How Bad Is Global Warming?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Luther Blissett » Mon May 16, 2016 4:20 pm

Earth just recorded its warmest April on record, and it wasn't even close

April was the warmest such month on record for the globe, and yet again, we saw a near-record large margin compared to average, according to NASA data released Saturday.

The record all but assures that 2016 will set another milestone for the warmest calendar year in NASA's database, regardless of whether the rest of this year sees comparatively cooler global temperatures.

During each of the past seven months, global average surface temperatures have exceeded the 20th century average by more than 1 degree Celsius, or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit.

Until October, that 1-degree threshold had not been crossed since NASA's global temperature records began in 1880.

This is particularly relevant since the Paris Agreement on climate change specifies that countries should work to keep human-caused global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by the year 2100.

Image

In addition, the agreement contains language referring to the need to limit global warming to as low as 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above the preindustrial average.

The temperature records that have toppled during the past year have shown just how close we already are to these climate guardrails.

If global warming shoots past the 2-degree target, experts fear a runaway cascade of dire consequences, from a sharp increase in sea level due to the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and loss of much of West Antarctica to the mass extinction of climate-sensitive species.

According to NASA, April had a temperature anomaly of 1.11 degrees Celsius, or 1.99 degrees Fahrenheit, above the 20th century average, which means the month tied with January for the third-most unusually mild month ever recorded.

The top two spots on that list are occupied by February and March, respectively.

The second-warmest April on record was in 2010, when the temperature anomaly was a comparatively paltry 0.87 degrees Celsius, or 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

On Monday, the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), which also tracks global temperatures, backed up NASA in finding that April was the warmest such month on record.

The JMA found that the global average surface temperature anomaly for the month was 0.54 degrees Celsius, or 0.97 degrees Fahrenheit, above the 1981-2010 average. This made it the warmest April since JMA records began in 1891, the agency said on its website.

Image

The JMA also found that April 2016 easily outpaced the previous warmest April, which occurred in 2010 and also in 1998, by 0.23 degrees Celsius, or 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit.

The unusual April warmth was most pronounced across the Arctic, from Siberia to Greenland and Alaska. Southeast Asia experienced deadly heat waves occurring in Thailand and India, among other nations.

Other climate monitoring tools have shown that Arctic sea ice is precariously sparse and thin for this time of year, potentially setting the stage for another record melt season by the end of the summer.

Image

The world was already setting more and more warm temperature records without the El Niño's assistance, but what El Niño has done is dial up the already elevated temperatures to damaging levels.

Although El Niño conditions are still present in the tropical Pacific, forecasts call for a La Niña event to develop by the fall. This will tend to dampen the release of heat from a vast swath of the tropical Pacific Ocean, and may put an end to the parade of record warm months.

However, over the long run, global warming will continue as long as greenhouse gas concentrations keep rising. The level of carbon dioxide, which is the main long-lived greenhouse gas, in the Earth's atmosphere also hit a record high.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Nordic » Mon May 16, 2016 9:31 pm

:popcorn:

(At this point what else can we do? Real life has become an actual disaster movie, with all of us as extras.)
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Luther Blissett » Tue May 17, 2016 12:28 pm

World's carbon dioxide concentration teetering on the point of no return
Future in which global concentration of CO2 is permanently above 400 parts per million looms

The world is hurtling towards an era when global concentrations of carbon dioxide never again dip below the 400 parts per million (ppm) milestone, as two important measuring stations sit on the point of no return.

The news comes as one important atmospheric measuring station at Cape Grim in Australia is poised on the verge of 400ppm for the first time. Sitting in a region with stable CO2 concentrations, once that happens, it will never get a reading below 400ppm.

Meanwhile another station in the northern hemisphere may have gone above the 400ppm line for the last time, never to dip below it again.

“We’re going into very new territory,” James Butler, director of the global monitoring division at the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, told the Guardian.

When enough CO2 is pumped into the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels, the seasonal cycles that drive the concentrations up and down throughout the year will eventually stop dipping the concentration below the 400ppm mark. The 400ppm figure is just symbolic, but it’s psychologically powerful, says Butler.

The first 400ppm milestone was reached in 2013 when a station on the Hawaiian volcano of Mauna Loa first registered a monthly average of 400ppm. But the northern hemisphere has a large seasonal cycle, where CO2 concentrations decrease in summer but increase in winter. So each year since it has dipped back below 400ppm.

Then, combining all the global readings, the global monthly average was found to pass 400ppm in March 2015.

In the southern hemisphere, the seasonal cycle is less pronounced and atmospheric levels of CO2 hardly drop, usually just slowing in the southern hemisphere summer months. This week scientists revealed to Fairfax Media that Cape Grim had a reading of 399.9ppm on 6 May. Within weeks it would pop above 400ppm and never return.

“We wouldn’t have expected to reach the 400ppm mark so early,” said David Etheridge, an atmospheric scientist from the CSIRO, which runs the Cape Grim station. “With El Nino, the ocean essentially caps off it’s ability to take up heat so the concentrations are growing fast as warmer land areas release carbon. So we would have otherwise expected it to happen later in the year.

“No matter what the world’s emissions are now, we can decrease growth but we can’t decrease the concentration.

“Even if we stopped emitting now, we’re committed to a lot of warming.”

Over in Hawaii, the Mauna Loa station, which is the longest-running in the world, is sitting above 400 ppm, and for the first time, might never dip below it again.

“It’s hard to predict,” Butler told the Guardian. “It’s getting real close.”

Meanwhile, the global average, after controlling for the seasonal cycle, popped above 400ppm late last year. Within a couple of years, the seasonal dips will never drop below 400ppm in the global average too.

All together, the world is on the verge of no measurements ever showing a reading under 400ppm.

“There’s an answer to dealing with this and that’s to stop burning fossil fuels,” Butler said.

Butler also emphasised that this CO2 is locking in future warming. “It’s like lying in bed with your electric blanket set to three. You jack it up to seven – you don’t get hot right away but you do get hot. And that’s what we’re doing.”

The CO2 concentrations are driving what appears to be runaway climate change around the world.

This year has seen record hot global ocean temperatures, which have caused coral reefs all around the world to bleach and devastated Australia’s Great Barrier Reef.

Air surface temperatures have also been shocking climate scientists. Yearly and monthly temperature records have been breaking regularly, with many of the records being broken by the biggest margins ever seen.

“It’s pretty ugly when you look at it,” Butler said.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby smoking since 1879 » Tue May 17, 2016 1:17 pm

as realtime as it gets :

https://www.co2.earth/

Atmospheric CO2

April 2016

407.57
parts per million (ppm)

Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii (Scripps)

Preliminary data released May 4, 2016
"Now that the assertive, the self-aggrandising, the arrogant and the self-opinionated have allowed their obnoxious foolishness to beggar us all I see no reason in listening to their drivelling nonsense any more." Stanilic
smoking since 1879
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: CZ
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Luther Blissett » Tue May 17, 2016 2:33 pm

Even for the fast-melting Arctic, 2016 is in ‘uncharted territory’

One of the oldest and best-established ideas about global warming is that it will hit the Arctic the hardest. The concept, which goes back to papers published decades ago, is called “Arctic amplification,” and the basic idea is that there’s a key feedback in this system that makes everything worse.

It works like this: Warmer air melts more of the sea ice cover that sits atop the Arctic ocean, especially during summer, which is, of course, ice melt season. That means the ocean is able to absorb more solar radiation than before, when it was covered with ice that reflected this sunlight away. That means there’s more heat retained in the system — and so on, and so on.

So Arctic amplification has long been understood — and, confirming the theory, the Arctic has already been warming much faster than the more temperate latitudes. Even in this context, though, scientists have been noting that there seems to be something especially stark about what’s happening atop the world this year, which has seen overall temperatures soar to new highs.

“We’re in record breaking territory no matter how you look at it,” says Jennifer Francis, an Arctic specialist at Rutgers University who has published widely on how Arctic changes affect weather in the mid-latitudes. “The ice is really low, the temperatures are really high, the fire seasons have started earlier,” she says.

It’s an “uncharted territory situation that we’re finding ourselves in,” Francis says.

Indeed, NASA and other keepers of planetary temperatures have documented staggering warmth in the region this year — not just 1 or 2 degrees Celsius above average, but more than 4 degrees above average across much of the Arctic during the first quarter of this year:
Image

January and February, in particular, set a new record for overall warmth in the Arctic, according to NOAA. Sure enough, when it comes to the U.S. Arctic in particular, Alaska has been warmer than ever recorded so far this year. NASA’s latest data show that this April was also record warm for the globe as a whole, but with some respite for some parts of the Arctic (though not others, including Alaska and Greenland).

And with temperatures already this warm, experts say we could see even more dramatic changes when summer arrives and we move fully into wildfire season, as well as the melt season for sea ice and the vast ice sheet of Greenland. Let’s look at some of these possible changes in sequence:

Sea ice. Arctic sea ice set a record in March for the lowest winter peak ever recorded. That means that during the time of year when there is seasonally the most ice covering the Arctic ocean, there was the least yet observed. More recently, Mashable’s Andrew Freedman highlighted fractures in the Arctic ocean ice cap between Greenland and the North Pole, which a leading sea ice expert, Mark Serreze of the National Snow and Ice Data Center, called “very unusual.”

All of which has raised concerns that 2016 may see a summer minimum for Arctic sea ice that is even lower than the all-time record year — 2012.

That isn’t assured yet — much could still change for the sea ice outlook. And scientists are struggling this year with the satellites they usually use to observe the Arctic, meaning the data are currently “provisional” (yes, at a critical time for climate change, we’re having technological problems observing it).

But nonetheless, the data, such as they are, suggest the extent of sea ice is running way below average now and also below levels seen at this time of year during the record low year of 2012:
Image

Looking at temperatures and the extent of sea ice are surely the most obvious ways to take stock of what’s happening in the Arctic. But what’s striking is that if you talk to the experts on some of the other key Arctic systems, you hear pretty similar things.

Greenland. Take the enormous sheet of Arctic ice that, if we’re unlucky, will contribute to momentous sea level rise in coming decades and centuries. Greenland’s record melt year was also 2012, when the ice sheet is believed to have given up 562 billion tons of ice to the ocean, leading to well over a millimeter of global sea level rise in a single year.

Once again, we can’t be sure that 2016 will be like 2012 — much less that it will surpass it. Still, Greenland has already seen a startling early surface melt event — in April — which could set the stage for a great deal more as summer rolls around. “Every time you have these events, they do make changes to the properties of the snowpack that are all going in the same direction, which is basically accelerating the melting,” says Marco Tedesco, a Greenland expert based at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University.

Tedesco says the critical factor will be the atmosphere — how much it carries warm, moist air over Greenland, as happened in 2012 when record melt occurred. Most recently, research has been homing in on how shrinking Arctic sea ice could be upending atmospheric patterns focused on the jet stream that could in turn entrain this warmer moist air and bring it north.

“There is this direct linkage, we think, between the sea ice loss and Greenland melt,” says Francis, who has recently published research on the topic. “So if we see a big ice loss melt this summer, most likely we’d see a big Greenland melt as well.”

Wildfires and permafrost. On land, meanwhile, the terrifying wildfire that devastated Fort McMurray, Canada, this year, while well south of the Arctic circle, has scientists wondering whether we could also be in for a very bad fire year in other parts of Canada, Alaska and Siberia.

Last year, Alaska saw its second-most extensive wildfire year ever. And this year, the weather is very warm. “Anchorage had its warmest April on record with a temperature of 43.5°F, 2.8°F warmer than the previous record set just last year,” the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration noted recently. “Parts of the Yukon River observed the earliest ice breakup on record, and Fairbanks observed a record-early ‘green up,’ or start of the vegetation growing season.”

“It certainly wouldn’t be surprising to me to have another one of these hugely anomalous years, where things dry out and burn,” says Max Holmes, a researcher at the Woods Hole Research Center who studies the interaction of wildfire and northern permafrost.

Holmes and his fellow Woods Hole expert Sue Natali will soon be traveling to the Yukon river delta region in Alaska, where there were intense fires last year, to see what it has done to the sensitive landscape. Fires consume trees and a thick organic layer at the forest floor and leave the remaining ground blackened. Sunlight then hits the dark, exposed surface and can quickly warm up the frozen soil layer beneath, dubbed permafrost. And that, in turn, can release carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, worsening warming.

While the researchers don’t know what they’ll find yet, they agree that 2016 is shaping up to be a momentous year. “It’s remarkable, this temperature anomaly for January, February, March, unbelievable,” says Natali.

Ted Schuur, a researcher at Northern Arizona State University who also studies permafrost and fire, concurs that we could be in for a great deal of northern burning this year. “This fire in Canada is the harbinger really of what could be a big fire season, depending on what happens with fire weather,” he says.

And he, too, fears not only fires but a hit to northern permafrost. “I’m really expecting this year, with the warm winter, especially low snow, to be another summer where we see permafrost thaw go even faster than it’s been going over the past five to eight years,” Schuur says. Based on preliminary data that he’s seeing at field sites, he says that the loss of carbon from permafrost is “happening several times faster even than our previous measurements have told us.”

So in sum: Scientists fear northern wildfires could be not only worsening, but also accelerating loss of permafrost from frozen northern and Arctic soils — which in turn would amplify global warming. And 2016, they think, could be a banner year for this process.

Granted, the atmosphere (and ocean) always deliver surprises, and as all of these researchers will tell you, there is no crystal ball to tell us what will happen in the Arctic as full summer nears. We only know that this year, five months in, is standing out for dramatic levels of warming, melting — and hints of early burning.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby brainpanhandler » Wed May 18, 2016 1:37 pm

Luther Blissett » Tue May 17, 2016 1:33 pm wrote:
Even for the fast-melting Arctic, 2016 is in ‘uncharted territory’

...scientists are struggling this year with the satellites they usually use to observe the Arctic, meaning the data are currently “provisional” (yes, at a critical time for climate change, we’re having technological problems observing it).



Gee, I'm sure that is just a coincidence.
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby 82_28 » Fri May 20, 2016 11:27 am

India records its hottest day ever as temperature hits 51C (that's 123.8F)

A city in northern India has shattered the national heat record, registering a searing 51C – the highest since records began – amid a nationwide heatwave.

The new record was set in Phalodi, a city in the desert state of Rajasthan, and is the equivalent of 123.8F.

It tops a previous record of 50.6C set in 1956.


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/m ... hats-1238f
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Luther Blissett » Fri May 20, 2016 4:25 pm

This Alaska stuff is nasty my kinfolk.

Arctic set for record-breaking melt this summer
Wildlife, and scientists, will be scrambling


The record heat that is baking Alaska is poised to smash a host of climate records in 2016, including the earliest snowmelt date at NOAA’s Barrow Observatory, the northernmost point in the nation.

Staff at the observatory reported snowmelt occurred May 13, the earliest snowmelt date in 73 years of record-keeping, beating the previous mark set in 2002 by a full 10 days.

The early melting follows a record-setting winter that saw temperatures average more than 11 degrees above normal for the 49th State, shattering the previous record set in 2015. At 320 miles north of the Arctic Circle, Barrow is usually one of the last places in the United States to lose snow cover.

Snow is not the only thing that’s vanishing. Preliminary data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center indicate 2016 will set the record for minimum winter sea-ice extent, eclipsing the 2015 mark. Satellite photos from mid-May depict an early sea-ice breakup with an ominous series of openings, known as leads, extending deep into the Arctic.

Image
Animation: Arctic ice on the move
This series of images from April 1 to 24, 2016, shows recent fracturing and rotation of sea ice near Alaska and the western Canadian Arctic archipelago. (National Snow and Ice Data Center/www.nsidc.org )


David Douglas, research biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said this spring’s conditions illustrate how fragile and dynamic pack ice has become. “It looks like late June or early July right now,” he said. “Polar bears are having to make their decisions about how to move and where to go on thinner ice pack that’s mostly first-year ice.” Walrus could also face a tough summer, he said.

For 40 years, wildlife biologist George Divoky has studied another Arctic species, the black guillemot, marking the start of egg-laying season for the fish-eating seabird on nearby Cooper Island. Guillemots generally lay their first eggs 10 days after snow-out in Barrow. Divoky, director of the nonprofit Friends of Cooper Island research institute, predicts a record early start to the season this year.

Early ice-out is a double-edged sword for guillemots, he said. The birds do well during the early part of the season, but when the ice pulls off shore, it takes the birds’ forage fish with it, reducing chick survival.

Intense spring heat also perturbs a host of biological and chemical cycles, from tundra green-up and wildlife breeding seasons, to fluctuations of atmospheric gases like methane and carbon dioxide. For scientists, climate change presents an unending — if disconcerting — series of research opportunities.

“It’s like a train wreck you can’t look away from,” Divoky said. “You never know what you’re going to see and this year’s as big a mystery as any.”
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Iamwhomiam » Fri May 20, 2016 6:18 pm

Scientists predict extensive ice loss from huge Antarctic glacier

Current rates of climate change could trigger instability in a major Antarctic glacier, ultimately leading to more than 2m of sea-level rise.

Image

The Totten Glacier front [Credit: Esmee van Wijk/Australian Antarctic Division]


This is the conclusion of a new study looking at the future of Totten Glacier, a significant glacier in Antarctica. Totten Glacier drains one of the world's largest areas of ice, on the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS).

By studying the history of Totten's advances and retreats, researchers have discovered that if climate change continues unabated, the glacier could cross a critical threshold within the next century, entering an irreversible period of very rapid retreat.

This would cause it to withdraw up to 300 kilometres inland in the following centuries and release vast quantities of water, contributing up to 2.9 metres to global sea-level rise.

The EAIS is currently thought to be relatively stable in the face of global warming compared with the much smaller ice sheet in West Antarctica, but Totten Glacier is bucking the trend by losing substantial amounts of ice. The new research reveals that Totten Glacier may be even more vulnerable than previously thought.

The study, by scientists from Imperial College London and institutions in Australia, the US, and New Zealand is published in Nature. Last year, the team discovered that there is currently warm water circulating underneath a floating portion of the glacier that is causing more melting than might have been expected.

Image

Totten Glacier, East Antarctica's largest outlet of ice, is unstable and has contributed significantly to rising sea levels in the past, according to new research [Credit: The University of Texas at Austin]


Their new research looks at the underlying geology of the glacier and reveals that if it retreats another 100-150 km, its front will be sitting on an unstable bed and this could trigger a period of rapid retreat for the glacier. This would cause it to withdraw nearly 300 km inland from its current front at the coast.

Retreating the full 300 km inland may take several hundred years, according to co-author Professor Martin Siegert, Co-Director of the Grantham Institute at Imperial College London. However, once the glacier crosses the threshold into the unstable region, the melting will be unstoppable -- at least until it has retreated to the point where the geology becomes more stable again.

"The evidence coming together is painting a picture of East Antarctica being much more vulnerable to a warming environment than we thought," he said. "This is something we should worry about. Totten Glacier is losing ice now, and the warm ocean water that is causing this loss has the potential to also push the glacier back to an unstable place."

"Totten Glacier is only one outlet for the ice of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, but it could have a huge impact. The East Antarctic Ice Sheet is by far the largest mass of ice on Earth, so any small changes have a big influence globally."

To uncover the history of Totten Glacier's movements, the team looked at the sedimentary rocks below the glacier using airborne geophysical surveys. From the geological record, influenced by the erosion by ice above, they were able to understand the history of the glacier stretching back millions of years.

They found that the glacier has retreated more quickly over certain 'unstable' regions in the past. Based on this evidence, the scientists believe that when the glacier hits these regions again we will see the same pattern of rapid retreat.

Author: Hayley Dunning. | Source: Imperial College London [May 18, 2016]

http://tinyurl.com/j5fer2h
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby fruhmenschen » Fri May 20, 2016 9:54 pm

Let's give up the climate change charade: Exxon won't change its stripes
Bill McKibben



http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... orm-divest

also see

India




Indians demand government action after temperatures hit 51C
Hospitals struggle to cope as patient numbers soar and cold water in short supply after hottest day




Youths cool off in Kolkata. Temperatures are expected to stay high in June. Photograph: Piyal Adhikary/EPA
Vidhi Doshi in Mumbai and Jon Boone in Islamabad
Friday 20 May 2016 09.37 EDT Last modified on Friday 20 May 2016 10.45

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/m ... es-hit-51c
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5735
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Nordic » Fri May 20, 2016 11:51 pm

"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby 82_28 » Sat May 21, 2016 2:14 pm

Lake Mead declines to lowest level in history

The nation’s largest reservoir has broken a record, declining to the lowest level since it was filled in the 1930s.

Lake Mead reached the new all-time low on Wednesday night, slipping below a previous record set in June 2015.

The downward march of the reservoir near Las Vegas reflects enormous strains on the over-allocated Colorado River. Its flows have decreased during 16 years of drought, and climate change is adding to the stresses on the river.

As the levels of Lake Mead continue to fall, the odds are increasing for the federal government to declare a shortage in 2018, a step that would trigger cutbacks in the amounts flowing from the reservoir to Arizona and Nevada. With that threshold looming, political pressures are building for California, Arizona and Nevada to reach an agreement to share in the cutbacks in order to avert an even more severe shortage.


http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/env ... /84597120/

Image
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sat May 21, 2016 4:59 pm

^^^^ That white line is 130' high.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby 82_28 » Sat May 21, 2016 5:48 pm

I know Colorado had a "good" snow season this year. I just think the cities and shit are way too big to be supplied from one single river. I'm sure there are other sources, but it is amazing. What happens when Lake Mead dries up?

There's this I just read here in WA:

Warm spring brings early meltout to Stevens Pass

STEVENS PASS, Wash. -- We all thought we had snuck one by El Nino. Despite a record El Nino that caused predictions of below-normal snowpack, what ended up being the wettest winter on record left the Cascades with about a normal snowpack year -- at least through March.

But then came the blistering "warm" April -- the hottest on record by leaps and bounds, with the heat rolling right into mid-May. That caused quite a bit of snow melt and now on May 21, the Central Washington Cacsades have snowpack that is just at 12 percent of normal.

In fact, Stevens Pass snow measuring site had its official snow meltout Saturday -- defined as less than 2" of snow on the ground at the measuring site. (Note this is near the roadway, not up atop the ski resort).

According to research meteorologist Mark Albright, May 21st is the 8th-earliest meltout since records began in 1981 -- and about two weeks ahead of the median meltout date of June 2. The earliest meltout date was last year on April 28, while the latest meltout was just five years ago on July 1 -- back when springs were gloomy and cool and 80 degrees was more of a June thing than an April thing.


http://komonews.com/weather/scotts-weat ... ly-meltout

I honestly don't have any idea. I'm just a link provider for the most part. But the overall trends seem quite dire.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How Bad Is Global Warming?

Postby Luther Blissett » Mon May 23, 2016 2:25 pm

Wealthier municipalities will truck water in, but in Bakersfield, Stockton, Davis and Fresno one day they're just going to turn the tap to find that nothing is coming out. And by that time, the rest of the country will have to begin hosting climate refugees from those places and South Florida.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests