'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sun Apr 19, 2015 3:30 pm

Senator: Decade-Old Gulf Oil Leak Is 'Unacceptable'

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS APRIL 17, 2015, 7:35 P.M. E.D.T.

BATON ROUGE, La. — A U.S. senator from Florida is pressing federal officials to disclose technical data and other information about a decade-old oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico, after an investigation by The Associated Press revealed evidence that the spill is far worse than a company or government regulators have publicly reported.

In a letter Friday to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Sen. Bill Nelson said it is "unacceptable" that oil is still leaking from the site off Louisiana's coast where an oil platform owned by Taylor Energy Company toppled during Hurricane Ivan in 2004.

The Florida Democrat, who is the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation, told Jewell and Johnson that "all necessary resources" should be committed to stopping the oil from flowing.

"If you've got an oil rig that's been leaking for 11 years, then it's time for us to find out what's going on," Nelson said during a telephone interview.

Taylor has downplayed the leak's extent and environmental impact. The New Orleans-based company recently touted a year-old estimate that less than 4 gallons per day is spilling at the site where its cluster of 28 wells remain buried under sediment from a mudslide triggered by Ivan's waves.

But the Coast Guard provided AP with a new leak estimate that is about 20 times greater than the one cited by Taylor.

AP's analysis of more than 2,300 pollution reports to the Coast Guard since 2008 showed a dramatic spike in sheen sizes and oil volumes since Sept. 1, 2014. That came just after federal regulators held a workshop to improve the accuracy of slick estimates reported by a Taylor contractor and started sending government observers on monitoring flights over the site.

When presented by AP with evidence of the spike, the Coast Guard attributed it to an improved method for estimating the slicks from the air — with the clear implication that far more oil had been spilling for years than had been reported.

The government-managed effort to stop the leak has been shrouded in secrecy. Nelson's letter asks Jewell and Johnson for "prompt and full disclosure" of:

— Subsea images or other data gathered underwater at the leak site.

— Aerial imagery of the sheens spotted at the site.

— Flow rate estimates since the leak started in September 2004.

— Information about the geological and geophysical formation at the site — "and the ways in which your agencies considered that information in exploration and response planning."

After BP's massive Gulf oil spill in 2010, Nelson criticized the London-based oil giant's reluctance to publicly release videos of its underwater gusher. BP eventually broadcast a live video feed that showed its efforts to stop the spill, which dwarfed even the highest estimate of Taylor's leak.

"It is unacceptable that in the eleven years since a hurricane caused an underwater mudslide, crude oil has continued to flow unabated into the Gulf of Mexico — especially given the attention focused on such accidents by the BP oil spill almost exactly five years ago," Nelson wrote.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/04/17/us/ap-us-gulf-oil-spill-hidden-spill.html?_r=0
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:05 pm

remember this THREAD?

THIS IS NOW WORSE
Environmental Disaster Happening In California Nobody Cares



Two months in, Porter Ranch gas leak compared to BP Gulf oil spill

“It’s like the BP spill on land,” said environmental activist Erin Brockovich, who was made famous by successfully battling Pacific Gas and Electric Co. over groundwater contamination in the community of Hinkley in the Inland Empire in 1996. “I’ve really never seen anything like this. I think the magnitude is enormous. Its like a volcano, and the gas is like the lava that can’t be shut off.”

LARGEST GAS STORAGE IN NATION


Alabama governor spends BP oil spill money to renovate beachfront mansion

New study: BP oil spill impacted turtles beyond Gulf of Mexico
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby NeonLX » Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:22 pm

Hahaha. You just gotta love people, right? Especially the fantastically wealthy ones.

A revolution doesn't seem even remotely possible at this point. And maybe it wouldn't "fix" things anyway.

I need to go bury myself somewhere. I'm taking up valuable resources that someone else could use far more productively than I do.
America is a fucked society because there is no room for essential human dignity. Its all about what you have, not who you are.--Joe Hillshoist
User avatar
NeonLX
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Enemy Occupied Territory
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:28 pm

first thing to do is stop using those damn capital letters .... we all are to blame for their overuse/abuse.......some more than others :lol:

i am going to do my part and never use a capital letter again ...it's for the good of the planet
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Cordelia » Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:51 am

6th Anniversary review ..............


New Oceana Report Highlights Long-Term Impacts of Deepwater Horizon Oil Disaster

April 19, 2016

WASHINGTON
Oceana released a new report titled “Time for Action: Six Years After Deepwater Horizon” that highlights the long-term impacts of the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history, which began six years ago next week. In the report, Oceana reviews the most recently published research that documents the damage from the oil spill to the Gulf of Mexico’s marine wildlife, habitats and communities.

While scientists are still working to understand the scale of the devastation to wildlife, fisheries and human health, Oceana marine scientist Dr. Ingrid Biedron says that we are already starting to see the long-term impacts of the spill.

“The significant die-off of whales and dolphins that began in 2010 continues today,” said Biedron. “Increased mortality rates and diminished reproductive success can have long-term effects on marine mammal populations impacted by the spill. But instead of learning from the disaster, Congress has done virtually nothing to reduce the risk of another spill in U.S. waters.”

https://greenlivingguy.com/2016/04/19/n ... -disaster/
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Grizzly » Wed Apr 20, 2016 1:21 pm

Congress has done virtually nothing to reduce the risk of another spill in U.S. waters.”


Bullshit!

If Congress wanted to take action they would have. If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice - Getty Lee
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby zangtang » Wed Apr 20, 2016 1:57 pm

that'd be Geddy Lee - tho the lyrics are usually Neil Peart
zangtang
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Grizzly » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:27 pm

Yup, yup ... Quite rifht, bloody wwll, right, I've given up trying to edit from my phone
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby MinM » Fri Sep 16, 2016 8:21 am

Seeker of the Truth ‏@Grtseeker

Cable News Silent as Two States Declare Emergency After Pipeline Spill

Never fear ..... Big Oil .. is here ..... :thumbsup001:

Blue » Thu Sep 15, 2016 6:07 pm wrote:
MinM wrote:
@Gizmodo Mar 23

The Deepwater Horizon movie ironically looks like an ad for BP http://gizmo.do/cQguSGP
Image

Peter Berg and Mark Wahlberg are becoming two of Hollywood's go-to guys fro propaganda.

Mark Wahlberg’s Boston Marathon movie will film at MIT


I just saw an ad for that BP slimefest and thought the Onion had moved to TV. I haven't watched TV in a long time and didn't know whether to laugh or cry or smash the set.

That shit ain't gonna fly anywhere in the Southeast especially the Gulf states. BP is still enemy number one.
Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:34 am

trump to Roll Back Safety Rules Created After Deepwater Horizon Spill
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/us/t ... lling.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:37 pm

Eight Years After BP Oil Spill, Sick Cleanup Workers Still Waiting for Day in Court

Julie Dermansky

Image
Rally in front of the Federal Court in New Orleans on April 20, 2018. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)Rally in front of the Federal Court in New Orleans on April 20, 2018. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)

Nonprofit, independent news outlets like Truthout are critical to countering the mainstream media narrative. Help get the real stories out by supporting Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.
On the eighth anniversary of the BP oil spill, Retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré stood in front of the New Orleans Federal Court House and called "bullshit" on the court's handling of claims made by those who participated in the cleanup efforts.

Thousands of workers BP hired to clean up the spill that polluted the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 have claimed exposure to oil and the dispersant has made them sick and still have not had their day in court. "It's a crying damn shame we've allowed this in America," Honoré said.

"Guess who don't have their life back? The people who did the cleanup, the people who have to go home and get public assistance to stay alive, and it's had an impact on their family," Honoré said on April 20 at a rally aimed at seeking justice for cleanup workers.

Honoré joined cleanup workers and their supporters calling for federal judge Carl Barbier to reverse his decision to delay hearing remaining cases of cleanup workers indefinitely. They gathered before delivering a petition with 25,000 signatures seeking justice for the cleanup workers.

Retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré at April 20 rally in New Orleans. (Photo: Julie Dermansky) Retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré at April 20 rally in New Orleans. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)

The petition states: "The Plaintiff Steering Committee walked away with $700 million; the Claims Administrator, in charge of processing the first round of payments to victims, walked away with $155 million dollars." So far only $60 million has been paid "to a small fraction of the injured people who helped in the cleanup or lived in the designated zones."
Image
Jonathan Henderson, an environmental advocate. (Photo: Julie Dermansky) Jonathan Henderson, an environmental advocate. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)

Jonathan Henderson, founder of Vanishing Earth, an environmental watchdog organization, helped compile the numbers cited in the petition from court filings and the medical claims settlement administrator, Garretson Resolution Group Status Report. He said he believes that justice delayed is justice denied. "People end up dying. They give up hope and they stop fighting. Time is what wears people down," Henderson said.

Judge Barbier, the federal judge handling BP oil spill-related cases, made a controversial ruling in 2014 that affected a cleanup workers' class action suit by siding with the oil company's interpretation of a medical settlement agreement. Barbier ruled that those spill workers who hadn't been diagnosed by a doctor before 2012 were not entitled to settlement payments in the class action suit.

Two recent scientific studies offered mounting evidence of the potential harms resulting from the oil dispersants, Corexit 9500 and Corexit 952, applied to break oil into smaller droplets during cleanup efforts in the 2010 spill.

A study by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences found that BP oil spill workers exposed to either forms of Corexit were more likely to experience a range of health symptoms such as coughing or burning in the lungs, eyes, nose, or throat.

In addition, a study from the Uniformed Services University, a federal government-run medical and health sciences school in Maryland, found that almost 2,000 members of the U.S. Coast Guard reporting exposure to oil dispersants experienced negative health issues, including "lung irritation, skin rash, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea," more often than those who avoided dispersants or only had contact with oil.

I asked BP via email if the company would still use the same types of dispersant if there were another major oil spill but have not received a response. In the past the company has said the use of dispersants was approved by federal environmental agencies and the Coast Guard.

Nalco Environmental Solutions, Corexit's manufacturer, donates to political action committees, according to public documents listed by the Center for Responsive Politics. A report by the center indicates that Nalco's spending on lobbying the year of the spill increased dramatically. Payments in 2010 included $160,000 to Ogilvy Government Relations to lobby on Nalco's behalf on "issues related to the use of Corexit in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill."

Honoré likened the use of dispersant in the Gulf to the recent alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria and drew comparisons to the United States' response: "We were poised to start World War lll over what the Syrians did to their own people, but here, we still haven't held BP accountable."

"These people are suffering from chemicals that our own government allowed a foreign company [BP] to put in our waters and poison our people," Honoré said.

According to The (New Orleans) Times-Picayune: "Nearly one million gallons was dropped by air, and another 770,000 gallons was injected into the damaged wellhead about a mile under the water's surface. It was the first time dispersants had been used on a large scale and in proximity to people." The unknown impacts of this approach essentially turned the Gulf Coast into a giant petri dish.
Image
Capt. Joseph Brown, BP oil spill cleanup worker. (Photo: Julie Dermansky) Capt. Joseph Brown, BP oil spill cleanup worker. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)

At the April 20 rally, Capt. Joseph Brown spoke of seawater mixed with oil and dispersant getting into his boots and on his legs while working on a boat laying containment boom to keep spilled oil away from Gulf wetlands. He says that not only did this work impact his health, but it sickened his wife too, whom he says was exposed to the chemicals on his dirty clothes.
Image
George Barisich, fisherman who worked on the BP oil spill cleanup. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)George Barisich, fisherman who worked on the BP oil spill cleanup. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)

When George Barisich, a third-generation Louisiana commercial fisherman, found he couldn't fish after the spill, he used his boat to assist in the cleanup effort. He said the oil and dispersant damaged his lung capacity and memory. He also asserted that not only did BP fail to inform workers of the potential hazards of Corexit, the company forbade workers from using respirators and threatened to fire workers who complained.

The U.S. Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) lays out standards and training for when oil spill cleanup workers should wear respiratory protection. In June 2010, a couple months into the spill, OSHA posted a worker education and training booklet that outlined how to deal with exposure to Corexit and other potential risks of oil spill cleanup. For Corexit, it recommended workers "avoid prolonged breathing of vapors. Use with ventilation equal to unobstructed outdoors in moderate breeze," among other precautions.
Image
BP oil spill cleanup workers, without respirators, deal with oiled absorbant boom in 2010. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)BP oil spill cleanup workers, without respirators, deal with oiled absorbant boom in 2010. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)
Image
BP oil spill cleanup worker, without a respirator, at an oiled wetland in 2010. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)BP oil spill cleanup worker, without a respirator, at an oiled wetland in 2010. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)
http://www.truth-out.org/images/Images_ ... mansy8.jpg

BP oil spill workers with oiled boom in 2010. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)BP oil spill workers with oiled boom in 2010. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)

Tiffany Odoms spoke on behalf of her dead husband Alonzo Odoms, who also worked the oil spill cleanup response. She described him as a healthy 45-year-old before the spill, who died two and a half years later after being diagnosed with multiple myeloma, a form of blood cancer. She has filed a wrongful death suit.
Image
Tiffany Odoms with her daughter at a rally on the BP oil spill anniversary. (Photo: Julie Dermansky) Tiffany Odoms with her daughter at a rally on the BP oil spill anniversary. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)

While thousands of people who took part in the BP spill cleanup have yet to have their cases heard in federal court, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke proposed opening almost all of the nation's coastlines to offshore oil and gas drilling. In addition, Scott Angelle, director of the Interior Department's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement is rolling back key safety regulations put in place after the 2010 well blowout on the Deepwater Horizon rig to prevent another such human and environmental disaster.

Both officials have ties to the oil and gas industry. During his successful 2014 run for a Montana congressional seat, Zinke's campaign received thousands of dollars from companies seeking oil and gas on public lands.

And the Department of Influence, a site the compiles information about the revolving door between special interest lobbyists and political appointees at the Department of the Interior, found that Angelle raised nearly half a million dollars in donations from oil and gas companies in his three unsuccessful bids for elected office in Louisiana. He has also made about $1.5 million since 2012 as a board member of oil and gas pipeline company Sunoco Logistics Partners, while also sitting on the board of the Louisiana Public Service Commission, which regulates state utilities.

Honoré, who founded the GreenArmy, a coalition of Louisiana-based environmental groups focused on fighting pollution, doesn't mince words when it comes to regulatory capture. He often states that "our democracy has been hijacked by the oil and gas industry."

During the April 20 rally, he placed blame on the Obama administration for what he says was letting BP off the hook so easily in the wake of the spill and faulted the Trump administration for what he described as its reckless proposals related to offshore drilling.
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/4427 ... y-in-court
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue May 15, 2018 6:58 am

BP's Toxic Gulf Coast Legacy: When Covering Up a Crime Takes Precedence Over Human Health

On April 20, 2010, BP's Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded. Over the next 87 days, it gushed at least 200 million gallons of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico, creating the worst human-made environmental disaster in US history and afflicting the coasts of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.

Less than one year after the disaster began, I spoke with Fritzi Presley, a Gulf Coast resident in Long Beach, Mississippi, who was already very sick at the time. Her doctor was treating her for bronchitis, extreme headaches, memory loss and other symptoms which mirrored those of hundreds of other sick fishers and cleanup workers I had interviewed.

Her blood tests revealed m-Xylene, p-Xylene, hexane and ethylbenzene in her body -- chemicals that MacArthur Award-winning toxicologist Wilma Subra had already shown to be present in BP's crude oil. The acute impacts include those which Presley was experiencing, among many others, like damage to the nervous system, nausea, skin rashes, vision and balance problems, and ultimately, possibly even death.

"I started having respiratory problems, a horrible skin rash, headaches, nosebleeds, low energy and trouble sleeping," Presley's daughter, Daisy Seal, told me at the time. "And I now feel like I'm dying from the inside out."

Seal is still alive, but her mother died last year at the age of 62.

To see more stories like this, visit "Planet or Profit?"

Most media would allow you to believe that that disaster ended years ago. But if you were an oil cleanup worker, fisher or resident on the Gulf coast in the oil impact zone, the human health disaster is ongoing, and there appears to be no end in sight.

BP used two kinds of toxic chemical dispersants to sink the oil from the Deepwater Horizon disaster, Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527, manufactured by Nalco Environmental Solutions. Approximately 770,000 gallons were injected at the wellhead while the oil gushed, while another million gallons were sprayed on the oil slick on the surface. Tens of thousands of cleanup workers, Coast Guard members, fishers and coastal residents were within range of the airborne chemicals, and many of them were sprayed directly with Corexit, which when mixed with crude, is 52 times more toxic than crude alone.

Other studies have also shown that dispersants are highly toxic to wildlife, including fish, crabs and even deep-sea coral. Other research has shown recently how dispersants hamper the growth of oil-eating bacteria, which of course, weakens nature's ability to clean up after a spill.

There have been at least three major health studies in the last year alone showing that Corexit only made the oil more toxic. An ongoing National Institutes of Health study of 30,000 oil cleanup workers linked the dispersants to symptoms including coughing, wheezing, tightness in the chest and burning in the eyes, nose, throat and lungs. Meanwhile, a recently published Johns Hopkins study showed how the dispersants can turn oil into a toxic mist that can travel up to 50 miles, penetrating human bodies along the way. Thousands of Coast Guard personnel who responded to the disaster were shown by a study to have their acute respiratory problems linked to the dispersants. There have been numerous studies on the chemicals' impacts on marine life, including one on how sperm whales have been harmed.

As astounding as those numbers are, they fail to tell the story of the human cost, much less the environmental catastrophe left in the wake of BP's disaster.

Here is a video of Presley, literally on her deathbed, telling the story of a fellow cleanup worker who got sepsis and died, as well as her and others' failed attempts to find one single doctor to attribute their ailments to BP's chemicals. Presley worked as long as she could until she could literally not make the walk to the beach.

Truthout spoke with Presley's very close friend, who asked that only her first name, Lana, be used. Shortly after the disaster began, Lana became involved in activism around the sick cleanup workers, which is how she met Presley.

"After the spill, she [Presley] would often walk down to the beach to assess the damages and talk to the cleanup workers," Lana said. "Like so many others, she was emotionally devastated."

Lana went on to tell of how she watched her dear friend become weaker from her ongoing exposure to BP's toxic airborne chemicals until she was unable to continue her beach walks. "She did have her blood tested for VOCs [volatile organic compounds from BP's oil] at one point," Lana said. "The results showed high levels of toxins known to be attributed to the signature of the oil and Corexit. No one knew of any successful treatments. Many professionals denied there was a connection."

Presley developed chronic shortness of breath and told Lana she was only able to take "little sips of air." In 2014, Lana went to visit her friend in person and found her to be far sicker than she had let on. Presley talked to Lana about the "log in her lung." Three days later, Lana talked her into going to the ER, where Presley was diagnosed with pleurisy and pneumonia.

As Presley's condition deteriorated, she was in and out of the hospital, and ultimately remained at home in hospice.

"I met a woman who was full of life in 2010, and over the next seven years, I saw that life slowly drain until she had no more breath to take," Lana told Truthout. "She had beat cancer. She had survived the death of her teenage son.... But she couldn't shake the damages that came with BP's oil and Corexit."

But Lana explained that Presley isn't the only person she knows who has succumbed to the effects of BP's chemicals.

"There are several that I know of who have died, and many others who suffer similar and worse symptoms, all easily attributed to exposures during the gulf oil spill and the 'cleanup' efforts," she said. "I personally know several who were not sick before the spill, yet, have been plagued with illness since."

An Ongoing Crisis
Activists remain busy seeking justice for victims of BP's disaster. Facebook pages have been created, and video testimonies of sick commercial fishers and oil cleanup workers are easy to find.

According to Jonathan Henderson, formerly with the Gulf Restoration Network and who now continues to work to help sick cleanup workers and fishers find compensation, more than 37,000 medical benefit claims have been submitted by cleanup workers, first responders and coastal residents, yet only a scant 40 of them have been paid for chronic conditions. And it gets worse.

"While the plaintiff's steering committee for this disaster walked away with between $350 and $700 million in fees and the claims administrator walked away with $155 million, all the victims who were compensated shared in only a $60 million payment," Henderson has written about the situation. "Those paid from that $60 million represent only a small fraction of the injured who helped in the cleanup and live in the designated impact zones."

And not a single case has gone to trial.

Jacob Boudreaux worked as a deck hand on a utility vessel pulling up containment boom that was soaked in oil for days on end, month after month. While his vision was great before the disaster, now on some days he struggles to see. It's the same with his lungs and skin, as he continues to have breathing issues, and his skin still suffers from rashes. He did not have insurance, so was unable to see his own doctor.

"I got a lot of oil on me, and that is why I'm sick," Boudreaux told Truthout.

"BP sent me to a doctor, but it was their doctor," he said. "They made me walk up and down a hall, took blood and urine, took some x-rays, but didn't tell me anything was wrong, and never gave me the paperwork from the samples they took."

Boudreaux said that "they always give me the runaround" whenever he attempts to acquire his test results.

"I worked that spill for more than six months," he said. "BP was supposed to give us all kinds of Tyvek suits and respirators, but they gave us water, Gatorade and baseball hats for the sun."

And now the only money he has received for his medical compensation claim is a scant $650, and that was only for the acute claim he filed from when he got sick on the boat. His long-term chronic claim has not been addressed, his lawyer recently told him he will have to wait three more years to possibly see any money, and he's already been fighting it for six years.

"My vision and lungs are not the same, and I suffered from headaches for a month straight, even when I was off the boat," Boudreaux concluded. "They have all the money in the bank, they just don't want to give it to any of us who it is owed."

In July 2015, the federal government and Gulf Coast states reached an $18.7 billion settlement agreement with BP for the disaster. However, the payments will be spread out over the next 18 years, according to BP, which actively worked to cut the amount down as low as possible. The federal government and BP previously reached a $4 billion settlement over criminal charges stemming from the accident, which killed 11 Deepwater Horizon workers.

Another man spoke with Truthout on condition of anonymity, given he has an ongoing lawsuit against BP. He was one of the first supervisor foremen for oil cleanup workers on the beaches of Alabama. He told Truthout that during their training, "nobody said anything about Corexit," and he currently has a pending lawsuit against BP for his illnesses.

He has suffered from chronic skin rashes, his hearing is nearly completely gone, his vision is now impaired, his short-term memory is shot, and he still has headaches and balance issues.

He also worked on a fishing boat contracted to haul oil boom into the backwaters, during which time he got covered in oil and was sprayed with Corexit from airplanes.

"I started having symptoms after I got into the oil cleanup program," the man told Truthout. "As soon as the sun set each day, the planes spraying the Corexit started spraying it all over us, and of course, we had no respirators. We got sprayed every night and every morning. I started having problems after that, and of course, I had no health insurance."

Like others, doctors he has seen in his area will not give him a diagnosis and refuse to link any of his ailments to BP's oil or Corexit. Meanwhile, his conditions persist, he finds it difficult to sleep at night because his skin rashes are "extremely bad," and he is struggling financially.

"They hired us to clean it up, and now we are high and dry," he added. "Now I'm sick and waiting on this lawsuit. I've got a lawsuit against BP, and they've strung it out for eight years now ... bottom line, they are hoping we will die."

"An Entire Population Was Compromised"
Trisha Springstead has been a registered nurse for four decades. Having worked in ICUs, ERs, in oncology and in cardiac units, she has seen it all. She has been involved in tracking the human health impacts of BP's disaster from the very beginning.

Truthout asked her how she would characterize the human health consequences of BP's ongoing disaster in the Gulf.

"This a catastrophe where lives and the health of an entire population was compromised in an effort to cover up a crime," Springstead said, referring to BP's work of sinking the oil with the dispersants, which knowingly exposed much of the coastal population to highly toxic chemicals. "Humans did not matter and covering up a crime took precedence over human health in order to salvage tourism and property values."

In 2015, National Institutes of Health sources estimated that 170,000 Gulf residents would die of spill-related illnesses over the next five years.

She refers to the cleanup workers as "collateral damage," and a study she was involved in about the human health impacts of the chemicals showed very high levels of BP's polycyclic hydrocarbons (crude oil) in the people they tested.

"Basically, the blood of the people was turning to gas and melting their cell walls, not to mention it was changing their DNA, creating cytotoxicity and genetic toxicity."

Springstead cited a study on the aforementioned sperm whales, which showed the dispersants' negative health impacts on them. The study, published in the journal Aquatic Toxicology, is titled "Chemical dispersants used in the Gulf of Mexico oil crisis are cytotoxic and genotoxic to sperm whale cells."

She told Truthout she had spoken to "numerous people" who had visited the National Institutes of Health (the agency conducting the ongoing study on the sick oil cleanup workers) who "were told to go home or take their children home because they were going to die."

During her more recent trips along the Gulf Coast to meet with sick people, she found "kidney, liver and lung cancers are rampant."

Springstead believes Fritzi Presley clearly died from BP's toxic chemicals, given that she lived just a few blocks from the coast and regularly went there to visit with the cleanup workers.

She attributes the visual impairments, breathing problems, skin rashes and massive uptick in cancer cases along the Gulf Coast to BP's chemicals.

"Had they not used those chemicals, let that oil rise to the surface, oxygenate and separate, then sent it to refineries, I don't believe it would have been nearly as bad as it is now," she added.

Similar to the cleanup worker who spoke with Truthout on condition of anonymity, Springstead believes BP is "stonewalling" when it comes to making the health claim payouts and is "waiting for these people to die."

Meanwhile, it is now more than eight years since BP's oil disaster began, and practically nothing has changed as far as how the government responds to offshore oil disasters.

Nalco's Corexit remains listed on the EPA's list of acceptable chemical dispersants. Despite ample documentation of their dangerous impacts, the Obama administration did nothing to regulate the use of dispersants, and of course, neither has the current administration.

"If l could reach out to the people who live along the Gulf, and who vacation along the Gulf, I would tell them the water isn't safe," Lana warned. "I would tell them to go easy on the seafood. I would tell them about my friends and what has happened to them. I would tell them the oil is still there."

Lana added that she would warn everyone of the possibility of being exposed to BP's chemicals across much of her region and tell them not to go into the water. "I would tell them not to let their precious children dig too deep in the sand where the oil is still buried ... people here just want their lives back," she concluded. "It's not over. Big oil companies lie, and they have very deep pockets. They spin lies and twist the truth, then the mainstream media complies by sending it out to the world."

There are enough sick oil cleanup workers that an already massive and growing petition exists demanding they have their day in court for what happened to them. Meanwhile, tens if not hundreds of thousands of people across the four Gulf states in BP's impact zone are sick and possibly dying, and there is no end in sight.

A Deadly Mix
As if BP's disaster weren't enough, according to the Gulf Restoration Network, an environmental NGO, 330,000 gallons of oil are spilled in Louisiana alone every year. There is a fire every three days on an offshore oil platform, three workers die annually and every year in the Gulf, 2,100 oil and chemical spills are reported to the Coast Guard.

Even this April, a massive spill of heavy fuel oil fouled the Mississippi River during the French Quarter Festival in New Orleans, which was ironically sponsored by Chevron, reminding people there how deeply the oil industry is embedded in their lives.
https://www.alternet.org/bps-toxic-gulf ... man-health
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests