Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
geogeo wrote:So Muhammad was just executed...at 9:11 PM.
Paranoid now?
(CBS) What does the phrase "caught like a duck in a noose" mean to the sniper?
Authorities are not revealing the context in which the sniper - if he is indeed the author of notes left for police - asked them to publicly say: "We have caught the sniper like a duck in a noose."
Police Chief Charles Moose read that sentence aloud late Wednesday night, as part of his latest message to the sniper, adding: "We understand that hearing us say this is important to you."
Until more information is made public, we can't know what the meaning is of the reference to the duck in the noose.
Nordic wrote:And I try to keep reminding people that the Ft. Hood shooter was on Guy Fawkes Day.
A joke, really, a very dark and sinister joke.
geogeo wrote:So Muhammad was just executed...at 9:11 PM.
Paranoid now?
Wikipedia wrote:Muhammad was executed by lethal injection on November 10, 2009, at 9:06 PM EST at Greensville Correctional Center in Jarratt, Virginia and was pronounced dead at 9:11 PM EST.[4] Muhammad declined to make a final statement
Los Angeles Times wrote:Muhammad, 48, was pronounced dead at 9:11 p.m., said Larry Traylor, spokesman for the Virginia Department of Corrections.
Wikipedia wrote:Death is pronounced after cardiac activity stops. Death usually occurs within seven minutes, although the whole procedure can take up to 2 hours, as was the case with the execution of Christopher Newton on May 24, 2007. According to state law, if a physician's participation in the execution is prohibited for reasons of medical ethics, then the death ruling can be made by the state Medical Examiner's Office. After confirmation that death has occurred, a coroner signs the executed criminal’s death certificate.
Why would that be?
JackRiddler wrote:[...] The rabbit manages to slip a noose around the neck of a duck, which then takes off, with the rabbit hanging on for dear life. The duck flies higher and higher, and finally the rabbit loses its grip, and falls into an old sycamore tree where it is trapped, and soon reduced to eating its own fur.
---
So if they caught the sniper like a duck in a noose, it means they didn't.
Authorities are not revealing the context in which the sniper - if he is indeed the author of notes left for police - asked them to publicly say: "We have caught the sniper like a duck in a noose."
Police Chief Charles Moose read that sentence aloud late Wednesday night, as part of his latest message to the sniper, adding: "We understand that hearing us say this is important to you."
Nordic wrote:I just can't get over the brazenness of the mind-control aspect of this, to the point where the cop in charge of questioninig him publicly announces the code word to make him stop!
Didn't anybody in the regular media discuss this at the time? I mean, you'd think they'd at the very least "debunk" it, or play it down, or try to "explain" it!!
I am just astounded at this.
Although I have to say at the time it blew right by me. Somehow. I men, I sorta remember it happening, but I don't remember questioning it at all.
Why would that be?
MacCruiskeen wrote:JackRiddler wrote:[...] The rabbit manages to slip a noose around the neck of a duck, which then takes off, with the rabbit hanging on for dear life. The duck flies higher and higher, and finally the rabbit loses its grip, and falls into an old sycamore tree where it is trapped, and soon reduced to eating its own fur.
---
So if they caught the sniper like a duck in a noose, it means they didn't.
Good catch. Then there's this:Authorities are not revealing the context in which the sniper - if he is indeed the author of notes left for police - asked them to publicly say: "We have caught the sniper like a duck in a noose."
Police Chief Charles Moose read that sentence aloud late Wednesday night, as part of his latest message to the sniper, adding: "We understand that hearing us say this is important to you."
If hearing those words could act as such a reliable "trigger" to the guy, then is it credible that he himself could have written those very same words without already being "triggered" by the mere writing of them?
I mean, imagine someone writing 'abracadabra' on a piece of paper while thinking: "Damn, I wish someone would finally say 'abracadabra' to me, so that I can finally do... well ... I don't know what. - Ah, I know: I'll send this written word 'abracadabra' to the police! They'll know what to do! And I'll be sure to make them understand it's important to me. "
It makes no sense. He can't possibly be the author of that allegedly found note.
yathrib wrote:Thinking back on that time--meaning pretty much the time from 9/11/01 to the 3/03 invasion of Iraq--the American people, myself included, were in a trance. We let a lot of bizarre stuff get by us without a word or a thought. Looking back on my own life in that period, there was so much I let slip by uncritically. And although I lived my life as normal, so far as I know, there is a fog over the time, including the period just before 9/11.
yathrib wrote:Thinking back on that time--meaning pretty much the time from 9/11/01 to the 3/03 invasion of Iraq--the American people, myself included, were in a trance. We let a lot of bizarre stuff get by us without a word or a thought. Looking back on my own life in that period, there was so much I let slip by uncritically. And although I lived my life as normal, so far as I know, there is a fog over the time, including the period just before 9/11.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests