Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
JackRiddler wrote:.
Transhumanism.
As an anarcho, I have to go against what the obvious skew will be on this board.
.
slomo wrote:False dichotomy... but if forced to choose between the two, I'd prefer the former to the latter. Ultimately, it may be totally recursive (i.e., we are living in a simulation, a fact that our "primitive" forbears were aware of in their own way) but I don't have any faith that the limited teratoid consciousness of today's human technic can lead to anything approximating nirvana.
freemason9 wrote:slomo wrote:False dichotomy... but if forced to choose between the two, I'd prefer the former to the latter. Ultimately, it may be totally recursive (i.e., we are living in a simulation, a fact that our "primitive" forbears were aware of in their own way) but I don't have any faith that the limited teratoid consciousness of today's human technic can lead to anything approximating nirvana.
Huh? Can you say that in English, please?
Nicely put, both times. You're one of those butterfly people, aren't you?slomo wrote:freemason9 wrote:slomo wrote:False dichotomy... but if forced to choose between the two, I'd prefer the former to the latter. Ultimately, it may be totally recursive (i.e., we are living in a simulation, a fact that our "primitive" forbears were aware of in their own way) but I don't have any faith that the limited teratoid consciousness of today's human technic can lead to anything approximating nirvana.
Huh? Can you say that in English, please?
Sure: transhumanism is based up on the totally insane idea that 21st Century human beings have any fucking clue what we're doing to ourselves, our environment, and the cosmos in general. We can't even manage the world we actually live in, let alone create new ones that match it in richness and complexity (sorry, English: virtual reality is pretty fucking boring compared to the real world). Anarcho-primitivism, for all of its romantic idealism (sorry, English again: crunchy-granola-hippy-dippiness), is at least based on something that actually worked for 100s of 1000s of years.
Better?
Perelandra wrote:Nicely put, both times. You're one of those butterfly people, aren't you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests