Im wondering who wrote those silly laws, about no free lunches, and the impossibility of perpetual motion stuff.
Imagine the resulting force of this on a circular track ;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7CyPtF0ChA
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
erosoplier wrote:Every action still produces an equal and opposite reaction. The magnet sucked the single ball in hard (not "gently" as the guy says in the video), and this transmitted over to the 4th ball on the other side, which was held further away from the magnet (3 balls between it and the magnet, not zero balls, as on the other side of the magnet => and the force holding it to the magnet diminishes according to the inverse square law), thus it was being held with much less force than the impact of the first ball represented, thus it was propelled away at pace. Imagine if there was only one ball on the other side of the magnet - the force of the impact would barely be enough to release that ball from the pull of the magnet.
To turn it into a perpetual motion machine, you have to pull the single ball away from the magnet in order to do it all over again, and that takes energy - precisely as much energy as was contained in the initial impact! No free lunch!
Im just wondering about your general thoughts on "free" energy from electromagnetism ?
Im just wondering about your general thoughts on "free" energy from electromagnetism?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 178 guests