compared2what? wrote:.....
Because if I can't live to be preoccupied with the calamity of the wider world another day, then obviously, I'm not going to be a hell of a lot of help to the even more disadvantaged people living in it whom I want to use whatever meager abilities I have in order to help.
There's nothing selfish or immoral about surviving and even, *gasp*, coping.
As someone close to me once said, "Life is like flying. You have to put on your oxygen mask first before helping others."
I think people should be free to do whatever is in harmony with their own aims and the world as they see it and as they are able to deal with it (as long as their aims and means of coping don't include, like, destroying the world or some part of it, it should go without saying).
People should be free...yes. BUT.
We are a species that has evolved to be social animals. Pack animals, if you will.
This means we are hardwired neurologically to take care of each other. As family.
And I'm surrounded by nice people who are only now rather late in life realizing that actively resisting fascism (education, activism, etc. heavy on education) is what we should all be doing as a lifestyle, not just "voting."
Back to the flying analogy.
In an emergency, it is not enough to be "doing no harm" and blocking the aisles watching others burn.
As many as possible to the best of their capability should actively LIVE against the Naziism that is flourishing. Obviously, many are not up to that task though more could be than today with more immediate support, encouragement, and motivation.
Lots of CIA energy goes into co-opting the bright nurturing peace and justice types into safe harbor-culture and behaviors that are no threat to fascism whatsoever.
Instead of 'the sixties,' "Noetic Science" and "Mother Jones.'
So there's a large effective middle-ground between coping/wishful thinking and throwing bricks through windows.
And I'm not kidding about CIA methodically channeling people towards LITERALLY wishful thinking with bogus science. There are CIA disinformationists promoting the idea that scientific studies are showing that "love" has a physical effect on water and chocolate.
I'm not kidding. This guy was on Pacifica Radio a few weeks ago. I've forgotten his name. This is blatant marketing of wishful thinking, a palliative a placebo, a substitute for activism and critical thinking.
Here's how the Pentagon defined this social control mechanism in military counterinsurgency terms in 1970.
From the Department of the Army's 1976 pamphlet no. 525-7-2, 'The Art and Science of Psychological Operations: Case Studies of Military Application, Vol. 2'--
An Unknown Warrior
by Edward J. Clarkson
.....
Individuals who have served the Viet Cong or the North Vietnamese Army in South Vietnam may join the Government of Vietnam and be welcomed as citizens of the Republic of Vietnam, so states the Chieu Hoi policiy of the government of Vietnam.
This policy was adopted by the government in early 1963. Americans, who had gained experience working with and observing defection programs in the Phillipines (HUKS) and in Malaya with the British, suggested a similiar program and and assisted in establishing it.
The rational is that an enemy force can be weakened by creating opportunities for defection. If the enemy soldier has no alternative to remaining, the enemy force is strengthened. But if an attractive visible alternative exists, the enemy's problems are compounded to a point where almost anyone is suspect. Such a pattern imposes on the enemy a requirement for additional manpower to observe their fellow soldiers.



