JackRiddler » Tue Apr 07, 2020 10:36 pm wrote:You're not this dense, so why pretend?
There are many cases of people intentionally or mistakenly inventing "Russian" trolls for their own purposes. Ergo nothing. It's already a correct empirical observation. The largest definitively confirmed case of a "Russian" troll attacking in the United States is the New Democracy false-flag in Alabama, to which they confessed after they were caught.
Of course there's going to be plenty of western propaganda outfits using Russian trolls as convenient scapegoats, because duh, they're the perfect scapegoat. Still doesn't mean Russia aren't running influence operations, just like a whole bunch of other countries. They're just another shitty empire doing shitty empire shit.
My main gripe here isn't really about the specifics on any particular case, it's the double standard applied to Russia versus the US and the UK. If Sounder had posted a BBC article making fun of the notion of UK internet trolls the default assumption here would immediately have been that they were full of shit and throwing up smoke screens and that GCHQ was definitely up to something.
No one would be demanding hard evidence to support that. It would be nice to have hard proof, sure, but it's the BBC - the UK's premier propaganda outlet - so the default assumption would be they're lying or trying to obfuscate something.
I could be wildly wrong about my views on Russia (probably am on much of it), but I prefer to treat them the same as any other quasi-fascist empire. If I'm wrong I'll be pleasantly surprised, if I'm right I get to say I told you so. Win-win.

"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave