JackRiddler wrote:These, not so much:
Wombaticus Rex wrote:If you want to use these techniques to gain attention for important stories... the numbers and metrics get kept...
You seed the interest on high-traffic and high-influence sites and circles, and you feed the content out according to a plan, a schedule. This is true for record labels, PR firms, internet marketers, or the Pentagon's Information Operations bullhorn: you plan the work and you work the plan, and you watch your numbers.
We tend to dump on people: this and this and this and so therefore that. It takes some un-thinking to get used to framing everything with hooks: take the most outrageous detail, and then just ask, "what in the hell is going on here?
...but even running through it in my head, I think the format is poisoned.
Trifecta wrote:Jack, thanks for posting information I linked to in an earlier thread, but, hey no reason some of the backstory can not also reside here.
As, we seem to have a number of ARG players/contributors here and many of us confused and bemused about what the game actually is, lets see if we can harness the collective wisdom of the RI crowd.
JackRiddler wrote:Trifecta wrote:As, we seem to have a number of ARG players/contributors here and many of us confused and bemused about what the game actually is, lets see if we can harness the collective wisdom of the RI crowd.
Okay, can we finally have an explanation of this? Because I keep reading something to that effect, from several people other than you, and still no one has just given us the punch and judy of what they think (at least, that I saw).
Who is an ARG player here?
JackRiddler wrote:Do you (or others talking about this issue) mean that some people are playing an ARG in their RI posts? I mean, do you (or others) that they're here specifically to play an ARG?
Trifecta wrote:I guess the players sense a trap, alas this is a genuine enquiry to tap those in the know brains .... will have to dig deeper elsewhere, there is a few bucks in it and a genuine good cause.
JackRiddler wrote:How do you (or others) know this? Has anyone confessed? What's the ARG being played? To what end? Is trolling or sock-puppetry or mere joking around being confused here with an ARG?
DreamsEnd believed that a group of such "game players" was behind certain online stalking and harassment of him and claimed RA/MK survivors and Alien Abductees.
Innovation: The sinister powers of crowdsourcing
12:42 22 December 2009 by MacGregor Campbell
Innovation is our regular column that highlights emerging technological ideas and where they may lead
When an ad hoc team of 5000 people who assembled in just two hours found 10 weather balloons hidden across the US by the Pentagon's research agency earlier this month, it was just another demonstration of the power of crowdsourcing – solving a task by appealing to a large undefined group of web users to each do a small chunk of it.
So far crowdsourcing has been associated with well-meaning altruism, such as the creation and maintenance of Wikipedia or searching for lost aviators. But crowdsourcing of a different flavour has started to emerge.
Law enforcement officials in Texas have installed a network of CCTV cameras to monitor key areas along that state's 1900-kilometre-long border with Mexico. To help screen the footage, a website lets anyone log in to watch a live feed from a border camera and report suspicious activity. A similar system called Internet Eyes, which pays online viewers to spot shoplifters from in-store camera feeds, is set to launch in the UK in 2010. An Iranian website is offering rewards for identifying people in photos taken during protests over June's elections.
Some people have declared those examples chilling. Now Jonathan Zittrain, a Harvard University law professor and co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, says the next step may be for such efforts to get web users to help out covertly.
In a recent talk, "Minds for Sale", at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California, he pointed out that this could be done right away, using Amazon's Mechanical Turk, a service that provides a platform for anyone to farm out simple tasks.
In a speculative example, Zittrain has calculated that, assuming a population in Iran of around 72 million people, it would cost around $17,000 for the government to use Mechanical Turk to identify any arbitrary person's picture, without the users that are doing it realising the cause they have enlisted in.
The scheme would show "Turkers" a photo of a protest, or just faces extracted from one, along with five randomly chosen photos from the country's ID card database, and asked to say whether or not there is any match.
Users would receive a few cents each time they contribute. Furthermore, Zittrain says that such a task might be made into an addictive game, similar to Google's image labeller.
"The people making the identifications in India or the US, idly doing this on their lunch hour instead of Minesweeper, would have no idea of the implications of what they are doing," Zittrain said in the talk. "I think people ought to know how their work is being used," he told New Scientist.
Crowdsourcing's power to compartmentalise and abstract away the true meaning of tasks turns human intelligence into a commodity. Zittrain's thought experiment shows how it could potentially entice people into participating in a project that they otherwise wouldn't support.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... rcing.html
Users browsing this forum: kwikoatz and 13 guests