rigorousintuition.ca

Remote viewing expert Daz has unearthed a very interesting document from the US government's remote viewing Stargate Project (released under the Freedom of Information Act). The document is somewhat of a Holy Grail for those learning or researching remote viewing, as it details the training for not only the known "6-stage model" of Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV), but also a hypothetical set of stages past the stage 6 going from 7 to stage 11, authored by pioneer Ingo Swann (with some very interesting information within). This document is not to be confused with the known CRV Training Manual currently available on the web. Head over to Daz's blog for the full run-down.

http://www.cosmicspoon.com/blog/2007/02/new-1985-crv-training-manualdocument.html

1985 CRV training manual/document - found in the Stargate FOIA archives.

Whilst part of the way through organising the entire archives into chronological order I found this doc which to me a CRV student is like a holy relic. This document is an earlier version than the curretn public domain manual, and is a record of Ingos famous six stage CRV methodology. What's differnt for me about this document is that it feels less military in its overall feeling and the addition of diagrams and an actual CRV session makes it an easier insight into how this ingenious PSI method works.

I feel this is a great document and a great insight into Ingo's thinking. Especially for those Newbies stuck on some of the key CRV elements like Ideograms - its a great find. The gem in the crown is near the back, a hypothetical set of stages past the stage 6 going from 7 to stage 11.
And boy some of the expanded stage ideas are mind blowing! (see below)

STAGE VII ANALYTICS
Analytics is the ability to make a yes/no decision without producing AOL. This also gives the viewer the ability to "recognize" numbers and letters. This is a further development of Stages IV and V. This has application in the recognition of addresses in search problems and code breaking. This stage is in the process of development by I.Swann. According to Mr. Swann this development is proceeding well.

STAGE VIII PHONETICS/SONICS
This, too, is a concept of 1.Swann. This was originally beli'eved to be Stage VII until he realized analytics actually preceded it. Stage VIII will allow the viewer to produce phonetic/sonic sounds which, it is hypothesized, will allow the viewer to produce the name of persons, places, and things at the site. In my experience these signals, which I have produced, have at times been very accurate. An example of this is "Carribah", which was produced when tasked against Karriba Dam.

STAGE IX TELEPATHIC SIGNALS
Stage IX is a follow-on to the Stage IV emotional impact (EI) column. The EI column is the place the viewer discusses the "feelings" of people at the site. If the viewer is "in-touch" with a distant persons feelings the next step would seem to be a more complete telepathic link. Stage IX would be broken into two phases:

PHASE I would be receiving telepathic signals from the site area. Again, this is very similar to Stage IV EI.

PHASE II would be transmitting telepathic signals to the site area. Once we understand telepathic signals well enough to receive them the next step would be to transmit them.


STAGE X REMOTE ACTION (RA)
Stage X would be mind-over-matter, also known as psychokinesis (PK). We have very little understanding of PK, but we do know it exists. If Stage IX is telepathic signals which effect people, it is logical the next stage would be RA signals which effect "things".

Stage X would be divided into three phases:

PHASE I Would be affecting or interacting with "things" at the site.

PHASE II would be teleportation of things from the site. Teleportation is an element of PK. Once we can interact with things at the site the next step would be to "bring things back from the site".

PHASE III would be teleportation of things to the site. Once we can remove things from the site we should be able to send them as well.


STAGE XI ALTERING THE DIMENSIONALITY AT THE SITE
This is the most diffiE-ultstage to under s tanT.-Time is considered another dimension, but there may be many more. Mathematically it is considered that there are infinite numbers of dimensions.

Stage XI would be broken into at least two phases:

PHASE I would be altering time at the site. Time could be frozen, moved forward, or moved back. The implications of this are mind boggling. I believe this is the first stage where we could truly effect (alter) the future (as well as the past and the present).

PHASE II Maybe by the time we reach Stage XI we will understand enough about alternate dimensions to use this phase. I believe there would probably be an additional phase for each additional dimension we discover. I realize these concepts are difficult to grasp and impossible to believe, but, they are a natural flow of the signal and it is for this reason I included them. Only time will tell,whatever time is.

The Full document can be found and downloaded from here:
http://www.remoteviewed.com/files/4.2.07/1985_CRV_manual.pdf

Thanks.

Nice find, JD. Thanks for posting -- I always like to see source documents like this.

Gee, what a coincidence that the CIA just got excoriated for effectively denying FOIA requests by making the fees prohibitive. You'd think just the opposite from the 'remote viewing' disin - I mean - document.

Get on the National Security Archives emailing list so you get this stuff promptly.

http://www.nsarchive.org

National Security Archive Update, February 7, 2007

CIA Proposed Rule on FOIA Fees Would Burden Requesters and the Agency

National Security Archive Warns that Fee Disputes Obstruct Open
Government

For more information contact:
Meredith Fuchs - 202/994-7000

http://www.nsarchive.org

Washington, DC, February 7, 2007 - The CIA's proposed new rule on
Freedom of Information Act processing fees is likely to discourage FOIA
requesters while imposing new administrative burdens both on the Agency and
the public, according to formal comments filed with the CIA today by
the National Security Archive of George Washington University.

The Archive's general counsel, Meredith Fuchs, commented that,
"Significant time, money, and other resources were spent by the CIA on fee
disputes last year. One of those disputes involved the CIA's refusal to
abide by a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals judicial decision about the
Archive's fee status. Given that the Agency recouped only $4,732.80 in fees
in FY 2006, those disputes served mainly to delay and obstruct FOIA
requests."

The Archive recommended that the Agency change its proposed rule to:
(1) eliminate the unnecessary and improper definitions of FOIA requester
categories; (2) eliminate the requirement that all requesters make
open-ended, written fee commitments because many FOIA requests can be
processed without the requester incurring any fees and the CIA proposal
would discourage requesters and add to the Agency's administrative
processing time; (3) eliminate the illegal provision mandating prepayment of
fees before the CIA will honor form or format requests; (4) revise the
proposed duplication fees provisions so that requesters pay only those
"direct costs" actually incurred in the processing of the individual
request, whether for paper or electronic duplication; and (5) revise the
public interest fee waiver provisions to follow the letter and intent of
the FOIA to promote dissemination of information in the public
interest.

The Archive has had to sue the CIA twice over FOIA fee issues, despite
the D.C. Circuit's definitive 1989 ruling in the Archive's favor. The
most recent case, filed in 2006, covered 42 FOIA requests that the CIA
deemed not to be "newsworthy"; only after the Archive filed its legal
complaint and a motion for summary judgment in the U.S. District Court
for the District of Columbia did the CIA reverse course on the 42
requests, but even then fell short of committing to abide by the judicial
precedents.

For more information, see today's posting at http://www.nsarchive.org .

________________________________________________________

THE NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE is an independent non-governmental
research institute and library located at The George Washington University in
Washington, D.C. The Archive collects and publishes declassified
documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). A
tax-exempt public charity, the Archive receives no U.S. government funding; its
budget is supported by publication royalties and donations from
foundations and individuals.