 2017

President Donald Trump and russian President Vladimir Putin. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Evan Vucci/AP, Alexander Zemlianichenko, pool/AP)View photos

In the early weeks of the Trump administration, former Obama administration officials and State Department staffers fought an intense, behind-the-scenes battle to head off efforts by incoming officials to normalize relations with Russia, according to multiple sources familiar with the events.

Unknown to the public at the time, top Trump administration officials, almost as soon as they took office, tasked State Department staffers with developing proposals for the lifting of economic sanctions, the return of diplomatic compounds and other steps to relieve tensions with Moscow.

These efforts to relax or remove punitive measures imposed by President Obama in retaliation for Russia’s intervention in Ukraine and meddling in the 2016 election alarmed some State Department officials, who immediately began lobbying congressional leaders to quickly pass legislation to block the move, the sources said.

“There was serious consideration by the White House to unilaterally rescind the sanctions,” said Dan Fried, a veteran State Department official who served as chief U.S. coordinator for sanctions policy until he retired in late February. He said in the first few weeks of the administration, he received several “panicky” calls from U.S. government officials who told him they had been directed to develop a sanctions-lifting package and imploring him, “Please, my God, can’t you stop this?”

Fried said he grew so concerned that he contacted Capitol Hill allies — including Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., the ranking minority member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — to urge them to move quickly to pass legislation that would “codify” the sanctions in place, making it difficult for President Trump to remove them.

Tom Malinowski, who had just stepped down as President Obama’s assistant secretary of state for human rights, told Yahoo News he too joined the effort to lobby Congress after learning from former colleagues that the administration was developing a plan to lift sanctions — and possibly arrange a summit between Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin — as part of an effort to achieve a “grand bargain” with Moscow. “It would have been a win-win for Moscow,” said Malinowski, who only days before he left office announced his own round of sanctions against senior Russian officials for human rights abuses under a law known as the Magnitsky Act.

The previously unreported efforts by Fried and others to check the Trump administration’s policy moves cast new light on the unseen tensions over Russia policy during the early days of the new administration.

It also potentially takes on new significance for congressional and Justice Department investigators in light of reports that before the administration took office Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his chief foreign policy adviser, Michael Flynn, discussed setting up a private channel of communications with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak — talks that appear to have laid the groundwork for the proposals that began circulating right after the inauguration.

Jared Kushner, Sergey Kislyak and Michael FlynnView photos
Jared Kushner, Russian Amb. Sergey Kislyak and former national security adviser Michael Flynn. (Photos: Evan Vucci/AP, Alexander Shcherbak/TASS via Getty Images, Carolyn Kaster/AP)
More
A senior White House official confirmed that the administration began exploring changes in Russia sanctions as part of a broader policy review that is still ongoing. “We’ve been reviewing all the sanctions — and this is not exclusive to Russia,” the official said. “All the sanctions regimes have mechanisms built in to alleviate them. It’s been our hope that the Russians would take advantage of that” by living up to Moscow’s agreement to end the Ukraine conflict, but they did not do so.

To be sure, President Trump’s interest in improving relations with Moscow was hardly a secret during last year’s presidential campaign. “If we can make a great deal for our country and get along with Russia, that would be a tremendous thing,” Trump said in a April 28, 2016, Fox News interview. “I would love to try it.”

But there was nothing said in public about specific steps the new administration took toward reaching the kind of deal the president had talked about during the campaign — without requiring the Russians to acknowledge responsibility for the annexation of Crimea or Moscow’s “influence campaign” during the 2016 election.

Just days after President Trump took office, officials who had moved into the secretary of state’s seventh-floor office sent a “tasking” order to the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs to develop a menu of options to improve relations with Russia as part of a deal in exchange for Russian cooperation in the war against the Islamic State in Syria, according to two former officials. Those options were to include sanctions relief as well as other steps that were a high priority for Moscow, including the return of two diplomatic compounds — one on Long Island and the other on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — that were shut by President Obama on Dec. 29 on the grounds that they were being used for espionage purposes. (The return of the compounds is again being actively considered by the administration, according to a Washington Post report Thursday.) “Obviously, the Russians have been agitating about this,” the senior White House official said when asked about the compounds, or “dachas,” as the Russians call them. But it would be inaccurate to report there has been an agreement to return them without some reciprocal move on Moscow’s part.

A vehicle with diplomatic license plates passes journalists after departing from a Russian compound in Upper Brookville, Long Island, New York, U.S., December 30, 2016. (Photo: Rashid Umar Abbasi/Reuters)View photos
A vehicle with diplomatic license plates passes journalists after departing from a Russian compound in Upper Brookville, N.Y., Dec. 30, 2016. (Photo: Rashid Umar Abbasi/Reuters)
More
Since this was the same State Department bureau that had helped develop the punitive measures in the first place, and actively pushed for them under the leadership of Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland, who had just resigned, the tasking order left staffers feeling “deeply uncomfortable,” said one source, who asked not to be identified.

These concerns led some department officials to also reach out to Malinowski, an Obama political appointee who had just stepped down. Malinowski said he, like Fried, called Cardin and other congressional allies, including aides to Sen. John McCain, and urged them to codify the sanctions — effectively locking them in place — before Trump could lift them

The lobbying effort produced some immediate results: On Feb. 7, Cardin and Sen. Lindsay Graham introduced bipartisan legislation to bar the administration from granting sanctions relief without first submitting a proposal to do so for congressional review. “Russia has done nothing to be rewarded with sanctions relief,” Graham said in a statement at the time. If the U.S. were to lift sanctions without “verifiable progress” by Russia in living up to agreements in Ukraine, “we would lose all credibility in the eyes of our allies in Europe and around he world,” added Cardin in his own statement. (A spokesman for Cardin told Yahoo News in an emailed statement: “I can also confirm that the senator did hear from senior Obama officials encouraging him to take sanctions steps, but that he had already been considering it as well.”)

