Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:20 am

This thread is for wintler2, with a question. Do you (or anyone else) believe that these examples are all hoaxes?


http://www.befreetech.com/energysuppression.htm

Suppression of Energy Technologies
This article by Christopher Walter

Time magazine August 17 July 1995 (p.46) are rounding up the future technologies that are going to severely change the world as we know it.

They correctly point out that a change in the usage of energy would have a massive impact, but then promise "The first company to design an affordable car that doesn't foul the atmosphere will race past it's competitors."

Not only are they totally wrong, but they're probably lying. The simple fact is the technology has been with us for most of this past century, it's just that it would free us from the enslavement by oil companies, and government, to allow us to utilize it.

My story began late one night driving home listening to talk back radio, when somebody piped up that they'd been working on a solar-powered car out at the local airport, and it was ready to go and as cheap and as safe as an average family car - except that you would only need about five dollars worth of fuel per year to get it started. The startled D. J. then asked when were we likely to see it in the market place, and the engineer coolly replied "probably never, I'd say the oil companies will buy us out in a flash." I nearly crashed my car- what on earth was going on here? The next day I rang the airport to find out who was doing the testing only to find out from an assertive voice, "there are no automobiles being tested here and there never has been." Fine, the dead end proved to be the spark of determination to send me on my investigative way.

The next encounter was about a year later involving a friend who knew a guy who invented a lawn mower that ran on water. Skeptical but excited, I said I wanted to meet the man and she came back a few days later quite upset to find he'd recently opened his front door to a shot gun blast in the face, the dead inventor had been solidly drinking for the past six months since he came home with a million or so dollars and word to the family that he didn't want to discuss his engines again. O.K. - that one seemed weird, maybe he was some dodgy businessman or something. I still needed more.

More came in the form of an article in the Melbourne Age (13/7/93 p.5)
introducing the "ozone safe induction" system, a little black box that was added to your engine that cut fuel usage by up to two-thirds with a corresponding reduction in pollution.

Oz Smart Technologies was the name of the firm, and Mike Holland the inventor that I talked to about his supposed breakthrough. "Yeah, the U.S. military just flew out some Generals and stuff and they want to buy it, and Nissan just offered me five million dollars but I want to develop it in Australia." Yeah but, does it work? Apparently it did, the E.P.A. told him off the record, that it was the best design of it's kind they'd ever seen, along with a bunch of techies from Swinburne University who'd done all the testing, but the media continued to consider the device a bit of a hoax and the company simply does not exist anymore - yep they just disappeared (again).

My research today tells me that Mike Holland's invention was probably of the "Improved fuel efficiency" variety simply burning fuel in a more efficient manner, nothing terribly difficult. Other well known developments are of the "car running on water" kind, usually involving electrical current running through the water to extract and then burn the hydrogen. Some of the more interesting involve the use of magnets, sometimes tuned to exact frequencies that take energy from the ambient atmosphere.

Since meeting Mike Holland I have managed to collect quite a list of energy inventions that have somehow avoided being utilized in the market place. You may not believe they all work, but it would be very difficult to claim that all of them are fabrications, still the evidence is here - you decide yourself.

Hydrogen Power

Yul Brown - from Sydney Australia developed a method of extracting hydrogen from water in 1978 and utilizing it as a car fuel and fuel for cutting steel and brazing. After much publicity (see The Bulletin (Aust) Aug 22, 1989) he had managed to raise over 2 million dollars.... UCSA offers this technology for cutting and brazing steel.

See Stanley Meyer's Water Powered Car:
It was estimated that Stanley's water powered car (which you can see on this website on the video page would have been able to go from California to New York using about 28 gallons of Water. Stanly was subsequently conscripted to work for the Pentagon and then was murdered by poison after hoisting a toast to success powering Army Tanks using the hydrogen in water.

See Stanley Meyer's Water Powered Car
Broadband Dialup


Francisco Pacheco - an inventor from Bolivia created the "Pacheco Bi-Polar Auto electric Hydrogen Generator" (US PAT #5,089,107) which separates hydrogen from seawater. He has built successful prototypes that have fueled a car, a motorcycle, a lawn mower, a torch, a boat, and most recently in 1990 he energized an entire home in West Milford. After many conferences (including U.N.) and public exhibitions proving the inventions worth, the wider community is still unable to utilize this technology.

Edward Estevel - from Spain developed a classic 'water to auto engine' system in the late 1960's extracting the hydrogen out of water to use as fuel. This system was highly heralded, then sank among other such 'high hope' hydrogen systems amid rumors of foul play.

Sam Leach - of Los Angeles developed a revolutionary hydrogen extraction process during the mid seventies. The unit easily extracted free hydrogen from water and was small enough to fit under the hood of automobiles. In 1976 two independent labs in LA tested this generator with perfect results. Mr. M.J. Mirkin who began the Budget car rental system purchased the rights to the device from the inventor who was said to be very concerned about his personal security.

Rodger Billings - of Provo, Utah headed a group of inventors that developed a system converting ordinary cars to run on Hydrogen. Instead of using heavy hydrogen tanks, he used metal alloys called Hydrides, to store vast amounts of hydrogen. When hot exhaust gases passed through these Hydride containers it released the gas to burn in the standard engines. Billings estimated the conversion would cost around US$500 and greatly improve fuel consumption.

Archie Blue - an inventor from Christchurch, New Zealand developed a car that runs purely on water by the extraction of hydrogen. An alleged offer of 500 million dollars from "Arab interests" was not enough to convince him to sell but never-the-less he has been unable to take his engine to the market place.

Electric Engines

Wayne Henthron - from Los Angeles built an "Electrometric Auto" in 1976 that managed to regenerate its own electricity. In normal stop and go driving it gave several hundred miles of service between recharges. The system worked by the wiring of the batteries to act as capacitors once the car was moving along with four standard auto alternators acting to keep the batteries charged. With little official interest in his system the inventor resolved to make the car available to the public to do so, is now involved with the World Federation of Science and Engineering - 15532 Computer Lane, Huntington Beach, CA, 92649.

Joseph R. Zubris - developed in 1969 an electric car circuit design (US PAT #3,809,978) that he estimated cost him $100 a year to operate. Using an old ten horse electric truck motor, he worked out a unique system to get peak performance from his old 1961 Mercury engine that he ran from this power plant. The device actually cut energy drain on electric car starting by 75%, and by weakening excitation after getting started, produced a 100% mileage gain over conventional electric motors. The inventor was shocked to find the lack of reaction from larger business interests, and so in the early seventies began selling licenses to interested smaller concerns for $500. Last known address was Zubris Electrical Company, 1320 Dorchester Ave, Boston, Ma, 02122.

Richard Diggs - developed at an inventors workshop (I.W. international) his "Liquid Electricity Engine" that he believed could power a large truck for 25,000 miles from a single portable unit of his electrical fuel. Liquid electricity violated a number of the well known physical laws that the inventor pointed out. The inventor was also aware of the profound impact the invention could have upon the world's economy - if it could be developed.

B. Von Platen - a 65 year old Swedish inventor made a major breakthrough in the field of Thermo-electric engines with his "Hot and Cold Engine" - based on the fact that wires of different metals produce electricity if they are joined and heated, the inventors secret breakthrough is said to give more than 30% more efficiency than regular motors, and with a radioactive isotope for power (hmmm?!) it could be completely free from oil.
Volvo of Sweden bought the rights to this in 1975.

Steam Engines

Oliver Yunick - developed a super efficient steam engine in 1970 (Pop.Sci. Dec.1970) able to compete admirably with combustion engines. DuPont Laboratories - built one of the most advanced steam engines in late 1971 using a recyclable fluid of the freon family. It is assumed to contain no need for an external condenser, valves, or tubes. (Pop.Sci.Jan 1972)

William Bolon - from Rialto, California, developed an unusual steam engine design in 1971, that was said to get up to 50 miles to the gallon. The engine used only 17 moving parts and weighed less than 50 pounds and eliminated the usual transmission and drive train in an automatic. After much publicity, the inventors factory was fire bombed with damages totaling $600,000 . Letters to the Whitehouse were ignored so the inventor finally gave up and let Indonesian interests have the design.

Air Power

Roy J. Meyers - from LA built an air powered car in 1931. (air has been used for years to power localized underground mine engines) Myers, an engineer, built a 114lb, 6 cylinder radial air engine that produced over 180 HP. Newspaper articles at the time reported that the vehicle could cruise several hundred miles at low speeds.

Vittorio Sorgato - of Milan, Italy also created a very impressive air powered vehicle in the 70's using compressed air stored as a liquid. After a great deal of initial interest from Italian sources his invention is now all but forgotten.

Robert Alexander - from Montebello, Ca. spent 45 days and around $500 to put together a car (US PAT #3913004) based on a small 7/8ths 12 v-motor that provided the initial power. Once going, a hydraulic and air system took over and recharged the small electric energy drain. The inventor and his partner were determined that the auto industry would not bury their "super power" system. To no avail.

Joseph P Troyan - designed an air powered flywheel that could propel an automobile for 2c a mile. Using a principle of "ratio amplification of motion" in a closed system, the Troyan motor (US PAT #040011) was easily attached to electric generators for pollution-free variable power systems.

David McClintock - created his free energy device known as the "McClintock Air Motor" (US PAT #2,982,26100) which is a cross between a diesel engine with three cylinders with a compression ratio of 27 to 1, and a rotary engine with solar and plenary gears. It burns no fuel, but becomes self-running by driving it's own air compressor.

Magnetic Energy

John W. Keeley - developed a car in the 1920's using principles similar to Nikola Tesla's, drawing harmonic magnetic energies from the planet itself. The electric car ran from high frequency electricity that was received when he simply broadcast the re-radiated atmospheric energy from a unit on his house roof. GM and the other Detroit oil "powers" offered the inventor 35 million dollars which was turned down when they would not guarantee to market the engine. Henry Ford - later bought and successfully shelved the invention.

John W Kelley died in the later part of the 1890's from pneumonia. We was not able to perfect his vibratory motor for the auto in the 1920's. When he died most of his research notes and motors disappeared never to be seen again. Chris Sproles

Harold Adams - of Lake Isabella, California, worked out a motor thought to be similar to Keeley's. It was demonstrated for many persons, including Naval scientists around the late 1940's before it too "disappeared" from our history.

Dr Keith E. Kenyon - of Van Nuys, California discovered a discrepancy in long accepted laws relating to electric motor magnets, and so built a radically different motor that could theoretically run a car on a very small amount of electrical current. When demonstrated to physicists and engineers in 1976 those present admitted that it worked remarkably well but because it was beyond the 'accepted' laws of physics they chose to ignore it.

Bob Teal - of Madison, Florida was a retired electronics engineer when he invented his Magna-Pulsion Engine which ran by means of six tiny electromagnets and a secret timing device. Requiring no fuel, the engine emitted no gases. It was so simple in design it required very little maintenance and a small motorcycle battery was enough power to get it started. The engine has been met with little else but skepticism.

Lester J. Hendershot - built his Hendershot Generator in the late 1920's largely through trial and error. He wove together a number of flat coils of wire and placed stainless steel rings, sticks of carbon and permanent magnets in various positions as an experiment. To his surprise it actually produced current. The generator raised considerable attention at the time.

Howard Johnson - developed a motor that's power is generated purely by
magnetism. It took six years of legal hassles to patent his design (US PAT #4,151,431) - more information is available from the "Permanent Magnet Research Institute" P.O. Box 199, Blacksburg, Virginia 24063. He is currently offering licensing rights.

Edwin V. Gray - developed in the early seventies an engine that uses no fuel and produces no waste, The engine that runs itself is U.S. Pat #3,890,548.

Petroleum Additives

Guido Franch - from Michigan U.S.A. began demonstrating in the mid seventies his "water-to-gas miracle" a fuel he created by adding to water a small quantity of "conversion powder" which was easily processed from coal. He claimed it could be processed for a few cents per gallon if mass produced. The fuel was tested by Chemists at Havoline Chemical of Michigan and the local University, and both concluded it worked more efficiently than gasoline. Franch continued to put on demonstrations for years but said the auto manufacturers, Government, and private companies just weren't interested in his revolutionary fuel.

Dr Alfred R. Globus - working for United International Research developed a Hydro-fuel mixture around the mid-seventies. The fuel was a mixture of 45% gasoline, 50% or more of water, and small percentages of United's "Hydrelate" which acted as a bonding agent. It was estimated that a hundred million gallons of fuel could be saved per day if this fuel were utilized but alas nobody seemed interested.

John Andrews - a Portuguese chemist who in 1974 developed a fuel additive that enabled ordinary gasoline to be mixed with water reducing fuel costs down to 2c a gallon. After successfully demonstrating the substance, impressed Navy officials when going to negotiate for the formula found the inventor missing and his lab ransacked.

Water and Alcohol Motor - Jean Chambrin, an engineer in Paris ran his private cars on a mixture of denatured alcohol and water. The inventor / mechanical engineer claimed his motor design could be mass produced at a fraction of the cost of present engines. He received nothing but publicity that led him to take great precautions in regard to his personnel security.

Mavrin D. Martin - from the University of Arizona developed in 1977 a "fuel reformer" catalytic reactor that was estimated to double mileage. The device was designed to cut exhaust emissions by mixing water with Hydro-carbon fuels to produce an efficient Hydrogen, Methane, Carbon-Monoxide fuel.

Improving Fuel Efficiency

Edward La Force - from Vermont U.S.A. designed with his brother Robert, a highly efficient engine that burnt all the usually wasted heavier gasoline molecules. The 'Los Angeles Examiner' (Dec. 29, 1974) reported that the cams, timing and so on were altered on stock Detroit engines. These modifications not only eliminated most of the pollution from the motor but by completely burning all the fuel, the mileage was usually doubled. After much publicity the US EPA examined the cars and found the motor designs were not good enough. Few people believed the EPA including a number of Senators who brought up the matter in a Congressional hearing in March 1975. The result was still silence.

Eric Cottell - was one of the pioneers of ultrasonic fuel systems. This involved using sonic transducers to 'vibrate' existing fuels down to much smaller particles, making it burn up to 20% more efficiently. Cottell then went on to discover that super fine S-ionized water could be mixed perfectly with up to 70% oil or gas in these systems, this was followed by much publicity (e.g. Newsweek, June 17,1974) and then, once again - silence.

L. Mills. Beam - had his super-mileage carburetor bought out in the 1920's. In the late 60's he worked out a catalytic vegetable compound that produced the same super mileage results. In principle it was nothing more than a method of using the hot exhaust gases of an engine to vaporize the liquid gas being burned. By rearranging the molecules of gas and diesel, he was able to triple mileage rates, while obtaining better combustion, mileage and emission control.

He was refused and rejected by U.S. State and Federal Air Pollution and Environmental Pollution agencies and was finally forced to sell his formula abroad in the mid-seventies just to survive.

John W. Gulley - of Gratz Kentucky managed 115 mpg from his 8 cylinder Buick using a similar vaporizing method as that employed by L.M. Beam. "Detroit interests" bought and suppressed the device in 1950.

SHELL research of London - produced a 'Vapipe' unit in the early seventies that also vaporized the petroleum at around 40 degrees centigrade, and used a sophisticated pressure loss reduction system, but alas was not marketed because it did not meet Federal emission standards.

Russell Bourke - designed an engine in 1932 with only two moving parts. He connected two pistons to a refined "Scotch Yoke" crankshaft and came up with an engine that was superior in most respects to any competitive engine. His design burned any cheap carbon based fuel and delivered great mileage and performance. Article after article was published acclaiming his engine but once again, to no avail. "The Bourke Engine Documentary" is the revealing book the inventor assembled just before his death.

New Fuels

Clayton J. Querles - from Lucerne Valley, California took a 10,000 mile trip across the country in his 1949 Buick on $10 worth of carbide by building a simple carbide generator which worked on the order of a miners lamp. He claimed that half a pound of acetylene pressure was sufficient to keep his car running, but because acetylene was dangerous, he put a safety valve on his generator and ran the outlet gas through water to ensure there would be no 'blow back'.

The inventor also toyed successfully with methods of fuel vaporization. (see Sun-Telegram 11/2/74.)

Joseph Papp - built the highly regarded Papp engine in the 60's that could run on a 15 cents an hour secret combination of expandable gases. Instead of burning fuel, this engine used electricity to expand the gas in hermetically sealed cylinders.

The first prototype was a simple ninety horsepower Volvo engine with upper end modifications. Attaching the Volvo pistons to pistons fitting the sealed cylinders, the engine worked perfectly with an output of three hundred horsepower.

The inventor claimed it would cost about twenty five dollars to charge each cylinder every sixty thousand miles. The idea has gotten nowhere amid accusations of suppression by the media.

Carburetors

G.A. Moore. - one of the most productive inventors of carburetors, he held some 17,000 patents of which 250 were related to the automobile and it's carburetion. Industry today relies on his air brakes and fuel injection systems, it continues to completely ignore his systems for reducing pollution, gaining more mileage and improving overall engine efficiency. More info from "The Works of George Arlington Moore" published by the Madison Company. (See US PAT #'s 1,633,791 to 2,123,485 for 17 interesting developments.)

Joseph Bascle - created the Bascle carburetor in the mid 50's. The carburetor raised mileage by 25% and reduced pollution by 45%. It's inventor, a well known Baton Rouge researcher remobilized every carburetor in the local Yellow Cab fleet, shortly after his arrival there.

Kendig Carburetors - were originally hand made for racing cars by a small group of mechanics in Los Angeles in the early seventies under the title of Variable Venture Carburetors. Eventually a young college student bought one of their less sophisticated prototypes for his old Mercury "gas hog", when he entered it in a Californian air pollution run - he won easily - not only did the carburetor reduce pollution, it gave almost twice the mileage. Within a week the student was told to remove the carburetor as it was not approved by the Air Resources Board. The simpler Kendig model was due for production in 1975 but has yet to be produced.

C.N. Pogue - from Winnipeg, Canada, developed a carburetor (US PAT# 2,026,789) in the late 1930's that used superheated steam in it's system and managed at least 200 miles per gallon. Much local interest, including threats from professional thieves, was not enough publicity to see this invention through to the market place.

John R. Fish - developed his "Fish" carburetor in the early 1940's that was tested by Ford who admitted that the invention was a third more efficient than theirs. The design can also be easily switched to alcohol. Nevertheless the inventor was hindered from manufacture and distribution in almost every possible way, he once even resorted to selling by mail order, only to be stopped by the Post Office. The device can be currently bought from "Fuel systems of America" Box 9333, Tacoma, Washington 98401 - U.S. ph:(206) 922-2228 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (206) 922-2228 end_of_the_skype_highlighting. (US PAT's 2,214,273 and 2,236,595 and 2,775,818.)

The Dresserator - was created around the early 70's in Santa Ana, California by Lester Berriman. It was based on a super-accurate mixture control using greatly enhanced airflow, and could run a car on up to a 22-to-1 fuel mixture. Test cars passed the pollution control standards with ease and managed up to an 18% mileage gain. Although Holley Carburetor and Ford signed agreements to manufacture the design in 1974, nothing has been heard of since.

Mark J. Meierbachtol - from San Bernardino, California patented a carburetor ( U.S. Patent # 3,432,281 March, 11, 69) that managed significantly greater mileage than was usual.

Much of this list is borrowed heavily from the book "Suppressed Inventions and other Discoveries" by Brian O'Leary, Christopher Bird, Jeanne Manning, and Barry Lynes, Auckland Institute of Technology Press, Private bag 92006, Auckland, New Zealand. ISBN No 0-9583334-7-
5. Along with references noted.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:46 am

How did 82-28 reply to a dup of this thread when my screen says that this topic does not exist (when I click on that version)?
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Jeff » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:52 am

Sounder wrote:How did 82-28 reply to a dup of this thread when my screen says that this topic does not exist (when I click on that version)?


He replied before I deleted it.

(His comment was regarding the multiple posting, not the substance of your post.)
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby elfismiles » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:04 am

Wow!! :shock:

That is some list at the link.

Thanks Sounder!!
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:17 pm

Thanks Jeff and elfismiles

Many of these folk are not so much suppressed as they are victims of an effect whereby most people keep disruptive ideation at arms length.

Humans are crazy creative all the time, unfortunately most of this is tightly channeled by social conformity requirements. This may be what drives some guys to tinkering in the garage or shed where surprising things can happen.

This list takes me back to Rex Research days when I was obsessed with alternative physics. One person that especially impressed was the ex-head of creative development for IBM. (I need to read the OP more closely to see if the author included this fellow) Upon retirement he was given a half million dollars of test equipment. He proceeded to do experiments where he spun flowing water around a crystal to create a potential. He claimed great results while admitting that he had no ideas about possible theoretical explanations.

I sulked for ten years before my obsession era because I was convinced that the search for and concepts of fundamental particles produced a poor atomic model. Hell, even calling it an ATOMIC model pisses me off. Kidding, I only get pissed on beer, well beer and a few other things, but nothing that kills one quicker than living does.

It bothered me from early on that Tesla could be so influential practically speaking, yet his theoretical work, from what I could tell, did not even exist. Well Ok, a lot of things bother me about orthodox theory, but there is no use bitching about them because it only marks one out as being a freak.

Anyway, partly because of a very gracious wife, I was able to pursue the obsession for about ten years. (Notice, the marriage came before the obsession was given free reign.) The end result was a crude (physical) model that at least has the benefit of a mechanism for transitions between manifest and non-manifest states. But because it does not derive from or depend on existing forms of understanding, there can be little interest from any backslapping academia that finds the measure of their worth via facility with existing forms of understanding.

Still, this is just as well because eventually even a ‘great civilization geek’ has to see that new knowledge brings greater ability to impact reality and therefore, how we organize our knowledge is worthy of much more consideration than are individual ‘facts’.

Which may be another way of trying to say that it makes more sense to create a better model for consciousness (the limiter), than it is to put effort into better modeling for Physics.

Or it could be another way of trying to say that knowledge without ethics will tend to kill more people than will relative ignorance that includes ethics.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:15 am

I wanted to post a video of me doing ‘Half as much’ by Hank Williams, but I’m illiterate and my wife says our equipment could not do it anyway. This will have to suffice, and at least it will be easier on the ear.

These quotes come from: http://nowyouliftyoureyestothesun.tumblr.com/page/7

If you limit your choices only to what seems possible or reasonable, you disconnect yourself from what you truly want, and all that is left is a compromise.
— Robert Fritz

To be beautiful means to be yourself. You don’t need to be accepted by others. You need to accept yourself.
— Thich Nhat Hanh

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark; professionals built the Titanic

To dare is to lose one’s footing momentarily. To not dare is to lose oneself.
— Soren Kierkegaard

None of us will ever accomplish anything excellent or commanding except when he listens to this whisper which is heard by him alone.
— Emerson

Optimism is a strategy for making a better future. Because unless you believe that the future can be better, it’s unlikely you will step up and take responsibility for making it so. If you assume that there’s no hope, you guarantee that there will be no hope. If you assume that there is an instinct for freedom, that there are opportunities to change things, there is a chance you may contribute to making a better world. The choice is yours.
— Naom Chomsky

When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be.
— Lao Tzu

Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
— Winston Churchill

We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.
— Buddha

So the Buddha says, but what is the nature of the causal chain that brings this arising out of thought? Where is the physics that will extend the causal chain into more subtle realms?
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:48 am

http://pesn.com/2010/12/07/9501740_Bob_ ... p_removed/

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News
Copyright © 2010
Last year we reported that Bob Boyce, the highly-revered inventor of ultra-efficient electrolysis systems and of a self-charging battery circuit (harnessing energy from the environment, possibly from zero point energy), had contracted terminal cancer and that the originating point was a VeriChip microchip that someone implanted in his right shoulder without his knowledge or permission.

He had a chip removed, but it turned out that another chip was still in there, implanted deeper, as confirmed by an X-ray.

He's lived with that one for a year, but finally had it removed yesterday at the Fannin Regional Hospital in Blue Ridge, Georgia.

The Fannin surgical staff took photos as the chip was removed from the tissue and placed in a specimen container, labeled "foreign body", and sealed by the surgeon. The blue color of the tissue is from a dye that was injected to mark cancerous cells.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby slimmouse » Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:17 am

I was reading the above article yesterday sounder. I hit the link to Mr Allans name for more info, given the nature of these apparently sensational claims about Boyce, and despite recognising that the MO of the former partner of Boyce certainly appears to fit the bill of agents of the PTB.

Whilst reading more about Allan, there was a link to a video (below) in which he listed his top 10 exotic energy technologies. I have yet to see this in its entirety. In introducing them however, the man seems completely level headed, marking each possible technology with its pro's and cons.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Event:2010 ... Conference

I have long believed ( for the sake of polity I wont say known) that working examples of exotic technology exist, which would go a long way to freeing the masses from the economic burdens heaped upon them by the usual suspects. But of course "the reptiles" wouldnt be best pleased with that kind of freedom now would they. Indeed one such creature ( Kissinger) is on the record saying as much.

Even if I were wrong in this "belief" of the ready-to-go nature of such technology, One really cannot help wondering why the billions being hallmarked for Carbon credit ponzi schemes and all the rest of it wouldnt be better employed refining such technologies as those highlighted in the video above for instance -particularly if global warming is anything like as much of a danger as it is touted.
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:19 pm

slimmouse wrote...
One really cannot help wondering why the billions being hallmarked for Carbon credit ponzi schemes and all the rest of it wouldnt be better employed refining such technologies as those highlighted in the video above for instance…

Yeah, funny thing, it’s almost like; there’s better money in not solving problems than there is in solving problems. But it’s all so last century business school mantra; securitize everything in sight’, and that is going just swimmingly. Yeah boys; ‘there’s no market like a free market’, heh heh, nudge nudge, wink wink.

-particularly if global warming is anything like as much of a danger as it is touted.

One is almost forced to assume that the carbonistas must have a fairly static view of the potentials within the orthodox models of physics, and believe at the same time that the orthodox model is ‘essentially’ correct so that there is no need to examine any counter examples.

It seems like people still find that the best way to not have a problem is to deny the existence of the problem in the first place. So great, that problem ‘disappears’, as ten more rise up to take its place. But it’s all good because the derivative problems are easier to monetize. It’s the new Hegel; problem, reaction, ten new problems, it’ll be great, like regular fractional reserve banking but it'll be for generating bad ideas, lots of opportunities man, lots of op's.

PSA

The central controllers encourage everyone to bitch about problems to your hearts content, along with the kindly advice that you not participate in the questioning of initial assumptions or the ‘essential’ validity of current representations of science.

Pssst; 'economics too' (asshole).

Uh um, yes good people do please accept the kindly advise to not question initial assumptions or the essential validity of science and economics.

Thank you for your attention.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:33 pm

http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/20101227 ... museum.htm

The "Dimitrie Leonida" National Technical Museum from Romania hosts a weird kind of battery. Built by Vasile Karpen, the pile has been working uninterrupted for 60 years. "I admit it's also hard for me to advance the idea of an overunity generator without sounding ridiculous, even if the object exists," says Nicolae Diaconescu, engineer and director of the museum.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:59 am

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Cold ... 1302201175
Cold fusion -- the largely discredited science of making more energy from less -- may be making a comeback.

Controversial yet high-profile demonstrations in Italy last month purported to show a cold fusion device turning 400 watts of heat power into 12,400 watts. The eye-popping 31-fold increase -- also known as an "excess heat effect" -- illustrates why lay observers say cold fusion is the "holy grail of energy independence" and why many scientists doubt, some to the point of apoplexy.

Since he's only seen second hand accounts of this latest project, University of Missouri Vice Chancellor for Research Robert Duncan, Ph.D., an expert in low-temperature physics, said he "can neither criticize nor endorse" it.

"But I do know that excess heat effects are real, and although we do not fundamentally understand their origins, the world's scientific community would be remiss if it does not seriously pursue these fascinating new observations," Duncan told TechNewsWorld.

The Italian Project
The reactor demonstrated in Italy is the brainchild of University of Bologna physics professor emeritus Sergio Focardi, Ph.D., and Andrea Rossi, who manufactures biofueled electric generators at his Bedford, N.H.-based Leonardo Corporation. It reportedly fuses nickel and hydrogen atomic nuclei at room temperature, producing copper -- and copious energy.

The process is also green, giving off neither coal-fired carbon dioxide nor radioactive waste, the two men said at a standing-room-only January 14 demonstration/press conference in Bologna. A nuclear physicist associated with the Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Giuseppe Levi, examined the procedure and told reporters he was 100 percent convinced.
.
King Caution
Despite all the excitement -- online chatter and news reports about the demo still haven't died down -- "the history of the cold fusion controversy teaches us that caution is king," said New Energy Times' Krivit.

Ever cautious, peer-reviewed journals and a patent examination have rejected the claims. The Rossi-Focardi reactor, the patent examiner wrote, "seems to offend against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories."
Oh dear, write home to Momma, it ‘seems to offend’.

The honor, let alone consideration, given to original thinking is pathetic when one considers that that is the best place to find opportunity for reordering our (currently inadequate) pictures of reality.

Particularly remarkable was the (decidedly chilly) cold fusion journey of Julian Schwinger, who with Richard Feynmann and Shinichiro Tomonaga won the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics for one of the greatest ever physical theories, quantum electrodynamics or QED.
After studying the Pons-Fleischmann experiments, "Julian had a theory that a process tantamount to cold fusion was occurring, but even as a Nobel laureate, he couldn't get reputable journals to publish it," Duncan told TechNewsWorld.
"My first attempt at publication was a total disaster," Schwinger recalled during lectures and seminars. He had devised a hypothesis about the effect "to suggest several critical experiments," but because cold fusion had become what Duncan calls a "pariah science, poison to all who touched it," Schwinger -- graduate advisor to four other Nobel laureates who also won the U.S. National Medal of Science -- was summarily ignored.

"What I had not expected was the venomous criticism, the contempt, the enormous pressure to conform. Has the knowledge that physics is an experimental science been totally lost?" he wondered.

"Temporarily misplaced" perhaps, Duncan said, urging that scientists leave peer pressure behind and return to their methodological roots.
"Cold fusion, or low-energy nuclear science, has benefited from exciting innovations and outstanding minds, yet massive, destructive 'group think,' has given it a checkered past," Duncan explained. "Now, however, it is of paramount importance that science proceed boldly, with a determined yet dispassionate focus, on the objective study of these fascinating phenomena."
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Sat Oct 08, 2011 8:11 am

I see much more potential here than I see in 'Carbon Tax Credits', as a proper manner for approaching reality.

Do any of you 'deniers' care to argue the point?




http://thrivemovement.com/
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Sounder » Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:55 pm

Interested observers might want to check out the brillouinenergy folk. These people are not popcorn vendors and I dare say carry more collective credibility with their yes vote than do a few internet naysayers.

http://www.brillouinenergy.com/

Our People

The Team

Robert W. George II, Chief Executive Officer

Mr. George is a multi-disciplined executive with extensive experience in product design and commercialization, running successful companies in the public and private sector, providing creative solutions for product development, marketing and international licensing and joint ventures.
Along with his duties at Brillouin Energy, Mr. George is Managing Director at Grosvenor Financial Partners, LLC, where he is a technical consultant assisting clients in establishing Joint Ventures, Licensing and Strategic Alliances in the U. S., Europe and the Gulf (GCC) region. Previously, he has produced extraordinary results as CEO for several companies including Commerce Direct Systems, Inc. Napa, CA, Imagineering International, Inc., Nashua, NH and Denning Mobile Robotics, Inc. Wilmington, MA (NASDAQ:GARD). At Denning Mobile Robotics Mr. George developed the world’s first commercial artificially intelligent autonomous mobile robots and positioned the company for a successful Initial Public Offering.
Mr. George serves on several Boards of Directors that include:

Equinox Equity Investments, LLC, Developer of hospitality properties. Evans Hagen & Company, Competitive market analysts, litigation support, technology telecommunications. Strategic Communications, Inc., Providing public companies with Investor Relations and Public Relations. Oklahoma Energy Corp (NASDAQ:OKOK) Oil, Gas and Energy development.

Mr. George has a BSME from University of New Hampshire in Mechanical Engineering and a BA from Massachusetts College of Art in High Temperature Ceramics. While studying at the University of New Hampshire he received the prestigious Lincoln Foundation Engineering Award.
Robert E. Godes, President and Chief Technology Officer

The founder of Brillouin Energy Corp. is an innovative technical designer, electrical engineer, and creative solution inventor with over 25 years experience in identifying and developing technology products for diverse organizations. Recognized and identified for improving overall productivity, focused on continuously delivering efficient applications while maintaining reliability and reducing overall costs. He has contributed to applications including torpedo guidance systems, paper currency recognition systems, distributed data collection and control systems, and puddle detection systems. He has actively studied mechanics, quantum mechanics, and several areas of physics, electronics, control systems, programming, and chemistry. His talent in integrating mechanical design, physics, and chemistry provides extraordinary insight into the various problems and failures of existing research in this field.

Previous to Brillouin Energy Corp, Mr. Godes worked as an electrical engineer at EnergyLine, Clear-com, Versatec and ARDAC. Mr. Godes earned a BS from Ohio Northern University in electrical engineering. He is knowledgeable in the fields of Material Science, Chemistry, Astrophysics, Molecular Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics. He was awarded the Remsburg Annual Creativity Award, ONU IEEE Design Contest and the ONU Board of Engineering Director's Contest. He published a nine-page feature article in Infinite Energy Magazine: “The Quantum Fusion Hypothesis”, Vol 14 issue 82 2008. (See link in the side bar to the left.)

Jim Aldridge, Engineering Manager, Project Leader

Accomplished and integrity-driven technology entrepreneur committed to developing renewable energy solutions. Jim’s career spans 35 years in Silicon Valley working in over 25 technology companies directing complex engineering and marketing projects. He has led successful product developments and commercial launches for companies in Fiber Optics, Telecommunications, Semiconductor Equipment, Automated Test Systems and Robotics. Jim is highly experienced in leading design teams to develop and commercially grow technology products for new emerging markets.

Other endeavors of Mr. Aldridge include:

2006 – Present, Alpha Robotics Systems, Palo Alto, CA - Engineering Consultant
Horizon Analog, Lawrence, KS - CTO for startup of electronic signal processing company - Led design of specialized all-analog filter for DSL and audio applications.

Global Silicon Networks, Fremont, CA - Directed electronic engineering for startup Designed and built robot and mechanical interface for thin film coating equipment.

Innovation Engineering, San Mateo, CA - Engineering manager - Developed electronic hardware and firmware to control SCARA robot arm for glass material handler.

Advisory Board
Technical Advisory Board

Brillouin has carefully selected our Advisory Board to help with experimental setup, data collection, calorimetry, calculations and interfacing with commercial generation companies. Brillouin Energy currently has a six man Advisory Board:

Charles S. Holden, scientific consultant, works with Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in development of nuclear Fuel cycles and medical isotopes.

Michael C.H. McKubre PhD., Director, Energy Research Center, Stanford Research Institute

Edward Beardsworth PhD. marketing strategy and business development consultant

Roger W. Fuller, Founder and the Senior Scientist Maxim Integrated Products

Adolfo O. Gutierrez PhD., Executive Director and co-founder of Southern Pacific Research Institute for Advanced Technologies

Robert Clear PhD. Past Staff Scientist for Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in the Applied Science Division.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Iamwhomiam » Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:01 pm

Well, I got down to the section on Hydrogen power, before I stopped reading further to post this comment...

But first let me say that certain new sources of energy probably are being suppressed...

Sounder, I'm not familiar with the institution teaching the suppressed technology being discussed in the first part, UCSA.

Could you please enlighten me as to what institution this is?
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hoaxes or Creativity Suppressed?

Postby Iamwhomiam » Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:59 pm

Hmm..."Russell Bourke - designed an engine in 1932 with only two moving parts. He connected two pistons to a refined "Scotch Yoke" crankshaft and came up with an engine that was superior in most respects to any competitive engine."

Two pistons = two parts

Plus

one crankshaft = three parts.


All righty, then... moving on...

Edited to add: "Clayton J. Querles - from Lucerne Valley, California took a 10,000 mile trip across the country in his 1949 Buick on $10 worth of carbide..."

Pray tell, which country is being discussed, the USA? "a 10k mile trip across the county" Well, maybe he got lost... a lot.

Edited to add:

"Kendig Carburetors..." "Eventually a young college student bought one of their less sophisticated prototypes for his old Mercury "gas hog", when he entered it in a Californian air pollution run - he won easily - not only did the carburetor reduce pollution, it gave almost twice the mileage."

Hmm... Should be some evidence available to support this, shouldn't there? Like, what California air pollution run? When did it take place and where was it held and who sponsored it? The "CARB" ordered him to remove it? Very interesting. the California Air Resources Board... okay, sure, if you say so.

Edited to add:

"C.N. Pogue - from Winnipeg, Canada, developed a carburetor (US PAT# 2,026,789) in the late 1930's that used superheated steam in it's system and managed at least 200 miles per gallon."

Any documentation at all of this remarkable mileage feat? Oh, that's right... It's been suppressed.
I suppose it was 'free energy' that created all the hot air, er, steam.

Edited to add:

"John R. Fish - developed his "Fish" carburetor in the early 1940's that was tested by Ford who admitted that the invention was a third more efficient than theirs. The design can also be easily switched to alcohol. Nevertheless the inventor was hindered from manufacture and distribution in almost every possible way, he once even resorted to selling by mail order, only to be stopped by the Post Office. The device can be currently bought from "Fuel systems of America" Box 9333, Tacoma, Washington 98401 - U.S. ph:(206) 922-2228"

No such company exists. Try googling for it. Sounds like yet another fish story to me.

"The Dresserator - was created around the early 70's in Santa Ana, California by Lester Berriman. It was based on a super-accurate mixture control using greatly enhanced airflow, and could run a car on up to a 22-to-1 fuel mixture. Test cars passed the pollution control standards with ease and managed up to an 18% mileage gain."

What fuel was being utilized? Normal fuel injected engines have an air to fuel mixture of 14.7 to 1. In naturally aspirated engines powered by octane, maximum power is frequently reached at AFRs ranging from 12.5 to 13.3:1. Of course Superchargers, Turbochargers and Blowers do increase the air to fuel ratio and all heat the air/fuel mixture before combustion and have been around in one form or another since the last quarter of the 19th century. Not suppressed!

And finally, we have a completely believable claim: "Mark J. Meierbachtol - from San Bernardino, California patented a carburetor ( U.S. Patent # 3,432,281 March, 11, 69) that managed significantly greater mileage than was usual."

To bad the author omitted to mention how much greater the mileage it achieved was, oh well.
Last edited by Iamwhomiam on Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:04 pm, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests