ParaTopics: Segregation, Balance, or Wheat From Chaff?

Okay, this is a very rough / rushed attempt at this idea as part of my reply to PW in this thread:
No evidence of a project named "Project Monarch" (2)
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=28500
It's an argument HMW makes all the time regarding what he calls WOO (Wonderment Occluding Objectivity).
I've seen plenty of criticism of Jeff Wells that focuses on his inclusion of the paranormal and claims of SRA and MK subjects as lessening the effectiveness of his (para)political message.
Conversely there are those who feel conspiracy and deep politics claims cloud various paranormal pursuits - and even within the "paranormal" arena there are those who feel bigfoot and cryptozoology weakens the import of talking about: Insert Para-Topic of Choice Here.
Even Jeff is critical of "conspiratainment".
What do you all think?
No evidence of a project named "Project Monarch" (2)
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=28500
Project Willow wrote:Tell me then, how is it possible to discern the scientific import from the crazy circus?
Whom do you think the crazy circus aids or harms?
Project Willow wrote:Do you factor that into your activity on the subject?
It's an argument HMW makes all the time regarding what he calls WOO (Wonderment Occluding Objectivity).
I've seen plenty of criticism of Jeff Wells that focuses on his inclusion of the paranormal and claims of SRA and MK subjects as lessening the effectiveness of his (para)political message.
Conversely there are those who feel conspiracy and deep politics claims cloud various paranormal pursuits - and even within the "paranormal" arena there are those who feel bigfoot and cryptozoology weakens the import of talking about: Insert Para-Topic of Choice Here.
Even Jeff is critical of "conspiratainment".
UFOs & The Black Lodge – A Blue Rose Report Primer
by SMiles Lewis
UFOlogists don’t like to talk about bigfoot. Cryptozoologists looking for sasquatch don’t like talking about ghosts. Ghost hunters won’t talk about UFOs. And conspiracy researchers are constantly lamenting, and rightfully so, being linked to all of the above by the media as a discrediting tactic. It’s a fair criticism (for those not wishing to taint there own activist chocolate with those other fringers’ peanut butter.)
A corollary criticism often follows that television shows and movies with wacky paranormal conspiracy subjects generally condition the public to associate those topics and issues with so much silly entertainment. And again, I generally agree with that sentiment.
http://www.anomalymagazine.com/2007/12/ ... rt-primer/
What do you all think?