RocketMan » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:58 pm wrote:Who here is demanding to get "this thread locked"? This is again utter insanity. I literally have no idea what you're talking about.
seemslikeadream » Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:08 am wrote:WikiLeaks withheld a US military document that proves the U.S. never had any intention of "regime change" in Syria, and that, in fact, it wants the Alawite-Baathist regime to stay in power.
JackRiddler » Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:49 pm wrote:.
That may well be true. If so, why has Mueller avoided all that and produced an exoneration?
seemslikeadream » Sun Apr 21, 2019 12:02 am wrote:Seth Rich did not disclose the DNC emails, why did you say that?
be careful Jack's on watch he doesn't like misrepresenting things
Julian Assange not only knew that a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer wasn’t his source for thousands of hacked party emails, he was in active contact with his real sources in Russia’s GRU months after Seth Rich’s death. At the same time he was publicly working to shift blame onto the slain staffer “to obscure the source of the materials he was releasing,” Special Counsel Robert Mueller asserts in his final report on Russia’s role in the 2016 presidential election.
“After the U.S. intelligence community publicly announced its assessment that Russia was behind the hacking operation, Assange continued to deny that the Clinton materials released by WikiLeaks had come from Russian hacking,” the report reads. “According to media reports, Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/mueller-r ... r-russians
“As laid out by Mueller, Assange’s involvement in Russia’s election interference began with a June 14, 2016 direct message to WikiLeaks’ Twitter account from “DC Leaks,” one of the false fronts created by the Russians to launder their hacked material.
“You announced your organization was preparing to publish more Hillary's emails,” the message read, according to Mueller’s report. “We are ready to support you. We have some sensitive information too, in particular, her financial documents. Let's do it together. What do you think about publishing our info at the same moment? Thank you.”
A week later, WikiLeaks reached out to a second GRU persona, Guccifer 2.0, and pitched WikiLeaks as the best outlet for the hacked material. On July 14, 2016, GRU officers used a Guccifer 2.0 email address to send WikiLeaks an encrypted one-gigabyte file named “wk dnc link I .txt.gpg.” Assange confirmed receipt, and on July 22 he published 20,000 DNC emails stolen during the GRU’s breach.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/4 ... an-Sources
JackRiddler » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:51 pm wrote:.
Just keep digging. I'd be thrilled to see this thread locked, or you to come to your senses and ask for the title to be changed. But it's not my motivation to post here, and thus kick this shitty storehouse of anti-Wikileaks propaganda.
I caught you lying. On a factual matter. Directly provable. Tough shit, that's what happened, and you will post a fucking encyclopedia of denial and dissembling rather than acknowledge it.
You could acknowledge the complete untruth of what you posted, and claim it was an error.
But until then, this is a lie and you are a liar:seemslikeadream » Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:08 am wrote:WikiLeaks withheld a US military document that proves the U.S. never had any intention of "regime change" in Syria, and that, in fact, it wants the Alawite-Baathist regime to stay in power.
Fact: Wikileaks provided the document. No one else did that. Wikileaks published the document soon after they received it in the Stratfor data dump. Otherwise you would not know the document existed. Otherwise Nafeez would not have been able to use it in his article.
seemslikeadream » Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:29 pm wrote:Jack has asked me to combine the Assange threads, let's see if we can keep all posts Assange here, thanks.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests