rigorousintuition.ca

It's really not that difficult...there's only one thing to look for or evaluate when trying to separate the genuine posters from the professional dysinfo agents or spammers.

Read their posts and look for even a small glimmer of compassion or empathy with the victims of the neoCon perps. Most, if not all of their posts will be written as though the writer had 'ice in his or her veins'. They will have the same approach as the women had who sat and knit in front of the gilloutine during the French Revolution. This is a comparison I often make.

They will come on one or two at a time but then they will eventually take over and their emotional toxicity will destory whatever thread they're on..and this is their goal.

When I was posting on the NYT there was one spammer who was on there 24/7 and ended many posts with the expression "Life is SO Grand"....he said this whether the topic was cluster bombing or assassination...no matter....he always pretended it referred to his oft boasted about 'bout with cancer'. But he used it so often and so inappropriately that it came to symbolize the attitude of lack of empathy that the neoCons have.

So, since there has been a recent influx of squatters on this forum...I would ask that you watch for this trait in an effort to identify the perp lovers.

gc

Hey, thanks. This should help things a lot.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... crochipped

Watch Aaron Russo when he talks about how Nick Rockefeller feels about the people he is proposing to have killed and/or microchipped.

Alex Jones asks Russo whether Rockefeller expressed any strong emotion or feelings as he talked about the plans the illuminati had for humanity in the "New World Order'.

Russo replies to the effect..."No, he appeared not to have any feelings about them at all"...He [Rockefeller] wondered why I [Russo] cared about them.

This is the clue...they simply do not care and they never will. Psychopaths.

gc

greencrow0 wrote:It's really not that difficult...there's only one thing to look for or evaluate when trying to separate the genuine posters from the professional dysinfo agents or spammers.

Read their posts and look for even a small glimmer of compassion or empathy with the victims of the neoCon perps.

I think that's a good way to spot an asshole, or maybe a sociopath, but not very handy when it comes to identifying a disinfo agent.

Disinfo's about disseminating bad info, and steering people away from the good info. And pretty awful disinfo can go down easily with a spoonful of affected compassion.

Man, Rockefeller sure laid it all out in a neat little package for Russo...

jeff

I think that's a good way to spot an asshole, or maybe a sociopath, but not very handy when it comes to identifying a disinfo agent.

Disinfo's about disseminating bad info, and steering people away from the good info. And pretty awful disinfo can go down easily with a spoonful of affected compassion.

on discussion forums, the dysinfo agents all have the same cool detachment from the victims....watch for this trait, aside from any facts or information they may have to offer. It's a dead giveaway.

gc

You are all idiots. You're talking about people who do what you infer for a living... every day of the week, as if they are stupid. THAT is stupid. Thus, YOU are fucking stupid. If there are any disinfo agents here, and it would be a stretch to expect their attention, then they would obviously be among the most respected, liked and well integrated among us. THAT IS WHAT THEY DO. Think about it... those guys work day and night on their cover, which includes getting along with us... we 'normals' who can barely stand eachother in the first place are on the complete opposite end of the scale and thus, first to be singled out.... anyway, that they have introduced the mere idea that those among us are working for them works better than actually having one of them in our midst... and that was the plan from the get go - obviously.

I am not an idiot, and you're not going to make anyone see your point by insulting them. I'm saying this because I think you have a relatively compelling point to make. So -- fuck you?

Once again, Jeff, I am reminded of your post from April of '05, "If you want somebody you can trust, trust yourself"

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2 ... trust.html

Kudos to Jeff for his reference in that post to Carpenter's The Thing. I'll be re-watching Prince of Darkness tonight, because it was referenced in another thread, and has similar themes throughout.

All I'm saying is I posted on a forum for over three years and there were two or three dysinfo agents on it at any given time...and never, NEVER did I ever see any of them ever show a shred of compassion for the Iraqis, or other victims of the neoCon.

I called them on it, I spelled it out to them that that's what they were doing...and they still couldn't muster up a shred of compassion for any of the Iraqis...and precious little for the young men and women who have been sent over there to kill and maim them.

gc

As with all professions, some are better than others when it comes to being transparent about what they are up to.

For me, it's the knee jerk defense of TPTB when it comes to the memes that are most threatening to them that is dead giveaway. But those are probably the just the amateurs as well.

Is there a Word Smith in the House?

The problem with my original premise is the term 'dysinfo agent'. That does'nt really capture what these posters do or are up to. There really isn't a good name for them. We tried to think of a good name on the NYT and never did come up with one.

What do you call a poster or forumist who squats on a forum 24/7 and therefore probably doesn't have a job in the 'real world', who unerringly totes a ideological agenda to the point where, yes, knee jerk and robotic, come to mind.

We need a word smith.

gc

How about discussion thread "saboteur"?

How about losers with emotional problems?

That's what I see. Not talking about y'all, I'm talking about these kinds of posters.

Why would anyone -- especially someone in the intelligence field -- bother paying people to do what they'll do anyway?