Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
josey wales wrote:The thing I don't 'get' is why he was taken down. He obviously was a 'chosen' boy a la his recieving a blessing at the Bliderberg meeting prior to the primaries. So the question is what happened? Was this simply a case of an internicene battle between the 'annointed' with a survival of the fitest spin? Or did it just make for good copy for the tabloids?
"It [the tape] was cut and pulled ...out," Cheri Young told ABC News, "We... taped it back together and we played it."
Nordic wrote:He always reminded me of this guy, and seemed about as sincere:
I never understood the appeal. He seemed transparent to me, but maybe I'm wearing da right kinda shades or sumpin
The woman also deserves some scorn, she didn't have to knowingly screw a married man. (or did she?)
The thing I don't 'get' is why he was taken down. He obviously was a 'chosen' boy a la his recieving a blessing at the Bliderberg meeting prior to the primaries
Nordic wrote:If you think he was "taken down", then how? Was Reille (or whatever her name was) an agent of some kind, someone set up to seduce him and get pregnant?
lupercal wrote:Sure, but what is a cigar? A product of considerable intention, not an accident. And that was Freud's whole idea: there are no accidents in the universe of the mind.
Now as to Edwards, sure, maybe he's just the sleazebag I always thought he was anyway, but he clearly isn't stupid. Weak yes, a backstabbing creep yes, but not at least not THIS stupid.
Also, the whole tape business is a little fishy. No faces, but the jewelry is hers? And exactly where and when was it discovered? In a box of trash marked "special"? Or cut up into pieces and taped back together by the former Edwards employees? The plot thickens quickly in the familiar way.
Anyway, have a look at this interesting DU post if you've got a minute:
"John Edward's Preggo Sex Video Tape..."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... _id=279841
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests