See the below documentation resources concerning the U.S. government-staged Columbine High School massacre on April 20, 1999 in Jefferson County, Colorado:
"Anatomy of a School Shooting," Dave McGowan, Center for an Informed America, May 2000 http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/littleton.htm
The above McGowan article is also contained in the below book:
You Are Being Lied To: The Disinformation Guide to Media Distortion, Historical Whitewashes and Cultural Myths by Russ Kick, editor (The Disinformation Company, 2001), pp. 124-127 http://samsugar.com/You_Are_Being_Lied_To.pdf
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0966410076/
http://books.google.com/books?id=KALsz08ijnkC
"Press Release #2: New Book Reveals Other Shooters at Columbine," The Disinformation Company, May 1, 2002 http://www.disinfo.com/site/displayarticle27.html
"Witnesses to a Massacre: Other Participants in Columbine," Russ Kick, in Everything You Know Is Wrong: The Disinformation Guide to Secrets and Lies by Russ Kick, editor (The Disinformation Company, 2002), pp. 74-84 http://www.amazon.com/dp/0971394202/
http://books.google.com/books?id=T75G7hLlk80C
"The Real Columbine: A Complete Chronological Report," Justin Tribble, the Columbine Research Task Force (C.R.T.F.) Webmaster, written June 11, 1999, updated July 14, 2000 http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Columbine2.htm
The Columbine Report, December 2000 http://www.boulderdailycamera.com/shooting/report.html
http://www.boulderclassifieds.com/shooting/report.html
##########
See the below documentation resources concerning the Australian government-staged April 28, 1996 Port Arthur, Tasmania massacre. Firearm ownership by common citizens in Australia was banned shortly after the massacre.
"A Shortcut to Australia's Civilian Disarmament?," Dr. Joanne Eisen, Dr. Paul Gallant and Andrew S. MacGregor, Guns & Ammo, May 2001 http://www.shootersnews.addr.com/snpagunsandammo.html
"Port Arthur Coverup: Information About The Deception & Coverup At Port Arthur" http://www.shootersnews.addr.com/snportarthur.html
"The Port Arthur Massacre Conspiracy" http://home.overflow.net.au/~nedwood/portarthur.html
What's Going On?: A Critical Study of the Port Arthur Massacre by Carl Wernerhoff (2006) http://www.archive.org/download/Whats_G ... cre/pa.pdf
http://www.archive.org/download/Whats_G ... e_3/pa.pdf
http://www.badongo.com/file/536915
"We are going to see a mass shooting in Tasmania of the likes you have seen in Strathfield and Hoddle Street, unless we get national gun control laws."--Roland Brown, Chairman of the Coalition for Gun Control, stated on "A Current Affair with Ray Martin," March 1996
##########
Freemason Thomas Watt Hamilton murdered 16 children and one adult in the shooting massacre at Dunblane Primary School in the Scottish town of Dunblane on March 13, 1996. Long before the shootings, Hamilton was a known pedophile who had been protected by his high-level U.K. government and Freemason connections. Revealations have come to light that Hamilton was part of a pedophile ring involving U.K. government officials. Firearm ownership by common citizens in the U.K. was banned shortly after the massacre.
Lord William Douglas Cullen, who led the inquiry and imposed the 100-year secrecy order on over 100 documents related to the killings, was asked to recuse himself if he was a Freemason, but he denied that he was. Yet he is numbered 1702 on the membership list of the Speculative Society of Edinburgh, which is an exclusive off-shoot of Freemasonry, founded by Freemasons from Lodge Canongate Kilwinning No. 2 in 1764. See:
"Lifting lid on judges' secret society," Gerard Seenan, The Guardian (U.K.), February 19, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article ... 74,00.html
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/lifting ... ociety.htm
"Who are they trying to protect?: Dunblane inquiry was a cover-up and peers bullied me to keep quiet says Lord Burton, ex-Masons leader," Marcello Mega, News of the World, December 28, 2003 http://dunblane.50megs.com/burtonart.htm
"Police, killer in child sex ring," Fidelma Cook, Daily Telegraph (Australia), June 6, 2005 http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/daily ... x-ring.htm
"Blackout in Britain: Alleged Pedophiles Helm Blair's War Room," Mike James, CounterPunch, January 29, 2003 http://www.counterpunch.org/james01292003.html
"Child porn arrests 'too slow,'" Neil Mackay, Sunday Herald, January 19, 2003 http://web.archive.org/web/200308031251 ... print30813
http://web.archive.org/web/200302020003 ... .com/30813
"Dunblane secret documents contain letters by Tory and Labour ministers," Neil Mackay, Sunday Herald, March 2, 2003 http://web.archive.org/web/200304221008 ... print31830
http://web.archive.org/web/200303101939 ... .com/31830
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dunblane_se ... sters.html
Below is an excerpt from the above article:
""
LETTERS between Labour and Tory ministers and correspondence relating to Thomas Hamilton's alleged involvement with Freemasonry are part of a batch of more than 100 documents about the Dunblane mass murder which have been sealed from public sight for 100 years.
The documents include a letter connected to Hamilton, which was sent by George Robertson, currently head of Nato, to Michael Forsyth, who was then Secretary of State for Scotland.
Until now it was thought that a 100-year public secrecy order had only been placed on one police report into Hamilton which allegedly named high-profile politicians and legal figures. However, a Sunday Herald investigation has uncovered that 106 documents, which were submitted to the Dunblane inquiry in 1996, were also placed under the 100-year rule.
The Scottish Executive has claimed the 100-year secrecy order was placed on the Central Police report, which was drafted in 1991 five years before the murders, to protect the identities of children named in the report. Hamilton had allegedly abused a number of children prior to his 1996 gun attack on Dunblane primary school in which 16 primary one children and a teacher died before Hamilton turned his gun on himself.
However, only a handful of the documents, which the Sunday Herald has discovered to be also subject to the 100-year rule, relate to children or name alleged abuse victims.
The most intriguing document is listed as: 'Copy of letter from Thomas Hamilton to Dunblane parents regarding boys' club, and flyer advertising Dunblane Boys' Sports Club. Both sent to Rt Hon Michael Forsyth, MP, Secretary of State for Scotland, by George Robertson MP.' Also closed under the 100-year rule is a 'submission to Lord James Douglas Hamilton, MP, Minister of State at the Scottish Office, concerning government evidence to the Inquiry'.
Another document relates to correspondence between the clerk of the Dunblane inquiry, which was presided over by Lord Cullen, and a member of the public regarding 'possible affiliations of Thomas Hamilton with Freemasonry ... and copy letters from Thomas Hamilton'.
SNP deputy justice minister, Michael Matheson, said: 'The explanation to date about the 100-year rule was that it was put in place to protect the interests of children named in the Central Police report. How can that explanation stand when children aren't named? The 100-year rule needs to be re-examined with respect to all documents.'
""
"Call to lift veil of secrecy over Dunblane," Gerard Seenan, The Guardian (U.K.), February 14, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolit ... 56,00.html
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/call_to ... nblane.htm
Below is an excerpt from the above article:
""
There have been allegations that the lengthy closure order was placed on the report after it linked Hamilton to figures in the Scottish establishment, including two senior politicians and a lawyer.
...
The report banned under the 100-year rule was compiled by Paul Hughes, then a detective sergeant with Central Scotland police, and concerns Thomas Hamilton's activities at a summer camp in Loch Lomond in 1991, five years before the shootings.
Selected extracts published during the Cullen inquiry revealed it recommended that Hamilton should be prosecuted for his activities at the summer camp and that he should have his gun licence revoked.
The report, however, was ignored. Although Lord Cullen referred to it in his inquiry, it does not feature in the index or appendices to his final report.
...
There has been much speculation about the identity of the politicians in the report. It is known that in June 1996 Michael Forsyth, then Scottish secretary and MP for Stirling, congratulated Hamilton on running a boys' club in Dunblane.
""
In the below article it is confirmed by a senior Scottish Freemason that Thomas Watt Hamilton was a Freemason for a number of years:
"Masonic link may explain Hamilton's 'charmed life'; Dunblane massacre: Suspicions grow that killer followed grandfather into the Freemasons," The Scotsman, March 22, 1996 http://dunblane.50megs.com/thart.htm
http://www.ramis.org.uk/Masonic_Link.htm
""
A senior Scottish Freemason told The Scotsman that Hamilton had been a Mason for a number of years and had visited functions at different lodges.
"Although I believe his lodge did not knowingly protect him, I am sure that favours between individual brothers would have been exchanged," he said.
The Scotsman has obtained a list of more than 100 senior Freemasons in the Central Belt of Scotland in an effort to trace Hamilton's own lodge membership. Of the dozen we contacted most refused to confirm or categorically deny that Hamilton was a Freemason.
""
"Secret brotherhood which protects its own," Fred Bridgland, The Scotsman, March 22, 1996 http://dunblane.50megs.com/thart.htm
##########
Below is documentation on the U.S. government-staged sniper attacks in and around the Washington, D.C. area in October 2002.
For starters, see the below well-documented article by Dave McGowan which provides voluminous evidence that John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo were being protected and funded by the U.S. government and that the D.C. Sniper attacks were staged by the U.S. government:
"Special Bulletin: The DC Snipers," Dave McGowan, Center for an Informed America, Newsletter #20, October 31, 2002 (updated and re-posted on November 10, 2003) http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr20.html
The below incident, not covered in the above McGowan article, proves that John Allen Muhammad (then John Allen Williams) was a protected asset of the U.S. government:
"Sniper suspect John Allen Muhammad's meltdown," Alex Tizon and the Seattle Times Investigative Team, Seattle Times, November 10, 2002 http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.c ... e=20021110
""
Retired Sgt. Berentson, the man who has kept Muhammad's name and dog-tag number in his wallet for the past 11 years, says the road should have dead-ended for Muhammad years ago.
Why Muhammad didn't end up behind bars in 1991, neither Berentson nor anyone else in the U.S. Army's 84th Engineering Company can explain. In the first months of that year, the unit was in the Middle East preparing for the ground-attack phase of the Gulf War.
The story, according to Berentson and at least two other former members of the 84th, was that Muhammad threw a thermite grenade into a tent housing 16 of his fellow soldiers.
Thermite grenades--made of finely granulated aluminum mixed with a metal oxide, and blasting heat up to 1,200 degrees--are used to destroy equipment during battle. The attack could easily have killed or maimed, but all 16 in the tent, some coughing and choking, escaped unharmed.
Berentson was in the tent. He says the grenade went off near him and near a staff sergeant with whom Muhammad had fought earlier that day. The Army's Criminal Investigation Division, Berentson says, concluded Muhammad (then named Williams) was the lead suspect.
Muhammad was led away in handcuffs and eventually transferred to another company pending charges. He had been court-martialed twice before for lesser incidents while serving in the Louisiana National Guard. But an indictment over the grenade incident never materialized, and Muhammad's Army file has no record of it.
""
Now there's no way in a cold Hell that John Allen Williams's malicious attack involving lethal intent upon his fellow Army soldiers with the thermite grenade wouldn't have gotten him court-martialed and thrown into a military prison posthaste (especially since he had been court-martialed twice before)--let alone not end up on his permanent military record--*unless* the U.S. government saw this as a golden opportunity to use John Allen Williams for other purposes and made him an offer he couldn't refuse.
After such an attack that was obviously intended to be lethal towards his fellow soldiers, the U.S. government would have figuratively had John Allen Williams's balls in a ringer. Had the U.S. government gone forward with the court-martial like they are supposed to do for such a serious crime, then John Allen Williams could likely look forward to being daily raped and tortured in a U.S. military prison, as the U.S. military personnel who man such prisons wouldn't have taken at all kindly to the charges that he would be in for (i.e., attempted murder of his fellow soldiers). The guards would have gladly fed him to the wolves, i.e., the worst of the worst prisoners, as well as likely giving him beat-downs themselves.
Thus, after his assault, the U.S. government had John Allen Williams by the balls. The *only* way he could have gotten out of that situation without so much as any mention of the incident appearing on his record is if the U.S. government cut a deal with him. The U.S. government obviously shielded him from facing these charges and kept any mention of the incident from appearing on his record, so it's quite literal to state that he had U.S. government protection against the consequences of serious crimes he committed. That is, he had literally become a protected U.S. government asset.
Now why in the blazes would the U.S. government bend over backwards to protect a would-be cold-hearted killer like John Allen Williams--a man who attempted to kill his fellow soldiers--and expunge from his record any mention of the incident? Of what critically important use could the U.S. government have for such a psychopath as John Allen Williams that it would go out of its way to protect him in that manner? Of what use is such a cold-hearted psychopath good for? Why, murder and mayhem, of course.
In this case, after John Allen Williams's thermite grenade incident, the U.S. government had him by the balls for the rest of his life. From that day forward the U.S. government owned him lock, stock and barrel. The U.S. government had its own psychopathic wind-up toy.
-----
One incident connected to the D.C. Sniper case that was quickly forgotten by the major media involved ex-Marine Michael L. Swift III, at the time age 38 (or 37), who was non-fatally shot in Baltimore by his girlfriend, Staci M. Burgess, at the time age 34, on October 12, 2002. He had an AR-15, .223 caliber ammunition, shell casings, sniper manuals, a white Astro van that matched a number of the eyewitness descriptions, a tarot card in the van, "radios" in the van (I assume two-way radios is what was meant by that), and a sign inside the van that read "Gihad in America" (sic). Yet the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms claimed on October 14, 2002 to have determined that Swift's rifle didn't match the ballistics in the D.C. Sniper case and he was released fron the hospital earlier the same day (and at least one media report claimed that because there had been a sniper attack the same day that this also ruled out Swift).
The manner in which the D.C. Sniper shootings took place has all the earmarks of multiple sniper teams conducting the attacks. As well, ballistics matching isn't very reliable (especially when it concerns ruling out a bullet coming from the same gun, as ballistics markings can change from shot to shot from the same gun), and that's assuming the BATF wasn't falsifying data--the U.S. government has been caught before falsifying laboratory results to get the desired results they wanted (look into the case of whistleblower Dr. Frederick Whitehurst, the FBI's highest-rated explosives residue expert).
Below are some of the news reports concerning Swift:
"Woman Fatally Shot, Police Look For Sniper Link: Shots Reportedly Came From Van," distributed by Internet Broadcasting Systems, Inc.; the Associated Press contributed to this report, October 14, 2002 http://www.ksat.com/news/1718053/detail.html
"Woman shot dead in Va.: Witnesses say man fired from cream-colored van; Chase leads to wrong vehicle; In Md., ex-Marine queried in the attacks is released," Del Quentin Wilber, Stephen Kiehl and Scott Shane with contributions from Laura Barnhardt, Tom Bowman, Johnathon Briggs, Gail Gibson, Allison Klein, Rona Kobell, Erika Niedowski, Dennis O'Brien, Tom Pelton, Eric Siegel, Tanika White, Laurie Willis and Kimberly A.C. Wilson, Baltimore Sun, October 15, 2002 http://www.orlandosentinel.com/bal-te.m ... 3712.story
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/bal-te.m ... ory?page=2
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/bal-te.m ... rint.story
http://wb4.trb.com/entertainment/movies ... 5245.story
"Police fear sniper has killed 9th time: Single bullet fells woman at shopping mall," John P. Martin and Bob Braun with contribution from Brian T. Murray, The Star-Ledger, October 15, 2002 http://web.archive.org/web/200210262335 ... 122980.xml
"Who Is the Sniper?," James S. Robbins, National Review, October 15, 2002 http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins101502.asp
"Ninth victim falls to sniper," Matthew Cella, Guy Taylor and Arlo Wagner, Washington Times, October 15, 2002 http://web.archive.org/web/200302021047 ... 696392.htm
"Police Question, Release Ex-Marine in Baltimore During Lull," Fox News and Associated Press (AP), October 15, 2002 http://web.archive.org/web/200211130105 ... 37,00.html
"Story unravels in light of Va. killing: Stations tread carefully in coverage," David Folkenflik, Baltimore Sun, October 16, 2002 http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainme ... 206.column
##########
See also the U.S. government's Operation Northwoods plan in March 1962, which involved the U.S. government staging a "terror campaign" (in among other places, Miami, Florida and Washington, D.C.) that would include the murder of U.S. Navy members and the murder of Cuban refugees, in order to provide a pretext to invade Cuba. This plan was approved for implementation by all the members of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Similar murderous plans under Operation Mongoose were also drawn up.
See the below Wikipedia article on these U.S. government false-flag terror plans, which provides extensive documentation on them. Almost all of the documentation research in the below article was done by me, and I also wrote a large part of the article.
"Operation Northwoods," Wikipedia, March 9, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =113733816
##########
More than six times the amount of non-combatants have been systematically murdered for purely ideological reasons by their own governments within the past century than were killed in that same time-span from wars. From 1900 to 1923, various Turkish regimes killed from 3,500,000 to over 4,300,000 of its own Armenians, Greeks, Nestorians, and other Christians. The Soviet government murdered over 61 million of its own non-combatant subjects. The communist Chinese government murdered over 76 million of it own subjects. And Germany murdered some 16 million of it own subjects in the past century. And that's only a sampling of governments mass-murdering their own non-combatant subjects within the past century. (The preceding figures are from Prof. Rudolph Joseph Rummel's website at http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/ .)
All totaled, neither the private-sector crime which government is largely responsible for promoting and causing or even the wars committed by governments upon the subjects of other governments come anywhere close to the crimes government is directly responsible for committing against its own citizens--certainly not in amount of numbers. Without a doubt, the most dangerous presence to ever exist throughout history has always been the people's very own government.
Needless to say, all of the above slaughtered populations had been disarmed by their respective governments beforehand.