The proposed bill lost some of its urgency six days later when Flynn resigned as White House national security adviser following disclosures he had discussed political sanctions relief with Kislyak during the transition and misrepresented those talks to Vice President Mike Pence. After that, “it didn’t take too long for it to become clear that if they lifted sanctions, there would be a political firestorm,” Malinowski said.

But the political battles over the issue are far from over. Cardin, McCain and Graham are separately pushing another sanctions bill — imposing tough new measures in response to Russia’s election interference. The measures have so far been blocked for consideration within the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by its chairman, Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., who says he wants to first hear the administration’s position on the issue.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of Sates Tom Malinowski speaks during a press conference at U.S. Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia in 2016. (Photo: Heng Sinith/AP)View photos
Assistant Secretary of State Tom Malinowski at a press conference in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, in 2016. (Photo: Heng Sinith/AP)
More
In the meantime, Malinowksi said he is concerned that there may be other, less public ways the administration can undermine the Russian sanctions. He noted that much of their force results from parallel sanctions imposed by the European Union, whose members must unanimously renew them each year.

“I had this nightmare vision of [White House senior adviser ] Steve Bannon or [National Security Council staffer] Sebastian Gorka calling in the Hungarian ambassador and telling them President Trump would not be displeased” if his country opposed the renewal of sanctions, he said.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-admini ... 01145.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:11 pm

General McMaster, Step Down—and Let Trump Be Trump

Save your reputation while you still can. The country will be fine.
By THOMAS E. RICKS May 28, 2017

During the presidential transition, when a friend called me to discuss whether he should accept a national security post in the Trump administration, I advised him to do so. My thinking was that the more mature, thoughtful people we had in the administration, the better.

But over the last two weeks, I have come to think I was wrong. I no longer believe in the “adults in the room” theory of containing President Trump and the similarly erratic and ignorant people around him.


The prime reason I have come to believe I was wrong was the experience of watching Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, Trump’s second national security adviser, make a series of statements. On the evening of Monday, May 15, he appeared before cameras at the White House to respond to a Washington Post article reporting that the president had shared sensitive intelligence about terrorism with Russian visitors. This information was sufficiently detailed, some intelligence officials feared, that it might enable interested parties to determine the source of that intelligence.

Not so, said General McMaster. “The story that came out tonight as reported is false,” he stated emphatically.

The next day, he appeared again before the cameras. This time his line was: “the premise of that article is false—that in any way the president had a conversation that was inappropriate or that resulted in any kind of lapse in national security.” That’s what people in Washington say when they can’t dispute the facts in a given article, but still dislike it.

On the president’s first foreign trip, McMaster has continued to defend Trump, for example, expressing over the weekend a lack of concern about reports that Trump’s son-in-law and confidant Jared Kushner sought to establish a secret, back-channel line of communication to the Russian government that would be hidden from the U.S. national security apparatus.

“We have backchannel communications with a number of countries,” McMaster said during a press availability in Italy. “What that allows you to do is communicate in a discreet manner, so I’m not concerned.”

Really? According to the Post’s story, which the White House did not dispute, “Kislyak reportedly was taken aback by the suggestion of allowing an American to use Russian communications gear at its embassy or consulate — a proposal that would have carried security risks for Moscow as well as the Trump team.” There’s no way that would be kosher. And so I fear that McMaster has confused protecting the president with protecting the country.

It saddens me to watch him do this. I’ve known McMaster since he was a major. He is an unusual officer. He has led troops in combat in two very different wars. He is one of our most thoughtful generals. And he wrote one of the best books about the Vietnam War, “Dereliction of Duty,” about the failures of senior American leaders during that war. Consider the two concluding sentences of that book: “The disaster in Vietnam was not the result of impersonal forces but a uniquely human failure, the responsibility for which was shared by President Johnson and his principal military and civilian advisers. The failings were many and reinforcing: arrogance, weakness, lying in the pursuit of self-interest, and, above all, the abdication of responsibility to the American people.”

McMaster also remains on active duty, which makes him subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This holds him to a far higher standard of behavior than we have seen on videotape from Donald Trump. A military officer is required to tell the truth and shun conduct unbecoming of his or her position.

McMaster probably thinks that by staying at his post, rather than resigning in disgust, he is doing his duty. Specifically, he may think that if stepped down, he might well be succeeded by an alt-right ally of White House adviser Steve Bannon. As I said, I used to believe that too.

But I have watched and waited, and I don’t see McMaster improving Trump. Rather, what I have seen so far is Trump degrading McMaster. In fact, nothing seems to change Trump. He continues to stumble through his foreign policy—embracing autocrats, alienating allies and embarrassing Americans who understand that NATO has helped keep peace in Europe for more than 65 years.

Thinking over this, I worry that having people like McMaster around Trump simply enables Trump. Mature national security specialists seasoned in the ways of Washington simply lend an air of occasional competence to an otherwise shambolic White House. By appearing before the cameras, looking serious and speaking rationally, they add a veneer of normality to this administration. In the process, they tarnish their own good names.

So I think that McMaster should step down—not just for his own good, but for the good of the country. What if he is replaced by a right-wing extremist who operates on an alternative set of “facts”? So much the better, I say.

Here’s why: The saving grace of Donald Trump as president is his incompetence. He knows almost nothing of how the federal government works. He seems to have been repeatedly surprised by the checks and balances written into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers. And he seems uninterested in learning.

Effectively, we have no president. Rather, we have someone who plays the president on television and on Twitter. Aside from a few of his pet subjects, such as immigration, Trump seems to have almost no effect on the workings of the federal government. What we have seen is a demonstration that it is actually a fairly robust establishment. On Iran policy, for example, Defense Secretary James Mattis seems to chug along by himself, pursuing an approach that is basically a somewhat more aggressive version of President Barack Obama’s policy. An ideologue likely would be as ineffective as national security adviser as Trump has been as president, and that wouldn’t be a bad thing.

