WHAT'S more, even if your account were accurate, I can forgive him.
How would you feel if it was YOUR daughter that he gave a ride to after drinking, crashing off a bridge and then leaving her to die?
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
WHAT'S more, even if your account were accurate, I can forgive him.
n0x23 wrote:WHAT'S more, even if your account were accurate, I can forgive him.
How would you feel if it was YOUR daughter that he gave a ride to after drinking, crashing off a bridge and then leaving her to die?
Wrong? YOU CONVENIENTLY FUCKIN LEFT OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF HISTORY THERE BUDDY, DO YOU ALWAYS JUDGE A PERSON BY ONE MOMENT OF THEIR LIFE? WHICH YOU ONLY HAVE READ ABOUT AND HAVE NO PROOF OF ANYTHING YOU POST. WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU? WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU ACCOMPLISHED IN YOUR LIFE? ARE YOU THE GOD OF THE UNIVERSE TO CONDEMN A PERSON YOU APPARENTLY KNOW VERY LITTLE ABOUT? HOW MANY LIVES HAVE YOU SAVED ALONG YOUR JOURNEY ON THIS PLANET? YOU ARE AN UNEDUCATED SELF ABSORBED CHILD.
Yea there's lots of "court records" out there, Warren Commission, 9/11 Commission, Robert Kennedy's assasination, MLK asssasination, etc.... apparently you believe everything that comes out in a "court" record? Grow up.
Bridge It wrote:Here is what happened according to Cutler's analysis of the evidence. The Group hired several men and at least one woman to be at Chappaquiddick during the weekend of the yacht race and the planned party on the island. They ambushed Ted and Mary Jo after they left the cottage and knocked Ted out with blows to his head and body. They took the unconscious or semi-conscious Kennedy to Martha's Vineyard and deposited him in his hotel room. Another group took Mary Jo to the bridge in Ted's car, force fed her with a knock out potion of alcoholic beverage, placed her in the back seat, and caused the car to accelerate off the side of the bridge into the water. They broke the windows on one side of the car to insure the entry of water; then they watched the car until they were sure Mary Jo would not escape.
Let's say for argument sake that I accept every aspect of this story as well as the facts supporting collusion to assassinate or discredit every other Kennedy living or dead. I am still left wondering what was so exceptional about this family that the “power group” (as the aforementioned article refers to them) felt the need to eliminate the entire male gene pool fro the board.
Anyone?
n0x23 wrote: to destroy an alcoholics credibility, alcoholics fuck this up all on their own.
daba64 wrote:John Dean said to Richard Nixon as recorded on the White House tapes in 1973: "If Teddy knew the bear trap he was walking into at Chappaquiddick...." [White House tapes pg 121]
E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis were seen in Martha's Vineyard that
weekend. It appears that Ted was set up by the CIA.
seemslikeadream wrote:josey wales wrote:I'm with n0x23
What I could never figure out was how he could serve the very beast that killed his two brothers? How could he sell his soul and never demand the truth and justice. Was a Senate seat worth the blood? I guess he learned it a the feet of his old man. He built the empire on illegal booze and stock manipulation so was it just a cost of doing business?
Never mind he sponsored and supported some of the worst legislation in our history.
you have no fuckin clue, serve the beast? you make me puke, fuck you
josey wales wrote:I'm with n0x23
What I could never figure out was how he could serve the very beast that killed his two brothers? How could he sell his soul and never demand the truth and justice. Was a Senate seat worth the blood? I guess he learned it a the feet of his old man. He built the empire on illegal booze and stock manipulation so was it just a cost of doing business?
Never mind he sponsored and supported some of the worst legislation in our history.
pepsified thinker wrote:I heard a brief clip on NPR--didn't catch all of it, so apologies if I get it wrong--in which one of the women who were the 'Jersey Girls' (have I got the name right? I'm referring to the women who became 9-11 activitis after their husbands died on 9-11) talked about him having been early and consistent in supporting them, and in particular, consistent even after events had passed them by--that he called and invited at least the one doing the interview to go sailing with him years after others had stopped giving them the time of day.
josey wales wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:josey wales wrote:I'm with n0x23
What I could never figure out was how he could serve the very beast that killed his two brothers? How could he sell his soul and never demand the truth and justice. Was a Senate seat worth the blood? I guess he learned it a the feet of his old man. He built the empire on illegal booze and stock manipulation so was it just a cost of doing business?
Never mind he sponsored and supported some of the worst legislation in our history.
you have no fuckin clue, serve the beast? you make me puke, fuck you
Well, I guess that speaks for itself. Too bad you apparently cannot produce a logical response to a fair set of questions.
He, in fact, did serve the beast in that he was a part of the Federal Government for decades. If you object to calling it a beast, so be it. But it certainly is nothing envisioned by the Founders and it is nothing authorized in the Constitution. He sat at the table of power. He drank their wine and ate their meat. Yes, my assertion is that that Power is the same that saw fit to kill this brothers.
I simply want to know why he did not pursue the facts surrounding the killing of his brothers. I am more than willing to look at evidence to the contrary. Perhaps I am uninformed about his investigations and his efforts to reign in the CIA and other 'black budget' operations. Pray, enlighten us, if there is such activity on his part.
As for his accomplishments, I still hold to the opinion that they were not good for the country but that debate could go on for days. To be brutally honest, I think he was a limousine liberal.
first - I don't believe that's what happened.
jesus. is it possible to favour a position wherein he is neither an inhuman monster nor a saint?
sounds like maybe you're speaking from personal experience
....anyway, it didn't destroy his credibility, if it had, he wouldn't have been in the Senate all these years.
Most humans, if they were involved in the very same scenario would have been imprisoned for quite some time
The scum always rises to the top right?
Fuck off, troll. Or actually don't, you can represent Ignoreland at RI.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests