Page 1 of 1

What Is Sarkozy Up To?

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:31 am
by judasdisney
Sarkozy to abolish GDP, defend against sovereign funds and other predators

Buried at the end of an IHT article on French president Nicolas Sarkozy's plan to tax the Internet and raise levies on blank media is this doozy: abolishing gross domestic product in favor of a better metric of happiness, and defending the economy "sovereign wealth funds and other financial predators."

In the 45-minute speech, Sarkozy declared the death of the 35-hour week, suggested that large companies may have to double or triple the part of their profit they are obliged to share with employees and vowed to replace gross domestic product with a more holistic indicator of economic welfare that he has commissioned from two Nobel laureates in economics, Amarthya Sen and Joseph Stiglitz. He also said that he would put a state bank in charge of defending French industry against sovereign wealth funds and other financial predators.

Sarkozy proposes taxing new technology to finance the old
By Katrin Bennhold and Victoria Shannon

PARIS: In a move that could profoundly reshape the media landscape in France, President Nicolas Sarkozy on Tuesday proposed banning commercials from public television and making up for some of the lost revenue with a first-of-its-kind tax on the Internet and mobile phones.

A government tax on Internet connections would be virtually without precedent and could be politically controversial, given that public policy experts say that Internet access drives a country's economic growth and productivity.

But France, like other countries around the world, is struggling to find ways to keep cultural industries, like video and music, afloat at a time when their traditional audiences are waning.

Sarkozy, proposing "a real cultural revolution" and stressing twice that his proposal was "unprecedented," said: "I want us to profoundly review the requirements of public television and to consider a complete elimination of advertising on public channels."

Instead, he said, those channels "could be financed by a tax on advertising revenues of private broadcasters and an infinitesimal tax on the revenues of new means of communication like Internet access or mobile telephony."

Analysts point out that the Internet and mobile phones are relatively new and still-developing economic and communications tools, while traditional television and other mass media are drawing fewer and fewer viewers.

"This could be seen as drawing on new technology to fund old technology," said Taylor Reynolds, economist at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, based in Paris.

Some observers cautioned that the proposal was still under review, but others noted that the announcement contained enough information to suggest that Sarkozy, a close friend of Martin Bouygues, whose namesake construction company owns TF1 as well as a mobile phone carrier, was serious about the plan.

Sarkozy's director of communications, Franck Louvrier, said the president was determined to implement the measures this year. "The goal is to wrap this up in 2008," Louvrier said.

Within minutes of the midday announcement, the shares of private broadcasting companies TF1 and M6 jumped in anticipation of less competition for lucrative advertising contracts, gaining 9.9 percent and 4.5 percent respectively.

TV advertising in France increased by 7 percent to €6.7 billion last year, according to Yacast, a market research firm. TF1's channels accounted for €3.3 billion, while state-owned television company France-Televisions attracted €1.18 billion. The benefit of public broadcasters no longer competing for advertisers would far outweigh any tax on advertising revenue, analysts said.

This would not be the first time France has been a leader in proposing changes in the digital economy. In 2006, French legislators approved a controversial law that would have reduced the penalties for the illegal downloading of music to little more than a parking fine; key parts of the law were later overturned.

Some people in France have also lobbied for a "global license" that would essentially levy a fee on Internet users that would pay musicians and others in the music industry for revenue theoretically lost because of digital music piracy.

For Sarkozy's proposal to become policy, his government would have to draft a bill which would have to be approved by both houses of Parliament. The Culture Ministry has set up working groups to review a 1986 broadcast law and present a reform proposal by the spring of 2008, an official said. The earliest these measures could take effect is Sept. 1, but more likely, industry insiders said, was Jan. 1, because of a busy parliamentary agenda and municipal elections in March.

In France, competition for Internet customers is intense, resulting in prices that are well below those of elsewhere, and an "infinitesimal" tax would presumably not discourage potential subscribers. The French pay an average of 37 percent less than the OECD average, or $36.70 a month as of October, compared to $49.36 for all 30 countries belonging to the group.

The share of residents with fast Internet connections in France is also slightly higher than elsewhere - 22.5 subscribers per 100 inhabitants, compared to 18.8 for the OECD as a whole.

But policy experts mostly advise making the Internet cheaper and not weighing down its growth with extra charges. The U.S. Congress last year extended a federal moratorium on Internet taxes for the next seven years.

While it is far from widespread, there are a few other examples of government levies on new technologies or communications to help older ones. In Europe, many countries tax blank storage media like CDs and devote that money to support music. Turkey and South Korea have also used telecommunications taxes to raise money for other industries.

Sarkozy's proposal was part of a dense salvo of measures fired off in a New Year's speech aimed at redirecting the focus from his Hollywood-style love affair with the Italian singer Carla Bruni to his vision for France.

In the 45-minute speech, Sarkozy declared the death of the 35-hour week, suggested that large companies may have to double or triple the part of their profit they are obliged to share with employees and vowed to replace gross domestic product with a more holistic indicator of economic welfare that he has commissioned from two Nobel laureates in economics, Amarthya Sen and Joseph Stiglitz. He also said that he would put a state bank in charge of defending French industry against sovereign wealth funds and other financial predators.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:11 pm
by Seamus OBlimey
I was just wondering the same...

Image

The couple met at a party on November 23, just one month after the president divorced his ex-wife Cecilia, and are said to be getting married on February 9.

Jules said: "They had a whirlwind romance after meeting at a party seven weeks ago, and have been almost inseparable ever since.


Sarkozy's fiancee 'pregnant' as ex Cecilia delivers blistering attack on couple (Daily Maill)

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:06 pm
by Corvidaerex
Love does funny things.

Also, remember, that Sarkozy is "conservative" for a socialist-leaning nation like France. He would be the most liberal guy in any major American party, except for maybe Kucinich.

A sad thing about the American coverage of this Sarkozy/Bruni thing is the total lack of mention that Bruni is a bit more than a "socialite." And more than a "former supermodel." She's also a very talented songwriter and singer whose debut CD a few years ago is actually wonderful. It's not well known in America but was a huge hit in Europe. http://www.amazon.com/Quelquun-Ma-Dit-C ... B0007KTAU4

If you like Serge Gainsbourg and smokey-voiced French singers in general, check her out. It remains in pretty heavy rotation at my house after several *years*, which is a rare thing indeed.

utterly bizarre

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:31 pm
by slow_dazzle
I haven't thought this through and even after I have done so I'm not sure if I'll be able to get my head around this move.

This is astonishing when read at first blush. WTF is going on here?

Watch this real close people because it is mighty interesting.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:36 pm
by IanEye
Corvidaerex wrote:A sad thing about the American coverage of this Sarkozy/Bruni thing is the total lack of mention that Bruni is a bit more than a "socialite." And more than a "former supermodel." She's also a very talented songwriter and singer whose debut CD a few years ago is actually wonderful. It's not well known in America but was a huge hit in Europe. http://www.amazon.com/Quelquun-Ma-Dit-C ... B0007KTAU4

If you like Serge Gainsbourg and smokey-voiced French singers in general, check her out. It remains in pretty heavy rotation at my house after several *years*, which is a rare thing indeed.


Thanks for the music tip!

very quick OT:

Beck is a thief! His track "Paper Tiger" totally rips off the Gainsbourg song "Cargo Culte" from the Histoire de Melody Nelson album.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:22 am
by Seamus OBlimey
What is he up to?

His neck, I'd say..

"Nicolas Sarkozy is the son of a Hungarian immigrant father," but what a pedigree..

Wiki

BBC Profile

Sarkozy's Jewish roots

Blair kicks off campaign to become EU President

And yeah, thank you for the music.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:29 pm
by Seamus OBlimey
Windsor Castle prepares for Mme Carla Sarkozy

FOREIGN Office officials believe President Nicolas Sarkozy will marry Carla Bruni, the model turned singer, before a state visit to Britain in March.

They say this should spare the Queen the embarrassment of offering the French head of state and his girlfriend separate bedrooms in Windsor Castle.

Saudi Arabia is reported to have told Sarkozy not to bring Bruni on a visit if the couple are not married. India has also expressed doubts about protocol.

etc..

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:42 pm
by Joe Hillshoist
Once incomplete and imperfect information are introduced, Chicago-school defenders of the market system cannot sustain descriptive claims of the Pareto efficiency of the real world. Thus, Stiglitz's use of rational-expectations equilibrium assumptions to achieve a more realistic understanding of capitalism than is usual among rational-expectations theorists leads, paradoxically, to the conclusion that capitalism deviates from the model in a way that justifies state action--socialism--as a remedy.[11]
The effect of Stiglitz's influence is to make economics even more presumptively interventionist than Samuelson preferred. Samuelson treated market failure as the exception to the general rule of efficient markets. But the Greenwald-Stiglitz theorem posits market failure as the norm, establishing "that government could potentially almost always improve upon the market's resource allocation." And the Sappington-Stiglitz theorem "establishes that an ideal government could do better running an enterprise itself than it could through privatization"[12] (Stiglitz 1994, 179).[11]
The objections to the wide adoption of these positions suggested by Stiglitz's discoveries do not come from economics itself but mostly from political scientists and are in the fields of sociology. As David L. Prychitko discusses in his "critique" to Whither Socialism? (see below), although Stiglitz's main economic insight seems generally correct, it still leaves open to question great constitutional questions such as how the coercive institutions of the state should be constrained and what is the relation between the state and civil society


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stiglitz



In 1981, Sen published Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, a book in which he demonstrated that famine occurs not only from a lack of food, but from inequalities built into mechanisms for distributing food. Sen's interest in famine stemmed from personal experience. As a nine-year-old boy, he witnessed the Bengal famine of 1943, in which three million people perished. This staggering loss of life was unnecessary, Sen later concluded. He believed that there was an adequate food supply in India at the time, but that its distribution was hindered because particular groups of people—in this case rural labourers—lost their jobs and therefore their ability to purchase the food. In his book Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (1981), Sen revealed that in many cases of famine, food supplies were not significantly reduced. In Bengal, for example, food production, while down on the previous year, was higher than in previous non-famine years. Thus, Sen points to a number of social and economic factors, such as declining wages, unemployment, rising food prices, and poor food-distribution systems. These issues led to starvation among certain groups in society. His capabilities approach focuses on positive freedom, a person's actual ability to be or do something, rather than on negative freedom approaches, which are common in economics and simply focuses on non-interference. In the Bengal famine, rural laborers' negative freedom to buy food was not affected. However, they still starved because they were not positively free to do anything, they did not have the functioning of nourishment, nor the capability to escape morbidity.

In addition to his important work on the causes of famines, Sen's work in the field of development economics has had considerable influence in the formulation of the Human Development Report, published by the United Nations Development Programme. This annual publication that ranks countries on a variety of economic and social indicators owes much to the contributions by Sen among other social choice theorists in the area of economic measurement of poverty and inequality.

Sen's revolutionary contribution to development economics and social indicators is the concept of 'capability' developed in his article "Equality of What." He argues that governments should be measured against the concrete capabilities of their citizens. This is because top-down development will always trump human rights as long as the definition of terms remains in doubt (is a 'right' something that must be provided or something that simply cannot be taken away?). For instance, in the United States citizens have a hypothetical "right" to vote. To Sen, this concept is fairly empty. In order for citizens to have a capacity to vote, they first must have "functionings." These "functionings" can range from the very broad, such as the availability of education, to the very specific, such as transportation to the polls. Only when such barriers are removed can the citizen truly be said to act out of personal choice. It is up to the individual society to make the list of minimum capabilities guaranteed by that society. For an example of the "capabilities approach" in practice, see Martha Nussbaum's Women and Human Development.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amartya_Sen

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:22 am
by Corvidaerex
IanEye wrote:
Corvidaerex wrote:http://www.amazon.com/Quelquun-Ma-Dit-Carla-Bruni/dp/B0007KTAU4

If you like Serge Gainsbourg and smokey-voiced French singers in general, check her out. It remains in pretty heavy rotation at my house after several *years*, which is a rare thing indeed.


Thanks for the music tip!

very quick OT:

Beck is a thief! His track "Paper Tiger" totally rips off the Gainsbourg song "Cargo Culte" from the Histoire de Melody Nelson album.


Paper Tiger is a lot like Cargo Cult, the staggering last track from Melody Nelson. But I've heard it as much more of a tribute than ripoff. Serge is not much known in the U.S., and Beck has helped make this music "hip" on this side of the pond.

Also, Beck has done some nice performance tributes to Serge, including this nice one with Ms. Jane Birkin herself, here on the YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seLS8M3hK-c

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:20 am
by judasdisney
Sarkozy defends Holocaust education plan
By CHRISTINE OLLIVIER, Associated Press Writer

President Nicolas Sarkozy on Friday defended a plan to require 10-year-olds to honor child victims of the Holocaust, saying adults should not hide terrible truths from children.

The idea, floated by the president earlier this week, rankled psychologists worried about traumatizing youth and has teachers reviving debates about how France remembers World War II. But Sarkozy stood firmly by the plan in meetings with teachers over proposed reforms of France's school system.

"We must tell a child the truth," he said. "We do not traumatize children by giving them the gift of the memory of the country."

The president wants each child in the last year of French primary school, at about 10 years old, to "adopt" the memory of one of the 11,000 Jewish children in France killed in the Holocaust, learning about the selected child's background and fate.

"If you do not talk to them of this tragedy, then you should not be surprised if it repeats itself," Sarkozy said. "It is ignorance that prompts the repetition of abominable situations, not knowledge. Make our children into children with open eyes."

Sarkozy outlined no details of the plan, which does not have to be submitted to a vote in parliament. Education Minister Xavier Darcos said the practice may not be obligatory, but the goal is to have children start adopting Holocaust victims in the next school year.

Respected former Health Minister Simone Veil, herself a survivor of the Auschwitz concentration camp, said she found the plan chilling.

"It's unimaginable, unbearable, tragic, and above all, unfair," Veil was quoted as saying on the Web site of the magazine L'Express. "We can't inflict this on 10-year-old children. We can't ask a child to identify with a dead child. The weight of this memory is much too heavy to bear."

Supporters of the plan include renowned Nazi hunter Serge Klarsfeld. Much of the existing information about France's Holocaust victims came out of research led by Klarsfeld.

Psychiatrist Serge Hefez was among those who voiced reservations about Sarkozy's idea, saying on LCI television that adults should not "impose ghosts" on children.

Teachers unions complained that they were not consulted ahead of time.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:57 am
by AlicetheKurious
An interesting take on Sarko's family background:

Links in original:

According to Le Monde, the video below has been circulating since November 2006 on the French blogosphere. French bloggers have even edited the video because they were not able to verify the highly incriminating passages concerning Sarkozy's past. The fact that his parents were Nazi collaborators.

Sarkozy comes from an aristocratic Hungarian family who fled Hungary for France, probably to escape persecutions for collaborating with the nazi regime.

Among other corpses unburied from sarkozy's past is his direct responsibility in hiding the radioactive pollution in France during the Tchernobyl catastrophe. I remember very well this episode. At the time we were living in France and my daughter was 18 months old. There was some worry for children's food like cow milk and cheese. The French government issued a statement denying any pollution. My husband and I visited his cousin in Italy during the same period and in Italy there was a ban on fresh milk. We wondered why in France it was all O.K. when over the border there was a ban ? We were really worried for our baby daughter. My husband joked at the time by telling me that the radioactive cloud stopped at the French border.

Sarkozy was responsible at the time for chemical and radioactive pollution and threat, and it was he who decided that the truth must be hidden from the French people. Of course later, it was officially aknowledged that there was pollution in the vegetation and consequently the cattle in eastern and southern France.

As for Sarkozy's parents collaboration with nazis, I find it ironic that Politicians whose parents collaborated with the Nazis are the most submissive to the israel lobby. Bush's grandfather is known to have breached an official US ban on commercial dealings with nazi Germany and he could have been tried for treason. There is actually a law suit from holocaust survivors, at least two families, against the Bush family. It is also known that the Bush family fortune was made this way. In the 'Inside Man', director Spike Lee shows us the picture of the Bush family in the bakground of the final scene when the New York financier is forced to reveal his dealings with the nazis, and illegal possession of diamonds having belonged to deported Jewish families, to the policeman. Sarkozy, despite being catholique, says that his mother was a jew converted to catholicism. I am surprised by the number of people who compete for the high office and who reveal during their campaign that one of their parents was actually Jew. Remember John Kerry?

What is more ironic is that this kind of people, along with fundamentalist Christians who prefigure the end of the Jewsih people in the Apocalypse, provide now the strongest support for the state of Israel. And the state of Israel, since its foundation, has never refused a fruitful collaboration with nazis and ex-nazis. Now, I don't really know if Sarkozy de Nagy Bosca's (his real name) family were really Nazi collaborators but given the kind of servile support of sarko for Israel, I will not be surprised that this kind of support is actually the only choice left for sarkozy if he wants to have a high profile political carreer. This means that the US before, and now as France probably will, have presidents who can easily be blackmailed by zionists. This is not to excuse Bush and Sarkozy for their families past dealings with nazis but to highlight that citizens must not choose for the high office someone who is already doomed and whose only choice is servility toward a foreign power. We are ruled by Mandchurian candidates.


http://lespolitiques.blogspot.com/2007/ ... rkozy.html

Re: What Is Sarkozy Up To?

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 6:56 pm
by MinM
Image
Then we pulled DSK off the plane... ~ Obama

Re: What Is Sarkozy Up To?

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 7:56 pm
by Canadian_watcher
I didn't realize that Canada's Asshat in Chief was the tallest Asshat in Chief of the whole G8!

woo-hoo!