NFL Conspiracy? Steelers-Chargers final play looks fishy

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:01 pm

.

Pretty big story just broke with publication of book by an NBA ref confirming in great (and fun!) detail the fixing in that league, which has been obvious to everyone with .19% of a brain all along. Very long set of passages are available online, I'll excerpt just some of the meat, many of you will want to follow the link for much more.

http://deadspin.com/5392067/excerpts-fr ... ou-to-read


Excerpts From The Book The NBA Doesn't Want You To Read

As promised earlier, here are a handful of excerpts from David Stern's favorite book, Blowing the Whistle, by Tim Donaghy.

On gambling refs:

!!!SNIP!!!

That very first time Jack and I bet on an NBA game, Dick was on the court. The team we picked lost the game, but it covered the large point spread and that's how we won the money. Because of the matchup that night, I had some notion of who might win the game, but that's not why I was confident enough to pull the trigger and pick the other team. The real reason I picked the losing team was that I was just about certain they would cover the spread, no matter how badly they played. That is where Dick Bavetta comes into the picture.

From my earliest involvement with Bavetta, I learned that he likes to keep games close, and that when a team gets down by double-digit points, he helps the players save face. He accomplishes this act of mercy by quietly, and frequently, blowing the whistle on the team that's having the better night. Team fouls suddenly become one-sided between the contestants, and the score begins to tighten up. That's the way Dick Bavetta referees a game — and everyone in the league knew it.

Fellow referee Danny Crawford attended Michael Jordan's Flight School Camp years ago and later told me that he had long conversations with other referees and NBA players about how Bavetta propped up weak teams. Danny told me that Jordan himself said that everyone in the league knew that Bavetta cheated in games and that the players and coaches just hoped he would be cheating for them on game night. Cheating? That's a very strong word to use in any sentence that includes the name Dick Bavetta. Is the conscious act of helping a team crawl back into a contest "cheating"? The credo of referees from high school to the NBA is "call them like you see them." Of course, that's a lot different than purposely calling more fouls against one team as opposed to another. Did Bavetta have a hidden agenda? Or was he the ultimate company man, making sure the NBA and its fans got a competitive game most times he was on
the court?

Studying under Dick Bavetta for 13 years was like pursuing a graduate degree in advanced game manipulation. He knew how to marshal the tempo and tone of a game better than any referee in the league, by far. He also knew how to take subtle — and not so subtle — cues from the NBA front office and extend a playoff series or, worse yet, change the complexion of that series.

The 2002 Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Sacramento Kings presents a stunning example of game and series manipulation at its ugliest. As the teams prepared for Game 6 at the Staples Center, Sacramento had a 3–2 lead in the series. The referees assigned to work Game 6 were Dick Bavetta, Bob Delaney, and Ted Bernhardt. As soon as the referees for the game were chosen, the rest of us knew immediately that there would be a Game 7. A prolonged series was good for the league, good for the networks, and good for the game. Oh, and one more thing: it was great for the big-market, star-studded Los Angeles Lakers.

In the pregame meeting prior to Game 6, the league office sent down word that certain calls — calls that would have benefitted the Lakers — were being missed by the referees. This was the type of not-so-subtle information that I and other referees were left to interpret. After receiving the dispatch, Bavetta openly talked about the fact that the league wanted a Game 7.

"If we give the benefit of the calls to the team that's down in the series, nobody's going to complain. The series will be even at three apiece, and then the better team can win Game 7," Bavetta stated.

As history shows, Sacramento lost Game 6 in a wild come-from-behind thriller that saw the Lakers repeatedly sent to the foul line by the referees. For other NBA referees watching the game on television, it was a shameful performance by Bavetta's crew, one of the most poorly officiated games of all time.

The 2002 series certainly wasn't the first or last time Bavetta weighed in on an important game. He also worked Game 7 of the 2000 Western Conference Finals between the Lakers and the Trail Blazers. The Lakers were down by 13 at the start of the fourth quarter when Bavetta went to work. The Lakers outscored Portland 31–13 in the fourth quarter and went on to win the game and the series. It certainly didn't hurt the Lakers that they got to shoot 37 free throws compared to a paltry 16 for the Trail Blazers.

Two weeks before the 2003–04 season ended, Bavetta and I were assigned to officiate a game in Oakland. That afternoon before the tip-off, we were discussing an upcoming game on our schedule. It was the last regular-season game we were scheduled to work, pitting Denver against San Antonio. Denver had lost a game a few weeks prior because of a mistake made by the referees, a loss that could be the difference between them making or missing the playoffs. Bavetta told me Denver needed the win and that it would look bad for the staff and the league if the Nuggets missed the playoffs by one game. There were still a few games left on the schedule before the end of the season, and the standings could potentially change. But on that day in Oakland, Bavetta looked at me and casually stated, "Denver will win if they need the game. That's why I'm on it."

I was thinking, How is Denver going to win on the road in San Antonio? At the time, the Spurs were arguably the best team in the league. Bavetta answered my question before it was asked.

"Duncan will be on the bench with three fouls within the first five minutes of the game," he calmly stated.

Bavetta went on to inform me that it wasn't the first time the NBA assigned him to a game for a specific purpose. He cited examples, including the 1993 playoff series when he put New Jersey guard Drazen Petrovic on the bench with quick fouls to help Cleveland beat the Nets. He also spoke openly about the 2002 Los Angeles–Sacramento series and called himself the NBA's "go-to guy."

As it turned out, Denver didn't need the win after all; they locked up a spot in the playoffs before they got to San Antonio. In a twist of fate, it was the Spurs that ended up needing the win to have a shot at the division title, and Bavetta generously accommodated. In our pregame meeting, he talked about how important the game was to San Antonio and how meaningless it was to Denver, and that San Antonio was going to get the benefit of the calls that night. Armed with this inside information, I called Jack Concannon before the game and told him to bet the Spurs.

To no surprise, we won big. San Antonio blew Denver out of the building that evening, winning by 26 points. When Jack called me the following morning, he expressed amazement at the way an NBA game could be manipulated. Sobering, yes; amazing, no. That's how the game is played in the National Basketball Association.
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15261
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:04 pm

And think of how the biggest sports cheating stories have been about doping all around and especially steroids in baseball. A distraction from the big money manipulation, which ain't in baseball (too hard to fix and there's a very long string of 4 and 5 game playoff series to confirm it) but in basketball and in the holy of holies, the NFL.
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15261
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby monster » Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:26 pm

I've noticed fixing in almost every sport lately. Baseball umpires have made some jaw-dropping "mistakes" this post-season. I noticed it in the Florida football game a couple weeks ago (forget who the opponent was). And most recently, in an MMA title fight the judges gave Lyoto Machida the win over Shogun Rua when everybody, and I mean everybody else on the planet had Shogun as the winner.
"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."
User avatar
monster
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Everywhere
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MinM » Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:35 pm

JackRiddler wrote:.

Pretty big story just broke with publication of book by an NBA ref confirming in great (and fun!) detail the fixing in that league, which has been obvious to everyone with .19% of a brain all along. Very long set of passages are available online, I'll excerpt just some of the meat, many of you will want to follow the link for much more.

http://deadspin.com/5392067/excerpts-fr ... ou-to-read


Excerpts From The Book The NBA Doesn't Want You To Read

As promised earlier, here are a handful of excerpts from David Stern's favorite book, Blowing the Whistle, by Tim Donaghy.

On gambling refs:

!!!SNIP!!!



The 2002 Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Sacramento Kings presents a stunning example of game and series manipulation at its ugliest. As the teams prepared for Game 6 at the Staples Center, Sacramento had a 3–2 lead in the series. The referees assigned to work Game 6 were Dick Bavetta, Bob Delaney, and Ted Bernhardt. As soon as the referees for the game were chosen, the rest of us knew immediately that there would be a Game 7. A prolonged series was good for the league, good for the networks, and good for the game. Oh, and one more thing: it was great for the big-market, star-studded Los Angeles Lakers.

In the pregame meeting prior to Game 6, the league office sent down word that certain calls — calls that would have benefitted the Lakers — were being missed by the referees. This was the type of not-so-subtle information that I and other referees were left to interpret. After receiving the dispatch, Bavetta openly talked about the fact that the league wanted a Game 7.

"If we give the benefit of the calls to the team that's down in the series, nobody's going to complain. The series will be even at three apiece, and then the better team can win Game 7," Bavetta stated.

As history shows, Sacramento lost Game 6 in a wild come-from-behind thriller that saw the Lakers repeatedly sent to the foul line by the referees. For other NBA referees watching the game on television, it was a shameful performance by Bavetta's crew, one of the most poorly officiated games of all time...

Image
http://deadspin.com/5392030/the-book-th ... ou-to-read

A couple of interesting side notes about this. Larry O'Brien, David Stern's predecessor (btw what a crooked, smug POS Stern is), and his office were at the heart of the Watergate Affair. Was he given the cushy job as NBA Commish to maintain any embarrassing State Secrets related to that?

Bob Delaney, part of Bavetta's crew that fixed the Kings-Lakers game 6, has a notable background too:
During the mid-1970s, Delaney worked as an undercover officer as part of an operation known as "Project Alpha".

Project Alpha was an investigation into the New Jersey organized crime scene. Delaney and a group of undercover officers posed as businessmen in the trucking industry trying to get out from under the pressures of union interests. This would open an association with the crime families who would alleviate their business pressures from the unions for a price. Delaney would assume the identity of "Bobby Covert", a deceased resident of New Jersey, for his protection. While doing all this, he had to maintain a profile as a reputable business owner and keep in mind his primary responsibility as a police officer. Mobsters nicknamed him "Bobby Smash".

Project Alpha came to an end in 1977 when Delaney failed to check in with his commanding officers because he went on a business trip for his trucking company. In 1981, Delaney testified before a United States Senate committee on organized crime led by Senator Sam Nunn about his experiences with the most powerful organized crime syndicates in New Jersey during his three year undercover operation. Delaney testified that over 100 cases against the mobsters were opened in state and federal courts as a result of Project Alpha, and that the majority of those charged either ended up in prison, on the run, or dead. Soon after testifying in the Senate, Delaney retired as a law enforcement officer and devoted full-time to becoming a basketball referee. In 2008, Delaney wrote about his undercover experience in Covert: My Years Infiltrating the Mob
...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Delane ... ll_referee)
Image
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Percival » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:15 pm

More:

From Donaghy's Book...

On gambling refs:

To have a little fun at the expense of the worst troublemakers, the referees working the game would sometimes make a modest friendly wager amongst themselves: first ref to give one of the bad boys a technical foul wouldn't have to tip the ball boy that night. In the NBA, ball boys set up the referees' locker room and keep it stocked with food and beer for the postgame meal. We usually ran the kid ragged with a variety of personal requests and then slipped him a $20 bill. Technically, the winner of the bet won twice-he didn't have to pay the kid and he got to call a T on Mr. Foul-Mouthed Big-Shot Du Jour.

After the opening tip, it was hilarious as the three of us immediately focused our full attention on the intended victim, waiting for something, anything, to justify a technical foul. If the guy so much as looked at one of us and mumbled, we rang him up. Later in the referees' locker room, we would down a couple of brews, eat some chicken wings, and laugh like hell.

We had another variation of this gag simply referred to as the "first foul of the game" bet. While still in the locker room before tip-off, we would make a wager on which of us would call the game's first foul. That referee would either have to pay the ball boy or pick up the dinner tab for the other two referees. Sometimes, the ante would be $50 a guy. Like the technical foul bet, it was hilarious-only this time we were testing each other's nerves to see who had the guts to hold out the longest before calling a personal foul. There were occasions when we would hold back for two or three minutes-an eternity in an NBA game-before blowing the whistle. It didn't matter if bodies were flying all over the place; no fouls were called because no one wanted to lose the bet.

We played this little game during the regular season and summer league. After a game, all three refs would gather around the VCR and watch a replay of the game. Early in the contest, the announcers would say, "Holy cow! They're really letting them play tonight!" If they only knew...

During one particular summer game, Duke Callahan, Mark Wunderlich, and I made it to the three-minute mark in the first quarter without calling a foul. We were running up and down the court, laughing our asses off as the players got hammered with no whistles. The players were exhausted from the nonstop running when Callahan finally called the first foul because Mikki Moore of the New Jersey Nets literally tackled an opposing player right in front of him. Too bad for Callahan-he lost the bet.

I became so good at this game that if an obvious foul was committed right in front of me, I would call a travel or a three-second violation instead. Those violations are not personal fouls, so I was still in the running to win the bet. The players would look at me with disbelief on their faces as if to say, "What the hell was that?"

On star treatment:





Relationships between NBA players and referees were generally all over the board-love, hate, and everything in-between. Some players, even very good ones, were targeted by referees and the league because they were too talented for their own good. Raja Bell, formerly of the Phoenix Suns and now a member of the Charlotte Bobcats, was one of those players. A defensive specialist throughout his career, Bell had a reputation for being a "star stopper." His defensive skills were so razor sharp that he could shut down a superstar, or at least make him work for his points. Kobe Bryant was often frustrated by Bell's tenacity on defense. Let's face it, no one completely shuts down a player of Kobe's caliber, but Bell could frustrate Kobe, take him out of his game, and interrupt his rhythm.

You would think that the NBA would love a guy who plays such great defense. Think again! Star stoppers hurt the promotion of marquee players. Fans don't pay high prices to see players like Raja Bell-they pay to see superstars like Kobe Bryant score 40 points. Basketball purists like to see good defense, but the NBA wants the big names to score big points.

If a player of Kobe's stature collides with the likes of Raja Bell, the call will almost always go for Kobe and against Bell. As part of our ongoing training and game preparation, NBA referees regularly receive game-action video tape from the league office. Over the years, I have reviewed many recorded hours of video involving Raja Bell. The footage I analyzed usually illustrated fouls being called against Bell, rarely for him. The message was subtle but clear-call fouls against the star stopper because he's hurting the game.

If Kobe Bryant had two fouls in the first or second quarter and went to the bench, one referee would tell the other two, "Kobe's got two fouls. Let's make sure that if we call a foul on him, it's an obvious foul, because otherwise he's gonna go back to the bench. If he is involved in a play where a foul is called, give the foul to another player."

Similarly, when games got physically rough, we would huddle up and agree to tighten the game up. So we started calling fouls on guys who didn't really matter-"ticky-tack" or "touch" fouls where one player just touched another but didn't really impede his progress. Under regular circumstances these wouldn't be fouls, but after a skirmish we wanted to regain control. We would never call these types of fouls on superstars, just on the average players who didn't have star status. It was important to keep the stars on the floor.

Allen Iverson provides a good example of a player who generated strong reaction, both positive and negative, within the corps of NBA referees. For instance, veteran referee Steve Javie hated Allen Iverson and was loathe [sic] to give him a favorable call. If Javie was on the court when Iverson was playing, I would always bet on the other team to win or at least cover the spread. No matter how many times Iverson hit the floor, he rarely saw the foul line. By contrast, referee Joe Crawford had a grandson who idolized Iverson. I once saw Crawford bring the boy out of the stands and onto the floor during warm-ups to meet the superstar. Iverson and Crawford's grandson were standing there, shaking hands, smiling, talking about all kinds of things. If Joe Crawford was on the court, I was pretty sure Iverson's team would win or at least cover the spread.

Madison Square Garden was the place to be for a marquee matchup between the Miami Heat and New York Knicks. I worked the game with Derrick Stafford and Gary Zielinski, knowing that the Knicks were a sure bet to get favorable treatment that night. Derrick Stafford had a close relationship with Knicks coach Isiah Thomas, and he despised Heat coach Pat Riley. I picked the Knicks without batting an eye and settled in for a roller-coaster ride on the court.

During pregame warm-ups, Shaquille O'Neal approached Stafford and asked him to let some air out of the ball.

"Is this the game ball?" O'Neal asked. "It's too hard. C'mon, D, let a little air out of it."

Stafford then summoned one of the ball boys, asked for an air needle, and let some air out of the ball, getting a big wink and a smile from O'Neal.

On his fellow referees:

Dick Bavetta


Crawford wanted the game over quickly so he could kick back, relax, and have a beer; [Dick Bavetta] wanted it to keep going so he could hear his name on TV. He actually paid an American Airlines employee to watch all the games he worked and write down everything the TV commentators said about him. No matter how late the game was over, he'd wake her up for a full report. He loved the attention.

I remember one nightmarish game I worked with Joe Crawford and Phil Robinson. Minnesota and New Orleans were in a tight game going into the last minute, and Crawford told us to make sure that we were 100 percent sure of the call every time we blew the whistle. When play resumed, Minnesota coach Flip Saunders started yelling at us to make a call. Robinson got intimidated and blew the whistle on New Orleans. The only problem was it wasn't the right call. Tim Floyd, the Hornets' coach, went nuts. He stormed the court and kicked the ball into the top row of the stadium. Robinson had to throw him out, and Minnesota won the game.
[...]
Later that week, Ronnie Nunn told me that we could have made something up at the other end against Minnesota to even things out. He even got specific-maybe we should have considered calling a traveling violation on Kevin Garnett. Talk about the politics of the game! Of course the official statement from the league office will always read, "There is no such thing as a makeup call."

That very first time Jack and I bet on an NBA game, Dick was on the court. The team we picked lost the game, but it covered the large point spread and that's how we won the money. Because of the matchup that night, I had some notion of who might win the game, but that's not why I was confident enough to pull the trigger and pick the other team. The real reason I picked the losing team was that I was just about certain they would cover the spread, no matter how badly they played. That is where Dick Bavetta comes into the picture.

From my earliest involvement with Bavetta, I learned that he likes to keep games close, and that when a team gets down by double-digit points, he helps the players save face. He accomplishes this act of mercy by quietly, and frequently, blowing the whistle on the team that's having the better night. Team fouls suddenly become one-sided between the contestants, and the score begins to tighten up. That's the way Dick Bavetta referees a game-and everyone in the league knew it.

Fellow referee Danny Crawford attended Michael Jordan's Flight School Camp years ago and later told me that he had long conversations with other referees and NBA players about how Bavetta propped up weak teams. Danny told me that Jordan himself said that everyone in the league knew that Bavetta cheated in games and that the players and coaches just hoped he would be cheating for them on game night. Cheating? That's a very strong word to use in any sentence that includes the name Dick Bavetta. Is the conscious act of helping a team crawl back into a contest "cheating"? The credo of referees from high school to the NBA is "call them like you see them." Of course, that's a lot different than purposely calling more fouls against one team as opposed to another. Did Bavetta have a hidden agenda? Or was he the ultimate company man, making sure the NBA and its fans got a competitive game most times he was on
the court?

Studying under Dick Bavetta for 13 years was like pursuing a graduate degree in advanced game manipulation. He knew how to marshal the tempo and tone of a game better than any referee in the league, by far. He also knew how to take subtle-and not so subtle-cues from the NBA front office and extend a playoff series or, worse yet, change the complexion of that series.

The 2002 Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Sacramento Kings presents a stunning example of game and series manipulation at its ugliest. As the teams prepared for Game 6 at the Staples Center, Sacramento had a 3–2 lead in the series. The referees assigned to work Game 6 were Dick Bavetta, Bob Delaney, and Ted Bernhardt. As soon as the referees for the game were chosen, the rest of us knew immediately that there would be a Game 7. A prolonged series was good for the league, good for the networks, and good for the game. Oh, and one more thing: it was great for the big-market, star-studded Los Angeles Lakers.

In the pregame meeting prior to Game 6, the league office sent down word that certain calls-calls that would have benefitted the Lakers — were being missed by the referees. This was the type of not-so-subtle information that I and other referees were left to interpret. After receiving the dispatch, Bavetta openly talked about the fact that the league wanted a Game 7.

"If we give the benefit of the calls to the team that's down in the series, nobody's going to complain. The series will be even at three apiece, and then the better team can win Game 7," Bavetta stated.

As history shows, Sacramento lost Game 6 in a wild come-from-behind thriller that saw the Lakers repeatedly sent to the foul line by the referees. For other NBA referees watching the game on television, it was a shameful performance by Bavetta's crew, one of the most poorly officiated games of all time.

The 2002 series certainly wasn't the first or last time Bavetta weighed in on an important game. He also worked Game 7 of the 2000 Western Conference Finals between the Lakers and the Trail Blazers. The Lakers were down by 13 at the start of the fourth quarter when Bavetta went to work. The Lakers outscored Portland 31–13 in the fourth quarter and went on to win the game and the series. It certainly didn't hurt the Lakers that they got to shoot 37 free throws compared to a paltry 16 for the Trail Blazers.

Two weeks before the 2003–04 season ended, Bavetta and I were assigned to officiate a game in Oakland. That afternoon before the tip-off, we were discussing an upcoming game on our schedule. It was the last regular-season game we were scheduled to work, pitting Denver against San Antonio. Denver had lost a game a few weeks prior because of a mistake made by the referees, a loss that could be the difference between them making or missing the playoffs. Bavetta told me Denver needed the win and that it would look bad for the staff and the league if the Nuggets missed the playoffs by one game. There were still a few games left on the schedule before the end of the season, and the standings could potentially change. But on that day in Oakland, Bavetta looked at me and casually stated, "Denver will win if they need the game. That's why I'm on it."

I was thinking, How is Denver going to win on the road in San Antonio? At the time, the Spurs were arguably the best team in the league. Bavetta answered my question before it was asked.

"Duncan will be on the bench with three fouls within the first five minutes of the game," he calmly stated.

Bavetta went on to inform me that it wasn't the first time the NBA assigned him to a game for a specific purpose. He cited examples, including the 1993 playoff series when he put New Jersey guard Drazen Petrovic on the bench with quick fouls to help Cleveland beat the Nets. He also spoke openly about the 2002 Los Angeles–Sacramento series and called himself the NBA's "go-to guy."

As it turned out, Denver didn't need the win after all; they locked up a spot in the playoffs before they got to San Antonio. In a twist of fate, it was the Spurs that ended up needing the win to have a shot at the division title, and Bavetta generously accommodated. In our pregame meeting, he talked about how important the game was to San Antonio and how meaningless it was to Denver, and that San Antonio was going to get the benefit of the calls that night. Armed with this inside information, I called Jack Concannon before the game and told him to bet the Spurs.

To no surprise, we won big. San Antonio blew Denver out of the building that evening, winning by 26 points. When Jack called me the following morning, he expressed amazement at the way an NBA game could be manipulated. Sobering, yes; amazing, no. That's how the game is played in the National Basketball Association.

In a follow-up email to the referee staff and the league office, Crawford railed about the lack of respect players had for referees and the NBA's failure to back him up. Then, in a direct shot at the league's embracing of referees like Dick Bavetta, he fired a sharp rebuke:

"I also told [Stu Jackson] that the staff is an officiating staff of Dick Bavetta's-schmoozing and sucking people's asses to get ahead. Awful, but it is reality."

Crawford also touched on the fact that he was being excluded from working the playoffs that year:

"Look on the bright side everybody, MORE playoff games for you guys and Dick, maybe you will get to be crew chief in the 7th game of the Finals, which is a travesty in itself you even being in the Finals."

Tommy Nunez


My favorite Tommy Nunez story is from the 2007 playoffs when the San Antonio Spurs were able to get past the Phoenix Suns in the second round. Of course, what many fans didn't know was that Phoenix had someone working against them behind the scenes. Nunez was the group supervisor for that playoff series, and he definitely had a rooting interest.

Nunez loved the Hispanic community in San Antonio and had a lot of friends there. He had been a referee for 30 years and loved being on the road; in fact, he said that the whole reason he had become a group supervisor was to keep getting out of the house. So Nunez wanted to come back to San Antonio for the conference finals. Plus, he, like many other referees, disliked Suns owner Robert Sarver for the way he treated officials. Both of these things came into play when he prepared the referees for the games in the staff meetings. I remember laughing with him and saying, "You would love to keep coming back here." He was pointing out everything that Phoenix was able to get away with and never once told us to look for anything in regard to San Antonio. Nunez should have a championship ring on his finger.

Derrick Stafford and Jess Kersey


Of course, Stafford had some friends in the league, too. I worked a Knicks game in Madison Square Garden with him on February 26, 2007. New York shot an astounding 39 free throws that night to Miami's paltry eight. It seemed like Stafford was working for the Knicks, calling fouls on Miami like crazy. Isiah Thomas was coaching the Knicks, and after New York's four-point victory, a guy from the Knicks came to our locker room looking for Stafford, who was in the shower. He told us that Thomas sent him to retrieve Stafford's home address; apparently, Stafford had asked the coach before the game for some autographed sneakers and jerseys for his kids. Suddenly, it all made sense.

Referee Jess Kersey was another one of Isiah Thomas' guys. They'd talk openly on the phone as if they had known each other since childhood. Thomas even told Kersey that he was pushing to get Ronnie Nunn removed from the supervisor's job so that Kersey and Dick Bavetta could take over. This sort of thing happened all the time, and I kept waiting for a Knicks game when Stafford, Bavetta, and Kersey were working together. It was like knowing the winning lottery numbers before the drawing!

Steve Javie


And then there was the ongoing feud between Javie and 76ers superstar Allen Iverson. The rift was so bad that Philadelphia general manager Billy King often called the league office to complain about Javie's treatment of Iverson during a game.

Iverson was eventually traded to Denver, and in his first game against his former team, he was tossed after two technicals. Afterward, Iverson implied Javie had a grudge against him, saying, "I thought I got fouled on that play, and I said I thought that he was calling the game personal, and he threw me out. His fuse is real short anyway, and I should have known that I couldn't say anything anyway. It's been something personal with me and him since I got in the league. This was just the perfect game for him to try and make me look bad." The league fined Iverson $25,000 for his comments, but most of the league referees thought the punishment was too lenient and were upset he wasn't suspended. As a result, we collectively decided to dispense a little justice of our own, sticking it to Iverson whenever we could.

Shortly after the Javie-Iverson incident, I worked a Jazz-Nuggets contest in Denver on January 6, 2007. During the pregame meeting, my fellow referees Bernie Fryer and Gary Zielinski agreed that we were going to strictly enforce the palming rule against Iverson. Palming the ball was something Iverson loved to do, but if he so much as came close to a palm, we were going to blow the whistle. Obviously, our actions were in direct retaliation for Iverson's rant against Javie. True to form, I immediately excused myself and made an important phone call.

Sticking to our pregame pledge, each of us whistled Iverson for palming in the first quarter-we all wanted in on the fun. The violations seemed to affect Iverson's rhythm and he played terribly that night, shooting 5-for-19 with five turnovers. After getting repeatedly whistled all night long, Iverson approached me in an act of submission.

"How long am I going to be punished for Javie?" he quietly inquired.

"Don't know what you're talking about, Allen," I responded.
User avatar
Percival
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 7:09 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MinM » Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:42 pm

This Day (November 4) in History:

Ex-NBA referee Donaghy released from jail - NBA News - FOX Sports on MSN

1 year anniversary of Obama election.

Michael Crichton died one year ago today.

14 years ago, Yitzhak Rabin was killed.

19 years ago, Ronald Reagan was elected.

125 years: Grover Cleveland

Image
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:41 pm

.

YES! FIRST OF THE DONAGHY DEBUNKERS ARRIVES!

Just another disgruntled jealous ex-convict whistleblower craving attention and payback, I guess...

Donaghy's botched book deal could help NBA

by Kevin Hench

Kevin Hench is a frequent contributor to FOXSports.com. An accomplished film and television writer, Hench's latest screenwriting credit is for The Hammer, which stars Adam Carolla and is now available on DVD.

Updated: October 30, 2009, 3:19 PM EDT



Move over, Magic Johnson.

There's a new most villainous NBA author in town. Only this one is apparently not coming to a bookstore near you.

Tim Donaghy's book will not be relaesed.

One week after explosive excerpts from a new book by Magic, Larry Bird and Jackie McMullen (a hoops lit Mod Squad) effectively ended whatever relationship Johnson had with Isiah Thomas, our old friend Tim Donaghy is back to make Bud Selig feel better about the state of officiating in his sport.

But proving once again the least reliable testimony is that of a jailbird, Donaghy's own publisher, Triumph Books, has decided the tales told in "Blowing the Whistle: The Culture of Fraud in the NBA" are just a little too tall for them.

Apparently the imprint (a division of Random House) was worried it would become Triumph the Insult Comic Publisher, abetting Donaghy's crusade against the NBA, if it went ahead with the release. A representative for the company wrote in an e-mail that the company had made its decision out of "concerns over potential liability."

The natural assumption was that David Stern had made it clear that the NBA would own Random House if Triumph published the book. But both the NBA and the publisher say that is not the case. Donaghy's would-be publisher arrived at this decision independently without threat of litigation from the NBA.
((Cause they said so, see?))

The decision would seem to make it clear that the publisher was unable to find anyone who could corroborate Donaghy's stories on the record. And even suggests that the publisher was unable to find anyone to corroborate the stories off the record.

After vetting the book, they must have simply concluded, "This stuff isn't true."

And I have to say, after reading the juicy excerpts over at our friends Deadspin.com, I don't buy it either. At least not the big stuff. Assuming these are actual excerpts from Donaghy's tell-all, he seems to repeatedly employ the kernel-of-truth-to-support-the-big-lie strategy.

Are there makeup calls in the NBA? Sure. Do refs have better relationships with some players than others? Of course. Do stars fare better with the refs than non-stars? Yep. Was Game 6 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals horribly officiated? You betcha.

Does that make the NBA one giant jai alai-like criminal enterprise? No. But Donaghy will tell you that it does.

The problem for Stern — a problem that doesn't necessarily go away with the shelving (non-shelving?) of this book — is that there's been enough atrocious officiating in the NBA over the years that fans will be predisposed to believe even the most implausible scenarios from Donaghy. And he spins some whoppers.

Superstars may get more calls than other players, but that's not necessarily evidence of a league conspiracy.

Donaghy claim: He suggests the league would send video to officials with the clear intent of having them call more fouls on defensive stoppers (like Raja Bell) guarding stars (like Kobe Bryant).

If that were really the case would Bruce Bowen have played 13 seasons in the league, making five NBA All-Defensive First Teams? ((A surreal argument.)) Nobody played superstars as physically with as much success. (Ironically, one of the most dubious non-calls in the Donaghy-worked Game 3 of the 2007 Western Conference semis was a Bowen hack on two-time MVP Steve Nash right in front of Eddie F. Rush.)

Donaghy says that if Kobe and Raja collide the call will "always" go to Kobe. But we know that is simply not the case. If Kobe didn't have close calls on plays involving non-stars go against him we wouldn't see him complain 4,381 times a season.

Donaghy claim: The disgraced ref says that if a star like Kobe got two fouls on him one of the refs would tell the others not to whistle him for his third unless it was obvious or to simply assign the foul to another player.

Really? The refs would say this out loud? With microphones surrounding the court? ((as though the refs can't signal each other - also, myth of perfect surveillance and transparency)) Again Donaghy seems to be working backward, making the star protection system — which everyone accepts exists — into a calculated and casually articulated conspiracy. (("Old news" tactic - also, "limited hangout." A few years ago "star protection system" would have been considered an outrageous allegation.))

[/b]One more note on the star system: stars get calls not because officials are cheating but because those officials are human and conditioned to seeing those stars succeed (psychologists call this "priming").[/b] ((Arrogant psychobabble. "Priming" doesn't exclude cheating.)) That happens in every sport. Look no further than Mariano Rivera's 1-0 pitch to Chase Utley and strike three pitch to Ryan Howard in Game 2 of the World Series. Was home plate ump Jeff Nelson cheating? No, he understandably expected Rivera to throw strikes and, therefore, saw strikes where the rest of the world — not charged with making a split-second call — saw balls. If stars getting calls was evidence of cheating, every official in every sport could have been locked up with Donaghy.

In another claim Donaghy outright contradicts himself. He says that ref Derrick Stafford had such a good relationship with then-Knicks coach Isiah Thomas and hated then-Heat coach Pat Riley so much that he (Donaghy) bet on the Knicks "without batting an eye."

In the same section (about the same game), to further impugn Stafford's integrity, Donaghy relays a story about Stafford being overly chummy with Shaquille O'Neal before tip-off. Well, which is it, Tim? Does your colleague have a too-cozy relationship with Isiah or Shaq? Because they were representing different teams. And if it's a push, then no harm, no foul. ((Great! Promiscuous corruption as evidence of no bias, no harm. Who won that game, by the way?))

But Donaghy saves his most serious — and legally actionable — accusations for his former colleague Dick Bavetta, making him out to be the league's Michael Clayton, a fixer who could always extend a series or get the result the league wanted.

Really? Did the league want Bavetta to wave off a Pete Maravich basket and erroneously whistle him for an offensive foul in the fourth quarter of his 68-point game in 1977? ((WTF for relevance?)) Of course not. The point is Bavetta has been a lousy official for 33 years. ((Imputed contradiction between incompetence and bad intent.))

So it's easy to point to Bavetta's work — especially in Game 6 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals — and say a crime was being committed there. That Bavetta was cheating. But if you're going to make that allegation you better have more evidence than your alleged memories of conversations with the guy. ((No. Confusing court-standard proof with one's claim. Obviously he can "make the allegation" on the basis of what he remembers. That's what makes it an allegation.)) (The idea that Bavetta would crow cavalierly about how the league could count on him for the result they wanted seems particularly preposterous.) ((Or like the culture that will predictably arise when a sufficiently corrupt system runs long enough.))

And if the league could count on its officials to create the results it wanted why haven't almost all series gone seven games? ((Fallacy that crime must be perfect to be crime.))

Reading these excerpts you realize that Triumph Books wasn't worried about the possibility of a lawsuit. They were bracing for the certainty of multiple lawsuits. Not only would the league invariably sue, but every official accused of being an accomplice — and Donaghy nails a bunch — would have to sue too.

Donaghy has a sordid tale to tell. It's just unclear which shelf it belongs on, fiction or non-fiction. Maybe he should have just changed the names and called it a novel. ("Everyone knew ref Jeve Stavie hated superstar Illen Averson ... ")

For over two years now Tim Donaghy has been David Stern's worst nightmare. But now that Donaghy's claims strain credulity, the disgraced ref might be a useful part of the league's reputation rehabilitation. ((Not bloody likely!))

In naming names — lots and lots of names — Donaghy sought to drag others down into the muck with him. But all he's succeeded in doing is further isolating himself and making the league and his former colleagues look good in comparison.


Now Hench could be right to dismiss Donaghy as a fabricator. How would I know? But that wouldn't make the arguments he presents any more valid. There's no evidence he called any of these people. Instead of investigating, he's running preemptive coverage for the NBA.

.
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15261
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MinM » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:05 pm

Source: Gambler claims 13 referees involved in NBA betting scandal
Image
BOSTON -- A source tells 7Sports that the gambler at the center of the 2008 NBA betting scandal says 13 referees were involved.

Jimmy "The Sheep" Battista pleaded guilty to conspiracy to transmit wagering information in connection with disgraced NBA official Tim Donaghy and served 15 months in federal prison.

The source also tells 7Sports that Battista claims he has the phone records to prove his contact with these 13 referees.

Donaghy served 15 months in federal prison for providing inside tips on NBA games to a professional gambler in exchange for money.

When the scandal broke in June of 2008, NBA commissioner David Stern called Donaghy a "rogue, isolated criminal."

The source tells 7Sports that Battista says he had a "Big-5" of dependable referees with Tim Donaghy being the "King" as Battista called him, who the gambler says delivered a winning bet 78 percent of the time in games he officiated.

The 7Sports source says that on December 12, 2006, the night before the Celtics played the Philadelphia 76ers, Battista says he met with Donaghy and a mutual high school friend.

On that night, the gambler claims they made a deal which according to Battista involved Donaghy supplying information including injury reports and referee assignments and Battista making the bets.

The source says that according to Battista, the first game the two men bet on together was the Celtics-76ers game the following night -- a game Donaghy officiated and one the Celtics covered with ease.

The Celtics were 1 1/2 point favorites, but with 10 minutes to play in the third quarter, the score was tied.

The Celtics would eventually go on to win by 20 points.

The source says Battista is making these claims as he works to finalize a tell-all book deal.

(Copyright (c) 2009 Sunbeam Television Corp. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
http://www3.whdh.com/news/articles/sports/BO130486/

Donaghy conspirator details NBA gambling scam
***

Bringing it back to the NFL - going from Jimmy "The Sheep" Battista to "Jimmy the Greek" - ESPN had a show that detailed how the NFL (on CBS) was able to bring point spreads through the backdoor into the mainstream.
Image
ESPN 30 for 30 | The Legend of Jimmy the Greek
Image
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MinM » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:32 pm

JackRiddler wrote:.
Donaghy's botched book deal could help NBA

Tim Donaghy Has Found A Publisher
Image
The former NBA referee's memoir, quashed by Random House under pressure from the NBA, has found a home with VTi-Group, a media company based in Tampa Bay. The book is now called Personal Foul and will be out by Christmas.

Donaghy's also about to embark on what sounds like a media barnstorming tour. The press release:

Tim Donaghy's memoir on his life as a former NBA referee and his basketball gambling has undergone a title change and a new publisher with the VTi-Group, a traditional and online media company based in Tampa Bay.

The book, now titled "Personal Foul: A First-Person Account of the Scandal That Rocked the NBA" is set to be pre-released to select outlets on Friday, December 4th and will be available in book stores nationwide for Christmas.

Tim Donaghy was interviewed by 60 Minutes for an episode that will air this Sunday the 6th. The interview and the book will finally answer many of the questions about his gambling, the NBA games that were affected and the involvement with the New York Mafia.

I don't know much about VTi-Group, other than that its CEO is Shawna Vercher, a Huffington Post contributor who says she's worked with President Obama, Jeb Bush, the Department of Homeland Security and the NFL...

http://deadspin.com/5415679/tim-donaghy ... -publisher
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 82_28 » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:20 pm

This guy's youtube rant is riveting. Really, watch it! I wanna hang out with him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt87d8SG ... re=related

He calls it as only a New Yorker can. This rant should get more play, it is a joy to listen to. Think Jerky Boys on conspiracies and pro football.

BTW, my neighbor had Moldea's book "Interference" (the guy who was on that earlier Sajak clip posted) and lent it to me the other day. I am going to begin reading very soon.

For example this is what has happened to my favorite team this week as we are trying to make the playoffs:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4788055

Naw. No money riding on that one. . .
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby leto » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:13 pm

Wanna hear a real good conspiracy theory......


Michael Jordan didn't retire because he didn't have anything left to prove, he was suspended by Stern for his enormous and out of hand gambling problem, including betting on NBA games, his OWN games. His dad's death was the perfect smokscreen for him and the NBA to save face and let him come back and have his redemption.
It is easier to brainwash & subdue a Race with enforced Myths of Divinity & History that while contain some grain of truth, leaves out so much of the peripheral fact's that any conclusion without these fact's is the very definition of Propaganda.
leto
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 82_28 » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:05 am

leto wrote:Wanna hear a real good conspiracy theory......


Michael Jordan didn't retire because he didn't have anything left to prove, he was suspended by Stern for his enormous and out of hand gambling problem, including betting on NBA games, his OWN games. His dad's death was the perfect smokscreen for him and the NBA to save face and let him come back and have his redemption.


Leto, do you have a link to those allegations? Absolutely not saying I don't believe what you have read or seen and what you say. But I would love a link.

What was up with Jordan's try at making pro baseball directly after his father's death too? On another thread recently I brought up Jordan and Cosby and other prominent African Americans who had crazy things happen to their families while at the tops of their "games". Forget which one it is though. The Tiger Woods thread?
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Truth4Youth » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:12 am

User avatar
Truth4Youth
 
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:27 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 82_28 » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:30 am

leto wrote:Wanna hear a real good conspiracy theory......


Michael Jordan didn't retire because he didn't have anything left to prove, he was suspended by Stern for his enormous and out of hand gambling problem, including betting on NBA games, his OWN games. His dad's death was the perfect smokscreen for him and the NBA to save face and let him come back and have his redemption.


Another thing to ponder. Forgive me.

There is some weird full circle here that I am witnessing.

Michael Jordan -- Mr. Hanes Underwear no?

Image

Underwear Bomber:

Image

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Last week's failed plot to bomb a U.S. passenger jet has exposed lingering fissures within the U.S. intelligence community, which had information from interviews and clandestine intercepts but did not put the pieces together, officials said.


And then this circling into the appearance of Charlie Sheen on Michael Jordan's underwear commercials, culminating in his Christmas arrest! Jesus.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNjf8tz8ltg

This deserves it's own post. Perhaps I will work on it. For now, I am going to get a drink. Jesus. Weird.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MinM » Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:41 pm

User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests