rigorousintuition.ca

The supermarket and drug store magazine racks are loaded with testosterone and Obama adulation.

Esquire- Clint Eastwood in a black shirt on a black cover. Dirty Harry in Blackwater. Male = survival.
GQ- Jennifor Anniston stark naked. Female = vulnerability.

Whenever the USG gears up for a violence surge, the CIA media goes all testosterone on us to show how useless female compassion is so we'll embrace male warrior culture.

Same thing happened before the invasion of Panama in '89, for instance.

Look out for recruiting cues leading up to Obama's inauguration.
Especially movies. Last year it was the 'Cloverdale' monster movie for two weekends before the mis-Statement of the Union Address by W.

Cuz we're going into a war surge! Prepare for Afghanistan success stories brought to you by lots of bombing and lots of "collateral damage."

Love the puff magazine portraying Obama as the realization of Martin Luther King's dream. Guess it doesn't really matter that blacks still can't vote, Katrina left- behind mass death, institutionalized poverty, prison-industrial complex, etc.

Psyops hyper-ventilation. As predictable as plumbing.

Not that I've seen it, but how does Cloverdale qualify as recruiting tool?

Joe Hillshoist wrote:Not that I've seen it, but how does Cloverdale qualify as recruiting tool?

Oddly, this film has almost disappeared from search engines.

The title was a keyword from the post-9/11 anthrax attacks.
The letter to Democratic Majority Leader Tom Daschle was labeled from "Cloverdale school."

Tactic: subliminal priming about an external attack instead of an internal one before Bruce Ivins was made the suicided patsy to make way for Campaign 2008.



But back in 2006 the keyword "Cloverdale" was on hold in the Christmasy movie 'Deck the Halls' even while seeming to prime us for reviling an ego-driven scientist like patsy Bruce Ivins-

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/movies/reviews/article_1223963.php/Movie_Review_Deck_the_Halls

In the town square of Cloverdale, Massachusetts (actually a Vancouver soundstage), where the new Christmas movie ‘Deck the Halls’ takes place, there is an old time movie house.
It’s showing a double bill of ‘It’s A Wonderful Life’ and ‘Miracle on 34th Street,’ two beloved Hollywood movies that tapped into the joy and spirit of Christmas.
.....
DeVito feels his life has amounted to nothing but gets the idea that if he puts enough lights on his house, it can be seen by satellite from outer space. Somehow this validates him as a human being. So he sets about lying, stealing and conning all about him....
......
The good burghers of Cloverdale gather around to help Hall realize his dream of Christmas Eve.

Oh cloverfield - now I'm really confused.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=H7g66GxNUxM

Thats the Cloverdale movie.

Now I am even more confused.

Hugh, one thing baffles me (well, lots of things baffle me, but mainly one in your voluminous output on this board): seeing as this is a place for people who generally already HAVE accepted the fact that people are constantly manipulated by the media, the movies etc., why on Earth do you insist on continuously giving us these "revelations" of what you perceive as individual, extremely intricate (dare I say implausible) "psyops" meme implanting schemes? What possible use is it, seeing as people on this board (as far as I can see it) already accept your general premise, if disagreeing vehemently on the details? What you're doing is constantly re-iterating reams and reams of possible evidence that should be used as a BASIS for discussion, not being the bleeping discussion in itself.

As a relatively neutral observer, I'd say a) you're on a major ego trip and b) you insist on laying your stuff on this board because thus far you've been accorded leeway that you wouldn't have on other boards.

As a one-time Hugh disbeliever turned convert, I would like to take this chance to say I like Hugh's posts. Yes, sometimes he hijacks other threads, and sometimes I do find myself wondering about the credibility of the connections he makes, but for the most part, I can see at least some validity to his points. I don't agree with every post, but they have opened my mind quite a bit. So, for anyone new to the RI board and unfamiliar with Hugh's theses, it may take them some time to come around to the realization that Hugh is frequently correct. Keep posting.

RocketMan wrote:

Hugh, one thing baffles me (well, lots of things baffle me, but mainly one in your voluminous output on this board): seeing as this is a place for people who generally already HAVE accepted the fact that people are constantly manipulated by the media, the movies etc., why on Earth do you insist on continuously giving us these "revelations" of what you perceive as individual, extremely intricate (dare I say implausible) "psyops" meme implanting schemes? What possible use is it, seeing as people on this board (as far as I can see it) already accept your general premise, if disagreeing vehemently on the details

Good question, though I have to say that I for one do not agree with all the basic assumptions that frame and define HMW's world.

CIA influence on the press? Sure.

Elaborate meme-planting ops inferred from tenuous links? Not so sure.

RocketMan wrote:Hugh, one thing baffles me (well, lots of things baffle me, but mainly one in your voluminous output on this board): seeing as this is a place for people who generally already HAVE accepted the fact that people are constantly manipulated by the media, the movies etc., why on Earth do you insist on continuously giving us these "revelations" of what you perceive as individual, extremely intricate (dare I say implausible) "psyops" meme implanting schemes? What possible use is it, seeing as people on this board (as far as I can see it) already accept your general premise, if disagreeing vehemently on the details? What you're doing is constantly re-iterating reams and reams of possible evidence that should be used as a BASIS for discussion, not being the bleeping discussion in itself.

As a relatively neutral observer, I'd say a) you're on a major ego trip and b) you insist on laying your stuff on this board because thus far you've been accorded leeway that you wouldn't have on other boards.

He's spamming the concept of keyword hijacking into oblivion with his nonsensical connections. Driving out the sane... boxing in the loonies. That's what he's doing.

Hysterical.
timetunneler uses keyword tech, "Spam/spam", to scorn me for focusing on how keyword tech is the master key to revealing psyops culture.

You can find spook work and their agendas by finding their fingerprints.

If you haven't by now studied how the brain and culture are keyword based before computers which obviously are...and the value of pre-emptive pre-biasing DECOYS...sigh....that's a really basic counterpropaganda tactic, ok?

> Subliminal priming.
> Inoculation theory.
> Interference theory
> Mutual exclusivity.
............Go look them up. Please.

You'll never understand psyops until you do.

The whole point of this thread was that now is a time when you can watch a psyops campaign be carried out. New American administrations come with all kinds of psyops theater.

And that is an important learning experience.

We are getting the door closed on the Bush years without too much vitriol.
We are getting sold Obama as purity ritual and cover-up of US racism.
We are getting prepped for more war.

This crap is all planned out with media campaigns to synthesize the public's emotions and channel them into the next phase of atrocity.

There's a reason for Obama's new puppy in all this. And this time the White House dog is tied into other memes.

The cute dog movie, 'Marley and Me' and a lead actor, Jennifer Anniston from 'Friends', are both really related to black people and politics, just like the movie produced earlier this year by General Electric, 'Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day.'

Creating subliminal positive associations that displace potential negative associations is standard operating procedure in psyops culture.

Translation:

AD, that was unwarranted. I'm giving you the supporting psyops science on a silver platter.

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:The whole point of this thread was that now is a time when you can watch a psyops campaign be carried out.

And that is an important learning experience.

We are getting the door closed on the Bush years without too much vitriol.
We are getting sold Obama as purity ritual and cover-up of racism.
We are getting prepped for more war.

This crap is all planned out with media campaigns to synthesize the public's emotions and channel them into the next phase of atrocity.

i think you're still just upset it wasn't John McCain.



seriously though, i find you sincere and entertaining at your worst and sometimes i agree with you as in the statement quoted above.

i really don't care about the details.
(my only criticism about your input is perhaps that you care too much about them, enough to come across as somewhat obsessive at times, but this doesn't make you all that strange in this place, however it might be something you'd wish to consider before bringing your gospel to the masses)

*There are times when you can pick up on 'enemy' movements as psyops and this is one of them.*

Thanks for noticing my point, OP ED.
Much appreciated.

...despite that McCain thing...