In my revised view, the less control Trump has over the federal government, the better. Think of it this way: Which would be more dangerous, a Mafia family overseen by the cruel and competent Michael Corleone, or one led by his ineffectual brother Fredo? So, I say, Let Donald be Donald.

Thomas E. Ricks is the author of five books about the modern U.S. military. His most recent work is “Churchill and Orwell: The Fight for Freedom.”
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/ ... ump-215199



Explanations for Kushner’s meeting with head of Kremlin-linked bank don’t match up

Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret channel with Kremlin

Sergey Kislyak reported to his superiors in December that Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and adviser, asked him about setting up a communications channel between the transition team and the Kremlin using Russian facilities in the United States. (Video: Alice Li,McKenna Ewen/Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
By David Filipov, Amy Brittain, Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger June 1 at 9:45 PM
ST. PETERSBURG, Russia — The White House and a Russian state-owned bank have very different explanations for why the bank’s chief executive and Jared Kushner held a secret meeting during the presidential transition in December.

The bank maintained this week that the session was held as part of a new business strategy and was conducted with Kushner in his role as the head of his family’s real estate business. The White House says the meeting was unrelated to business and was one of many diplomatic encounters the soon-to-be presidential adviser was holding ahead of Donald Trump’s inauguration.

The contradiction is deepening confusion over Kushner’s interactions with the Russians as the president’s son-in-law emerges as a key figure in the FBI’s investigation into potential coordination between Moscow and the Trump team.

The discrepancy has thrust Vnesheconombank, known for advancing the strategic interests of Russian President Vladi­mir Putin and for its role in a past U.S. espionage case, into the center of the controversy enveloping the White House. And it has highlighted the role played by the bank’s 48-year-old chief executive, Sergey Gorkov, a graduate of the academy of the Federal Security Service, or FSB, the domestic intelligence arm of the former Soviet KGB, who was appointed by Putin to the post less than a year before his encounter with Kushner.

[Jared Kushner now a focus in Russia investigation]

What you need to know about Jared Kushner's ties to Russia. (Thomas Johnson/The Washington Post)
Either account of the meeting could bring complications for a White House undergoing intensifying scrutiny from a special counsel and multiple congressional committees.

A diplomatic meeting would have provided the bank, which has been under U.S. sanctions since 2014, a chance to press for rolling back the penalties even as the Obama administration was weighing additional retaliations against Moscow for Russia’s interference in the U.S. election.

A business meeting between an international development bank and a real estate executive, coming as Kushner’s company had been seeking financing for its troubled $1.8 billion purchase of an office building on Fifth Avenue in New York, could raise questions about whether Kushner’s personal financial interests were colliding with his impending role as a public official.

VEB, as Vnesheconombank is known, did not respond to a list of questions about the Kushner meeting and the institution’s history and role in Russia. The bank declined to make Gorkov available for an interview.

[Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin]

Gorkov could draw new attention to the clashing story lines Friday, when he is scheduled to deliver public remarks to an economic conference in St. Petersburg. Gorkov, cornered Wednesday by a CNN reporter on the sidelines of the conference, responded “no comments” three times when asked about the Kushner meeting.

The Kushner-Gorkov meeting came after Kushner met with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, in early December. At the meeting, Kushner suggested establishing a secure communications line between Trump officials and the Kremlin at a Russian diplomatic facility, according to U.S. officials who reviewed intelligence reports describing Kislyak’s account.

President Vladimir Putin, right, meets with Vnesheconombank Chairman Sergey Gorkov at the Kremlin in August. (Michael Klimentyev/Sputnik via AP)
The bank and the White House have declined to provide the exact date or location of the Kushner-Gorkov meeting, which was first reported in March by the New York Times.

Flight data reviewed by The Washington Post suggests that the meeting may have taken place on Dec. 13 or 14, about two weeks after Kushner’s encounter with Kislyak.

A 19-seat twin-engine jet owned by a company linked to VEB flew from Moscow to the United States on Dec. 13 and departed from the Newark airport, outside New York City, at 5:01 p.m. Dec. 14, according to positional flight information provided by FlightAware, a company that tracks airplanes.

The Post could not confirm whether Gorkov was on the flight, but the plane’s previous flights closely mirror Gorkov’s publicly known travels in recent months, including his trip to St. Petersburg this week.

After leaving Newark on Dec. 14, the jet headed to Japan, where Putin was visiting on Dec. 15 and 16. The news media had reported that Gorkov would join the Russian president there.


White House spokeswoman Hope Hicks and Kushner’s attorney said Kushner intends to share with investigators the details of his meeting with Gorkov.

“Mr. Kushner was acting in his capacity as a transition official and had many similar discussions with foreign representatives after the election,” Hicks told The Post in a statement this week. “For example, he also started conversations with leaders from Saudi Arabia that led to the President’s recent successful international trip.”

The bank this week told The Post that it stood by a statement it issued in March that, as part of its new investment strategy, it had held meetings with “leading world financial institutions in Europe, Asia and America, as well as with the head of Kushner Companies.”

Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said that the bank’s activities “have nothing to do with the Kremlin.” Peskov, like Trump, has frequently dismissed revelations about the meetings as “fake news” and “a witch hunt.”

Officially, VEB is Russia’s state economic development bank, set up to make domestic and foreign investments that will boost the Russian economy.

Practically speaking, according to experts, the bank functions as an arm of the Kremlin, boosting Putin’s political priorities.

It funded the 2014 Sochi Olympics, a project used by Putin to signal that Russia holds a key role on the world stage.

VEB has also been used to promote the Kremlin’s strategic aims abroad, experts say, financing projects across the Eastern bloc.

“Basically, VEB operates like Putin’s slush fund,” said Anders Aslund, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Center and a Russia expert who follows the bank’s activities. “It carries out major Kremlin operations that Putin does not want to do through the state budget.”

Before the United States imposed sanctions, VEB sought to extend its international reach to draw more investment to Russia. Among those named by the bank to an advisory board for a new global fund was Stephen Schwarzman, the CEO of the Blackstone Group and now an outside adviser to the Trump White House. Schwarzman declined to comment through a spokeswoman, who said the fund’s advisory board has been inactive.


Gorkov was named to head VEB in February 2016, after eight years as a senior manager at Russia’s largest state-owned bank, Sberbank. While Gorkov was a deputy head of Sberbank, it was one of the sponsors of the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in Moscow produced by Trump, who owned the pageant.

Gorkov’s personal relationship with Putin is unclear.

Some Russia watchers described Gorkov, who was not seen as being especially close to the Kremlin before his appointment, as an unlikely diplomatic link between the Kremlin and the Trump administration.

“I can think of many back channels that one might cultivate to have close, discreet, indirect communications with Putin. VEB’s Gorkov would not make my list,” said Michael McFaul, who was the U.S. ambassador to Russia under President Barack Obama.

Other observers suggested that Gorkov, the recipient of a “service to the Fatherland” medal, may have earned Putin’s trust as a discreet go-between.

“He indeed is an FSB academy graduate, and for the Kremlin today it is a sign of trustworthiness,” said Andrey Movchan, who heads the economic program at the Carnegie Moscow Center think tank.

VEB has played a role in Russian espionage efforts in the past, serving as the cover for a Russian operative convicted last year of spying in New York.

According to court documents, Evgeny Buryakov posed as the second-in-command at the bank’s Manhattan office for at least three years while secretly meeting dozens of times with a Russian intelligence officer who tasked him with gathering intelligence on the U.S. economic system.

The court records show that Buryakov’s handlers were also recorded discussing attempts to recruit an American whom government officials have confirmed was Carter Page, an energy consultant who later served as an informal adviser to Trump’s campaign. Page has said he assisted the FBI with its investigation into the spy ring and provided the Russians no sensitive information.

The court documents show that the FBI recorded a conversation in which one of Buryakov’s handlers described hearing an intelligence officer tell Buryakov’s VEB boss that Buryakov worked for a Russian intelligence service.


VEB paid for Buryakov’s legal fees after his arrest, the court documents show. The Russian Foreign Ministry at the time blasted the charges and accused the U.S. government of “building up spy hysteria.”

Buryakov was sentenced to 30 months in prison but was released in April for good behavior. He was immediately deported to Moscow. Efforts by The Post to reach Buryakov through family members were unsuccessful.

VEB, along with other Russian state-owned institutions, has suffered financially since 2014, when the United States imposed economic sanctions following Russia’s incursion into Crimea.

Gorkov’s meeting with Kushner took place at a time of major changes within the bank.

On Dec. 21, VEB announced that its proposed 2021 development strategy — which Gorkov dubbed “VEB 2.0” — had been approved by its supervisory board, which is chaired by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev.

As a result of the sanctions, U.S. companies are prohibited from lending the bank money or buying equity in the institution, an attempt to drain resources from the Russian economy.

The sanctions would not prohibit Kushner from conducting a business negotiation with VEB or even prevent the Russian bank from investing in a U.S. firm.

Experts on Russia’s security services said that it would have been unlikely for Gorkov to meet with Kushner and not discuss sanctions.

Gennady Gudkov, a reserve colonel in the FSB who is now a leader of a small opposition party, said that Russian business leaders are looking for ways to lobby for the softening of sanctions. “This activity is constant,” Gudkov said in an interview. “They are trying however they can, even informally, to lower the sanctions.”

In late December, Gorkov told Russian state television that he hoped “the situation with sanctions will change for the better.”

In February, Gorkov met with Putin to update him on the bank’s status. “We are confident of its future,” he told the Russian leader, according to a transcript released by Putin’s office, asserting the bank had many new deals in the works.

“Good,” Putin said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 9d1b3fe24b
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jun 02, 2017 7:04 am

Trump’s ‘Pit Bull’, With Biz Ties To Ukrainian Emigres, Is Back In Spotlight
Image
FILE - In this Dec. 16, 2016, file photo, Michael Cohen, an attorney for President-elect Donald Trump, arrives in Trump Tower in New York. Cohen fired back at critics on Twitter on May 14, 2017, after he posted a picture of his daughter wearing lingerie. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)
Richard Drew/AP
By ALLEGRA KIRKLAND Published JUNE 2, 2017 6:00 AM


Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s “pit bull” personal attorney, is the latest associate of the President’s with ties to a former Soviet republic to emerge as a person congressional investigators want to hear from in their probes into Russian interference in the U.S. election.

The pugnacious Manhattan lawyer’s name has cropped up in various subplots involving the Trump administration and Russian interests, from a largely unverified dossier compiled by a former British spy to an effort to get a secret Ukraine “peace plan” that would end U.S. sanctions against Russia on the desk of Trump’s first national security advisor. He’s also reportedly a person of interest in the sprawling federal investigation into Russian election meddling.

Like other Trump campaign associates who’ve been asked to provide Congress with documents, Cohen has business ties to the former Soviet Union. Ukraine is a country that has figured heavily both in Cohen’s professional and personal life, as he and his brother, Bryan, are each married to Ukrainian immigrants. Cohen and his in-laws own multiple units in Trump-branded properties, and he maintains business relationships with other Ukrainian immigrants (there’s no evidence that any of his business partners are connected to efforts to interfere in the U.S. election).

Reached for comment Thursday, Cohen asked TPM to provide him with a list of written questions. Cohen did not respond to those questions by press time.

Here’s an overview of Cohen’s web of business ties and other dealings:

Conduit for secretive Ukraine “peace plan”
When the New York Times first reported in February that Cohen hand-delivered to then-national security adviser Michael Flynn a proposal to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and lift U.S. sanctions against the former, Cohen confirmed the story.

“Who doesn’t want to help bring about peace?” Cohen said to the newspaper, justifying his delivery of a plan drawn up by Andrii Artemenko, an eccentric member of Ukraine’s parliament.

The effort was coordinated by Cohen, Artemenko and Felix Sater, a Trump associate who helped the Trump Organization identify opportunities in Russia in the mid-2000s and served time for his involvement in a stock manipulation scheme.

Cohen dramatically changed the account of his involvement in the peace plan in three subsequent interviews. First he “emphatically” denied to the Washington Post discussing the plan or “delivering any documents,” saying he simply told Artemenko that he could mail his proposal to Flynn.

In a subsequent conversation with Business Insider he denied “even knowing what the plan is,” before finally telling NBC News that even if he indeed brought the proposal to the White House, there would be nothing “wrong with that.”

The story took a bizarre twist in early March, when Artemenko announced the death of Alex Oronov, Bryan Cohen’s father-in-law, via Facebook. His rambling post blamed media pressure following the New York Times report for the death of Oronov, who he said helped broker his meeting with Cohen.

“Yes, I’m guilty …. Alex Oronov, my partner, my friend, my mentor, Alex was a family member of Michael Cohen,” Artemenko wrote. “And he organized all kinds of stuff, including an introduction and a meeting for me with Michael Cohen.”

An ethanol business that’s all in the family
An art dealer-turned-agricultural sector magnate, Oronov teamed up with the brothers Cohen on several companies tied to the ethanol industry. The trio incorporated International Ethanol of Ukraine, Ltd. in Delaware 2006, and in 2007 followed up with Ukrethanol LLC, a company that exported farm equipment from the United States to Ukraine on behalf of Oronov’s agribusiness company, Grain Alliance.

The ethanol gig brought Cohen to Ukraine in the mid-2000s as Oronov and fellow investors looked for an ideal site for an ethanol processing plant, according to the Kyiv Post.

Evgeniy Radovenyuk, current CFO of Grain Alliance who was involved in planning for the plant, told the Ukrainian newspaper that Cohen “participated in discussions” but had “no financial involvement.”

Cohen recently told Yahoo News that he went to Ukraine twice in “either 2003 or 2004” because his “brother’s father-in-law lives in Kiev.”

“That’s the extent of it,” Cohen told Yahoo. “I’ve never been to Russia. I have no Russian Kremlin connections.”

Riding with taxi magnates
Cohen has a lucrative side venture in the taxi business, teaming up separately with two Ukrainian-born New York City cab kingpins known for their run-ins with the law. His first partner, Simon Garber, has a long rap sheet that included charges for filing a false police report, trespassing and driving while intoxicated, according to the New York Observer. Garber’s company, Yellow Cab SLSJET Management Corp., was once fined $1.6 million by the New York state attorney general for illegally charging drivers “late fees.” Then there’s Evgeny “Gene” Freidman, also known as “The Taxi King,” who’s been accused of sexual harassment and owed some $13 million in taxes from his cab business, per the New York Daily News.

It’s unclear exactly how Cohen entered the taxi business and first linked up with Garber. But he’s told the Wall Street Journal that Garber was a legal client of his and that they were partners in the taxi business until the early 2000s, at which point he said he sold Garber his stake in their company, relinquishing control of the operations and fleet. After that Garber continued to manage some of the more than 15 taxi medallion companies owned by Cohen, which had playful names like Smoochie Cab Corp and Lady Laura Hacking Corp.

The arrangement devolved into a legal dispute in 2012 when Garber filed a claim with the American Arbitration Association, accusing Cohen, who’d cited neglected insurance payments from a number of accidents involving SLSJET drivers in abruptly cutting ties with the company, of breaching his contract. Cohen, along with his wife, Laura, and his mother-in-law, Ania Shusterman, went to New York State Supreme Court to try to stay the proceedings, saying the original contract they agreed to with Garber contained no arbitration agreement.

In the claim, Garber charged that Cohen “unilaterally” drafted a second contract that contained arbitration language. He further alleged that Cohen went to his home while he was “travelling on business” and “manipulated” Garber’s wife into signing that second contract. A judge ultimately ruled against the Cohens, and the claim went into private arbitration. It’s unclear how the dispute was resolved.

Cohen had been pulling in more than $1 million per year from the medallions Garber managed, arbitration documents showed.

After that messy business breakup, Freidman assumed control of those 15 medallion companies on Cohen’s behalf. In a February phone conversation with TPM, a nervous-sounding Freidman confirmed that he’d been managing medallions for Cohen for more than 16 years, including some in Chicago. While emphasizing that he didn’t want to comment on such a “hot issue,” he heaped praise on his longtime friend, saying the two “talk daily sometimes.”

“I keep up a relationship with him,” Freidman said before rushing off the phone. “I help him out as much as I can. I also have a business relationship but we’re friends, you know. We have dinner with his wife.”

Casino boat venture gone bust
In 2003, Cohen teamed up with Ukrainian partners Leonid Tatarchuk and Arkady Vaygensberg to launch Atlantic Casino, a gambling boat company based in south Florida. Cohen was a shareholder and director of two companies that controlled the casino boat, MLA Cruises and Majesty Enterprises, according to state business records.

Cohen put up $1.5 million for his 30 percent stake in the casino boat, which ran successfully for months before suddenly going bust, leaving a long trail of unpaid vendors and marina fees in its wake.

The casino boat project was ultimately subject to at least 25 Florida lawsuits, according to a thorough investigation by BuzzFeed News, although Cohen himself was not listed as a defendant in any of those suits. Those owed money received much less than they were due, while some judgments against the company went unheeded entirely, according to the investigation.

Cohen told BuzzFeed that, as a “silent partner,” he was unaware of some of the lawsuits and lamented the $1.5 million loss on a botched investment.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/michael ... es-ukraine


Who is Sergey Gorkov, the Russian banker who met with Jared Kushner
By PATRICK REEVELL MOSCOW — Jun 1, 2017, 12:49 PM ET
Sergey Pyatakov/Sputnik via AP
WATCH
Sergey Gorkov brushes off reporters' questions about meeting with Jared Kushner

Jared Kushner's December meeting with Russian banker Sergey Gorkov is a focus in the FBI's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, sources told ABC News.

In the wake of reports that Kushner, the president's son-in-law, discussed establishing back-channel communications with the Russian government during Trump’s transition, Kushner and Gorkov's meeting is once again under scrutiny.

Attention has also naturally fallen on Gorkov, the banking executive, who graduated from a Russian security services school and now runs one of Kremlin’s key financial institutions.

Gorkov refused to answer questions about the meeting when stopped by reporters on the sidelines of an economic forum in St. Petersburg today, saying he had nothing more to add.

"We have already given all our comment on this," Gorkov said. "We have a lot of meetings."

Gorkov is chairman of Vnesheconombank (VEB), a non-commercial development bank controlled by the Russian government. Tasked with funding efforts that will develop Russia’s economy, VEB’s role has often been to effectively serve as a piggy bank for major Kremlin projects that have more of a political justification than a financial one.

An obvious illustration of the bank’s role was during the Winter Olympics that Russia hosted in 2014 in the Black Sea resort of Sochi. The bank supplied most of the funding for the vast infrastructure construction undertaken for the Games, providing loans for projects that were deemed unlikely ever to make returns, according to the Associated Press. Opposition activists alleged the Games, which were ultimately estimated to cost over $50 billion, were exploited for corrupt construction deals.

VEB was used in particular to ensure that the facilities for the Games were completed, even when their costs began to run far ahead of the returns they could be expected to produce. The bank guaranteed 70 percent of many of the Olympic projects, sometimes more.

Dems: Red flags from Kushner sit-down with Russian banker
Scrutiny of Jared Kushner's Russia contacts brings the probe to Trump's inner circle
Jared Kushner's contacts with Russia a focus in FBI's investigation
“VEB is used by the government as a second budget,” Sergey Aleksashenko, a former deputy chair of Russia’s Central Bank and now a fellow at Georgetown University told Bloomberg at the time. The U.S. has noted the bank’s role, imposing sanctions on it in response to Russia’s 2014 seizure of Crimea.

The bank appears to have also served the state in other ways, performing a similar function to that played by Soviet trade agencies during the Cold War: providing cover for Russian spies.

In March 2016, the FBI caught a man working for Russia’s foreign intelligence agency, known as the SVR, posing as a senior employee of Vnesheconombank in New York. The man, Evgeny Buryakov, pleaded guilty to espionage and was deported earlier this year. During his trial, Vnesheconombank paid Buryakov’s legal costs.

In a further twist, it has emerged Buryakov was part of an effort at the time to recruit Carter Page as an intelligence source. Page, a U.S. businessman and one-time Trump campaign foreign policy advisor, is now also under scrutiny in the Russia investigation. The FBI indictment of Buryakov includes his description of the attempts in 2013 by Russian operatives who held themselves out as Russian trade officials to persuade Page to provide them with documents on energy policy. The attempt took place years before Trump declared his candidacy and Page has denied he was aware the men were spies. In a statement to ABC News in April, Page wrote that he shared "basic immaterial information and publicly available research documents."

Gorkov himself has a connection to the intelligence world. According to his official bio at the Russian bank, Sberbank, where he later worked, in the early 1990s, Gorkov graduated from an academy run by the Federal Security Service or FSB, the successor to the KGB.

That background is common among top officials in Putin’s government. Gorkov, however, has a feature on his CV that that does stick out among Putin’s inner circle. After graduating, Gorkov began working as a human resources director at the Russian bank Menatep, which at the time belonged to the oligarch and later Putin nemesis, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

Khodorkovsky was famously jailed for 10 years after challenging Putin’s political authority. Gorkov also headed the HR department at YUKOS, Khodorkovsky’s oil company, which after his downfall was carved up and parceled out to parts of Putin’s inner circle.

Gorkov’s time at YUKOS, however, appears to have done no harm to his career under Putin. After YUKOS was broken up, Gorkov completed a three-year stint at a private transport company and then moved to Sberbank, Russia’s largest state bank, again managing human resources. The Russian newspaper, RBC, reported that at Sberbank, Gorkov was tasked with overseeing mass layoffs. Between 2008 and 2010, he cut 30,000 jobs at the bank.

His experience at Sberbank illustrates a different side of Gorkov: his career as a corporate bank executive. In interviews with his former colleagues given to the Russian business paper, RBC, Gorkhov is described as an effective -- if slightly colorless -- administrator. In his public speeches dedicated to banking topics, he speaks in detail about managerial issues and finance technologies.

It is this side that perhaps in part explains Gorkov’s rise to head VEB. He was appointed chairman of VEB in 2016, when the bank was in serious trouble, requiring a $16 billion bail-out. The bail-out was partly the legacy of its financially questionable loans for the Kremlin’s politically motivated projects. Gorkov’s appointment at the time was seen as bringing in an effective crisis manager to replace Vladimir Dmitriev, a Putin insider under whom things had run out of control.

Nonetheless, Gorkov’s security services background was apparently still important. At the time, an anonymous source close to the bank told RBC that Putin’s administration felt someone with a “security services background” would make the best candidate for the job. Of the 11 deputy chief executives at Sberbank, RBC noted, Gorkhov was the only one who fit the bill.

VEB has confirmed the meeting with Kushner took place, saying it was part of a series of meetings the bank held with top Western executives to inform a new strategy it was developing.

"As part of the preparation of the new strategy, executives of Vnesheconombank met with representatives of leading financial institutes in Europe, Asia and America multiple times during 2016," VEB said in an emailed statement to Reuters. “Including the head of Kushner Companies, Jared Kushner."

The White House has said the meeting was routine, although the subject of their conversation has not been made public.

Kushner's lawyer said he would be willing to share with Congress "what he knows about these meetings."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sergey-g ... d=47722731




Russian banker, explained
Updated by Alexia Fernández Campbell@AlexiaCampbellalexia@vox.com May 31, 2017, 3:00pm EDT

Vladimir Putin with the CEOs of Russia’s state-controlled banks Mikhail Metzel/Getty Images
Federal investigators are fixated on a mysterious December meeting between senior White House adviser Jared Kushner and Russian banker Sergey Gorkov. Was Kushner really trying to open a direct channel of communications with Russian President Vladimir Putin? And why would he meet with the head of a state-controlled Russian bank to discuss such a thing?

The content of that 30-minute meeting is the latest focus of a federal investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, which was first reported Friday by the Washington Post.

Whatever the motive of the encounter, it was a shocking and risky move for Kushner to meet with the head of a sanctioned Russian bank at all. Gorkov is the CEO of Vnesheconombank, or VEB, one of several state-run Russian banks under US sanctions since mid-2014.

As a US citizen, Kushner could face up to 20 years in prison if he even talked about lending money to the bank, or if he discussed helping the bank get financing. That would have violated the economic sanctions put in place by the Obama administration as punishment for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2014. Under the sanctions, it’s illegal for Americans and US financial institutions to lend money to or buy stocks from these banks. Americans are not even allowed to talk about doing so, which could be considered criminal conspiracy.

The fact that Gorkov released a statement in March saying Kushner met with him in his role as a businessman and CEO of Kushner Companies, and not as an administration transition official, makes it look worse for Kushner. And so does the fact that Kushner never reported the meeting to investigators during his security clearance check. The White House later portrayed the meeting as a routine, inconsequential diplomatic encounter after the New York Times first reported in March that it had occurred.

Regardless of what the two men discussed, Kushner should have avoided meeting privately with Gorkov at all costs, says William Pomeranz, deputy director of the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies at the Wilson Center, a think tank in Washington, DC.

“It’s the perception of the meeting that is so damaging,” says Pomeranz. “You do not want to give the impression that you are trying to get around sanctions, even if the conversation was innocuous.”

Sanctions law casts a shadow on the meeting
It’s certainly possible that Kushner and Gorkov avoided talking about money and financing for the bank. But it’s not such a remote possibility that they did either. Right now, raising capital is major concern for Russia’s sanctioned financial institutions.

The country’s largest state-run banks, including VEB, have been struggling to raise money on the global market after the United States and the European Union cut them off from financing. American citizens, US residents, and all financial institutions located in the United States are not allowed to issue loans to these banks for longer than 30 days. They are also prohibited from buying stocks or shares in the financial institutions.

The sanctions don’t prohibit Americans from all business transactions with the banks. For example, I could open a bank account in Moscow with Sberbank (Russia’s largest bank), without violating sanctions. I could even get a loan from the bank. But it doesn’t work the other way. The United States doesn’t want American dollars invested in banks that mostly belong to the Russian government. The Russian Federation owns a majority share in the five sanctioned banks, and the government relies on them to fund government projects and weapons manufacturing.

The intention of the sanctions was to put financial pressure on the Russian government to retreat from Crimea. So far, it has not. But that doesn’t mean the banks aren’t hurting. Sberbank and VTB, Russia’s two largest banks, spent hundreds of thousand of dollars last year lobbying Congress and the Obama administration to address “sanctions relief,” according to lobbying disclosures. President Trump, during the first weeks of his administration, had also discussed lifting the Obama-era sanctions on Russia, which he has not yet done.

Trump’s connection to Russian banks
Kushner’s meeting with the Russian banker is particularly alarming as investigators uncover more and more evidence linking the Trump administration to Russia, which was accused of meddling in the US election.

But even before Trump was president, and before the Ukraine-related sanctions were in place, it wasn’t unusual for Trump to associate with Russian bankers. While he was partial owner of the Miss Universe Organization, the 2013 pageant was hosted in Moscow, where Trump reportedly met with the CEO of Sberbank. The state-run bank —Russia’s largest one — was also one of the pageant’s sponsors. At the time, Trump bragged about how much the Russian oligarchs loved him.

Earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal reported that $15 million from VEB, the development bank, was used to fund the construction of Trump International Hotel and Tower in Toronto in 2007. A Russian-Canadian developer, Alexander Shnaider, who built the 65-story hotel, put that money into the project after receiving hundreds of millions of dollars from a separate asset sale that involved the Russian bank.

At the time, there were no restrictions on business deals between Americans and Russian banks. But even if Trump’s financial transactions with Russia were not illegal, it’s important to understand how deep his ties are to the region, says Pomeranz.

“It would be good to know how much financing Trump has received from the former Soviet Union,” he said. “That would be important, at least for transparency’s sake, to understand his motivations for dealing with the region.”

So far, Trump has shown no inclination to do such a thing, though he has tried to distance himself from the Russian billionaires and financiers he’s long admired. Last month, his lawyers released a letter saying that they had analyzed Trump’s tax returns for the past 10 years and concluded that he had very little income from Russian sources.

The letter says that neither Trump nor his businesses owe money to Russian lenders, and that there have been no Russian investments in his business. They included two exceptions: income from the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and the sale of a Florida condo to a Russian billionaire.

This assertions in the letter, of course, cannot be verified, as Trump still refuses to release his tax returns to the public.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... ian-banker


Who is Sergey Gorkov, the Russian banker who met with Jared Kushner

Posted on 6/1/2017 12:55 PM
Skadr/iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Jared Kushner's December meeting with Russian banker Sergey Gorkov is a focus in the FBI's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, sources told ABC News.

In the wake of reports that Kushner, the president's son-in-law, discussed establishing back-channel communications with the Russian government during Trump’s transition, Kushner and Gorkov's meeting is once again under scrutiny.

Attention has also naturally fallen on Gorkov, the banking executive, who graduated from a Russian security services school and now runs one of Kremlin’s key financial institutions.

Gorkov refused to answer questions about the meeting when stopped by reporters on the sidelines of an economic forum in St. Petersburg today, saying he had nothing more to add.

"We have already given all our comment on this," Gorkov said. "We have a lot of meetings."

Gorkov is chairman of Vnesheconombank (VEB), a non-commercial development bank controlled by the Russian government. Tasked with funding efforts that will develop Russia’s economy, VEB’s role has often been to effectively serve as a piggy bank for major Kremlin projects that have more of a political justification than a financial one.

An obvious illustration of the bank’s role was during the Winter Olympics that Russia hosted in 2014 in the Black Sea resort of Sochi. Opposition activists alleged the Games, which were ultimately estimated to cost over $50 billion, were exploited for corrupt construction deals.

VEB was used in particular to ensure that the facilities for the Games were completed, even when their costs began to run far ahead of the returns they could be expected to produce. The bank guaranteed 70 percent of many of the Olympic projects, sometimes more.

“VEB is used by the government as a second budget,” Sergey Aleksashenko, a former deputy chair of Russia’s Central Bank and now a fellow at Georgetown University told Bloomberg at the time. The U.S. has noted the bank’s role, imposing sanctions on it in response to Russia’s 2014 seizure of Crimea.

The bank appears to have also served the state in other ways, performing a similar function to that played by Soviet trade agencies during the Cold War: providing cover for Russian spies.

In March 2016, the FBI caught a man working for Russia’s foreign intelligence agency, known as the SVR, posing as a senior employee of Vnesheconombank in New York. The man, Evgeny Buryakov, pleaded guilty to espionage and was deported earlier this year. During his trial, Vnesheconombank paid Buryakov’s legal costs.

In a further twist, it has emerged Buryakov was part of an effort at the time to recruit Carter Page as an intelligence source. Page, a U.S. businessman and one-time Trump campaign foreign policy advisor, is now also under scrutiny in the Russia investigation. The FBI indictment of Buryakov includes his description of the attempts in 2013 by Russian operatives who held themselves out as Russian trade officials to persuade Page to provide them with documents on energy policy. The attempt took place years before Trump declared his candidacy and Page has denied he was aware the men were spies. In a statement to ABC News in April, Page wrote that he shared "basic immaterial information and publicly available research documents."

Gorkov himself has a connection to the intelligence world. According to his official bio at the Russian bank, Sberbank, where he later worked, in the early 1990s, Gorkov graduated from an academy run by the Federal Security Service or FSB, the successor to the KGB.

That background is common among top officials in Putin’s government. Gorkov, however, has a feature on his CV that that does stick out among Putin’s inner circle. After graduating, Gorkov began working as a human resources director at the Russian bank Menatep, which at the time belonged to the oligarch and later Putin nemesis, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

Khodorkovsky was famously jailed for 10 years after challenging Putin’s political authority. Gorkov also headed the HR department at YUKOS, Khodorkovsky’s oil company, which after his downfall was carved up and parceled out to parts of Putin’s inner circle.

Gorkov’s time at YUKOS, however, appears to have done no harm to his career under Putin. After YUKOS was broken up, Gorkov completed a three-year stint at a private transport company and then moved to Sberbank, Russia’s largest state bank, again managing human resources. The Russian newspaper, RBC, reported that at Sberbank, Gorkov was tasked with overseeing mass layoffs. Between 2008 and 2010, he cut 30,000 jobs at the bank.

His experience at Sberbank illustrates a different side of Gorkov: his career as a corporate bank executive. In interviews with his former colleagues given to the Russian business paper, RBC, Gorkhov is described as an effective -- if slightly colorless -- administrator. In his public speeches dedicated to banking topics, he speaks in detail about managerial issues and finance technologies.

It is this side that perhaps in part explains Gorkov’s rise to head VEB. He was appointed chairman of VEB in 2016, when the bank was in serious trouble, requiring a $16 billion bail-out. The bail-out was partly the legacy of its financially questionable loans for the Kremlin’s politically motivated projects. Gorkov’s appointment at the time was seen as bringing in an effective crisis manager to replace Vladimir Dmitriev, a Putin insider under whom things had run out of control.

Nonetheless, Gorkov’s security services background was apparently still important. At the time, an anonymous source close to the bank told RBC that Putin’s administration felt someone with a “security services background” would make the best candidate for the job. Of the 11 deputy chief executives at Sberbank, RBC noted, Gorkhov was the only one who fit the bill.

VEB has confirmed the meeting with Kushner took place, saying it was part of a series of meetings the bank held with top Western executives to inform a new strategy it was developing.

"As part of the preparation of the new strategy, executives of Vnesheconombank met with representatives of leading financial institutes in Europe, Asia and America multiple times during 2016," VEB said in an emailed statement to Reuters. “Including the head of Kushner Companies, Jared Kushner."

The White House has said the meeting was routine, although the subject of their conversation has not been made public.

Kushner's lawyer said he would be willing to share with Congress "what he knows about these meetings."
http://www.wjbdradio.com/politics/2017/ ... ed-kushner
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests