Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Fri Aug 10, 2018 12:45 pm

Laura Ingraham's anti-immigrant rant is ripped from white supremacists
Blog ››› August 9, 2018 2:04 PM EDT ››› JOHN KERR


There has been a massive backlash following Laura Ingraham's anti-immigrant rant on her Fox News show. Ingraham's arguments are directly reminiscent of arguments made by white supremacists Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer, and David Duke.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-L5gqYxuG4

Duke, unsurprisingly, was one of the few to endorse what Ingraham said.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby The Consul » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:34 am

As the old song goes, fear is a man's best friend. When you take to killing mice because there is nothing adorable about their shit and the way they rip everything up - you overcome concerns of inhumane extermination, especially when they get in your food and your bed. The dread of them breaking through, the dread of setting traps, the dread of finding them crushed and having to dispose.
Ingraham is a mouse. She breeds little hate lies that can be seen for the vile hate spit they are except by other twitchy cute little Nazi fucking mice. They are what they are, and if you let them they'll burrow right through your eye socket to eat your brains before nesting in your skull.
The Nazi mice are here in swarms to guarantee the end is the most brutal nightmare, beyond beyond. They've only just begun.
" Morals is the butter for those who have no bread."
— B. Traven
User avatar
The Consul
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Ompholos, Disambiguation
Blog: View Blog (13)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby dada » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:46 am

When my cat kills a mouse, he brings it to me. How can I feel bad for the mouse? I'm humbled by the gesture, and glowing with pride.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby BenDhyan » Sat Aug 11, 2018 7:47 am

^ So long as it was a white mouse, ok.
Ben D
User avatar
BenDhyan
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Aug 11, 2018 9:46 am

well there you are ...nice great to read you again :lovehearts:

The Consul » Fri Aug 10, 2018 11:34 pm wrote:As the old song goes, fear is a man's best friend. When you take to killing mice because there is nothing adorable about their shit and the way they rip everything up - you overcome concerns of inhumane extermination, especially when they get in your food and your bed. The dread of them breaking through, the dread of setting traps, the dread of finding them crushed and having to dispose.
Ingraham is a mouse. She breeds little hate lies that can be seen for the vile hate spit they are except by other twitchy cute little Nazi fucking mice. They are what they are, and if you let them they'll burrow right through your eye socket to eat your brains before nesting in your skull.
The Nazi mice are here in swarms to guarantee the end is the most brutal nightmare, beyond beyond. They've only just begun.




"When you take to killing mice because there is nothing adorable about their shit and the way they rip everything up - you overcome concerns of inhumane extermination"

.........a completely understandable notion in a few different circumstances

bubonic plague comes to mind and maybe a political situation which might be just as deadly :P



4,229 lies in 558 days
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:51 pm

Brock Univesity to strip ex-prof of title after racist tweets

AUG 10 Posted by Zig Zag

Image
On a lonely train to nowhere: retired Brock University professor Garth Stevenson.

Tweets on account of retired professor Garth Stevenson attacked Indigenous people

by Grant LaFleche, Aug 8, 2018, The St. Catharines Standard

Brock University is distancing itself from a retired political science professor whose social media accounts shared racist and derogatory messages aimed at Indigenous people this week.

In a Friday statement the university said it was moving to strip retired professor Garth Stevenson — formerly the head of Brock’s political science department — of his status as a professor emeritus after posts on Stevenson’s Facebook and Twitter accounts attacked Indigenous Canadians as “snivelling,” and ignorant pagans who were making Canada “unfit for civilized people.”

The posts expressed skepticism that Indigenous nations lived in Canada before the arrival of European settlers, that he would never speak to an Indigenous person again and told another Twitter user to die a painful death.

“Brock has no connection whatsoever with his view and abhors comments that have been posted on his social media sites,” said the statement by Tom Dunk, Brock’s provost and vice-president academic.

In an emailed statement late Friday evening, Stevenson defended his social media posts and called the issue a “tempest in a tea pot.”

“I am sure many aboriginals are fine people and at one time I knew and got along with several of them,” he wrote. “But I have been driven over the edge by the systematic campaign over the last few years to blacken the reputation of our first and best prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, a campaign in which prominent aboriginals and some of their white ‘liberal’ fan club have played the predominant part.”

In his email, sent to The Standard and the CBC, Stevenson said he is outraged by what he perceives as attacks on MacDonald’s reputation and he removal of his statue from city hall in Victoria, B.C.

Image

The city is removing the statue from city hall because of McDonald’s role in the mistreatment of Indigenous people and the establishment of residential schools. The city plans to place the statue somewhere else in the city. Stevenson regards this as “highly offensive” and that he “almost exploded” when Ontario teachers suggested removing MacDonald’s from the names from public schools last summer.

“I also note that some kind of pagan ceremony of ‘cleansing’ and ‘healing’ will be held in front of the Victoria city hall after Macdonald is removed. The notion that such a ceremony is necessary in the circumstances is one that I find highly offensive,” he wrote. “I should also mention that if a Christian or Muslim religious ceremony were to be held on public property, the same people who are obsessed with the aboriginals would probably say that this was an improper violation of the separation of church and state.”

In his email, Stevenson said those who claim that Canadian leaders of MacDonald’s era were engaged in the genocide of Indigenous people is untrue, pointing to the Holocaust as evidence.


https://warriorpublications.wordpress.c ... st-tweets/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:48 pm

Mistaking Identity Politics: A Conversation with Asad Haider (Part I)

"We can't decide in the abstract which of any social relations is more determinant in any particular social phenomenon. Some have primacy in particular moments, some come in a particular kind of sequence, but we can't just say: race, class, which one is more important?"

Image
Asad Haider speaking in Seattle, May 2018. via YouTube.

I think one key way that the argument often gets confused on is that it gets reduced or disfigured into this question of whether class matters more than race. Or whether class oppression is like more immoral than racial oppression or whatever.

One thing that we can't do is decide in the abstract which of any social relations is more determinant in any particular social phenomenon. You can't say: when it comes to slavery, was race more important or was class more important or economics more important?

It's a nonsense question because you had an actual historical phenomenon, which was constituted by many different kinds of relations. We generate abstractions for the purposes of analysis. We can speak about the racial aspect of it, so that we can understand that aspect better. We can speak about the economic aspect to understand that aspect better.

We can also look at a history in which it's not just like all of these things are piled up or just stacked together alongside each other, but they're articulated in various ways. Some have primacy in particular moments, some come in a particular kind of sequence, but we can't decide in the abstract and just say: race, class, which one is more important?

You quote a great and classic Barbara Fields line. She wrote: "as though the chief business of slavery were the production of white supremacy, rather than the production of cotton, sugar, rice and tobacco." Which I think really kind of clarifies the historical question. It's not in any way diminishing the horror of racism to note that it was constituted in the United States to legitimate a form of just absolutely brutal and near total economic subjugation and exploitation.

In her book Lose Your Mother, Saidiya Hartman argues this, in some ways, makes [slavery] even more horrifying. That while in the Holocaust, extermination was directly the goal, in slavery, this kind of brutality was the result of the profit motive. It came out of the profit motive, and in some ways, that makes it seem even more horrifying that it wasn't even the primary intention. I don't want to get into a contest about which was worse, which would be obscene, but the point is that by pointing to the economic motive, you are not in any way minimizing the violence and the obscenity of these historical episodes. And one of the important things of that Barbara Fields line shows us is that white supremacy is contingent. White supremacy is not something that is in the genes of white people. We cannot allow that kind of racialist thinking to invade the way that we think about this history.

One thing we touched on a bit is that often the liberal argument that socialists don't care about race or gender is a straw man — in the case of Hillary Clinton, for — but as you've mentioned earlier and you write in the book, there is a current of what can only fairly be called class-first politics on the left. You argue that it plays into identitarians' hands.

The socialist left has a mixed history on the question, with points high and low. Things did improve, at least initially, with the rise of the Communist Party, where black cadre made the fight against racism central. Explain where the left sometimes falls short today and some of the historical antecedents.


First of all, the history of the labor and socialist movement in the United States is the history also of immigration and immigration from Europe, which is voluntary. But then also the forced immigration, the forced migration of African laborers.

That means that socialism always has a complicated relationship with the process, a long process of what Theodore Allen called the invention of the white race. When immigrants arrive in the United States, they have to make a choice, which is whether they will join up with the labor movement, with IWW, with the Socialist Party, etc., or will they opt to enjoy the privileges that are extended to people who join the club of whiteness and allow them to have some advantage over people who are formerly enslaved?

Now the Socialist Party and other organizations of that kind were not necessarily racist. We could certainly imagine that there were racist members and so on, but they often opposed segregation. They were often in favor of equal rights for black people. But what they didn't understand, in most cases, was that you couldn't have equality and you couldn't have the advancement of the interests of the working class as a whole unless you put anti-racist demands and programs at the center of your political work.

That's what people in the Communist Party started doing, particular figures like the African Blood Brotherhood, which was absorbed into the Communist Party at a certain point. It was founded in 1919, and in a few years was absorbed into the Party. A figure who I talk about a lot, who has a biography with one of the best titles I know of: Black Bolshevik. His name was Harry Haywood.

What he talked about was looking around, he was trying to recruit his friends and black people he knew to the Communist Party because he had an understanding of how racism was produced through the history of American capitalism. And he understood the necessity of having an anti-capitalist program to overcome racism. But it was hard to convince black people of that because they saw an organization that appeared to be primarily white. And they were more drawn to organizations like those of Marcus Garvey, which put demands for self-determination front-and-center.

That's why Haywood went to Moscow and wrote the famous 1928 Comintern Resolution, which said that there's a black nation in the American South, which has the right to take up the demand of self-determination. Lots of people quibble about this, whether it's really correct to say there was a nation in the Black Belt South. This is not the important thing. The important thing is that this was a strategic move to say there is a nationalist demand which is mobilizing a lot of people and Garveyism was a mass movement, and that Communists have to engage with that desire. They have to be able to say that the demand for self-determination can be taken up by a multiracial movement, by a movement which is anti-capitalist. We do not need to yield that to movements which are fundamentally based on an essentialist concept of race and which are opposed to solidarity with other nationalities and other groups.

Coming up to the present, where do actually existing class-first leftists fall short and what is the analysis that's put forward?

First of all, they suppress this history — one of the most precious aspects of the history of Marxism and what made Marxism a global phenomenon in the 20th century. They suppress this history partly because they have Eurocentric blinders, partly because of a really inadequate analysis of what went wrong with actually existing socialism in the 20th century that is popular in the United States.

They misrepresent Marxism to a public which otherwise might potentially be receptive to it. Many activists today look at Marxism as something which says that anti-racist demands are frivolous or should be subordinated to class demands. And class-based demands will realize anything that an anti-racist demand would do. Like an anti-racist demand is only just a sort of muddled way of expressing what is actually a class demand.

When they do that, when socialists talk like that, they turn off so many people who might otherwise be receptive to the idea of an anti-capitalist and anti-racist movement and they introduce the fuel for this kind of division.

It's sort of a destructive closed circuit, because it seems to me that for some so-called class-first leftists, the root of the analysis is anger at the identitarian argument, such that their counter argument becomes simply its inverse.

That's right and actually that's happened on both sides. The way that people who are now advocating identity politics often operate is based on pure negation of what they perceive to be the class-first position. Everybody loses in the situation.


https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3972-m ... der-part-i
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Mon Aug 20, 2018 1:02 pm

Mistaking Identity Politics: A Conversation with Asad Haider (Part II)

"We have to come back to the straightforward explanation that this is a society which is structured by racial oppression and has been for its entire history."

Image
Detail from the cover of Mistaken Identity.


I want to ask you about another line of school of criticism of identity politics that unlike yours, is very stupid and dangerous, which is the one put forward infamously by Mark Lilla and company. When he's arguing against identity politics, what I think he's arguing is that any real concern about race and sexuality, and about racism and homophobia and sexism, has led to some sort of like liberal coalitional unity being undermined. Unity around what? Because he's by no means a socialist.

You make an argument that's entirely to the contrary. What are these anti-identity liberals exemplified by Lilla arguing?


For Lilla, there is a clear thing that he wants to converge around and that is citizenship. He makes a universalist claim and he wants to defend his universalism against these forms of difference, these fixations on difference. I have a slight philological problem with saying that identity politics is fixated on difference because identity is the opposite of difference, but let's leave that to the side. That's for the philosophy seminar room.

His universalism is one which is a contradictory universalism, because it is a universalism which is restricted to the nation-state. He has an American universalism and he believes that citizenship, and we can criticize him for taking up a category which is so contested right now —

Of all things.

Of all things, yes, it's not like that solves any problems. Of course, he will respond that he thinks that people who are currently undocumented immigrants should have access to citizenship. But the problem is still there, that this kind of universalist category of citizenship is based on the existence of a nation-state and it's based on the attachment to the identity of this nation-state to American values, to American culture. He wants everybody to be welcomed into that.

But actually Lilla still has an identitarian conception. He just has one which he considers to be universalist. But like so many universalisms, it's false universalism. Because it's based on the identity of the American nation-state.


https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3974-m ... er-part-ii
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Wed Aug 22, 2018 5:11 pm

American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:55 pm

They’re Just Like Us: Race and the White Working-Class on Roseanne

Image

Race has long been a powerful component of working-class identity. For the white working class, in particular, race became a way to distinguish between their social position and that of people of color. As historian David Roediger argues in his classic work The Wages of Whiteness, “whiteness was a way in which white workers responded to a fear of dependency on wage labor and to the necessities of capitalist work discipline” (13). In other words, instead of the white working class joining in solidarity with the multiethnic working class as their compatriots, they used whiteness as a cudgel to beat other workers with.


https://classism.org/race-white-working ... -roseanne/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Fri Aug 24, 2018 9:15 am

The dangerous myth of 'white genocide' in South Africa

Narratives about a fictitious campaign to exterminate Afrikaners have the power to produce real violence.

On Wednesday, President Trump tweeted that he was instructing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to look into “the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers.”

This is a huge victory for South Africa’s far-right, which has been lobbying foreign governments intensively over the past year. So far, they have managed to find a few sympathetic legislators in Western countries, but Trump is the first head of state to make such overtures.

The president’s statement is troubling because it signifies the mainstreaming of white nationalist narratives about “white genocide,” of which South Africa’s farm murders are an essential component.


https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/201 ... uth-africa
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Tue Sep 04, 2018 6:22 am

When They Bought Us Out

“[W]hite supremacy exists not external to the class, but as a perversion of its own interests.”

From Shane Burley


Image

Fascism is not just a system of obtuse and indecipherable totalitarianism. It is not simply the decisive rule from the top. It is populist: meaning, in a sense, it is popular. It is a movement that has to be rooted in the people. Fascism was not popular in an era before mass politics, when aristocratic elites ruled by decry without the charade of mass democracy. Fascism rises and rules by the mass participation of segments of the working class, a point which many have tried to ignore. It is the flaws in democracy it hopes to exploit, to expose the lies of extra-judicial violence and control that allow the system to continue.

As a revolutionary movement which seeks to undermine some of the basic assumptions of Western liberalism, fascism rises from the same conditions that the radical left does: economic strife, dehumanizing living conditions, racial conflict, state repression, and the range of violence marked by modern capitalist society. This creates the turmoil, a revolutionary spirit that can tip over into a number of directions. The rage of the marginalized classes is always sincere and valid, yet its purity guarantees nothing about outcomes.

One element that can pivot and distort class rebellion is the meager benefits that a privileged class of workers have. This is to say, the more white, male, or otherwise marginally-benefited workers have, the more advantages they see above their counterparts. A reactionary privileged class, desperate to hold on to those privileges in a world of uncertainty and competition, have the longest tradition of patented self-destruction. The inability of white workers to see the benefits of anti-racist solidarity, the strength that comes from class unity only possible through a revolutionary refusal of white supremacy, has been the bargain made for decades in an attempt to grasp at that privilege.

This choice has been the Achilles Heel of the worker’s movement, and largely all left mass movements, and enacts arson on liberation. The push in the labor movement to bait out immigrants, including demonizing immigrant labor, was a bid to raise wages for domestic workers. However, it ignored the fact that those meager wage gains were nothing compared to what could have been achieved if a true internationalism was embedded. The benefits of male social caste came at the cost of crushing patriarchy, the kind of rigid gender roles that have cost men the ability to hold relationships and live with themselves as they are. The exchange has been made, and for pennies now they lost thousands.

The mass politics of fascism is built on the white working class, it cannot exist without it. They are what gives it strength, people, anger. They are the enforcers, even the vanguards, even if they are not the beneficiaries. This reality has to be confronted: white supremacy exists not external to the class, but as a perversion of its own interests. But whose fault is it? As the left recedes into urban college campuses, internalize jargon, and failed liberal movements, where is the white working class? Is it organizing?

No one needs to tell us to organize, to survive. We do it every day, and we do it without the organized left. There is no reason to believe, however, that this is always in a direction we could celebrate, or even accept. The old IWW slogan of “if you aren’t talking to your co-worker, someone else is” with the silhouette of a Klansman rings true, and the anger of the white worker class has nowhere to go but down. Their energy, built on de-industrialization, falling real wages, and the true reality of working life rises; it has been effectively turned upon itself and on immigrants, women, queers, and people of color.

This is not eternal, it has not always been this way. While the shift has taken place, the left has always been there, a step away to mock, criticize, and remain insular, losing popularity as it loses the class.

This is a call to engage all members of the working class in fundamental change, but it is not a declaration to ignore the reality of violent white supremacy coming from people with similar paychecks to our own. We have to prioritize defense in times of repression and supremacist insurrection, including building networks of community protection against white nationalist attacks and the growing infrastructure of genocide in the state. While white workers have not largely sided with movements like the project to Abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcment (ICE) system, we push ahead without apology.

Regardless, white workers benefit from a deeply revolutionary antiracist movement, one that drives out divisions in the working class. Such a movement can do so only by uprooting actual inequality and destroying racism, both interpersonal and institutional. When white workers give up privilege by undoing the system of institutionalized white supremacy, they will get solidarity in return. This provides real power, not just the illusion of freedom so many cling to.

A movement like that can destroy all borders, wages, bosses, and states. And to do that we need everyone together, with foundations that were built consciously. A working class movement does not abandon the work at road blocks, or offense, or even trauma; instead, it sees the reclamation of the class as inherent to a revolutionary process. This doesn’t stop the work: there are two projects ahead, revolution against the top and the rebuilding of the class. This is a permanent work in progress, a permanent revolution.

This doesn’t mean every white worker will read your pamphlet, hear your speech, and join your movement. And why would they? Organizing rests on more than that: the legitimacy of shared class identification and matching of idealism with material conditions. It won’t work universally, and the “false consciousness,” or even parallel consciousness, lingers in huge swaths of people whose mythology of self is cemented in the whiteness offered as a consolation prize. That doesn’t matter, though: they benefit from the destruction of whiteness just the same.


More: https://godsandradicals.org/2018/09/04/ ... ht-us-out/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:04 am

Alt-Right Radio Host: America Is Discriminating Against White Men

By Jared Holt | September 20, 2018 4:49 pm

Lana Lokteff, a host at the white supremacist web-based outlet Red Ice, made a video praising Fox News host Tucker Carlson for questioning whether diversity is a strength on his show, expanding that praise to argue that white men are discriminated against.

Lokteff is an unabashed “ethno-nationalist,” meaning that she advocates for immigration policies that would enforce a white supermajority in America and has declared that American “can never, ever, ever, be too white.”

In a video uploaded to Red Ice’s YouTube channel, Lokteff decries “forced multiculturalism,” a label she applies to changing attitudes about race relations in America, and dismisses evidence that shows that hiring a diverse group of workers can make companies more profitable. Lokteff argues, as she has before, that Europe was already contained diversity among its white majority because a variety of languages and cultural traditions existed among its white supermajority.

“Before the word ‘diversity’ became the globalist political statement in European nations, it was just a word that meant variety—difference in talent, skill, ability or thought. Today it is all about melanin content, your genitals, and who you have sex with and if you’re a leftist, of course,” Lokteff said.

Lokteff said that she longed for a time when “it didn’t need to be about race because we lived in a homogeneous nation. European diversity got stuff done. … We never required rigid rules, about ‘must have one of each of this and that,’ and that’s what made America wild, free and successful.”

Later on in the video, Lokteff says it’s “funny” that people point out her clearly racist beliefs and say she is “obsessed with skin color” when really she believes that “race is more than skin color.” She also claims that white men in America are discriminated against.

She says, “White guys are still a majority in America, yet they are actively discriminated against in the name of diversity, tolerance, and anti-racism—so fight discrimination by excluding an entire group, got it. Well, all of these problems are hurdles because of forced multiculturalism.”


http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/alt- ... white-men/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Abolish the White Race - By Any Means Necessary

Postby American Dream » Sun Sep 23, 2018 2:51 pm

Greg Johnson: For A White Ethnostate To Exist In The U.S., Racial Minorities Must Be Disenfranchised

Image

Let’s just say that tomorrow, we decided we were going to have a white homeland in the United States, and that we were going to have a 50 year transition to this, and there’s this nice Asian couple that you know next door and they’re 50-years-old and they’ve got a couple Golden Retrievers and they’re good citizens and they worked a long time. My attitude about them is, look, they can retire. They can enjoy their pensions. They can live their lives out. And in 50 years though they’re not gonna be around. They’re just not gonna be a problem.

And the thing that we have to do, though, is we have to make sure that these people don’t have any political influence over our societies. So we wanna take away their voting rights, we wanna take away their political power. That doesn’t mean that they won’t have human rights, that we won’t respect their right not to be murdered arbitrarily, and things like that. I believe that we can respect the human rights of all people to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, and so forth. But we don’t have to give them power in our societies to shape our future.


[Emphasis added]

https://angrywhitemen.org/2018/09/23/gr ... ranchised/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests