Top Climate Scientist: Copenhagen Must Fail, Slams CapnTrade

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby American Dream » Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:34 pm

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/KL18Aa01.html

Paradise on the front line of global warming
By Christopher Johnson



MAJURO, Marshall Islands - Perhaps more than anywhere else on Earth, the catastrophic fear of rising seas hits home when flying into Majuro atoll, a narrow strip of land in the middle of the vast Pacific Ocean.

Hovering above turquoise waters until the last moment, the plane lands on a runway protected from crashing waves on both sides by nothing but a meter-high wall. Driving the atoll's only road, the sea is always lurking on both sides, with nothing to stop its advance. Other than a few two- or three-story buildings, there is no high ground at all in this idyllic atoll nation of 1,200 islands. None.

A natural disaster such as the recent tsunami in Samoa could wipe the entire nation of 60,000 people, and 3,000 years of culture, off the surface of the Earth. "Some people say, in 2012, the water will come," says Mentil Laik, making a wave motion with his hand. "Majuro, all gone."

Yet he does not seem overly worried, because the Marshallese have a history of surviving almost anything, including more than 60 US nuclear tests. Raised on Ailuk Atoll, which suffered high radiation levels after the Castle Bravo hydrogen bomb test in 1954, Laik, who was born at that time, has been showing younger Marshallese how to carve and sail traditional canoes which for centuries have carried islanders on epic voyages. In a worst-case scenario, he says his largest craft could sail "all the way to America".

While delegates in Copenhagen debate the science of global warming [1], Marshallese on the front lines of climate change see the impact of rising seas on a daily basis. "The sea is too hot. The ice is melting. The water is rising. The coral die, the fish die, the people die," Laik says in limited English. Asked why, he points to the sky. "Ozone," he says. "Too many holes." The solution, he says, is also simple. "Stop pollution. Everybody."

For many Marshallese, who have never spent a moment of their lives away from the roaring ocean, evidence of climate change is everywhere. Laik says the tide-line has been creeping up to the level of his boathouse in recent years. Taxi drivers talk about ancient trees on their home islands falling into the sea. Fishermen say they are catching fewer and smaller fish, while Japanese and Chinese vessels keep most of the tuna for sale back home. Puddles of rain and sea water dot the landscape, causing bacterial infections in locals who saunter in flip-flops, unable to afford expensive imported shoes.

"Our land is very low, so we are very vulnerable to changes in the environment," says Morean Kabua, a hospital employee. "The weather has become very unpredictable. In the past few years, the rainy season has been going into December and January. Now it can rain anytime in Majuro."

Last Christmas, a storm mixed with unusually high tides flooded Majuro, which is teeming with shops and a faded old-time Pacific charm. The ocean poured across the defenseless land from east to west, blowing holes in homes, sweeping garbage into the lagoon, and scaring residents on smaller islets such as Ejit, who dreaded being washed out to sea. Locals and aid workers also worry that future storms could uproot Christian cemeteries perched dangerously beside the raging Pacific.

"Graveyards are about to fall into the ocean," says Ingrid Ahlgren, a Stanford-educated anthropologist who was born and raised on Kwajalein atoll. "There's a potential that corpses can be exposed, and that's a health risk."

While Marshallese traditionally only built homes on the calmer lagoon side, and buried their dead at sea, a population explosion on scarce land, plus the influence of Christianity, led them to build homes and cemeteries on the rougher ocean side. "What are you going to do with all these bodies," says Ahlgren. "It's going to become a bigger problem over the next 50 years."

Many wonder who will take the initiative to deal with climate-related problems. Given their nuclear history, Marshallese have long felt abused or neglected by the outside world, which can only be reached by four- or five-hour flights to Guam or Hawaii costing US$1,500 on Continental Airlines. Even with some of the most pristine beaches, reefs, and surfing waves in the world, and quality hotels including the Marshall Islands Resort, Hotel Robert Reimer's, and the Long Island Hotel, the country receives only about 1,500 tourists a year - about what a beach in Thailand would see in a single day.

"The industrialized nations of the world have to realize they have a responsibility for the future, not just profits," says Bill Weza, a native of Newfoundland in Canada who has managed more than 80 local staff at the upscale Marshall Islands Resort for the past seven years. Like others, he says the world should not underestimate the threat of rising seas to atoll nations such as Kiribati and the Maldives. "If there's a big storm on top of a super high tide, we're screwed."

Fortunately, the Marshalls have normally stayed outside the zone for typhoons which devastate Fiji, Tonga and the Philippines further west. Many islanders believe the coral reefs would shelter them from tsunamis. Yet some researchers have estimated the Marshalls could become uninhabitable in 50 to 100 years - within the lifetime of children playing in puddles today. "If that day comes, it will be a disaster," Ahlgren says, because the country only has two operational planes, and not enough boats to evacuate 60,000 people from hundreds of distant islands.

She says that even if the entire populace relocated to the United States or neighboring Micronesian islands with higher ground, the Marshallese government would also have to think of how to manage the tuna fishing grounds, which Japanese and Chinese already exploit by paying small fees to the government. "They are faced with the entire destruction of their culture," says Ahlgren. "Land is everything here. It's where all the power exists. People are so connected to their land, they're reluctant to ever leave it. If you take away the land, the culture disappears. People are so afraid of this, they don't even want to broach the subject in public."
While the government has hosted conferences in Majuro at their hotel and convention center, one non-governmental organization (NGO), Women United Together for the Marshall Islands, has conducted four forums to reach people on 24 outer island groups, which can take days to reach by boat.

At first, many devout Christians wouldn't believe the warnings about global warming, because "God promised Noah he wouldn't flood the world again," says the group's director, Daisy Alik-Momotaro. "Many people believe that God will save them, and they don't worry about it. They've been living on the same island their whole life, and they never show fear, unlike the younger generation who have gone to the US or read about these things. So we have to convince these islanders that they have to save the world themselves."

To do this, NGO workers show them before-and-after photos of eroded coast lines and fallen trees. "It makes them think for a long time. They don't understand what makes the water rise, but they see it. Eventually they realize that God is not happy, because we've been abusing the world. Maybe they will not do anything about it yet. But now many people understand that global warming is a big issue."


Note 1. The two-week United Nations summit on climate change underway in Copenhagen, Denmark, is due to end with a meeting of world leaders on Friday. Attended by more than 190 countries, the summit aims to seal national pledges to curb the heat-trapping carbon gases that cause climate change, and set up a mechanism to provide billions of dollars for poor countries facing worsening drought, flood, and rising seas. However, as of Thursday, talks on a deal remained deadlocked, due to a split between rich and poor countries over cutting carbon emissions.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Jeff » Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:03 am

Copenhagen negotiators bicker and filibuster while the biosphere burns

George Monbiot despairs at the chaotic, disastrous denouement of a chaotic and disastrous climate summit


guardian.co.uk, Friday 18 December 2009

First they put the planet in square brackets, now they have deleted it from the text. At the end it was no longer about saving the biosphere: it was just a matter of saving face. As the talks melted down, everything that might have made a new treaty worthwhile was scratched out. Any deal would do, as long as the negotiators could pretend they have achieved something. A clearer and less destructive treaty than the text that emerged would be a sheaf of blank paper, which every negotiating party solemnly sits down to sign.

This was the chaotic, disastrous denouement of a chaotic and disastrous summit. The event has been attended by historic levels of incompetence. Delegates arriving from the tropics spent 10 hours queueing in sub-zero temperatures without shelter, food or drink, let alone any explanation or announcement, before being turned away. Some people fainted from exposure; it's surprising that no one died. The process of negotiation was just as obtuse: there was no evidence here of the innovative methods of dispute resolution developed recently by mediators and coaches, just the same old pig-headed wrestling.

Watching this stupid summit via webcam (I wasn't allowed in either), it struck me that the treaty-making system has scarcely changed in 130 years. There's a wider range of faces, fewer handlebar moustaches, frock coats or pickelhaubes, but otherwise, when the world's governments try to decide how to carve up the atmosphere, they might have been attending the conference of Berlin in 1884. It's as if democratisation and the flowering of civil society, advocacy and self-determination had never happened. Governments, whether elected or not, without reference to their own citizens let alone those of other nations, assert their right to draw lines across the global commons and decide who gets what. This is a scramble for the atmosphere comparable in style and intent to the scramble for Africa.

At no point has the injustice at the heart of multilateralism been addressed or even acknowledged: the interests of states and the interests of the world's people are not the same. Often they are diametrically opposed. In this case, most rich and rapidly developing states have sought through these talks to seize as great a chunk of the atmosphere for themselves as they can – to grab bigger rights to pollute than their competitors. The process couldn't have been better designed to produce the wrong results.

I spent most of my time at the Klimaforum, the alternative conference set up by just four paid staff, which 50,000 people attended without a hitch. (I know which team I would put in charge of saving the planet.) There the barrister Polly Higgins laid out a different approach. Her declaration of planetary rights invests ecosystems with similar legal safeguards to those won by humans after the second world war. It changes the legal relationship between humans, the atmosphere and the biosphere from ownership to stewardship. It creates a global framework for negotiation which gives nation states less discretion to dispose of ecosystems and the people who depend on them.

Even before the farce in Copenhagen began it was looking like it might be too late to prevent two or more degrees of global warming. The nation states, pursuing their own interests, have each been passing the parcel of responsibility since they decided to take action in 1992. We have now lost 17 precious years, possibly the only years in which climate breakdown could have been prevented. This has not happened by accident: it is the result of a systematic campaign of sabotage by certain states, driven and promoted by the energy industries. This idiocy has been aided and abetted by the nations characterised, until now, as the good guys: those that have made firm commitments, only to invalidate them with loopholes, false accounting and outsourcing. In all cases immediate self-interest has trumped the long-term welfare of humankind. Corporate profits and political expediency have proved more urgent considerations than either the natural world or human civilisation. Our political systems are incapable of discharging the main function of government: to protect us from each other.

Goodbye Africa, goodbye south Asia; goodbye glaciers and sea ice, coral reefs and rainforest. It was nice knowing you. Not that we really cared.
The governments which moved so swiftly to save the banks have bickered and filibustered while the biosphere burns.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... -biosphere
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:46 pm

Image
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Gouda » Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:03 am

Chávez: 'If climate were a bank, it would have been already saved'

The President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Hugo Chávez warned that capitalism threatens to wipe out the human species and the environment, and said that what needs to be changed is not climate but the system. "This is the only way we can start saving the planet."

The Venezuelan president delivered these statement during his speech at the XV UN Climate Change Conference (COP15), held in Copenhagen, Denmark.

We can say that a specter is haunting Copenhagen, and it lurks this hall in silence, among us. Such a specter is horrific; it is capitalism. I call in all of you to keep on fighting against capitalism."

VIDEO: CHAVEZ'S SPEECH IN FULL WITH ENGLISH SUBTITLES
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests