Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
semper occultus » Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:54 am wrote:.......we at least need to mention the staging of the global televised panopoly of the moon landing or "landing" as a mass psychodrama / ritual of extraordinary psychic power - whether genuine or not.....( and they don't use the real blood and flesh of an incarnated god at Communion apparently )
......the profane can but speculate as to what arcane workings were being performed by the olympian level occult initiates to channel and mould this energy to unknown purpose....
DrEvil » Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:08 pm wrote:A few things that don't make sense to me regarding the supposed hoax:
Assuming they faked the landings, why did they continue doing it for years? It would only increase the chance of someone screwing up and exposing the whole thing.
And if it's so obviously fake, why wasn't the Soviet Union all over it with evidence and charts showing exactly why it was fake? It would be a huge win for them.
Moon rocks: Both the US and the Soviet Union retrieved samples from the Moon. If the US samples were faked they shouldn't match up with the samples from the Soviet Union and someone would have noticed. And if the Soviet samples were faked too, how did they manage to fake two sets of samples and have them agree on all the details? And why are the old "fake" samples not completely different from newer samples? If they never went there they couldn't know the composition of the rocks well enough to fake them accurately.
Pictures of the Apollo landing site from new orbiters. Are those faked too?
And what about the reflectors placed on the Moon by astronauts that anyone with a powerful laser can check?
New type of moon rock discovered by Chinese lunar lander
An unmanned Chinese lunar lander, launched in 2013, has explored an ancient flow of volcanic lava and identified a type of basalt entirely unlike anything collected by the American astronauts between 1969 and 1972, or by the last Soviet lander in 1976.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015 ... ?CMP=fb_us
DrEvil » Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:25 pm wrote:Wikipedia has great summaries of various hoax claims and refutations of said claims:
Moon landing conspiracy theories
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_land ... y_theories
Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-par ... n_landings
lucky » Wed Dec 23, 2015 6:02 am wrote:Re taking objects up in to space - there is a cost per gram/kilo which is a very steep curve...but beyond that it is a very weird 'visible in plain' kinda object - was it ever explained in any detail?
lucky » Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:16 pm wrote:..Its very expensive to take anything in to space as weight=more fuel etc ( So someone gave permission for it to be taken on board as I would have thought it would have been impossible to 'smuggle' anything)
Why was that flag taken in to space? and why was it publicly shown?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests