Bush in a goat-mask

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby eyeno » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:51 pm

Image
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby eyeno » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:53 pm

Image
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby eyeno » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:54 pm

Image
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby 82_28 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:17 pm

The train wreck of a "correspondent" that is Jenna Bush on NBC's Today Show (fuck, she's awful):



However, check out this. Watch the above video and pay attention to the time signature/stamp of about 1:37 on.

Ganny:
1. ganny

The humorous nickname for the King of Darkness, Ganondorf Dragmire from the Legend of Zelda.


2. ganny

A term to describe the desirable female genitalia, wherein one would like to place ones bone. It may sometimes be elusive in the most awesome of forms, but is more readily available when surrounded by a larger mass.
Are you going out tonight to get the ganny? or; did you get the ganny?


Bill Hicks had this to say at one point:

Speaking of Satan, I was watching Rush Limbaugh the other day. Doesn't Rush Limbaugh remind you of one of those gay guys who likes to lay in a tub while other men pee on him? Am I the only one? Can't you see his fat body in a tub while Reagan, Quayle and Bush just stand around pissing on him? His little piggly wiggly dick can't get hard, 'Uhh... uhh...I can't get hard. Reagan, pee in my mouth!' He still can't get hard, so Barbara Bush comes in. She takes off her pearls, and undoes her girdle. Her wrinkled, flaccid labia unfurls half way to her knees, like some ball-less scrotum. Barbara walks over, squats over his face, and squeezes out a link into his mouth. Finally, his tiny dick gets half-way hard. 'Oooh!' A little bubble forms on the end of his dick, with a little demon maggot inside. The demon maggot pops the bubble, and goes off to join a pro-life group somewhere.




In that first urban dictionary definition one must also note the "GANONdorf" aspect of it all as well. . .

There you have it. Don't hold me to it, but have fun doing some of the multi-contextual "math" this portends. :partyhat
Last edited by 82_28 on Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby norton ash » Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:20 pm

Watch it, Bill, talking like that could get you killed.
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby Nordic » Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:41 pm

norton ash wrote:Watch it, Bill, talking like that could get you killed.


Yeah, I always had my suspicions about that very thing.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Postby Perelandra » Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:48 pm

82_28 wrote:There you have it.

Utter nonsense AND gratuitous ugly obscenity.
“The past is never dead. It's not even past.” - William Faulkner
User avatar
Perelandra
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby Laodicean » Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:25 am

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby eyeno » Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:55 am

Laodicean wrote:


Ok dude. That was fuckin priceless. For one Sunday night, between this and two or three other posts, I just got my entertainment quota filled. I (might) be sane after all. Thanx for that one...lol....
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby Stephen Morgan » Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:04 am

Is that Fiona Bruce on Pappy's knee?

Better Pet than scape.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby eyeno » Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:18 am

Ok now i'm curious...

Would thinking with the left side of your brain most of time cause you to squint your right eye?
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby Pierre d'Achoppement » Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:33 am

Violent videos of Oslo killer's 'mentor'
The suspected “mentor” of the Oslo killer Anders Breivik has backed violent videos apparently advocating a "war between Christians and Islamists" and the establishment of "Order 777" it can be disclosed.
By Duncan Gardham, Security Correspondent
4:53PM BST 29 Jul 2011

(...)

The group, calling itself Order 777, claims to bring together Christian resistance movements and features a depiction of a Templar Knight with the slogan “The Order 777 Strikes Back!” alongside footage of a variety of armed gangs with the words “factions united.”

(...)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... entor.html
Jeff: I'm afraid that Earth, a-all of Earth, is nothing but an intergalactic reality-TV show.
Man 2: My God. We're famous! [everyone stands and whoops it up]
- script from "Cancelled" - South Park
User avatar
Pierre d'Achoppement
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby eyeno » Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:42 am

Pierre d'Achoppement wrote:
Violent videos of Oslo killer's 'mentor'
The suspected “mentor” of the Oslo killer Anders Breivik has backed violent videos apparently advocating a "war between Christians and Islamists" and the establishment of "Order 777" it can be disclosed.
By Duncan Gardham, Security Correspondent
4:53PM BST 29 Jul 2011

(...)

The group, calling itself Order 777, claims to bring together Christian resistance movements and features a depiction of a Templar Knight with the slogan “The Order 777 Strikes Back!” alongside footage of a variety of armed gangs with the words “factions united.”

(...)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... entor.html



^^^holy shit, that is real innit?
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bush in a goat-mask

Postby 82_28 » Mon Aug 01, 2011 5:44 am

Hardly nonsense at all, Perelandra. I believe Bill Hicks right there was doing all there was that was available to him to try and "destroy" the fascism that was taking hold in the US at this time. Be disgusting. If you need beautiful and uplifting screeds from Hicks, you will find those too. But this one, was the one I believe that got Hicks assassinated. I am of the camp he was assassinated. I am also of the camp that Bill Hicks was one of the most important figures that should America see a new revolution, he will figure quite considerably in it.

Do I know? No. I, personally think he was assassinated by the family that believes itself to be American royalty. Is what he said offensive and disgusting? Yes. That was the point. It was to offend the Satanic Bush family, not you and your gender. That's how I see it and also how I fully believe he meant it. The asshole wasn't an idiot, but a firebrand that tested the limits of free speech within the norms of the time and the steady march of idiocracy he portended. (see his American Gladiators commentary)

Whether you want to believe it or not, Bill Hicks did everything he could and I would suggest, sacrificed his life, so that we can be here today, talking on the webs. He needed to use this terminology in order to make a point. This was before the Internet. Before "trolls". Before tweeting. He used his mind and expressed "full spectrum dominance" on that which was unprepared to respond to such a thing known as "calling one out". Hicks called it. He spoke his mind. Didn't mince any words. And didn't give a fuck whether Perelandra or Barbara Bush was offended. (I'm certainly not comparing or equating you to Barbara bush, Perelandra)

Hardly was this offensive any more so than the Bush family's 10s of millions dead through their many decades of death they have brought the world (that we can historically track down -- WWI on up to now). Hicks called it and Bush's beautiful mind well before she did. While Hicks was personally offending in the most stark terms available, the bush's were busy exterminating tens of thousands of humans on the "Highway of Death".

There is nothing gratuitous, nonsensical or ugly about anything that I have seen concerning Bill Hicks ever. Obscene? Yes. 101% less obscene than fucking genocide though. Save your disgust for the bush clan and their hangers-on. Barbara Bush is a specimen of such evil, in my book, that it would take a million Hicks to amount to. 100 million G HW bush's and 1 billion dubyas.

Bill Hicks is a saint.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Thomas Friedman: Bring Back Poppy

Postby MinM » Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:59 am

Image
Op-Ed Columnist
Bring Back Poppy
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: July 30, 2011


WATCHING today’s Republicans being led around by an extremist Tea Party faction, with no adult supervision, I find my mind drifting back to the late 1980s when I was assigned to cover the administration of George H.W. Bush, who I believe is one of our most underrated presidents. I have long admired the elder Bush for the deftness with which he dealt with the collapse of the Soviet empire. But, in later years, I came to admire him even more for the fact that he believed that math and science were not matters of opinion — a view increasingly rare in today’s G.O.P.

Despite having run on the promise of “Read my lips: No new taxes,” when the deficit started spiraling to dangerous levels under his presidency, Bush agreed to a compromise with Democrats to raise several taxes, along with spending cuts, as part of a 1990 budget deal that helped to pave the way for the prosperity of that decade. It definitely hurt his re-election, but he did it anyway.

George H.W. Bush also believed in science. How many Republicans know that he and his aide Boyden Gray pioneered the use of cap-and-trade to deal — very effectively — with the problem of acid rain produced by power-plant emissions?

In an article, “The Political History of Cap and Trade,” published in Smithsonian Magazine in August 2009, Richard Conniff details how “an unlikely mix of environmentalists and free-market conservatives hammered out the strategy known as cap-and-trade.” As Conniff explained it, “Gray liked the marketplace approach, and even before the Reagan administration expired, he put [Environmental Defense Fund] staffers to work drafting legislation to make it happen. ... John Sununu, the White House chief of staff, was furious. He said the cap ‘was going to shut the economy down,’ Boyden Gray recalls. But the in-house debate ‘went very, very fast. We didn’t have time to fool around with it.’ President Bush not only accepted the cap, he overruled his advisers’ recommendation of an eight million-ton cut in annual acid rain emissions in favor of the 10 million-ton cut advocated by environmentalists. ... [Today,] the cap-and-trade system continues to let polluters figure out the least expensive way to reduce their acid rain emissions.”

George H.W. Bush also believed that to be a conservative was to act with “prudence,” one of his favorite words and a philosophy he demonstrated in foreign policy by deciding, once he defeated Saddam Hussein in Kuwait, not to follow him to Baghdad.

I find it hard to look at today’s G.O.P. without thinking how far it has drifted from the kind of balanced conservatism the elder Bush brought to politics. Today’s G.O.P. has gone from espousing cap-and-trade to deal with pollution to espousing the notion that all the world’s climate scientists have secretly gotten together and perpetrated a “hoax,” called climate change, in order to expand government — all of this at a time of record heat waves and climate disruptions.

On the economy, the G.O.P. has gone from the magical thinking of Vice President Dick Cheney — who argued that “Reagan proved deficits don’t matter” and used this argument to help run up the deficit to its current astronomical levels with huge tax cuts — to an anti-tax cult that spurned a “Grand Bargain” with President Obama because it would have not only cut $3 trillion in spending over the next decade but also involved $1 trillion in tax increases. Somehow, the G.O.P. has forgotten that even Ronald Reagan didn’t believe deficits don’t matter and he raised taxes when our fiscal stability demanded it. As for prudence today, well, the willingness to risk a default on America’s financial obligations by refusing to raise the debt ceiling may be many things, but it is not prudent.

Where have all the adults in this party gone? Where is Dick Lugar, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Colin Powell, Hank Paulson and Big Business? Are you telling me that they are ready to fall in line behind Michele Bachmann, Grover Norquist, Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin? Are these really the pacesetters of modern conservatism?

I wish President Obama had embraced the Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction plan when it was announced last November and then added his own long-term investment plans on top of it and then built a national mandate for this “Grand Bargain” — before we got to this point. But the president has now embraced such a deal, which is important and constructive, though he needs to spell out this Grand Bargain more emphatically, publicly, repeatedly and specifically.

Because it is the only long-term solution — and it is coming. Either the market will impose a Grand Bargain on us in a haphazard way or we can do it rationally by a Democratic and Republican consensus. The president says that he is ready and that his party is behind him. I hope so. But without a Republican Party that returns to the sane conservatism of the likes of George H.W. Bush — which accepts that both spending and tax increases are, reluctantly, needed to fix our budget and maintain social stability — we’re not going to get even a minibargain, let alone a grand one. It is time for a counterrevolution in the G.O.P.

A version of this op-ed appeared in print on July 31, 2011, on page SR11 of the New York edition with the headline: Bring Back Poppy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/31/opini ... poppy.html

Image
Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests