This is despite a post-mortem, a second examination and toxicology tests, the results of which might not be available for weeks.
Sources close to the inquiry say the PC who found the body described it as being in ‘fluid’ when he radioed for assistance. Detectives at the scene are understood to have used the same word in their reports.
Immediately after making the discovery at the flat, the PC said: ‘This is a murder scene.’
so while looking for a missing person the pc found a bag in a tub full of "fluid".
but if the bag was locked why would he even imagine it held a body?
did he then disturb the evidence by breaking the lock in order to determine there was a body inside?
would this be standard practice?
if the bag was in "fluid" wouldn't there have been some concern about possible toxicity of the "fluid"?
so did he then drain the tub precluding any analysis of the "fluid"?
and i can't imagine a spook could disappear, while living in a safe house, and nobody would come looking for him.