Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
DrEvil wrote:Apparently Breivik didn't start shooting until around 1720. Can't find the source right now, but the gist of it was one of the kids on the island was talking to his mother on the phone when he heard the first shot, and according to his phone log that was at 1720.
Also - The police did know Breivik's name when they got to Utøya. Was it because of some big conspiracy involving the police? No, they traced the license plate from the bomb car in Oslo through surveillance tapes. Sometimes the simplest explanation is the correct one.
Norwegian media have suggested police knew Breivik's identity before they reached the island, tracing him through a rental car firm from whom he hired a van in which the Oslo bomb was planted.
Dag Andre Johansen, Scandinavian chief executive of the Avis car rental company, told Associated Press that Breivik had rented two vehicles, including a Volkswagen van. Police contacted the company after the bombing and confirmed Breivik's identity. But Johansen declined to say whether that contact preceded Breivik's arrest on Utøya.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... est-norway
DrEvil wrote:Yes, I knowI'm looking..
Edit : Thanks for that vk. Stopped reading the other thread due to rage issues..
DrEvil wrote:it's in norwegian, but here's a rough translation of the relevant bits :
[i]"I was talking on the phone with my mother at 17.20. While we were talking I heard the first shot and told mom that someone is shooting and that I had to hang up", says AUF-leader from Buskerud, Niclas Toskerud.
Burnt Hill wrote:stickdog99 wrote:My POV is not that there had to be some big conspiracy, but only that the cops fucked up and are lying through their teeth about it.
And anyone who goes to extreme lengths to justify the cops' indefensible delay simply to quell any suspicions about this event is pissing on the graves of the children who where brutally murdered during this delay, IMHO.
Well then your view could be stated in one post.
I also think you are misreading the intent of other posters on this thread.
If you start out at "the cops fucked up and are lying through their teeth about it" then what is the sense of going any further?
I understand that as an initial response. But that also leaves a lot unanswered.
But when you get to "pissing on the graves" - I dont know, that could easily be turned on to you and your insistance on placing blame on the cops.
waugs wrote:stickdog99 wrote:My POV is not that there had to be some big conspiracy, but only that the cops fucked up and are lying through their teeth about it.
And anyone who goes to extreme lengths to justify the cops' indefensible delay simply to quell any suspicions about this event is pissing on the graves of the children who where brutally murdered during this delay, IMHO.
this is an overly dramatic statement (define "extreme lengths") and completely unfair. It seems to me that people are simply trying to arrive at the truth with the very little information out there. You, on the other hand, seem to have figured it all out and it is clearly the fault of the cops and their inability to get to a frickin' island quickly enough. and anyone who disagrees with you is an apologist for the cops.
stickdog99 wrote:Unless the 911 operators are actually the ones to blame, the local police lied about how long it took them to learn of the shootings. Then, according to their own timeline...
An official timeline released on Sunday showed that local police got the first call about the shootings at 5: 26 p.m. (1526 GMT).
Gaasbakk said he got called in from a day off and arrived at Hoenefoss police station, which covers Utoya Island, at 5: 43 p.m., less than 20 minutes later.
barracuda wrote:Thanks, Doc. I'm more and more of the opinion that we may not possess a credibly accurate timeline by which to standardise the chronology of events.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests