Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:21 pm

http://www.newsmakingnews.com/vm,fred,a ... 16,10.html

SEEKING THE HEAD OF THE OCTOPUS:

THE YEARS LEADING UP TO THE ALVAREZ EXECUTIONS

by Virginia McCullough 1/16/10



Among the many lives the patriarch of the Nichols’ family changed were those of his wife and children. In 1992 the second oldest child of John Philip and Joann Nichols was interviewed by author Ambrose L. Lane Sr. for the soon-to-be-published book Return of the Buffalo. At 32 years of age, nine years after his mother Joann’s death, John Paul Nichols said about his family:

I was thinking earlier today – I worked out this morning – that we’ve been 10 years on this Indian reservation –actually our family has been here for 13 years now. These stories I am telling you are not the stories of a typical guy that runs a hotel somewhere. In that sense, it’s exciting. I told you about the tension and stress and all that.

But this place has taken a huge toll on our family. In fact, it’s not the same family that arrived here in 1979. It just isn’t. I have to tell you, we’ve been through a catharsis where there’s evidence that exists, somewhat catalytic ([brought into focus] around the death of Mother, but even before and after, that you can’t live in this crazy environment, work as a family and expect the family to not suffer as a result. In fact, I think it’s a very high price to pay. I have had the luxury, and it is a luxury, to step out. I had to step out, because when you are in the midst of this, it makes perfect sense. But in fact, it is not a normal environment. It is not necessarily a healthy environment. It’s not a business that lends itself to a healthy environment. It is an inherently and politically unstable environment. It’s always the majority, but it is politically unstable nonetheless.


The “place” that took a huge toll on the Nichols family was an environment created by a visionary turned dictator who was enabled by state, federal and international politicians. No one man, no matter how driven, how matter how hard working or how dedicated could single handedly grease the thousands of rails necessary to send this train down the track this fast.

The white man’s control of the Cabazon Nation began in 1876 with President Ulysses S. Grant designating 1,700 acres of disparate desolate desert located approximately 20 miles north of California’s great Salton Sea as the Cabazon Reservation.

On February 8, 1887 Congress passed the Dawes Allotment Act (U. S. Statutes at Large, Vol. XXIV, p. 388 ff.), named after the author of the act Massachusetts Republican Senator Henry Dawes who had believed that owning private property would civilize the Native Americans. He defined “civilized” as being able to “wear civilized clothes…cultivate the ground, live in houses, ride in Studebaker [Conestoga] wagons, send children to school, drink whiskey [and] own property.”

In reality this Act would allow land that was not allotted to individuals and was held in trust by US government to be sold off to railroads, mining companies, ranchers, or other whites. Over the life of the Dawes Act approximately 90,000 Indians were made landless and the decimation of the contiguous reservation land eliminated hunting as a mean of subsistence. The website nebraskastudies.org states:

Tribal ownership, and tribes themselves, were simply to disappear. The story would be much the same across much of the West. Before the Dawes Act, some 150 million acres remained in Indian hands. Within twenty years, two-thirds of their land was gone. The reservation system was nearly destroyed.

In 1928 the Calvin Coolidge Administration issued the Meriam Report that found the Dawes Act had been used to illegally deprive Native Americans of their land rights.

The man who was a close friend of John Philip Nichols and who became the first attorney for the Cabazon tribe as they sought to legalize gaming on their reservation was the former Senator from South Dakota James George Abourezk. In his book Advise and Dissent published in November 1989 Abourezk commented on the Dawes Act:

The Act took the land out of tribal control and allotted each Indian adult 16 acres of land to be held in trust by the government. Because the land could not be sold, with the passing of each generation, ownership of the allotted quarter section had to be shared by all the heirs of the original allottee. As generations passed, an individual share of 1/256th of a quarter of land was not uncommon…The Allotment Act was intended to “civilize” the Indians and to get their land out of common, tribal ownership and into the hands of white men.

Image

James Abourezk, son of Lebanese immigrants served South Dakota in the US Senate from 1973 until he resigned his safe seat on January 3, 1979.

Three days later, January 6, 1979, the Cabazon Tribal Council passed resolutions removing tribal spokesman Joseph R. Benitez and other supporting tribal members and replacing them with Art Welmas, Fred Alvarez, and James and Sam Welmas.

Two more important matters would be addressed at the January 18, 1979 meeting (1) the tribe would request now former Senator Abourezk to use his political pressure to help expedite the Tribe’s application for a postal sub-station on the reservation [and] (2) plans were made to hire Abourezk as the tribal attorney if he would donate his services.

At the Cabazon Council meeting of March 10, 1979 under resolution No. 38-79 the business committee retained the law firm of Abourezk and Feldman to represent the tribe in legal matters and authorized a retainer of $3,000 and hourly rates for Abourezk of $200 per hour and for Feldman of $75 per hour. The resolution was signed by Chief Art Wilma's and Vice-chairman Fred Alvarez.

Simultaneously, a Gambling Ordinance and a Liquor Ordinance were unanimously adopted. A ½ cent use tax and a ½ cent sales tax per package of cigarettes sold by the Cabazons was initiated and a motion was made and passed to donate one cent per card sold at each Bingo game and donate it to designated religious groups.

The Cabazon tribe either ignored or never saw an open letter sent on April 14, 1978 to tribes in California and Arizona by Alexander Lewis Sr. governor of the Gila River Indian Tribe near Phoenix, Arizona warning that Pro Plan had spent $65,500 in tribal federal funds during a three-year period with little to no results. Lewis also warned that [John Philip] created “dissension among tribal boards and councils” and “once the forces were divided the firm [Pro Plan] would step in with proposals to patch up the destruction at the expense of the tribal funds”.

The train was now barreling down the tracks and no one would be able to stop this money driven machine. In Return of the Buffalo John Philip Nichols said, "Pro Plan, which is my family, just wants your [Cabazons] backing. Once we get things rolling, if things aren't running the way you want them to run, you're welcome to fire us. You're just hiring us is all you're doing."..... "Well, I'm talking about a 10-year plan and a five-year plan, then a 10-year plan---with a tentative additional 10-years on top of that." He said, "You'd be surprised. It goes real quick...especially if you're successful. One trick is to bypass the BIA (Bureau of Indian Affairs) and go directly to Washington."And that is exactly what the Nichols family did and it would be over twenty years before the last of the Nichols family was forced to relinquish control over the reservation.

If John Philip Nichols was the visionary with the political connection to usurp and retain power, than his son John Paul Nichols was the young man with the business acumen to make the old man’s vision come true and John Paul would be the power behind the throne from the moment the tribe secured its legal counsel.

Under the joint management of John Philip and John Paul Nichols the tribal minutes show that resolutions were quickly adopted for gambling and liquor sales, Cabazon sponsorship of an Indian Olympics and Telethon was approved, all tribal land was frozen in preparation of an overall development plan and a motion passed exploring the possibility of selling a little known wonder drug, DMSO, which was not authorized for use by humans by the FDA. This information contained in a Sacramento Bee article by John Berthelsen also discussed tribal development plans such as growing guayule for resale to rubber companies and shipping coal from Kentucky to the reservation where favorable Indian tax laws would make reprocessing profitable, and reselling it to fossil fuel plants.

One month after James Abourezk and Glen Feldman were hired John Paul Nichols left his position at the greater Miami Howard Johnsons and arrived in Indio, California in April 1979. Nichols’ father had secured two investors Al Pearlman and Bill Blank and together they formed a company called P.N. Associates (Pearlman. Nichols Associates). John Paul Nichols was a principal in this joint venture and the venture had a contractual relationship with the tribe. John Paul has stated that it was his job to run the cigarette enterprises and any related businesses that P.N. might develop in the future. The joint venture was financed by approximately $50,000 of Al Pearlman’s money.

The P.N. Associates contract with the Cabazons was in addition to the contract John Philip Nichols has initiated on behalf of his family members with this same tribe. The 10-year deal the patriarch had secured would give the family business Pro Plan 50 percent of the profits of any business the senior Nichols brought to the reservation. Less than one year after John Paul’s arrival at the reservation Pro Plan salaries would total $90,000 a year. There is no public record of the salary John Paul drew under the P.N. Associates contract.

Under John Paul’s guidance the Cabazon opened a shop selling tax-free cigarettes one month after his arrival at the reservation. Among the shop’s first employees were Cabazon Treasurer Welmas, the youngest Nichols son Mark and Brenda James-Soulliere.

The infamous Gold Telex detailing the transfer of over 57 tons of gold and naming John Philip Nichols and giving his social security number “on behalf of all concerned parties” was dated Friday, June 27, 1979 and was designated by the code name “ALI-JVF Goldfinger 007”.

Half a world away events in Iran were having an impact on the small Indian tribe in Indio, California. The next year would see people in middle-eastern dress introduced to tribal members by their newly retained attorney James Abourezk and these guests would travel thousands of miles to meet members of the Cabazon nation.

Then on October 22, 1979 the very ill Shah of Iran, accompanied by his wife, entered New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center to receive medical care. United States President Carter had made a fateful decision bowing to heavy political pressure and it would be a decision that would rock two nations and a tiny Indian reservation in California. The “student” revolution in Iran against the Shah and the United States culminated in the taking of the American hostages on November 4, 1979.

Even as the world political storms grew in strength there were some who tried to save the Cabazon Reservation from the wild winds tearing the tribe apart. In November of 1979 the head of the program office of the Indian Health Services wrote his Washington Superior, Assistant Surgeon General Emery Johnson a second memo of concern regarding John Philip Nichols. It stated in part that an investigation into events at the Cabazon reservation “were astonishing and leads one to speculate on the degree of competency, interest or ambivalence” of the agents who conducted the probe of Nichols’ activities. (Source: Sacramento Bee article by John Berthelsen)

Despite these concerns no regulators or politicians interfered with the Nichols family pursuit of new ventures to use in the name of the Cabazons. The politics influencing the future of the Cabazon nation were accelerating with each national and international event. Now the local disputes between the Cabazons and the City of Indio and the County of Riverside took a back seat. As the world wide events escalated the Cabazon nation would find itself right at the center of the horrific hurricane.

The “student” revolution in Iran against the Shah and the United States culminated in the taking of the American hostages on November 4, 1979. Then on November 12, 1979 all oil imports from Iran ended and on November 14 President Carter issued Executive Order 12-170 freezing about $8 billion worth of Iranian assets. Once again Nichols’ friend and Cabazon Attorney James Abourezk was involved as detailed in the excellent book 1983 book by Paul Hoffman entitled Lions of the Eighties:

The following day -- November 15 -- Chase Manhattan, citing the freeze, refused to make a $4 million interest payment on a $500 million loan to Iran from a consortium of eleven banks, led by itself. Chase Manhattan declared the loan in default on November 19 and on November 23 seized the accounts of Bank Markazi, Iran's central bank, to offset the debts of Iran's government. Six days later -- on November 29 -- Bank Markazi sued Chase Manhattan in London for release of $320 million deposited in Chase Manhattan's London branch. On December 6, Chase Manhattan filed suit in Manhattan's federal court against forty-seven Iranian concerns, including Bank Markazi and the National Iranian Oil Company for $366 million.

The great Iranian assets litigation explosion had started.

By the time the hostages were released fourteen months later, more than three hundred lawsuits attaching Iranian assets of more than $4 billion had been filed in federal courts around the nation. Other suits by American companies were started overseas. If the seizure of the Teheran embassy was a fifteen-month ordeal for the Americans held hostage there, it was a bonanza for the bar, generating millions of dollars in legal fees for more than one hundred major law firms. And neither the litigation nor the legal fees ended with the release of the hostages.

First, there was the handful that represented Iranian interests. The Iranian Government retained ABOUREZK, SHACK & MENDENHALL, the Washington law firm of South Dakota's James Abourezk, the first man of Arabic stock to sit in the U.S. Senate. Bank Markazi was represented by Boudin, Rabinowitz, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C., the Forty-second Street firm of Leon and Boudin, a civil-rights lawyer best known for defending anti-Establishment radicals. (Click. The Cabazons: James Abourezk and Iran research.)


As the new decade descended upon the tiny Cabazon tribe it found itself intertwined with the events in the Middle East. In 1980 Nichols obtained the blue prints to Crown Prince Fahd’s palace in Tiaf, Saudi Arabiaand soon a plan was drafted for The Cabazons to provide security for the Saudi palace.

Jonathan Littman, reported on September 6, 1991 in the San Francisco Chronicle:

The Saudis were interested enough to do a background check on the Cabazons. Mohammad Jameel Hashem, consul of the Royal Embassy of Sandi Arabia in Washington, wrote former South Dakota Senator James Abourezk: “According to our blacklist for companies, the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians/Cabazon Trading Company and Wackenhut International are not included.” Translation: Neither the Cabazons nor Wackenhut were Jewish-run enterprises.

Things were moving rapidly at the reservation and on February 9, 1980 the tribe celebrated the formal dedication of its new community building. The building was the first substantial indication that the Cabazons might actually benefit from the many deals Nichols had been promoting.

Then on May 22, 1980 Fred Alvarez’s sister Linda Streeter addressed 6 pages of questions that reflected her concerns about the Cabazon interaction with the Nichols family and their businesses. The questions were addressed to John Philip Nichols, Art Welmas, Fred Alvarez, John James and Sam Welmas.

The Cabazon cigarette shop closed August 1980 but the next month the Cabazon Security Corporation Inc. was formed. Then in October the Cabazons opened a poker-pan-lo-ball casino. Soon the City of Indio and Riverside County tried unsuccessfully to shut down the casino operation.

Then sometime between May and October of 1980 Fred Alvarez wrote a letter to Presidential candidate Ronald Reagan. That letter has never been located but interviews with various sources close to Fred Alvarez said Alvarez expressed his thoughts about the troubling events occurring at his reservation.

It is known that this letter was received by Ronald Reagan because Reagan’s reply to Alvarez and the envelope it was mailed in were discovered in Fred’s papers following his assassination. The envelope was addressed to "Fred Alvarez, 1st Vice Chairman, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 83-203 Indio Blvd., Indio, CA 92201." Ronald Reagan’s return address was "8941 Airport Boulevard, Suite 1430, Los Angeles, California 90045." The letter mailed on October 7, 1980 reads as follows:

Dear Mr. Alvarez:

Thank you very much for your thoughtfulness in sharing a copy of your letter to me. I found your comments to be very interesting.

Sincerely, Ronald Reagan


The politics influencing the future of the Cabazon nation were accelerating with each national and international event. Now the local disputes between the Cabazons and the City of Indio and the County of Riverside took a back seat. As the world wide events escalated the Cabazon nation would find itself right at the center of the horrific hurricane.

On November 15, 1980 Cabazon member Joe Benitez was taken before a tribal tribunal and found guilty of charges involving the misuse of tribal funds but local law enforcement in Riverside County was not involved. The attorney for representing Joe Benitez at the time was Steve Rios, a man whose advice was later going to be sought by Benitez and Fred Alvarez regarding the alleged misuse of Cabazon funds by John Philip Nichols.

The1980 annual Christmas Party for the Cabazons was held at a country club in Rancho Mirage under very unusual circumstances. During past Christmas parties wine was served to those assembled. This year, as in the past, wine glasses were set out on the banquet tables, but this year the wine glasses were quickly whisked away as John Philip Nichols explained that partaking of alcohol would offend the religious beliefs of this year’s guests and so there would be none served.

Shortly thereafter Nichols introduced Cabazon attorney and now attorney for the Iranian government James Abourezk. According to those in attendance Mr. Abourezk gave a short speech asking the Cabazon members and their guests to think about what they could do to help President- elect Ronald Reagan gain the release of the hostages held in Iran.

The coming decade would see many new business ventures come and go at the Cabazon nation.

In January 1981 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Indians could not sell cigarettes without collecting taxes on them. As a consequence the Cigarette Shop on the reservation later filed for bankruptcy.

In April 1981 the Wackenhut Security firm of Florida entered into a joint venture with the Cabazon tribe. At the time this new business began the huge Wackenhut Corporation already had a $24 million contract to provide security to the Saudi Arabian government. That same month a young man named Jimmy Hughes trained in Special Forces was hired by the Cabazon/Wackenhut Joint Venture according to a time line written by the venture’s President Peter Zokosky four years later.

Ambrose L. Lane, Sr., recounted in Return of the Buffalo (pp. 84-85):

On April 9, 1981, “To Whom It May Concern” letter, R. Barry Ashby, Intersect’s Vice-President and Director, wrote the following:

This letter serves as evidence that Dr. John P. Nichols is authorized to convey and use two items of night vision equipment in his possession. These items are the model M 802 night vision goggle and the model M 841 night vision pocket scope. This equipment is for demonstration purpose and none other, as has been authorized by the manufacturer (Litton Industries), the sales representative (INTERSECT Corporation), and the United States government licensing agent (Department of State), to be in the care of Dr. Nichols.

A year earlier, Intersect provided a draft proposal and briefing booklet for Integrated Security Systems through Dr. Nichols for the United Arab Shipment Company of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The systems were proposals, ostensibly, for a Saudi palace. Dr. Nichols would later report to the Tribe that they had been misled about getting the Saudi contract.

During this period of optimism that federal contracts were probable, the Tribe –secure in its control of the CIS/WSI Joint Venture – placed Peter Zokosky on CIS’s Board of Directors, making him President and Security Officer, and Robert Frye Vice President. It was an attempt to maximize whatever clout these people may have had in the defense agencies. The payoff was small, but there was a payoff.

The CIS/WSI joint venture, with Wackenhut as its patron and Zokosky as its president, sought and secured Department of Defense security clearance from the Defense Investigative Service (DIS).


Then on April 15, 1981 2-page unsigned letter Preliminary Profit and Loss Statement reflected a total $292,826.71 and a net profit/loss of $35,476.48 to “Cabazon Business Committee, Mr. Rocco Zangari, Dr. John Nichols, Mr. Al Pearlman” from John Paul Nichols, Project Manager and an excerpt set forth:

....expenses you will find a preliminary profit and loss statement on the Cabazon Indian Casino operation for the period from November 15, 1980 to February 27, 1981. These are rough figures and must be confirmed by our CPA but are nonetheless accurate.

They include no capital expenses during this period but do include costs that could not be capitalized as they were expenses beginning with i.e. payroll for R. Zangari, F. Galea, etc. …(p 1)

In reality as we normalize our business, our profit picture at sales of $329,000 should show a profit of approximately $77,000 assuming our costs will be cut back to approximately $252,000 for a three month period – or $154,000 profit per year for Pro-Plan/Nichols family (p 2)


Between May 11 and May 22, 1981 John Philip Nichols, Peter Zokosky and Robert Frye met with a John Vanderwerker of Intersect Corporation at various US government facilities including the Picatinny Arsenal. Discussions were also held regarding Dr. Gerald Bull’s firm Valleyfield Chemical Products Corporation and another company called Canadian Resources International Limited which was seeking to conduct oil and gas exploration on Indian lands through the United States.

Throughout the month of May Fred Alvarez was surreptitiously entering the offices of John Philip Nichols and gathering the paperwork that documented these many deals around the world. He would call his sister Linda telling her what he was uncovering.

Fred Alvarez was threatened many times after it was discovered that he was opposing the Nichols regime. His mail box was shot up and his brand new motorcycle sabotaged. He received verbal warnings from friends and threats from his enemies. Fred sought help from many different people from private investigators and security firms to former college associates who lived out of state. It is reported that he even confided in the man now accused of his murder, Jimmy Hughes. Jimmy Hughes, in turn, allegedly talked to others that Fred Alvarez had confided in about his life being in danger.

Fred visited his parents, his sister and his aunt in Truckee, California and he also traveled to Utah to discuss his plight with old friends there asking if he could hang out at their home. They welcomed him but, like many others the stories that Fred told them about the contract out on his life by his own government seemed unbelievable. After all, who would have believed that a small Indian tribe would be involved in international revolutions and money laundering?

On June 5, 1981 Fred Alvarez went to a local reporter at the Daily News asking for help and detailing the corruption he had uncovered and he laid it at the door of John Philip Nichols. He told the reporter that he was going to get killed over this story.

On June 6, 1981 the Cabazon Tribe held an election and Brenda James defeated Fred Alvarez for 1st Vice Chairman.

23 days later Fred Alvarez, Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro were executed.



Virginia McCullough © 1/16/10
vmccullough@hotmail.com
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:13 pm

This article, as with most all of the mainstream coverage, doesn't fully definef how far officials in charge of the Jimmy Hughes case do or don't want to go in "seeking the head of the Octopus".

http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/arre ... -1.1718301

Arrest in 1981 tribal murders revives old mystery

January 22, 2010 By The Associated Press AMY TAXIN (Associated Press Writers), GILLIAN FLACCUS (Associated Press Writers)


Image
This is a s Sept.26,2009 file photo released by the Miami Dade Police Department showing James 'Jimmy' Hughes. Hughes faces three counts of murder and a count of conspiracy for allegedly killing Fred Alvarez to prevent him from exposing illegal activities at the Cobazon Indian reservation in California.


INDIO, Calif. - (AP) — In the days before Fred Alvarez was shot execution-style with two friends on his verandah, the strapping Cabazon tribal leader feared he was a marked man: His motorcycle had been tampered with, his mailbox shot up and his house ransacked.

He visited the local newspaper several times to say that he'd uncovered something big enough to get him killed. He arranged to talk with a lawyer to divulge what he knew, but never made the meeting.

On that day, tribal member Joe Benitez swung by Alvarez's stucco house tucked among tamarisk trees in the wind-swept sand dunes of rural Rancho Mirage, about 130 miles southeast of Los Angeles. There, he found the bloated bodies of Alvarez and his friends Patricia Castro and Ralph Boger, all fatally shot.

Dried puddles of blood stained the sand near mattresses they had dragged outside to escape the sweltering desert heat. The three had been sitting in a semicircle. Police estimated they had been dead two days.

But why was Alvarez killed? That's what police and loved ones wanted to know in the summer of 1981, when the killings happened.

Now, 28 years later, the arrest of a murder suspect has revived the question, which lengthy investigations and a grand jury probe failed to answer.

Some believe the former college football lineman with tattoos, long black hair and a Fu Manchu mustache discovered money-skimming by outsiders helping the tiny Cabazon Band of Mission Indians manage its fledgling casino.

Others believe something hinted at by documents over years: Alvarez had stumbled onto plans for a top-secret weapons deal.

"When a guy comes in off the streets and says, 'Somebody's going to kill me,' you think he's out of his mind. But he was right," said Jim Lycett, an editor at the now-defunct Indio Daily News who met with Alvarez before his death. "Obviously, it's because he knew something that was going to get somebody in a whole lot of trouble."

Authorities are saying little about their suspect, Jimmy Hughes, a 52-year-old former tribal security official-turned-preacher.

Hughes was arrested in September in Miami as he sat on a Honduras-bound plane. He faces three counts of murder and a count of conspiracy for allegedly killing Alvarez to prevent him from exposing illegal reservation activities.

Hughes, who is fighting extradition, declined interview requests.

"More than anything we really wanted it to be over and to have peace," said Linda Alvarez, Alvarez's sister. "All these years, everything I've been saying, maybe now they'll believe me."

___

The Cabazons are a small tribe, just 25 members at the time of the murders. A tribal history commissioned in 1995 recalls the band as eager to drum up business — at first, talking about agricultural projects but eventually opening a smoke shop and later a casino.

The history also recalls Alvarez's killing. It describes him as a renegade involved in criminal activity and denies the tribe had any involvement in his murder — which a state policeman told Lycett bore the signs of an "obvious professional hit."

Almost before the bodies were in the ground, rumors began to fly, backed up by Alvarez's premonitions.

Some said the tribal leader was determined to expose a scheme by outsiders to cheat the tiny tribe out of gambling profits.

But some relatives of the victims wondered whether Alvarez might have also discovered a secret partnership between the Cabazon tribe and private security firm Wackenhut Corp.

Witnesses and court documents alternately describe the deal as everything from providing security services to building a munitions arsenal to selling weapons to the Nicaraguan Contras, a U.S.-backed rebel group. The tribal history also details various attempts to start weapons production.

Current officials at Wackenhut Services Inc. declined comment, and tribal officials did not respond to interview requests.

Rachel Begley, whose father Ralph Boger died with Alvarez, has spent years researching the case. Begley recorded Hughes on a hidden camera at a 2008 religious conference as he said that Alvarez died in a "mafia hit" that was "a lot bigger than the murder of this guy or that guy."

Begley, who believes Alvarez was onto some kind of Wackenhut deal, has worked closely with the main sheriff's detective assigned to the case.

Court documents and interviews suggest outsiders were aggressively pushing the Cabazons beyond gaming.

Primary among them was John Philip Nichols, a business consultant hired by the tribe to help it open its casino. Nichols, who died in 2001, is now listed as a co-conspirator in the triple murder.

One of Nichols' sons married into the tribe and soon non-Indians were everywhere talking big money, said Linda Alvarez.

"There was just all kinds of (non-Indian) people wandering in and out, coming into meetings and we had no idea who they were," she said. "We felt fearful. I got the heck out of there."

Riverside County sheriff's Detective John Powers, the lead homicide investigator, said he has no proof Alvarez was aware of a deal with Wackenhut. But he said Alvarez wanted to oust Nichols from the reservation over concerns about money-skimming at the casino — which could have thwarted Nichols' plans for business deals on the reservation, including with Wackenhut.

"What Fred was doing was trying to get rid of the Nichols family out of Cabazon," Powers said. "That is what got him killed because there was literally millions of dollars at stake."

Authorities probing Alvarez's death recently took a large cardboard box of Wackenhut-related documents and tape recordings from Peter Zokosky, the former president of a nearby munitions manufacturing plant.

"With all the documents and memos I have seen go back and forth, it looks like they wanted to do these things," Powers said. "It just never happened."

Zokosky, who had government security clearance and whose wife was Indio's mayor, said Wackenhut had asked him to write a proposal to build an arsenal and manufacture tank ammunition on tribal land. But the classified project went nowhere.

"It was submitted. I didn't hear anything more about it, and Wackenhut withdrew," said Zokosky, now 83. "I think they were dissatisfied with the structure of the Indian organization."

The Florida-based company did sign a joint venture with the tribe to win government security contracts — but the partnership fizzled when it failed to get bids, said former Wackenhut spokesman Patrick Cannan. He said to his knowledge the deal did not involve weapons.

Yet two men said in separate legal filings the Cabazon-Wackenhut partnership was forged to sell weapons to the Contras. The idea was to develop night vision goggles, machine guns and biological and chemical weapons to support foreign entities, including the Contras, according to an affidavit filed in an unrelated case by a man named Michael Riconosciuto, who said he worked on the deal. He is now in federal prison on drug charges.

People claiming CIA ties wanted the venture to develop machine guns at a "top secret" tribal facility for distribution to Nicaragua, said a second man, weapons manufacturer Robert Booth Nichols (no relation to John Philip Nichols). In civil court filings, he said he pulled out because Wackenhut didn't provide State Department approval.

___

Before he died, Alvarez told the Indio Daily News five times that John Philip Nichols and other outsiders were cheating the tribal members.

"He said, 'I'm living in a hovel while all these guys are getting rich off the casino,'" recalled Paul Zalis, a reporter who worked on the story.

Alvarez felt he was paying a price for questioning the tribe's direction. He told his family and Zalis that his house had been ransacked, his mailbox shot and his motorcycle tampered with. The day after he first spoke to the newspaper, he was voted out of tribal office.

"He said, 'I just know too much, and they're going to kill me,'" editor Lycett recalled. "He said it twice."

Alvarez also contacted attorney Stephen Rios and arranged a meeting, saying he had evidence to support his claims. Rios recalls waiting for hours in his office and growing impatient — until Benitez called and told him, "Fred's dead."

After the murders, Zalis said he began trying to piece together Alvarez's allegations, but was never able to find proof for a "rat's nest of references." The paper ultimately decided not to publish Zalis' investigative story.

Authorities probed the murders but no arrests were made.

Three years later, the story of the killings resurfaced when Jimmy Hughes approached law enforcement and claimed he had been asked in the presence of Nichols, the tribal administrator, to deliver $25,000 to a hitman to kill Alvarez.

That claim prompted reexamination of the murders, including probes by the Riverside County grand jury and the state attorney general.

In 1985, Nichols was charged in a separate murder-for-hire plot that was foiled by police informants, for which he served 1½ years.

Authorities were unable to connect that plot to Alvarez's death and the case went cold for two decades, Powers said. This time, investigators are confident — and hint there could be more arrests.

"If it was the story Jimmy gave back in 1985, we wouldn't be charging him with murder," Powers said. "It is much more than what he said."

___
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:46 pm

http://www.newsmakingnews.com/vm,fred,a ... 24,10.html

THE ALVAREZ EXECUTIONS
ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATOR JOHN PAUL NICHOLS


by Virginia McCullough

Image

An Introduction – The Alleged Co-Conspirators

Deputy Attorney General Michael T. Murphy on behalf of the People of the State of California filed an Amended Felony Complaint in Case No. INF066719 - The People v. Jimmy Hughes on December 18, 2009. It detailed charges naming James Hughes as the man who murdered Fred Alvarez, Patricia Castro and Ralph Boger on June 29, 1981 in the County of Riverside, State of California. The final page of the complaint cites the special allegation of multiple murders in violation of Pen. Code Section 190.2(a)(3).

Page one of the complaint outlines the “Conspiracy to Commit a Crime”. The three people who are named here, John Philip Nichols, John Paul Nichols, and Glen Heggstad have been featured in the media to differing degrees. Now the state alleges that each and every one is central to the conspiracy that resulted two days later in the Alvarez executions. Deputy AG Murphy alleges the following:

That on or about June 27, 1981, in the County of Riverside, State of California, JAMES HUGHES did unlawfully conspire with John Nichols, John Paul Nichols, Glen Heggstad and other persons whose identities are unknown; to commit the crime of Murder, in violation of Penal Code section 187(s), a felony.

Image
JOHN PAUL NICHOLS
THE SON OF
JOHN PHILIP NICHOLS


Who are these men and what are their backgrounds? This is the second part of a three part biographical series.

During the summer of 1989, four years after Jimmy Hughes had left the United States, the youngest son of John Philip Nichols became the Chief Executive Officer of the Cabazon tribe. Mark Nichols had been acting as the Cabazon historian and he contracted with author Ambrose L. Lane to write a book about the interactions between the Nichols family and the Cabazon reservation. Lane’s book Return of the Buffalo was published in 1995. On pages 103 and 104 of this book, John Paul Nichols, who held the position his father before him had held from 1985 until his resignation 10 years later, called the murder of Fred Alvarez, Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro “catalytic". The interview between John Paul and Lane follows:

John Paul: In 1981, Fred Alvarez was murdered in June. Fred lost the election the month before and was no longer a Tribal officer. He apparently, for whatever reason, was running around town and bad mouthing everybody, etc., and had gone to some local newspaper and said, “I fear for my life,” or whatever the hell he said. To make a long story short, the next day, two days later, or a week later, he and two other people are murdered….immediate front-page headlines. We had zip to do with it. To this day there’s this perception that we were involved. I’m in Austin, Texas, and people say to me, “You were involved in that, weren’t you?” It’s amazing.

Author: Give me your perspective. Why would Linda et al accuse unnamed persons associated with the Tribe of killing Fred?

John Paul: Let’s look at the position Fred was in. Fred was a very mean, vibrant Indian. There is no other way of saying it. Fred, in my view, was paranoid. He was very, very power hungry. He had lost; the Tribe had voted him out, whenever the hell it was, March, May, I don’t even remember what the day was in ’81. He wasn’t even a Tribal officer anymore. There is this perception that he was a tribal officer. He wasn’t. That’s when his sister said, “We’ve got problems.” There was no Alvarez power base in 1981. It didn’t exist.

So, Fred was an inconvenience at that point in time. There was this perception that Fred was an insider that somebody had to get because he knew everything, which was totally erroneous. He had no support to begin with. But honest to God, Fred was very verbal. If you met Linda Streeter [Dukic], Linda Streeter is also very verbal. But, you can sit there until the sun don’t shine, and sooner or later people will listen to you. I hate to say this, but I’ll use Adolf Hitler in the sense that if you say things enough times and sooner or later someone goes, well look at the history of these things! Jesus Christ, you read enough bullshit, you belief anything!

I don’t know if it was the next day, anyway, I walked into the casino and right there in the newspaper machine and pasted on the thing “Man Foretold Own Death.” I read that and go, “What?!” This is, like, the next day. Fred supposedly, or allegedly had gone to the newspaper reporter the day before or two days before and just ranted and raved. It was taped, “I fear for my life.” I’m sure this was a continuous conversation about a grand conspiracy that made perfect sense. From that point on, it was a hell of a newspaper story. Mafia. Hiding stuff. I mean that was it. Forget all the weapons bullshit that you read later; that was all tacked on to the basic story. All that allegedly happened afterwards anyway. “Foretold” he was in danger, but didn’t say who he was in danger from, of course.

In retrospect when I look at it, or what all really happened, I think I spent 10 minutes with the sheriff one time two days after the murder. Somebody asked me a couple of questions about “what do you think happened?” I’ve never talked to somebody in law enforcement once, before or after that. Never been asked one question. To my knowledge, nobody questioned Rocco Zangari, who according to the press is the bad guy here supposedly. Right? Right or wrong, I think maybe the Alvarez family had to blame someone. Grief is grief. I don’t discount that, regardless of who Fred was. Family is family, and Linda somehow had to come to grips with that. I don’t think she wanted to face it, and I don’t think to this day she wants to face who her brother really was. I think personally he got knocked off---obviously he got knocked off---but to me it sounds like a drug deal or something of that nature and he had made an enemy somewhere down the line, and that’s it.

Fred's been a catalyst around which a lot of other hate built. It's the hate built out of "I've got power." The issue is taking over the tribe. If the Nicholses left tomorrow, Joe Blow could be in this position and it would be the same issues.

Author: And the other thing is there’s been one issue that’s been consistent and that was trying to get tribal membership for Linda’s daughter since 1966.

John Paul: Why do you think?

Author: Power?

John Paul: Power. That the name of the game.


It is extremely rare to have a defendant allegedly involved in a murder speak of the killings in such detail. Defense attorneys as a group are famous for advising their clients to not speak to anyone about any detail of their case. This window into John Paul Nichols’ feelings about the Fred Alvarez murder is notable for many reasons:

1) John Paul never mentions the other two victims Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro by name in this triple execution. Clearly these two friends of Alvarez suffered the same fate as Fred but Nichols clearly states that Fred Alvarez is the victim “around which a lot of other hate built”.

2) Throughout the interview with author Lane, John Paul’s anger with Fred Alvarez is obvious. According to the manager of the Cabazon businesses at the time, Fred was “running around town and bad mouthing everybody. Fred Alvarez's home had been ransacked, his mailbox had been shot up and his motorcycle had been sabotaged according to many witnesses. At the time of his murder his new bike was still in a repair shop where the damage was being repaired. So there was evidence to support the fact that Fred Alvarez feared for his life. No one at the Cabazons, in law enforcement, or the many people Alvarez told about his fear seemed to believe him and no one in a position to do so helped him. But John Paul’s anger seems directed at the man murdered in his home on June 28, 1981 who Nichols said, "was an inconvenience at that point in time" and he "just ranted and raved".

3) The descriptions of Fred Alvarez by John Paul in the interview re-victimizes the slain man when he says, “Fred was a very mean, vibrant Indian. There is no other way of saying it. Fred, in my view, was paranoid”.

4) John Paul Nichols reveals that law enforcement had little to no interest in pursuing those who might have had a reason to execute Alvarez and anyone else in his presence. He emphatically states, "I've never talked to somebody in law enforcement one, before or after that. Never been asked one question. To my knowledge, nobody questioned Rocco Zangari, who according to the press is the bad guy here supposedly".


It took 28 long years of suffering by the families of the victims before law enforcement would try to interview John Paul Nichols about the Alvarez executions. To the best of this author's knowledge no one in law enforcement has ever interviewed Rocco Zangari about his possible involvement even though Fred Alvarez and Rocco Zangari had an argument in the Cabazon Casino on New Year's Eve 1981 about Alvarez's manner of dress. John Paul had implemented a dress code so that the casino would appeal to wealthy card players. Apparently Alvarez style of dress did not conform to the new image the Cabazons wanted to project.

In March of 1988 Rocco Zangari pleaded guilty in Los Angeles Federal Court to two acts of racketeering and being involved in a criminal enterprise but he denied being a member of the syndicate. Zangari is mentioned in The Last Mafioso by Ovid Demaris and is said to be an acting capo in the LA mob and a well-known mafia-made guy". The issue that looms largest in John Paul's interview with author Lane is the struggle for power that was going on at the Cabazon reservation and Nichols says clearly, "Power. That's the name of the game."

Finally, this interview with alleged co-conspirator John Paul Nichols also contains one statement that goes to the very heart of the Alvarez executions and the media coverage that followed the killings in the years to come. This is his statement, "Forget all the weapons bullshit that you read later; that was all tacked on to the basic story. All that allegedly happened afterwards anyway".

Virginia McCullough © 1/25/10
vmccullough@hotmail.com
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:25 pm

Damn, she's a good writer. I really enjoyed all this.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:39 pm

You can find an interesting radio show about all this, along with some written commentary and links from this Christian/conspiracy-oriented source:


P.I.D. Radio 10/4/09: The Octopus
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:22 pm

This new twist is sure to have relevance to the case as Nathan Baca has played an important role in terms of this story. What exactly it will mean remains to be seen...


http://www.mydesert.com/article/2010012 ... as-station

Local TV reporter leaving KESQ for Las Vegas station

Nicole C. Brambila • The Desert Sun • January 26, 2010



Nathan Baca, an Emmy Award winning TV reporter, is leaving KESQ channel 3 for a new gig with a Las Vegas TV station this week.

Baca’s last broadcast will be Wednesday at 5 p.m. He starts at KLAS in Las Vegas on Feb. 1.

During his tenor covering Coachella Valley news, Baca, 28, has investigated cold case murders, the Church of Scientology and the “Octopus Murders,” for which he won an Emmy in 2008.



***

KLAS-TV, a CBS affiliate, will be his new station:

History

KLAS was the first TV station in Nevada (beating KOLO-TV in Reno by 2 months and 5 days) and was started by Hank Greenspun on July 22, 1953. Greenspun also owned the Las Vegas Sun. Greenspun sold it to aviation magnate Howard Hughes some time in the 1960s, reportedly because the tycoon was dismayed that the station never played his favorite late-night movies. Eventually, the station was sold to its current owner, Landmark Communications. Landmark Communications was renamed Landmark Media Enterprises in September 2008.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KLAS-TV
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby desertfae » Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:52 am

American Dream wrote:This new twist is sure to have relevance to the case as Nathan Baca has played an important role in terms of this story. What exactly it will mean remains to be seen...


http://www.mydesert.com/article/2010012 ... as-station

Local TV reporter leaving KESQ for Las Vegas station

Nicole C. Brambila • The Desert Sun • January 26, 2010



Nathan Baca, an Emmy Award winning TV reporter, is leaving KESQ channel 3 for a new gig with a Las Vegas TV station this week.

Baca’s last broadcast will be Wednesday at 5 p.m. He starts at KLAS in Las Vegas on Feb. 1.

During his tenor covering Coachella Valley news, Baca, 28, has investigated cold case murders, the Church of Scientology and the “Octopus Murders,” for which he won an Emmy in 2008.



***

KLAS-TV, a CBS affiliate, will be his new station:

History

KLAS was the first TV station in Nevada (beating KOLO-TV in Reno by 2 months and 5 days) and was started by Hank Greenspun on July 22, 1953. Greenspun also owned the Las Vegas Sun. Greenspun sold it to aviation magnate Howard Hughes some time in the 1960s, reportedly because the tycoon was dismayed that the station never played his favorite late-night movies. Eventually, the station was sold to its current owner, Landmark Communications. Landmark Communications was renamed Landmark Media Enterprises in September 2008.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KLAS-TV


I'm going to say this as nice as possible, or at least try.
Why would Nathan getting a new job have anything whatsoever to do with my case?
There is no "twist" except in your head.
desertfae- exposing the octopus
http://www.desertfae.com
User avatar
desertfae
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:32 am

[Cross-posting on "Michael James Riconosciuto" thread]

http://www.newsmakingnews.com/vm,fred,a ... ,4,10.html

"MAGIC MIKE" RICONOSCIUTO MEETS "DR." JOHN PHILIP NICHOLS AT THE CABAZON RESERVATION

by Virginia McCullough



Image
Mike Riconosciuto
Image
John Philip Nichols


The mainstream media has reported that two years after John Philip Nichols took control of the Cabazon Reservation employing his family in the company called Pro Plan Inc. a young genius named Michael James Riconosciuto was introduced to him. However, even the timing of the introduction, the location of the first meeting, the reason for the initial contact, the people who arranged the meeting, the reason for bringing the two men together, the entities behind the scenes still remain a mystery to this day. Just like "Magic Mike" the fascination is wrapped up in the unknown.

Albert Einstein said, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed."

Ever since the first meeting between the general manager of the Cabazons and the strange young man who had built his own laser when he was barely a teenager, reporters around the world had their eyes wide open and they remained captivated with the ever expanding web that started with this first meeting.

"Dr." John Philip Nichols was interviewed by Ambrose I. Lane, Sr. in 1995 for his book Return of the Buffalo. Lane wrote that Nichols was asked how the relationship with the giant Florida security firm Wackenhut came about and Lane recounted that "According to him [Nichols], establishing that contact was a source of pride. Because of the uncertainty of adequate income to meet the increasing expenses of the Tribe, he was pushed to concentrate on seeking new business opportunities. He described the hookup with Wackenhut this way:

When I was told to go out and look for new business, that's what I did. Wackenhut -- I was very proud of this and the way that came about -- Mr. Wackenhut's mother was a friend of a guy named Charles Emmert, and Emmert was a friend of Mike Riconosciuto's father, Marshall Riconosciuto. He was also a friend of Beryl Barber and Beryl Barber had reportedly developed a lot of the hardware for the AWAC's [Airborne Warning And Control System] airplane. This Charles Emmert was the head of a group calling itself something like "We Won't Pay Income Tax." They refused to pay income tax because of wars and all that stuff, and he [Emmert] just wouldn't pay it. So, of course the federal government was really hot on his tail. But he was also a conservative.

Apparently Emmert was also a friend of a fellow named Pat Moriarty who owned Red Devil Fireworks Company. Moriarty, allegedly a former CIA agent who had worked overseas and in Northern Japan, was an acquaintance of Robert Meskunas who knew me. Meskunas supposedly told some of them I was a social worker who often successfully treated people with severe mental and emotional problems, citing for example my work in Kentucky and Michigan. Apparently they had been discussing Mike Riconosciuto.

So what happened, Charles Emmert called me and said, "Look, I have a problem. We have a genius by the name of Michael Riconosciuto." He said Michael had shot down an RCA satellite in Mozanbique where he had gone when he had gotten mad at RCA. Now Mike was hanging around the Stanford Research Institute and he knew all the scientists there. Mike had lived with Janis Joplin in the past and it was stated he was a cook for the Hells' Angels for making amphetamines. I said, "He sound pretty sick to me."

Emmert felt I could help get Mike cleaned up for Wackenhut. Emmert felt Wackenhut would like to have him mentally and emotionally straight to use his genius. I went to Pinole, California, accompanied by Peter Zokosky and my wife and his wife. Pinole was the site of Hercules Powder Company, which had been owned by Dupont. It has been sold, and Michael's father had gotten control of this mammoth, mammoth plant. His son Mike was manufacturing amphetamines, apparently unknown by his dad. Mike wanted to hire me. He brought with him to the meeting $100,000 in street money. He was disheveled, dirty looking and smelled like he needed a bath. He said, "I would like to work with Wackenhut," as Emmert had said Wackenhut could use him. Zokosky still thought he really was a genius. Zokosky had been president of Armtec, which made caseless ammunition that was used in the Vietnam War. They made artillery ammunition out of nitrocellulose, with a metal cap and a traditional nose on each shell. The case, when fired, would disintegrate. After disintegration, only the bottom of the shell would be left. Before this invention, the entire hot shell would be left, burning the legs of the soldiers. Zokovsky had been president of this company which was the sole source for these shells, located in Coachella.

Zokosky, Riconosciuto, Bob Frey and myself went to two U.S. Arsenals, one was Dover Arsenal in New Jersey, and I forgot the name of the second in Indiana. We sat there with the absolute top brass in the United States in military physics talking about particle beams.

Riconosciuto held his own all the way through. I didn't know a particle beam from a sunbeam. I gave Wackenhut a lot of help with Mike because he was sent to me. That's how we met Riconosciuto. The bottom line was Riconosciuto was nuts. He brought with him a young man named Victor. They said they were running teenage prostitutes to service L.A.cops. They brought some of their prostitutes with them. Mike said he owned that business. Of course, he had all this money from manufacturing and selling drugs. He had been busted, because to escape detection he had built an under-the-water laboratory to make drugs [1972]. This way the lab couldn't be detected by Seattle Police helicopters. The guy is the closest to, if you ever read comic books, [Lex] Luthor in Superman. He is one of the most evil people I ever met. My diagnosis was he suffered from a combination character defect and was a sociopath."


The bottom line was that Nichols, according to those who introduced him and the Tribe to Wackenhut, gave Wackenhut what it wanted -- an attempt by Nichols to treat Riconosciuto to make him more functional -- and Wackenhut gave Nichols what he wanted, a tribal joint venture business relationship. As events would prove it was not a good bargain for either. [Source: Return of the Buffalo, pp. 75-77]

If Dr. Nichols' account of his first meeting with Michael Riconosciuto is correct, the impact it had on what transpired in future years at the Cabazon Reservation is overwhelming. But is there any independent verification that Nichols' story is true?

Court records reveal that the Cabazons were locked in a fight for survival with local, county and state officials over the tribe's desire for legalized gambling on their reservation. Because of this fight the business committee recognized the need for funds to support the legal bills involved in the struggle as well as the day to day expenses necessary to keep the staff paid, the offices open and health insurance paid.

According to John Philip Nichols he had to expand his consulting business and it is said he used his personal funds to support the tribe during this time. However, it must be pointed out that Nichols' family company, Pro Plan received 50% of the monies derived from businesses he brought to the reservation. In Nichols' account of his first meeting with Riconosciuto he states that Michael brought $100,000 in "street money" to their meeting at the old Hercules Powder Company and Nichols states he knew that "Mike was manufacturing amphetamines, apparently unknown by his dad". The remainder of Nichols' statement about this first meeting implies that Nichols accepted the money and soon those involved were visiting U.S. Arsenals with "Magic Mike". And those welcoming them apparently had no qualms about interacting with Michael Riconosciuto whose history included associating with scientists at Stanford Research Institute where Edwin and Ursula Meese held court at the Foundation for the Future.

It cannot be denied that Michael Riconosciuto came to the Cabazon reservation armed with some very powerful connections. In his statement Nichols lists a few influential people such as Charles Emmert, Beryl Barber, W. Patrick Moriarty, Robert Meskunas, and Bob Frye. These men had extended connections that led to several presidents and many foreign leaders. Michael Riconosciuto came into his power through his family's generational friendships and business relationships.

But when did this first meeting take place? That is a much harder question to pin down. What is known is that in September of 1980 the tribe formed The Cabazon Security Corporation Inc. in anticipation of some future relationship with the Wackenhut Corporation of Coral Gables, Florida. On April 1, 1981 Wackenhut and Cabazon entered into a joint venture that would last until October 1, 1984.

A five-page document given to this reporter by the mother of Michael Riconosciuto's daughter is on letterhead for Emmert & Associates. It is entitled Weekend Outline and details meetings taking place from 1-24-1981 through 1-26-1981. Among those attending this weekend conference were Robert Meskunes associated with the Energy Group who would be discussing alcohol plants and Beryl and Herma Barber who would be discussing solar pumps and an airport industrial park. These are names referred to by John Philip Nichols. On page two was a reference to Hercules Research.

Hercules Research

(1) Michael Riconosciuto

METC
Methane Plant
Communications

(2) Marshall Riconosciuto

Scientific Village
Land Development
Port Facilities


Hercules Properties was a real estate development project built around the partnership of long time friends Marshall Riconosciuto and W. Patrick Moriarty who were also partners is the huge fireworks company called Pyrotronics.

On page 5 the summary of this conference states "The scope and potential of the people, projects and inventions could and will change the direction of the world".

The preceding information provides a time window for Nichols version of his first meeting with Michael Riconosciuto. But what does Michael Riconosciuto say about their initial encounter?

On October 18, 2005 Michael Riconosciuto hand wrote an 8 page letter addressed "To Whom It May Concern" and Anita Langley, who said she spoke for "Magic Mike," faxed this reporter a copy. On page 2 and 3 Riconosciuto tells his side of the story:

(2) There are a string of unsolved homicides that authorities readily acknowledge the deceased parties as having a person connection to me and the Wackenhut/Cabazon joint venture. San Francisco homicide investigator Eddie Erdelatz is quoted in a 12/30/91 San Francisco Chronicle article as describing these still open homicide cases"...It's the craziest mix of characters and circumstances that any of us has ever come across...". The article further states that police detectives describe the murders as the most bizarre they have ever seen, and that all leads...keep going back to the group of people involved with the Cabazon tribe.

It is not a matter of dispute that a string of homicides have been committed that are closely related. It is also agreed upon as fact by media and law enforcement that I personally knew the victims and that we all had some connection to the Cabazon tribe.

What is in dispute is my claim of high level U.S. Intelligence officials and government agencies with the Cabazon tribe's joint venture with Wackenhut Corporation. Ambrose Lane's book on the Cabazon Tribe entitled Return of the Buffalo unambiguously states I was the reason Wackenhut became involved with the Cabazon Tribe. Lane clearly "blames" me for the military and weapons related projects undertaken by the Wackenhut/Cabazon joint venture. At the same time Lane's book portrays me as a "psychiatric patient" of Dr. John P. Nichols. The "wacko genius" that Wackenhut wanted Dr. Nichols to try to salvage.


The proclaimed doctor/patient relationship of Dr. Nichols to me was used as an excuse to prevent homicide detectives in the Morasca murder [January 1982] from meaningfully questioning Dr. Nichols on the Morasca murder. The fact is that John P. Nichols has no professional credentials medical, psychiatric, or otherwise. The San Francisco District Attorney's office and the FBI allowed J. P. Nichols to get away with this ruse. The so-called credential J. P. Nichols used to establish his standing to claim doctor/patient confidentiality was a mail order SOCIAL WORKER'S CERTIFICATE. This would be laughable but for the fact that it was used to shield J.P. Nichols from the full force of an active homicide investigation.

There is some third party documentation that both supports and discredits the stories told by both Nichols and Riconosciuto. There is a strange document that Michael Riconosciuto refers to as "the service contract with JPN". Anita Langley emailed this reporter on March 9, 2005 and said "Michael asks if you can find a copy of the service contract with JPN, would you please sent it to him" at FCI Allenwood, Whitedeer, PA. This "service contract" suggests that John Philip Nichols and Michael Riconosciuto had entered into an agreement where JPN would assist Riconosciuto is somehow "altering" his behavior. Many references to this service contract occur in the years following that first meeting between the two men. As Riconosciuto states this bizarre document plays a central part in many homicides and the personal relationship Michael had with his wife Phyllis. Additionally JPN's future use of this contract bring into sharp focus the possibility of Nichol's use of mind control, not just of Riconosciuto and his wife, but of other Cabazon Indians who met strange deaths while Nichols controlled the reservation.

Riconosciuto is accurate when he infers that Nichols' social worker's certificate was issued by a paper mill in Manitoba, Canada The name of the school was Philathes Seminary and according to a letter signed by the Archbishop of the church "Nichols graduated from Philathes Seminary in July 1971 with the Degree of Doctor of Religious Education. His minor was pastoral counseling, his claim to a Ph.d is not correct."

The website "Welcome to Freemasonry.org" reveals that:

The Philalethes Society was founded on October 1, 1928, by a group of Masonic students. It was designed for Freemasons desirous of seeking and spreading Masonic light. In 1946, The Philalethes magazine was established to publish articles by and for its members. For many years it has been voted the best Masonic publication in the world. The sole purpose of this Research Society is to act as a clearinghouse for Masonic knowledge. It exchanges ideas, research searches problems confronting Freemasonry, and passes them along to the Masonic world.
[URL https://freemasonry.org/index.php?optio ... e&Itemid=1 internet ]

Each reader must make up his or her own mind about when and how the initial meeting between the mysterious "Dr." John Philip Nichols and "Magic Mike" Riconosciuto took place . The only thing one can be certain of is that this unique encounter forever changed the future of the Cabazon Nation.



Virginia McCullough © 2/4/2010
vmccullough@hotmail.com
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:13 pm

http://www.newsmakingnews.com/vm,fred,a ... 27,10.html

THE ALVAREZ EXECUTIONS
ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATOR GLEN HEGGSTAD


by Virginia McCullough


Introduction – The Alleged Co-Conspirators


Deputy Attorney General Michael T. Murphy on behalf of the people of the State of California filed an Amended Felony Complaint in Case No. INF066719 - The People v. Jimmy Hughes. The amended complaint was filed on December 18, 2009 and detailed charges naming James Hughes as the man who murdered Fred Alvarez, Patricia Castro and Ralph Boger on June 29, 1981 in the County of Riverside, State of California. The final page of the complaint cites the special allegation of multiple murders in violation of Pen. Code S 190.2(a)(3). Much has been written about the four people addressed in this portion of the complaint.

Page one of the complaint outlines the “Conspiracy to Commit a Crime”. The three people who are named here, John Philip Nichols, John Paul Nichols, and Glen Heggstad have been featured in the media to differing degrees. Now the state alleges that each and every one is central to the conspiracy that resulted two days later in the Alvarez executions. Deputy AG Murphy alleges the following:

That on or about June 27, 1981, in the County of Riverside, State of California, JAMES HUGHES did unlawfully conspire with John Nichols, John Paul Nichols, Glen Heggstad and other persons whose identities are unknown; to commit the crime of Murder, in violation of Penal Code section 187(s), a felony.

Who are these men and what are their backgrounds? This is the third and final segment of a three part biographical series.


GLEN HEGGSTAD
THE MYSTERIOUS STRIKING VIKING


Three men are named in the two complaints filed by Deputy Attorney General Michael Murphy: John Philip Nichols, John Paul Nichols and Glenn Heggstad. Father and son, John Philip and John Paul Nichols clearly have ties to the Cabazon Indian Reservation in Indio, California dating back to the late 1970s. Countless documents in Cabazon and court files attest to the ties these two men had in the day to day operations and business deals conducted in the Cabazon name. There is no question about both Nichols' involvement in the events before and after the triple execution of Fred Alvarez, Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro. The alliance and the animosity between the two white men controlling the reservation and Cabazon Indian Fred Alvarez are detailed in several books.

Glen Heggstad, the third man named in the complaints, cannot be found in any documents, articles or books dealing with the Cabazon nation. This writer has interviewed numerous media sources and members of the Cabazon nation and none recall the name Glen Heggstad in connection with the business deals, conflicts, and/or scandals which occurred in the 1970s and 1980s at the reservation. So why has this man's name been interjected into this high profile case by the prosecutor? Who is he and why is he listed by name as an alleged co-conspirator when there is no obvious paper trail connecting him to the Alvarez triple execution?

Glen Heggstad is a native Californian born in San Mateo, California. A December 2006 article by Cameron Weckerley in Friction Zone, a magazine devoted to motorcycle travel and information, describes Heggstad's early life:

As a youngster in the San Francisco Bay-area town of Belmont, California, Heggstad spent much of his time wearing out the bench in the principal's office and directing his restless energy to fighting and other destructive activities. "Standard warnings had no effect and punishments [had] no effect," he says almost apologetically. In high school, he was voted the most likely to end up behind bars, and he did--but they were handlebars. He began riding a homemade scooter to school daily when he was 15. Then, at age 16, he read Jack Kerouac's autobiographical novel celebrating the spontaneous road trip, On the Road, and set out hitchhiking across country the very next day.

His restless road trip finally ended in San Bernardino in 1973 and Heggstad became the youngest member of the Hells Angels riding with the club until he retired as Sergeant-at-Arms in 1979. When questioned by interviewers about his experiences in this unique motor club he will only say that, "We leave the Hell's Angels particular business things to them" and they "are an extremely energetic organization."


When Glen Heggstad left the Hells Angels he devoted his energy to the Chinese discipline of Kung Fu and for the next few years he concentrated solely on the study of numerous martial arts. He became so proficient that he won several national championships in both judo and Brazilian jiujutsu. It was about this time that he opened a business called Viking Security that provided bodyguard services for people in and around the Palm Springs area. In was a natural fit for the powerfully built, blond man depicted on his web site "Strikingviking.net" at http://www.strikingviking.net/.

Image


Glen Heggstad is a public figure and the author of two books Two Wheels Through Terror: Diary of a South American Motorcycle Odyssey published by Whitehorse Press in 2004 and One More Day Everywhere: crossing 50 borders on the Road to Global Understanding published by Ecw Press in November 2009. His first book was featured in a National Geographic Channel docu-drama and on 48 Hours. He has appeared on Larry King Live and the Montel Show and his adventures have been covered on CNN, NPR and MSNBC.

Many publications describe Heggstad as an ambassador of good will mounted on two wheels. When one reads his books it is apparent that he is also a thoughtful, considerate and respectful individual whose devotion to motorcycle adventure is only exceeded by his determination to help those in need that he has met in his travels around the world. It is well known that Heggstad donates all the monies realized from his books to a variety of worldwide aid and relief organizations. The money made from his first book went to the International Red Cross and the profits from his second book were donated to "Room to Read" a group that builds schools in Vietnam, Cambodia and Nepal. The public attention generated by Heggstad's adventures also led the Southern California BMW dealers who provided him with the F650GS Dakar he rode around the world to raffle the bike off and present the proceeds to Amnesty International.

While Heggstad himself says he has had "a checkered and demented career" he is also a well know businessman who founded a martial arts school, Coachella Valley Judo. He conveys to his students his policy in life, "Whenever I experience any setback I am determined to come out ahead." He says, "I try to inspire my students by telling them if you say you are going to do something then do it. Commit to a goal and pursue it with zeal. You may skin your knees in the process but you'll get up again and be stronger for it."

It was undoubtedly this philosophy that enabled him to survive 33 days in captivity in 2001 when he was kidnapped by the National Liberation Army while riding his Kawasaki 650 motorcycle on a mountain road between Medellin and Bogota, Colombia .

On his web site Glen Heggstad features his building project, a house to be called "La Casa del Viking" (Norte) with photos showing the various friends and workmen who are constructing this home in the desert. It is apparent that this man conducts his life in an open and straight forward manner.

So why was this man named in a criminal complaint that states that "on or about June 27, 1981, in the County of Riverside, State of California, JAMES HUGHES did unlawfully conspire with John Nichols, John Paul Nichols, Glen Heggstad and other persons whose identifies are unknown to commit the crime of Murder, in violation of Penal Code section 187, subdivision (a), a felony." wording of this complaint implies that Glen Heggstad was an active participant conspiring to murder Fred Alvarez in order "to prevent Fred Alvarez from exposing illegal activities of John Philip Nichols, occurring at the Cabazon Indian Reservation."

Overt Act Number 1 states that "On or about June 27, 1981, James Hughes asked a friend to introduce John Paul Nichols to Glenn Heggstad, for the purpose of hiring Heggstad to prevent Fred Alvarez from exposing illegal activities of John Philip Nichols, occurring at the Cabazon Indian Reservation." The "friend" who allegedly acted as a go-between John Paul Nichols and Glen Heggstad is not named and to date has not been otherwise identified. However, two men who have not yet been charged with any wrongdoing are named, so why isn't the so-called "friend" also named? What motivation does the prosecutor have for keeping this name secret from public view? Has either Detective John M. Powers or Prosecutor Michael Murphy interviewed the "friend" and does that person maintain a credible position in the community? If this unidentified individual has been interviewed by the investigator and/or the prosecutor did they determine whether or not this informant had a grudge against either John Paul Nichols or Glen Heggstad?

Overt Act Number 2 alleges that "On or about June 27, 1981, John Paul Nichols met with Glenn Heggstad, for the purpose of hiring Heggstad to prevent Fred Alvarez from exposing illegal activities of John Philip Nichols, occurring at the Cabazon Indian Reservation." The wording in this portion of the complaint leaves more questions to be answered. Assuming the allegation is accurate and taking it word for word raises the question of whether or not there was one meeting or two separate meetings. If there was only one meeting than why isn't James Hughes mentioned as being present in Overt Act No. 2? If there was only one meeting why would it be necessary to have a "friend" do the introduction between John Paul and Heggstad?

Overt Act Number 3 states "On June 29, 1981, James Hughes went to Fred Alvarez's residence to prevent Fred Alvarez from exposing illegal activities of John Philip Nichols, occurring at the Cabazon Indian Reservation." So now suddenly John Paul Nichols and Glen Heggstad disappear from the narrative. The complaint continues stating that James Hughes committed three counts of murder killing Fred Alavaez, Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro. There is no further mention of any other people involved in the actual act.

Reliable sources have told this reporter that both John Paul Nichols and Glen Heggstad have taken the precaution of hiring attorneys and investigators of try to protect themselves against any possible pending charges that might or might not be brought in this 28 year-old murder case.

Bills for both men could run as high as $100,000 dollars and recovering their damaged reputations might not be possible at any price.

The phone number for John Paul Nichols was unavailable and he had left his last known place of employment last year. An associate indicated that Nichols had retained an attorney after he was contacted by cold case Detective John M. Powers.

An October 1, 2009 article issued by the Associated Press discussed how Glen Heggstad felt about the complaint.

Glen Heggstad, another person named but not charged in the complaint, said Thursday he was interviewed by sheriff’s detectives several months ago and was cooperating. Heggstad said he had been friends with Alvarez, and the tribal leader told him before his death that he feared for his life because he had “uncovered some information.”

“I just spoke with the investigating officer, and he says I’m not involved,” Heggstad said. “This is pretty freaky."


The questions must be asked: Is there a standard policy within the State of California that spells out how to handle a criminal complaint that designates uncharged co-conspirators in felony complaints? What is the legal responsibility of a prosecutor who litigates a case in the name of the State while upholding a moral obligation to protect the innocent?

Assistant Attorney General Michael Murphy wrote the complaint naming John Paul Nichols and Glen Heggstad. (Murphy Complaint dtd Sept. 29, 2010) He works out of the same San Diego Office that employs another Deputy General Melissa Anne Mandel who is prosecuting a very high profile case jointly with San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos. This later complaint filed refers to those individual who were not charged as "John Does 1 through 5" as stated in the excerpt below (Ramos/AG complaint dtd Feb. 9, 2010)

II. CHARGES

Between on or about January 1, 2005, and September 15, 2008, WILLIAM JOHN POSTMUS; JAMES HOWARD ERWIN; John Doe #1, not charged herein; John Doe #2, not charged herein; John Doe #3, not charged herein; John Doe #4, not charged herein; and John Doe #5, not charged herein; did unlawfully conspire together and with another person, and persons whose identity is known and unknown, to commit the crimes of Corrupt Influencing (Penal Code Section 85), Accepting a Bribe (Penal Code Section 86), Offering a Bribe to a Supervisor (Penal Code Section 165), Supervisor Accepting a Bribe (Penal Code Section 165), Misappropriation of Public Funds (Penal Code 424), Extortion (Penal Code Section 518), Conflict of Interest (Government Code Section 1090), Obtaining Money to Improperly Influence a Legislator (Government Code 9054), and Willfully Omitting to Perform a Duty (Government Code Section 1222) in violation of Penal Code Section 182 (a)(1), a felony.


An article about this case by reporter Joe Nelson entitled "Prosecutors allege biggest corruption scandal in San Bernardino County history" appeared in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Click.) sIt included a quote from San Bernardino County District Michael A. Ramos who said "The overt acts will detail the threats, the extortion, the inducements and the bribery." Mr. Ramos stressed that none of the five unnamed co-conspirators have been charged because prosecutors do not feel they have gathered enough evidence to prove those cases beyond a reasonable doubt. He emphasized that the investigation was far from over and "I want to make this very, very clear today: This is an ongoing investigation and things can change as to those uncharged co-conspirators."

The Attorney General for the State of California posts the following mission statement on his web page:

MISSION STATEMENT

It is our duty to serve our state and work honorably every day to fulfill California's promise. The Attorney General and our Department's employees provide leadership, information and education in partnership with state and local governments and the people of California to:

Enforce and apply all our laws fairly and impartially.

Ensure justice, safety, and liberty for everyone.

Encourage economic prosperity, equal opportunity and tolerance.

Safeguard California's human, natural, and financial resources for this and future generations.


Why do two Deputy Attorney Generals in the same San Diego Office use completely opposite formats when issuing a complaint dealing with uncharged alleged co-conspirators? Does this lack of conformity ensure compliance with the Attorney General's Jerry Brown's mission statement?

Deputy AG Michael Murphy would not comment about his choice to name John Paul Nichols and Glenn Heggstad even though they have not been charged.

Deputy Attorney General Melissa Mandel would not discuss the policy and transferred this reporter to the AG's media office. However, repeated messages left with various receptionists at the AG's media office did not generate a response over a three day period.

It is apparent that any prosecutor in this powerful state office can determine whether or not to name an individual who has not been charged in any complaint they choose to file.

There appears to be no protection for the average citizen ensuring equal justice and safety by those who should apply the laws fairly and impartially. Legal enforcers operating on personal whims do not insure the safeguarding of California's citizens.


Virginia McCullough © 2/27/10
vmccullough@hotmail.com
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:51 pm

http://www.newsmakingnews.com/vm,fred,a ... 28,10.html

THE ALVAREZ EXECUTIONS -- THE HEAD OF THE OCTOPUS

by Virginia McCullough 3/28/10



Prior to 1978 the Cabazon Reservation in Indio, California received very little publicity; then the Cabazons made a life altering decision when they hired John Philip Nichols and his family company, Pro Plan. Author William H. Thompson described the arrival of the Nichols' family in the paragraph below:

A very troubling case developed on the California lands of the Cabazon Band in 1981. The tribe consisted of 22 individuals -- 16 adults and 6 children, and they lived on a 1700-acre reservation in Southern California that President Grant had set up for the tribe in 1876. Since the land was quite unfit for habitation at the time, most of the tribal members lived in local cities off the reservation. Two hundred of the acres, however, turned out to be located adjacent to Interstate Highway 10. In 1978, the tribe hired John Paul [Philip] Nichols to be its financial adviser. Nichols had an unusual past, having spent seventeen years in South America as a consultant before moving to Sarasota, Florida, where he was a social worker specializing in writing federal grant proposals. As the tribal financial adviser, Nichols's eyes turned immediately to the 200 interstate acres and "tax-free" commercial possibilities. He examined outlets for the sale of cigarettes, for liquor, and also for a bingo hall and card games casino. Nichols invited several of his friends to develop a gambling hall.

Native American Issues - Second Edition, Pg. 30
Author William H. Thompson, published 2005


A 1991 article in the San Francisco Chronicle by John Littman describes the continuing activities of John Philip Nichols:

In the summer of 1980, Nichols embarked on the most extraordinary business of all -- a spate of international security and military ventures, starting with a plan to provide security for a royal Saudi palace in a joint venture with Wackenhut International, a Florida-based security firm run by former CIA, FBI, National Security Agency and military officials.

During the next three years, Nichols proposed manufacturing 120mm combustible cartridge cases, 9mm machine pistols, laser-sighted assault weapons, sniper rifles and portable rocket systems on the reservation and in Latin America. At one point, he even sought a contract to make biological weapons.


Image

All of these developments were noteworthy, but the media coverage was limited until one devastating act, allegedly ordered by John Philip Nichols, forced the Cabazon tribe onto the front pages of newspapers throughout the United States. The triple execution of former Cabazon Vice-chairman Fred Alvarez and his two friends Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro on June 29, 1981 caught the immediate attention of the world wide media. (Seeking the Head of the Octopus: The Years Leading up to the Alvarez Executions.) Suddenly all of the business ventures initiated by Pro Plan, John Philip Nichols and his family were subject to examination under the intense scrutiny of a triple homicide investigation that remained open in both Riverside County and the State of California for the next 28 years. Then on October 1, 2009 Deputy Attorney General Michael Murphy filed a felony warrant in Riverside Superior Court naming James "Jimmy" George Hughes as the alleged murderer of three people. Three other alleged co-conspirators were named including the now deceased John Philip Nichols. (Attorney General Jerry Brown's Felony Complaint Against Jimmy Hughes).

In the winter of 2007 the Alvarez Executions were placed in the hands of Riverside Sheriff Cold Case Detective John M. Powers. On July 10, 2008 Detective John Powers told this reporter that, "I simply cannot understand why this case was never solved and it was put back on the shelf so many times. Numerous detectives from the sheriff's department, the DA's Office, the FBI, the Justice Department, and a grand jury spent years investigating it, but no one seems to know why it wasn't completed. I have an FBI report closing the case in 1986 with no further leads to follow up. The only conclusion that I've come up with is that everyone gets caught up in the Octopus and gets overwhelmed by the vastness of where this case reaches. I myself have decided to focus simply on the murder of 3 people in the desert, who ordered it to be done, who organized it, and who pulled the trigger.

It was now obvious that the arrest and attempted conviction of defendant Jimmy Hughes would address only the act of murder itself and little to no attention would be paid to the motivation or mental state that resulted in the slaughter of three people. However, the felony complaint itself spells out the attorney's general's reason the co-conspirators allegedly planned the triple execution. The final words in each paragraph in Overt Acts 1, 2, and 3 states "to prevent Fred Alvarez from exposing illegal activities of John Philip Nichols, occurring at the Cabazon Indian Reservation".

Many of those illegal activities were invented by, sanctioned by and protected by the CIA, DEA and NSA. The FBI operating in concert with and usually under the direction of one or all of these three agencies served a very specific purpose that directly affected the outcome of the Alvarez murder investigation. As Mr. Powers so succinctly said, "I have an FBI report closing the [Alvarez Executions] case in 1986 with no further leads to follow up."

There were many shady businesses that began on the Cabazon land, but the primary goal of Pro Plan, Nichols and those who controlled and protected them was to achieve legalized gaming on all Indian Reservations within the United States. In order to achieve that goal it was necessary for the challenges to Indian gambling to wind their way through the local, state and federal courts until the Supreme Court took up the issue of gaming on Sovereign Nations and made a ruling.

Legalized and unaudited gambling on sovereign Indian land would provide tremendous profits for the gaming management teams such as Pro Plan and it would also provide unlimited funding to support America's undeclared wars in South America. Intelligence funding for these purposes had been largely curtailed following the Church Hearings in 1975-76.

Many states fought against legalized Indian gaming because of countless complaints of organized criminal activity involved with the management groups and gaming suppliers operating on various Indian Reservations. Organized crime on Indian reservations and political assassinations to hide such blatant illegal activities and the subsequent publicity would endanger the ultimate goal of a favorable Supreme Court ruling. Therefore the numerous accusations of mob activity controlling Indian gaming were ignored and all such criticism was directed to the FBI and ultimately to the courts themselves.

During the first three years of the 1980s organized crime was exposed on several Indian casinos run by white management teams. William H. Thompson describes a few instances below:

The Seminole Tribe in Florida garnered publicity in the Miami Herald on May 29, 1983 when a federal grand jury, unable to get the accounting records of the Seminole Casino, filed to obtain indictments against the Pan American Associates for skimming.

Soon Pan American had arranged for a Boston firm, New England Entertainment, to finance a bingo facility for a tiny Mdewakanton Sioux Reservation in Shakopee, Minnesota on the outskirts of Minneapolis.


William H. Thompson describes the expanding operation below:

The two companies then merged and took the new name Little Six, Inc., for the Minnesota project. They agreed to operate the bingo games for fifteen years in exchange for a 45 percent share of all net profits from bingo after a $1 million loan for the building was repaid. Little Six received $850,000 beyond the repayment of the loans and other expenses in the first year of operations.

[Mdewakanton Sioux Reservation Tribal Chair] Crooks was happy with the operation. He claimed that the bingo game profits allowed the 150 inhabitants of the 250-acre reservation to have paved roads for the first time. He also enjoyed the $80,000 he received from Little Six for the use of his land. The bingo hall was constructed on a reservation parcel that was assigned to Crooks. The tribal chair neglected to tell the tribal council and tribal members that he was taking this money from Little Six. He won council approval for the tribe to also pay him a monthly stipend for the use of his land. In addition, they noted that some unsavory characters were associated with Little Six. The federal district court of Minnesota voided the contract; the tribe took over management of the games United States ex. rel. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community v. Pan American Management Company 1985).

When {Indian tribal attorney Stephen] Whilden reached out for financial help from New England Entertainment, he latched onto a group with a past. Two of New England's partners had criminal records. Under Whilden's direction, Pan American also lined up New England Entertainment to be its partner in establishing a blackjack casino in the State of Washington on the Lummi Reservation. The federal authorities acknowledged that the criminal involvement of the New England partners was a major factor in their closing down the operation in February 1983 Akron Beacon Journal June 3, 1984).

Stephen Whilden seemed to be ubiquitous, but actually he was but one of a cadre of entrepreneurs looking for opportunity in Native American Gaming. The high-stakes bingo games on the Cherokee reservation in North Carolina provide an example of how tribal revenues were diverted to non-Native managers. An audit of 1983 and 1984 revenues revealed that bingo revenues in excess of $8 million resulted in tribal shares of $800,000 after the Cherokee Management group had deduced "expenses" Charlotte Observer July 7, 1985; Raleigh News Observer July 28, 1985).


As early as 1978 rumors of organized crime controlling Indian gaming were rampant. Audio, video and printed media covered numerous tribes who were being torn apart as white management teams with shady pasts spread like a cancer over reservations nationwide. By 1980 almost 20 states were filing formal complaints with the United States Congress requesting that legislation severely limiting Indian gaming be implemented at the federal level. The fight to establish Indian sovereignty had begun.

On May 6, 2002 David A. Yeagley wrote an article that looked back on the repercussions of uncontrolled, unaudited monies approaching $5 billion dollars a year in California alone. Yeagley's piece, When Sacred Places Sell that originally ran at FrontPageMagazine.com stated in part:

The deeper crisis has been brought out by ongoing investigations of the Executive Intelligence Review (EIR). In the January 15, 1993 issue, Phillip Valenti said it’s all about global money laundering, international drugs and weapons trafficking, prostitution, pornography, or "Dope, Inc."

Valenti says "the organized crime takeover of Indian reservations in the United States is already well advanced," and its "part of a larger scheme to force legalized casino gambling through state legislatures everywhere."

Valenti offers exotic lists of people, like John Philip Nichols (CIA), Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI.), Sidney Yates (D-Ill.), Michael Riconosciuto, Paul Morasca, Shabtai Kalmanowitch, Minnesota Attorney General Hubert Humphrey, and Anti-Defamation League’s Burton Joseph as players. Valenti cites the playing fields too, like specific Indian reservations, and how they were surreptitiously "invaded" by players from South Africa, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, and Britain.

Saudis have been involved in Connecticut’s Mashantucket casino (Foxwoods), as well as Malaysians. This was well publicized in the Harford Courant (1994).

All international crooks, including Americans, want to exploit the Indian "sovereignty" situation, because on reservations casino industries are free from government regulation.


At the Cabazon Reservation tribal members delegated total responsibility for the day to day operations of all businesses operated in the Cabazon name to the business committee and the Nichols family delegates. The managers or administrators promised the world to individual tribal members and they also had the absolute power to deny all benefits to any tribal member who objected to the arrangement often using a process called disenrollment to punish the most vocal critics. Those who bent to the will of the administrator and the business committee were promised the earth and the moon, a promise that was often filled with outright lies.

An excellent example of this manipulative process was documented during a HUD hearing in an exchange between California Congressman Ton Lantos and Cabazon Chief John James on October 21, 1991:

Cabazon Tribal Administrator Mark Nichols explained an estimated net income of between $6 and $7 million to Congressman Lantos:

It is a small percentage that an operation takes off the amount of wagers. Of that $6 million figure, we have to sustain a work force of approximately 260 people and a whole slew of associated costs.

A tribal tax which comes to the tribe on a monthly basis, which sustains operations on a monthly basis and that also, comes off the top.

MR. LANTOS: There is nothing wrong in being a millionaire. I wish everybody would be a millionaire. Is it accurate, Mr. James, that you stated in an interview in the Desert Sun, what I would try to do is to make sure every one of the Indians in the next 4 years is a millionaire -- did you make that statement?

MR. JAMES: At the time, it was a campaign speech. I was running for the office of chairman. At that time, the net worth of the Cabazon Indians was $250,000, so I figured on average I will increase it by $750,000.


Congressman Lantos ignored the obvious lie by the Indian Chief to his people and changed the subject asking, "Can you just tell us about this high-tech security for the Sandi Arabian palace, what that venture was?"

Certainly Congressman Lantos and all those attending the hearing that day were fully aware of the regulations of the Indian Gaming Regulators Act which the Cabazon's former attorney James G. Abourezk spelled out in a letter to his client on March 2, 1994.

It is necessary to advise you of the substance the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act which covers such a situation. Under 25 U.S.C. Section 2701(b) (2) the Chairman [of the National Indian Gaming Commission] shall approve any tribal ordinance or resolution concerning the conduct of Class II gaming on the Indian lands within the tribe's jurisdiction if such ordinance or resolution provides that -

(B) Net revenue from any tribal gaming is not to be used for purposes other than:

(i) to fund tribal government operations or programs;

(ii) to provide for the general welfare of the Indian tribe and its members;

(iii) to promote tribal economic development;

(iv) to donate to charitable organization; or

(v) to help fund operations of local government agencies.


Ignoring and then covering up the many allegations about organized criminal activities and mismanagement and outright theft of American Indians funds by the many now profiting from Indian gaming, the FBI and the court pushed headlong toward absolving all those accused of any wrongdoing. One paragraph in a letter dated October 13, 1993 from the Seminole Tribe of Florida to The honorable Bill Richardson, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Native American Affairs of the Committee on Natural Resources in Washington D.C. was typical of the united effort to ignore any and all accusations about organized crime's control of Indian gaming:

None of the allegations raised by Mr. Torricelli or [retired FBI special agent] Richard] Elroy has ever been pursued by the FBI, by any other agency of the federal government or by the Special Committee of Investigations of the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs that initially heard these charges more than four years ago.... We strongly urge that any individual with information concerning corruption or links to organized crime within our gaming operations make that information available to the FBI.

A close examination of the public and private records clearly documents countless instances of organized crime on Indian reservations brought about because of gaming. But the FBI, acting on behalf of and at the instance of various agencies consistently ignored and/or covered up any such allegations.

In October 1991 at the infamous HUD hearings, Cabazon Chief John James felt so comfortable with his protection by that very agency that he recounted for the committee the following:

The first is the organized crime allegation. This is the cheapest shot of all. Let me state clearly: There is no criminal involvement in our gaming activities -- organized or disorganized. The Chronicle story says that the HUD grant was made "despite a decade of allegations by state and local authorities that organized crime has infiltrated the Cabazon's gambling activities." This is a lie. The Cabazon Band litigated the legality of its gambling operations for seven years against the City of Indio, Riverside County and the State of California. During that entire time, no such allegation was ever presented in court, and, in fact, the County and State specifically stated in the litigation that they were not alleging any organized crime involvement in our gaming operations.

As a result, in 1986 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that:

"There is no evidence whatsoever that organized crime exists on these (Cabazon and Morongo) Indian reservations."

A year later, in 1987, the United States Supreme Court reached the same conclusion:

"California does not allege any present criminal involvement in the Cabazon and Morongo enterprises and the Ninth Circuit discerned none."

The long journey to legalized gaming on the sovereign land of United States Indian Reservations was finally achieved with the US Supreme Court Decision handed down in 1987. The ruling essentially discounts all individual state concerns about organized crime involved in Indian gaming on sovereign land located within state boundaries. Item 2 of California v. Cabazon Bank of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) - Appealed from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 85-1708. The case was argued December 9, 1986 and decided on February 25, 1987. Item 2 summarizes the court's reasoning:

2. Even though not expressly authorized by Congress, state and local laws may be applied to on-reservation activities of tribes and tribal members under certain circumstances. The decision in this case turns on whether state authority is pre-empted by the operation of federal law. State jurisdiction is pre-empted if it interferes or is incompatible with federal and tribal interests reflected in federal law, unless the state interests at stake are sufficient to justify the assertion of state authority. The federal interests in Indian self-government, including the goal of encouraging tribal self-sufficiency and economic development, are important, and federal agencies, acting under federal laws, have sought to implement them by promoting and overseeing tribal bingo and gambling enterprises. Such policies and actions are of particular relevance in this case since the tribal games provide the sole source of revenues for the operation of the tribal governments and are the major sources of employment for tribal members. To the extent that the State seeks to prevent all bingo games on tribal lands while permitting regulated off-reservation games, the asserted state interest in preventing the infiltration of the tribal games by organized crime is irrelevant, and the state and county laws are pre-empted. Even to the extent that the State and county seek to regulate short of prohibition, the laws are pre-empted since the asserted state interest is not sufficient to escape the pre-emptive force of the federal and tribal interests apparent in this case. Pp. 214-222.

The case that brought about this historic supreme court ruling began as Cabazon Band of Mission Indians vs. County of Riverside and for 28 years law enforcement officers and prosecutors in Riverside County and the State of California have been led down the rabbit hole and gotten lost in the in the tentacles of the Octopus. Did they know as they allegedly pursued the executioners of three people that they had simply been sacrificed to the head of the Octopus so that the federal government could usurp local and state rights in order to turn over the proceeds from sovereign nation gaming to organized crime.

Fred Alvarez, Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro were simply collateral damage in this immoral war for the economic control of billions of dollars generated by Indian gaming. The FBI closed their investigation in 1986 into this brutal triple murder for the very same reason the State Attorney General Jerry Brown alleges Jimmy Hughes pulled the trigger -- "to prevent Fred Alvarez from exposing illegal activities of John Philip Nichols, occurring at the Cabazon Indian Reservation".



Virginia McCullough © 3/28/10
vmccullough@hotmail.com
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby compared2what? » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:33 am

American Dream wrote:http://www.newsmakingnews.com/vm,fred,alvarez,jimmy,hughes,head,of,octopus,3,28,10.html

THE ALVAREZ EXECUTIONS -- THE HEAD OF THE OCTOPUS

by Virginia McCullough 3/28/10



Prior to 1978 the Cabazon Reservation in Indio, California received very little publicity; then the Cabazons made a life altering decision when they hired John Philip Nichols and his family company, Pro Plan. Author William H. Thompson described the arrival of the Nichols' family in the paragraph below:

A very troubling case developed on the California lands of the Cabazon Band in 1981. The tribe consisted of 22 individuals -- 16 adults and 6 children, and they lived on a 1700-acre reservation in Southern California that President Grant had set up for the tribe in 1876. Since the land was quite unfit for habitation at the time, most of the tribal members lived in local cities off the reservation. Two hundred of the acres, however, turned out to be located adjacent to Interstate Highway 10. In 1978, the tribe hired John Paul [Philip] Nichols to be its financial adviser. Nichols had an unusual past, having spent seventeen years in South America as a consultant before moving to Sarasota, Florida, where he was a social worker specializing in writing federal grant proposals. As the tribal financial adviser, Nichols's eyes turned immediately to the 200 interstate acres and "tax-free" commercial possibilities. He examined outlets for the sale of cigarettes, for liquor, and also for a bingo hall and card games casino. Nichols invited several of his friends to develop a gambling hall.

Native American Issues - Second Edition, Pg. 30
Author William H. Thompson, published 2005


A 1991 article in the San Francisco Chronicle by John Littman describes the continuing activities of John Philip Nichols:

In the summer of 1980, Nichols embarked on the most extraordinary business of all -- a spate of international security and military ventures, starting with a plan to provide security for a royal Saudi palace in a joint venture with Wackenhut International, a Florida-based security firm run by former CIA, FBI, National Security Agency and military officials.

During the next three years, Nichols proposed manufacturing 120mm combustible cartridge cases, 9mm machine pistols, laser-sighted assault weapons, sniper rifles and portable rocket systems on the reservation and in Latin America. At one point, he even sought a contract to make biological weapons.



All of these developments were noteworthy, but the media coverage was limited until one devastating act, allegedly ordered by John Philip Nichols, forced the Cabazon tribe onto the front pages of newspapers throughout the United States. The triple execution of former Cabazon Vice-chairman Fred Alvarez and his two friends Ralph Boger and Patricia Castro on June 29, 1981 caught the immediate attention of the world wide media.

[snip

It was now obvious that the arrest and attempted conviction of defendant Jimmy Hughes would address only the act of murder itself and little to no attention would be paid to the motivation or mental state that resulted in the slaughter of three people. However, the felony complaint itself spells out the attorney's general's reason the co-conspirators allegedly planned the triple execution. The final words in each paragraph in Overt Acts 1, 2, and 3 states "to prevent Fred Alvarez from exposing illegal activities of John Philip Nichols, occurring at the Cabazon Indian Reservation".

Many of those illegal activities were invented by, sanctioned by and protected by the CIA, DEA and NSA. The FBI operating in concert with and usually under the direction of one or all of these three agencies served a very specific purpose that directly affected the outcome of the Alvarez murder investigation. As Mr. Powers so succinctly said, "I have an FBI report closing the [Alvarez Executions] case in 1986 with no further leads to follow up."

There were many shady businesses that began on the Cabazon land, but the primary goal of Pro Plan, Nichols and those who controlled and protected them was to achieve legalized gaming on all Indian Reservations within the United States. In order to achieve that goal it was necessary for the challenges to Indian gambling to wind their way through the local, state and federal courts until the Supreme Court took up the issue of gaming on Sovereign Nations and made a ruling.

Legalized and unaudited gambling on sovereign Indian land would provide tremendous profits for the gaming management teams such as Pro Plan and it would also provide unlimited funding to support America's undeclared wars in South America. Intelligence funding for these purposes had been largely curtailed following the Church Hearings in 1975-76.

___________________________

Wait.

She can't possibly be talking about this fine gentleman -- the best representation of whose activities during those years she already judiciously sifted through her archives in order accurately to recount to us just three months ago -- can she?

Because seemingly she didn't know nothing 'bout no 1991 San Francisco Chronicle story then:

The time span between Brazil and the Nichols family arrival at the Cabazon Reservation have not been widely covered in the media but it is essential to an understanding of the man that brought the bright sun of gambling riches to a small desert tribe at the cost of some of the tribal members lives.

The best description of these years is contained on pages 27 and 28 of a book published in 1995, commissioned by the youngest son, Mark Nichols and paid for by the Cabazon tribe.

"Return of the Buffalo" by Ambrose L. Lane Sr. is clearly a biased book but one that is invaluable to understanding what happened in the 70s and 80s in Indio, California. Lane’s interview with Nichols Sr. recounted the Latin American years of Nichols’ career:

Nichols then returned to the United States for a short period. While waiting to return to Latin America, he took a temporary assignment as Executive Director of the Lower Eastside Neighborhood Association in New York City. Securing a position with Church World Service as staff representative, Nichols was assigned to Ayuda Christiana Evangelica (ACE) and the Concilio Evangelica de Chile. He would be based in Santiago and would be supervised by Obispo Enrique Chavez.

For more than four years, Nichols worked with health and social welfare treatment facilities and on economic-development projects of Chile's almost 900 local committees, covering a 2,300-mile area serving 2,000,000 Chilean Evangelicals. Among these projects were setting up and working small mines for precious stones such as lapis lazuli and various kinds of metals, deep-sea diving, the collection of abalone, the cultivation and gathering of seaweed for the Far East market, sawmills, millwork factories and native crafts work centers.

From that operations base, Nichols did consultation work for evangelical groups in Peru, Brazil, El Salvador, Bolivia and similar economic-development work with COMBASE, a group representing Protestant, Evangelical, Mennonite and Pentecostal churches in Bolivia.

In 1967, 10 years before contracting with the Cabazon's in California, Nichols was a consultant to the Chilean Council of Churches delegation to the World Congress of Pentecostalism in Rio de Janeiro. He was also a delegate from Chile to the World Congress of Evangelicals held in Berlin, West Germany, in 1966. Assisted by his wife, Joann, he was ACE’s official coordinator for disaster relief within Chile and throughout Latin America. While serving in that position in 1965, 80 percent of the country was declared a disaster because of the devastation from nationwide earthquakes and tidal waves produced by another mammoth earthquake. During this time, he and Joann coordinated the feeding of 3,000,000 people, the rebuilding of thousands of houses, the distribution of planeloads of clothing and blankets and the establishment of post-disaster cooperative economic-development enterprises.

Before returning to the United States, Nichols made several trips to countries in Africa as an as an economic-development consultant after the Declaration of Rancaqua was drafted. The Declaration was a faith statement for Evangelicals and Pentecostals. Nichols, Obispo Chavez Pentecostal Church of Chile, the Reverndo Coelho Ferraz Presbyterian Church of Brazil, and Reverndo Geraldo Valdevia were among the drafters of the Declaration. To raise money for Evangelical economic and social-health-development projects, Bishop Chavez, Nichols and other staff made multiple trips to the Orient and throughout Europe. In late 1967, Nichols sought and was granted a five-year leave of absence by the board of ACE so he could return to the United States for his children’s education. The leave was twice extended so that he could represent ACE with resource-development activities in the United States and Europe.

Upon his return to America, Nichols, Joann, and Dr. William Willner formed Pro Plan International Ltd. Inc. in Tallahassee, Florida. Willner was a lawyer, the retired Director of Grants and Contract Management of the National Aeronautical and Space Administration, and a professor of public administration. Together Nichols and Willner wrote and published two major training books: Revenue Sharing in 1973, and Handbook of Grants and Contracts for Nonprofit Organizations in 1976. Included in the latter book were the Federal Register regulations, published November 4, 1975, governing the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, Public Law 93-638. The year it was published, Joe Benitez and Nichols met for the first time, and one year later Benitez, Welmas, Nichols and the Cabazon Band’s Business Committee had reached a meeting of the minds. Given Nichol’s broad-reaching experience, all that needed to be done was to formalize an agreement on paper and secure the money to pay for his services [at the Cabazon reservation].


[snip]


In 1978 John Philip Nichols and his family’s company Pro Plan International Ltd. took control of the Cabazon Indian Reservation in Indio, California. Assisted by his close friend, the former Senator from South Dakota James Aboureszk, Nichols exercised absolute control over the tribe’s powerful business committee. Working hand in iron glove with Aboureszk and using powerful political connections the two men pushed through the “Cabazon Decision” that made gaming on Indian Reservations legal.

That historic Supreme Court decision was handed down on February 25, 1987. Nichols second oldest son John Paul Nichols described the impact of this decision on the Cabazon tribe and the Nichols family:

When we won the Supreme Court decision, we all of a sudden were legitimatized. We were legitimized in the view of Indian tribes nationwide. We, all of a sudden, became a political force in and of itself the Cabazon Decision became the law of the land. If you will, and so, this small little tribe of 25 members, voting members, all of a sudden had the influence of 25,000 members. We became, in fact one of the most influential tribes in the nation. It was an amazing turnaround from going to tribal meetings before that decision to going to tribal meetings after that decision. It was almost like being ostracized and then treated overly with respect, if you will.

That landmark ruling eclipsed all of the failed business ventures and all of the negative publicity that Nichols Sr. had generated in the years between 1978 and 1987.

___________________________

I honestly hope and pray with all my heart that she finds her work rewarding. Seriously. She's on my prayer list, starting now.

And....even though I know that everyone who's at all capable of grasping this has probably already done so, just for the record:

Since the prosecution was and is keeping the case under wraps and some of the court filings were and are under seal, it was and still is now obviousanybody's guess whether the arrest and attempted conviction of defendant Jimmy Hughes would address only the act of murder itself and little to no attention would be paid to the motivation or mental state that resulted in the slaughter of three people or not.


Fixed.

Also I'm sorry but...

The case that brought about this historic supreme court ruling began as Cabazon Band of Mission Indians vs. County of Riverside and for 28 years law enforcement officers and prosecutors in Riverside County and the State of California have been led down the rabbit hole and gotten lost in the in the tentacles of the Octopus. Did they know as they allegedly pursued the executioners of three people that they had simply been sacrificed to the head of the Octopus so that the federal government could usurp local and state rights in order to turn over the proceeds from sovereign nation gaming to organized crime.


That's two metaphors too many for any paragraph that short, especially when it's the kicker. And the second sentence is missing a question mark, too.

However, these things can happen to anyone. Therefore, as a matter of principle, I blame the copy department, even if there isn't one. I'm mostly just mentioning it because I'm OCD-ish about stuff like that. Which is my problem, not Virginia McCullough's, I fully concede.
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby Project Willow » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:52 am

I haven't spoken on this subject in a while and this issue has been festering.

I am extremely saddened that Rachel was basically chased out of this venue and now the only active thread on this board concerning the Octopus murders is populated by a writer who is obviously hostile to Rachel. That writer's output is placed here by a poster who made Rachel feel most unwelcome here (to put it extremely politely).

The one thread where VM and KD were active here, their behavior displayed, their own words on view, completely discredited them in my eyes. Judging by similar responses, I am not alone. If NMN ever attempted to write on some case I were a part of, I'd do anything I could to dissuade them. I can't see anyone needing that kind of "assistance".

The tragic thing is, this entire scenario has, and continues to, feed forces nurturing long festering malevolence towards all things RI.

What a sad state of affairs.
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4793
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby barracuda » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:18 pm

I totally agree, Willow. The panting characterisation of a Hell's Angel Sergeant-at-Arms named as a conspirator to commit a triple murder as a ruggedly handsome "good will ambassador" speaks volumes about the intent of the author of the Heggstad article above. American Dream managed to remain within the letter of the rules of the board during his altercations with desertfae, but I don't think there is any doubt amongst those paying attention that (s)he has successfully driven Rachel from the board. Why she would chose to make that her mission here is a question only American Dream can answer. In the short and the long run, I feel the board is lessened by Rachel's absence. I know that Jeff feels he shouldn't censor the NewMakingNews site, and I tend to agree with that, but desertfae's position in the case ties her hands as far as her responses to the inquiries of American Dream and her friends. It's my hope that when the case is in full swing, Rachel may feel less constrained, and be free to respond in full force here. Til then, I guess American Dream and the likes of Virginia McCullough will control the flow of information. Anyone seeking another viewpoint is advised to consult less obviously tainted sources, including, of course, http://www.desertfae.com/
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby Peregrine » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:49 pm

Project Willow wrote:
I am extremely saddened that Rachel was basically chased out of this venue and now the only active thread on this board concerning the Octopus murders is populated by a writer who is obviously hostile to Rachel. That writer's output is placed here by a poster who made Rachel feel most unwelcome here (to put it extremely politely).


Thanks for stating what many, including myself, feel. I really liked Rachel's contribution & am saddened that she was treated in such a manner. I too hope she returns.
~don't let your mouth write a cheque your ass can't cash~
User avatar
Peregrine
 
Posts: 1040
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:42 am
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Seeking The Head Of The Octopus

Postby American Dream » Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:05 pm

barracuda wrote:
American Dream managed to remain within the letter of the rules of the board during his altercations with desertfae, but I don't think there is any doubt amongst those paying attention that (s)he has successfully driven Rachel from the board. Why she would chose to make that her mission here is a question only American Dream can answer. In the short and the long run, I feel the board is lessened by Rachel's absence. I know that Jeff feels he shouldn't censor the NewMakingNews site, and I tend to agree with that


So let's see- you're admitting that I adhered to the guidelines, but somehow you're sure I drove Rachel from the board? There is an alternative explanation, that seems pretty obvious: Anyone from the Prosecutor's Office who was doing their job actually should have told such a key witness that now is not the time to go on saying all kinds of things about the case on the Internet which you can very definitely be called to task for later. I'm no lawyer, but this seems like it should be obvious.

As to NewsmakingNews, you "tend to agree" that censorship is not appropriate but...what?

If censorship is not appropriate, then it's simply not appropriate, right?
Last edited by American Dream on Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests