How the CIA defeated Apartheid & placed the ANC in power

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

How the CIA defeated Apartheid & placed the ANC in power

Postby chlamor » Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:07 pm

How the CIA defeated Apartheid & placed the ANC in power
Date Posted: Thursday 08-Mar-2007


From International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Summer 1995:



A Diamond Is Forever: Mandela Triumphs, Buthelezi


and de Klerk Survive, and ANC on the U.S. Payroll


by Richard Cummings






Nelson Mandela is the president of South Africa, an event of

monumental significance in world history. This great personal

triumph is for him a vindication of his struggle. But now that the

South African elections are long past, the record must be set

straight about what really happened and why. The press has

concealed as much as it reported; ideologues of all stripes have

rushed around to rationalize their hypocrisies, and American

politicians have been spreading around largesse as if the money

were their own. That the results were so perfect, historically so

symmetrical, is rather remarkable.



But, those with power, or who are connected to it, do not want the

facts about the funding of the election to be known because it

would reveal a pattern of deception and control, both to influence

the outcome and to moderate the African National Congress. And

those on the radical left don't want it known that the ANC has

compromised itself by joining the list of organizations taking

money from the United States, because they think it will hurt the

cause of revolution. Everyone involved, across the ideological

spectrum, has therefore joined in a kind of game to cloud the minds

of outside observers.



Most hypocritical perhaps was the attempt to make a devil out of

Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi by characterizing him as the tool of the

oppressors and an obstructionist in the transition to democracy.

His anomalous situation in post-apartheid South Africa led to

suggestions that he was an enemy of democracy, and the cause of

dissension that led to violence in an attempt to disrupt the

electoral process that black South Africans struggled for decades

to achieve. Chairman of the Inkatha Freedom Party and chief

minister of KwaZulu, this prince and descendant of Shaka Zulu was

then cast in the role of villain and reactionary. But it was not

always so.






ANC and the CP




The triumph of Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress in

South Africa was, for many years, viewed in certain circles as an

extremely undesirable result. During the Cold War, the power of the

South African Communist Party in the ANC made the ANC unacceptable

as a holder of power in a post-apartheid South Africa. Yet, because

apartheid and the white supremacist Nationalist Party were anathema

to the rest of Africa, and because white racism fueled the

sentiments for communism among the black majority in South Africa,

a reliable black alternative to the ANC became essential. As Harry

Rositzke, the Central Intelligence Agency station chief in New

Delhi from 1957 to 1962, and coordinator of operations against

Communist parties abroad from 1962 until his retirement from the

CIA in 1970, wrote in 1977: "In Africa, an area of

primitive, unstable states, Soviet influence is substantial in

Somalia, Guinea, Nigeria, and Angola. The support of black

independence movements against the Rhodesian and South African

governments may extend that influence. The training of five

thousand African students each year in the Soviet and East European

universities is a direct investment in the future leadership of a

largely illiterate continent."1

Noting the "Chinese competition the Soviets face in ... the South

Africa liberation movements," Rositzke argued candidly for covert

action in the Third World: "Do we try to make a deal with

the leftists -- covertly at least to start? Do we take any covert

political action to ensure the continued supply of chrome from a

black Rhodesia that threatens to boycott its sale to the United

States if we do not withdraw our investments in South Africa?

However unlikely these scenarios, we cannot forecast what

will happen in the economic world to threaten our

prosperity."2

<snip>

http://www.africancrisis.co.za/Article.php?ID=11102&
Last edited by chlamor on Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Liberal thy name is hypocrisy. What's new?
chlamor
 
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Who wrote?

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:07 pm

[This is the most important article I found on the web in my more than 5 years on the web. The original discovery was by a military friend of mine overseas. He found the book, and then later, I found this article.


Chlamor, you might want to clarify that these words are part of the link and article and not your personal affirmation and approval, my first mistaken impression.

This article was written by a CIA agent. :roll:

Now off to read this thing with a salt shaker at the ready...
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who wrote?

Postby chlamor » Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:22 pm

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:
[This is the most important article I found on the web in my more than 5 years on the web. The original discovery was by a military friend of mine overseas. He found the book, and then later, I found this article.


Chlamor, you might want to clarify that these words are part of the link and article and not your personal affirmation and approval, my first mistaken impression.

This article was written by a CIA agent. :roll:

Now off to read this thing with a salt shaker at the ready...


Thanks Hugh. I just edited that out. I haven't read the entire thing and have the same initial skepticism. It's pretty long so I printed it out to read later tonight or tomorrow.

Peace bro'
Liberal thy name is hypocrisy. What's new?
chlamor
 
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:39 pm

Just call me a Thatcherite -- Thabo Mbeki.

Said, I believe, at the launch of a neo-lib structural readjustment programme the name of which escapes me. I remember a book, "One No, Many Yeses" in which an ANC minister laments the fall of the USSR as it leaves them no economic choices but submission.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:26 am

The New Apartheaid

Desai's task is simple: to describe how residents of some of the poorest townships and settlements in South Africa are struggling to hold on to their homes, their jobs and their scarce access to water and electricity in the face of privatizations and mounting state repression. What emerges is a devastating account of the African National Congress, a party that still insists it is synonymous with "national liberation" and brands its critics "counterrevolutionaries"--even as it cuts off the water of its former "comrades" and slips eviction notices under their doors.


http://www.thenation.com/doc/20021216/klein


There has always been a rift between the ruling African National Congress (ANC) and the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) on privatization. But it deepened substantially in January when the Government decided to sell the state telephone company, Telkom, under the rubric of ‘black economic empowerment’.

...

Access to water and electricity has become a key struggle in South Africa’s townships. One study conducted through the Government’s Human Sciences Research Council found that an estimated 10 million people have suffered water cutoffs and electricity disconnections under privatization, mostly because they couldn’t afford new, higher rates.

...

As the Government prepares to sell off 30 per cent of the national electricity company, Eskom, next year, it too has clamped down on customers in arrears. In Soweto 20,000 households were disconnected every month in 2001 – until resistance from militant communities rolled back the process.


http://newint.org/features/2003/04/01/fightback-newapartheid/
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests