Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Moderators: Project Willow, DrVolin, Wombaticus Rex, Jeff

Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby 8bitagent » Sat May 21, 2011 9:13 am

Did Fox News really just broadcast a documentary called "Secrets of 9/11". As brought up by Whatsmystory in another thread, tonight Fox News aired a documentary that ends with a plea to never stop investigating the truth of 9/11. They go into the secret network that supported the hijackers and how they never faced justice, the Saudi state sponsorship, Anwar Awlaki, and the FBI being obstructed from stopping the hijackers. They even go into Awlaki, despite being crucial to the 9/11 plot, secretly meeting at the Pentagon after 9/11.

Yet, they still end the documentary with the tired "mistakes were made" and "al Qaeda is still a viable threat" meme. If you read in between the lines, its pretty clear this is covering the protected deep state networks that sheltered, protected, financed and puppeteered these jihadi networks.

While it doesn't go into Ptech, the Nick Berg mystery in Oklahoma, the Israeli spies in Hollywood Florida, or many other 9/11 mysteries...it does delve into an aspect I've long been talking about

(full video)


WHY is this coming out now? Why is Fox aggressively pushing what is ultimately exposing not just Clinton but the Bush government and their Saudi pals? When, for years Fox DEFENDED Bush and aggressively attacked 9/11 truthers. Very odd...but regardless:


Some of the big points explored:

- After the CIA had photographed and monitored lead 9/11 hijacker Nawaf al Hazmi and Khalid al Mihdhar's meeting with KSM and other top al Qaeda figures in the infamous Kuala Lampar summit
in January 2001, the CIA was blocked from sharing intel with the FBI...as Hazmi and Mihdhar flew to Los Angeles from Bangkok

- Once in LA, Saudi government agents al-Bayoumi and Osama Basnan left the Saudi consulate to meet al Hazmi and Mihdhar and provide them with driver's licences, bank accounts, and a place to live

- al-Bayoumi used a Yemeni college student named Mohdar Abdullah to show the hijackers around and help them out

- al-Bayoumi called Anwar Al Awlaki the day he helped get the hijackers settled into San Diego. Already, by 1999 the FBI had been investigating Awlaki for having been a known bin Laden recruiter and al Qaeda operative.

- The funds al-Bayoumi and Basnan were giving the hijackers appear to have directly come from the Saudi government

- al-Bayoumi threw a welcoming party for the two hijackers, where Anwar Awlaki was present

- Anwar al Awlaki became the main spiritual guide for the hijackers by early 2000

- After a key meeting with Awlaki, the two hijackers would then move in with a high paid FBI informant named Abdusattar Sheikh.

- FBI head Robert Mueller told the 9/11 inquiry that they could not interview the FBI informant, as their asset program is very sensitive. Essentially, the 9/11 hijackers were being ran by both Saudi and American intelligence assets in San Diego(as a side note, Sheikh's friend and fellow FBI asset whom was also suspected of helping the hijackers, Sam Koutchesfahani owned and rented out the mansion to the Heaven's Gate UFO death cult in 1997...an event triggered by a former government remote viewer. Also of note, top remote viewer agent Bert Rodriguez trained lead Flight 93 hijacker Ziad Jarrah in 2001...more evidence of the military occult complex at work here)

- The hijackers had a vast network of protected secret helpers throughout America in 2000-2001.

- In June 2000, Mohamed atta and Marwan al shehhi(part of the Hamburg cell ran by protected German intelligence asset and top bin Laden operative Mamoun Darkazanli)
move to Venice Florida to meetup with Lebanese 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah to start flight training

- Atta and al Shehi then meet up with al Qaeda operative Adnan Shurkijumah in Florida(this is where the FBI informant behind the fake 2006 Miami plot would come into play)
Like Mohdar Abdullah, Awlaki, Darkazanli, etc Shurkijumah was protected from prosecution by US agents. Shurkijumah's dad was the translator for the Blind Sheikh as part of the Al Kifah Refugee WTC 1993 bomb plot.

- US agents had given the Blind Sheikh Abdul Rachman full access to be in America, even though he was the #1 top figure in violent radical Islam by 1990. (It was CIA/FBI asset and Special Forces member Ali Mohamed who would train the WTC bombers, later infiltrated by FBI informant Emad Salem) After El Nosssair killed radical Rabbit Meir Khahane in November 1990, plans to blow up the world trade center with blueprints and high level army bomb manuals smuggled by Ali Mohamed were found in Nossair's house. Central to this was the MAK/al Qaeda franchise group Al Kifah, later turned into Care Intl and brought into the Saudi government funded Ptech network in 1994)

- Saudi agent Osama Basnan, who worked with al Bayoumi to host the hijackers, was the man who helped bring and welcome the Blind Sheikh into America.

- Tuscon Arizona(home of the Safeway grocery massacre that left Giffords badly wounded) was designated as an al Qaeda hot spot, both of Hani Hanjour(flight 77 pilot), Zakaria Soobra
and Wadih el Hage(top bin Laden associate and connected to the WTC 1993 plot)

- FBI agent Ken Williams in July 2001 wrote a memo saying bin Laden was establishing a cadre of operatives at flight schools to conduct future operations. Like all the other FBI agents trying to stop 9/11, he was told to shut up. He also wrote how from 1999 to 2001, Hanjour and Soobra had conducted a number of flight hijacking dry runs

- Hijackers Nawaf al Hazmi and Hani Hanjour then moved to Falls Church Virginia, now being hosted by Anwar Awlaki where had become an iman over there.

- A DMV driver's license scam ring ran by Eyad Alrababah in Virginia then comes into the picture with the hijackers. Researchers will note a similar connected ring in Memphis TN that had aquired access passes to WTC sub levels the week before 9/11. Is he at all connected to Sakyer Rocky Hammad and the "plumbers"?

- Eyad Alrababah and an older Syrian man seemed to be in contact with Saudi embassies, and appeared to be sent to the Falls Church mosque to help four of the hijackers

- Evidence that Anwar Awlaki instructed Alrababah to help the hijackers: http://www.historycommons.org/context.j ... mihanirent

- 9/11 co-plotter Ramzi bin al shidh was in contact with Anwar Awlaki when he was at the Virginia mosque

- Witnesses see Eyad Alrababah with Hani Hanjour on a public computer

- Awlaki was invited to the Pentagon 3 months after 9/11, despite long being known as a bin Laden operative and for playing a crucial role in the 9/11 attack support system

- Awlaki was arrested in 2002 in America, but was secretly forced to be released by unknown FBI agents. News articles at the time hinted Saudis had pressured the release

- 27 pages were redacted from the 9/11 inquiry report, dealing with Saudi Arabia's direct role in sponsoring and financing the 9/11 hijackers


More:

CBS: Saudi government, bin Laden financier, Ptech, and the entire US government agency computer system


Fox News: Awlaki dined at Pentagon right after 9/11


Fox News: Is there an Israel connection to 9/11?


Bush covered up Saudi role in 9/11
http://dir.salon.com/news/feature/2004/ ... index.html

And finally, this goes into some pretty interesting smoking guns, from the words of the FBI themselves.
Saudi involvement, secret teams helping the hijackers at airports(preplanting weapons?), credit cards the hijackers had being in use after 9/11, secret mystery men at the hotels of the hijackers even as the planes were in the air, endless money spent on booze, porn, drugs and strippers, etc

Anyways, doesn't Fox News known showing this sort of stuff goes back to shining a light on Bush era shenanigans? And doesn't this go back against their venomous hate of anyone who questions 9/11 ?
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 11137
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby 82_28 » Sat May 21, 2011 1:27 pm

They're muddying the "truth waters". Fox has a reputation that precedes it and thus they are now free, for the time being, to look objective/while at the same time take the tack of the "kooks" who believe that "9/11 was an inside job". Fox knows that their claim to fame is political buffoonery and sports. They are taking this, probably via orders from "central casting" and helping to draw the dog off the scent with so much chaff and "political" infighting with just the "FOX" name alone. This shit on FOX is meant for us and the idiot right.

I would never trust a word any corporate media outlet told me period, period. They think all of us lap this shit up with the news cycles they present, when in truth the mighty wurlitzer has cycles beyond and within the cycles that are immediately present for the "ordinary" viewer. This simple act of thinking for yourself and sharing with others may soon become illegal.

On edit:

Not to say that social media etc doesn't have a place in the betterment of our condition, it does. But the full on disclosure and distaste, distrust of the media as it is handed to us, could become illegal and either be an enforcible offense or algorithmically edited out. You never know! :jumping:
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 7174
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby 8bitagent » Sat May 21, 2011 5:01 pm

82_28 wrote:They're muddying the "truth waters". Fox has a reputation that precedes it and thus they are now free, for the time being, to look objective/while at the same time take the tack of the "kooks" who believe that "9/11 was an inside job". Fox knows that their claim to fame is political buffoonery and sports. They are taking this, probably via orders from "central casting" and helping to draw the dog off the scent with so much chaff and "political" infighting with just the "FOX" name alone. This shit on FOX is meant for us and the idiot right.

I would never trust a word any corporate media outlet told me period, period. They think all of us lap this shit up with the news cycles they present, when in truth the mighty wurlitzer has cycles beyond and within the cycles that are immediately present for the "ordinary" viewer. This simple act of thinking for yourself and sharing with others may soon become illegal.

On edit:

Not to say that social media etc doesn't have a place in the betterment of our condition, it does. But the full on disclosure and distaste, distrust of the media as it is handed to us, could become illegal and either be an enforcible offense or algorithmically edited out. You never know! :jumping:


Only, virtually everything mentioned on Fox is precisely what Historycommons and other truth research has exhaustively detailed. See, the only thing is they take that and lead to a different conclusion. Like Peter Lance's books, it talks all about 9/11 coverups, secret deep state stuff...but it puts it into an "al qaeda infiltrated our systems/too much inter agency infighting" framework...its the fall behind position for those that think theres a "coverup, but not one of complicity".

But wait a second...if the US is knowingly covering the ass of a guilty country, and then continues to do business with said country, that in itself is a form of complicity. Like if you help protect a friend after he just robbed a bank you work at, profit from the loot...but claim you had no idea of the plot beforehand. See, even a special like this disrupts the official narrative held by most, even if it shores up the "al Qaeda is as big a threat as any". I wrote a thread in 2007 here when I first joined about Anwar Awlaki(or back then, Anwar al-Auluqi), noting he had to be a protected intelligence asset. I had no idea he met in an elite private dining section at the pentagon...why would the Pentagon knowingly release this info? As a steamvalve?
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 11137
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby freemason9 » Sat May 21, 2011 11:22 pm

If you think that Fox is following some sort of sinister allegiance to an ideological path, you're out of your mind. Fox is a capitalist entertainment corporation, and they will air anything anytime that is likely to draw the largest audience and gain the most attention.

That is what Fox is all about. Like any other modern American media corporation, it is an exercise in well-funded whorish behavior.
The real issue is that there is extremely low likelihood that the speculations of the untrained, on a topic almost pathologically riddled by dynamic considerations and feedback effects, will offer anything new.
User avatar
freemason9
 
Posts: 1676
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby Nordic » Sat May 21, 2011 11:24 pm

What are you talking about? Fox is a propaganda outfit. At least the "news" division.

It is a bit mystifying why they would ever "go there".

Unless they're ultimately going to blame the gays or the liberals or something.
"Whatever deceives men seems to produce a magical enchantment." -- Plato
User avatar
Nordic
 
Posts: 11222
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby freemason9 » Sat May 21, 2011 11:39 pm

Nordic wrote:What are you talking about? Fox is a propaganda outfit. At least the "news" division.

It is a bit mystifying why they would ever "go there".

Unless they're ultimately going to blame the gays or the liberals or something.


I disagree. I believe Fox engages in propaganda because it is profitable. They "went there" because it drew ratings.

Love ya anyway, Nordic.
The real issue is that there is extremely low likelihood that the speculations of the untrained, on a topic almost pathologically riddled by dynamic considerations and feedback effects, will offer anything new.
User avatar
freemason9
 
Posts: 1676
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby thatsmystory » Sun May 22, 2011 1:08 am

I think this explains the reason for the special:

Product Description for The Next Wave: On the Hunt for Al Qaeda's American Recruits by Catherine Herridge.

TERROR WALKS AMONG US. Born here, raised here, plotting here, the terrorists of al Qaeda 2.0 aim to kill Americans. And our government helps.

Who are the recruits for the next wave? They live next door.

A radicalized army major guns down forty-five, killing twelve soldiers and one civilian; an airport shuttle-bus driver plots a subway slaughter; a legal immigrant tries to blow up Times Square while another fanatic hopes to kill hundreds at a Christmas tree–lighting ceremony . . . and a radical Muslim born in New Mexico has a legion of fanatics in his web. The Next Wave reveals the shocking story of how that blood-crazed American, Anwar al-Awlaki—now hiding in Yemen—was treated to Pentagon pomp as a “moderate Muslim,” and how our Justice Department hid his movements from the 9/11 Commission . . . even though al-Awlaki aided the 9/11 hijackers.

The terrorists next door turn our tech against us, exploiting Facebook, Skype, and our outdated laws. Online terror recruiters are one of the Web’s greatest success stories—yet our government refuses to stop them. Activists howl about “inhuman” conditions at Guantánamo—while pampered inmates laugh at our weaknesses. The next wave of deadly terror is here and now. Washington shuts its eyes. And the next massacre in the name of Islam will be “Made in the U.S.A.”


Catherine Herridge is a national correspondent for FOX News covering homeland security, the Department of Justice and the intelligence community.

Bio
thatsmystory
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby 82_28 » Sun May 22, 2011 1:22 am

8bitagent wrote:
82_28 wrote:They're muddying the "truth waters". Fox has a reputation that precedes it and thus they are now free, for the time being, to look objective/while at the same time take the tack of the "kooks" who believe that "9/11 was an inside job". Fox knows that their claim to fame is political buffoonery and sports. They are taking this, probably via orders from "central casting" and helping to draw the dog off the scent with so much chaff and "political" infighting with just the "FOX" name alone. This shit on FOX is meant for us and the idiot right.

I would never trust a word any corporate media outlet told me period, period. They think all of us lap this shit up with the news cycles they present, when in truth the mighty wurlitzer has cycles beyond and within the cycles that are immediately present for the "ordinary" viewer. This simple act of thinking for yourself and sharing with others may soon become illegal.

On edit:

Not to say that social media etc doesn't have a place in the betterment of our condition, it does. But the full on disclosure and distaste, distrust of the media as it is handed to us, could become illegal and either be an enforcible offense or algorithmically edited out. You never know! :jumping:


Only, virtually everything mentioned on Fox is precisely what Historycommons and other truth research has exhaustively detailed. See, the only thing is they take that and lead to a different conclusion. Like Peter Lance's books, it talks all about 9/11 coverups, secret deep state stuff...but it puts it into an "al qaeda infiltrated our systems/too much inter agency infighting" framework...its the fall behind position for those that think theres a "coverup, but not one of complicity".

But wait a second...if the US is knowingly covering the ass of a guilty country, and then continues to do business with said country, that in itself is a form of complicity. Like if you help protect a friend after he just robbed a bank you work at, profit from the loot...but claim you had no idea of the plot beforehand. See, even a special like this disrupts the official narrative held by most, even if it shores up the "al Qaeda is as big a threat as any". I wrote a thread in 2007 here when I first joined about Anwar Awlaki(or back then, Anwar al-Auluqi), noting he had to be a protected intelligence asset. I had no idea he met in an elite private dining section at the pentagon...why would the Pentagon knowingly release this info? As a steamvalve?


Are you being facetious? Not saying you are or aren't, but one can never tell. The US is no country, perhaps none are. It is a conglomerate of corporations, mob bosses and charlatans that run the show and they all have their rake. The part we see is media "outreach". They meet in big "rooms". At the end of the day following this shit, it leads us right back where it left us -- which is the point. It's the double-bind.

Again:
A double bind is an emotionally distressing dilemma in communication in which an individual (or group) receives two or more conflicting messages, in which one message negates the other. This creates a situation in which a successful response to one message results in a failed response to the other (and vice versa), so that the person will be automatically wrong regardless of response. The double bind occurs when the person cannot confront the inherent dilemma, and therefore cannot resolve it or opt out of the situation. For example, if your employer tells you to do a job but doesn't allow enough time for you to do it and you are in danger of losing your job if you question the situation you are in a double bind.

Double bind theory was first described by Gregory Bateson and his colleagues in the 1950s.[1]

Double binds are often utilized as a form of control without open coercion—the use of confusion makes them difficult to respond to or resist.

A double bind generally includes different levels of abstraction in orders of messages, and these messages can be stated or implicit within the context of the situation, or conveyed by tone of voice or body language. Further complications arise when frequent double binds are part of an ongoing relationship to which the person or group is committed.[2][3]

Double bind theory is more clearly understood in the context of complex systems and cybernetics because human communication and also the mind itself function in an interactive manner similar to ecosystems. Complex systems theory helps us understand the interdependence of the parts of a message and provides "an ordering of what to the Newtonian looks like chaos."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 7174
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby Nordic » Sun May 22, 2011 4:16 am

freemason9 wrote:
Nordic wrote:Love ya anyway, Nordic.



Lubya
"Whatever deceives men seems to produce a magical enchantment." -- Plato
User avatar
Nordic
 
Posts: 11222
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby 8bitagent » Sun May 22, 2011 4:33 am

freemason9 wrote:
Nordic wrote:What are you talking about? Fox is a propaganda outfit. At least the "news" division.

It is a bit mystifying why they would ever "go there".

Unless they're ultimately going to blame the gays or the liberals or something.


I disagree. I believe Fox engages in propaganda because it is profitable. They "went there" because it drew ratings.

Love ya anyway, Nordic.


Probably, but ratings from who? This documentary goes against the simple blowback/incompetence/al qaeda alone dun'it.

Who is into this info? Not most Obama worshipping liberals, or even a lot of activists. Not most truthers, who will angrily attack you for even mentioning the word hijackers.
Republicans? Tea Party people?

Nordic wrote:What are you talking about? Fox is a propaganda outfit. At least the "news" division.

It is a bit mystifying why they would ever "go there".

Unless they're ultimately going to blame the gays or the liberals or something.


Well it's odd...Gerlado came out supporting the WTC7 demo theory, but then almost jizzed his pants when Bin Lade was killed. Said it was the proudest moment of his career.
Im just glad Noam Chomsky finally came around this year.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 11137
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby 8bitagent » Sun May 22, 2011 4:39 am

thatsmystory wrote:I think this explains the reason for the special:

Product Description for The Next Wave: On the Hunt for Al Qaeda's American Recruits by Catherine Herridge.

TERROR WALKS AMONG US. Born here, raised here, plotting here, the terrorists of al Qaeda 2.0 aim to kill Americans. And our government helps.

Who are the recruits for the next wave? They live next door.

A radicalized army major guns down forty-five, killing twelve soldiers and one civilian; an airport shuttle-bus driver plots a subway slaughter; a legal immigrant tries to blow up Times Square while another fanatic hopes to kill hundreds at a Christmas tree–lighting ceremony . . . and a radical Muslim born in New Mexico has a legion of fanatics in his web. The Next Wave reveals the shocking story of how that blood-crazed American, Anwar al-Awlaki—now hiding in Yemen—was treated to Pentagon pomp as a “moderate Muslim,” and how our Justice Department hid his movements from the 9/11 Commission . . . even though al-Awlaki aided the 9/11 hijackers.

The terrorists next door turn our tech against us, exploiting Facebook, Skype, and our outdated laws. Online terror recruiters are one of the Web’s greatest success stories—yet our government refuses to stop them. Activists howl about “inhuman” conditions at Guantánamo—while pampered inmates laugh at our weaknesses. The next wave of deadly terror is here and now. Washington shuts its eyes. And the next massacre in the name of Islam will be “Made in the U.S.A.”


Catherine Herridge is a national correspondent for FOX News covering homeland security, the Department of Justice and the intelligence community.

Bio



But...but...the army had all his emails! Knew Hasan was a threat! The FBI was tracking Awlaki since 1999, knowing he was a top bin Laden recruiter. Fuck...I hate to default to Alex Jones, but its like
Peter Lance and all these "researchers" can't put two and two together.

Its like fucking christ...the 7/7 trainer was CIA, the mastermind was MI6...the madrid bombers were given explosives by Spanish intelligence. The WTC 1993 bombers were trained by special forces/CIA asset.
The Dar-es-Salaam/Nairobi attack was also by this Ali Mohamed guy. USS Cole? Yemen and Sudanese intelligence. 9/99? Russian FSB. 2003 Philippines Marriot? Philippines intelligence.

There has never been a major western city/tourist attack that wasnt heavy on the inside job elements.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 11137
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby 8bitagent » Sun May 22, 2011 4:45 am

82_28 wrote:

Are you being facetious? Not saying you are or aren't, but one can never tell. The US is no country, perhaps none are. It is a conglomerate of corporations, mob bosses and charlatans that run the show and they all have their rake. The part we see is media "outreach". They meet in big "rooms". At the end of the day following this shit, it leads us right back where it left us -- which is the point. It's the double-bind.

Again:
A double bind is an emotionally distressing dilemma in communication in which an individual (or group) receives two or more conflicting messages, in which one message negates the other. This creates a situation in which a successful response to one message results in a failed response to the other (and vice versa), so that the person will be automatically wrong regardless of response. The double bind occurs when the person cannot confront the inherent dilemma, and therefore cannot resolve it or opt out of the situation. For example, if your employer tells you to do a job but doesn't allow enough time for you to do it and you are in danger of losing your job if you question the situation you are in a double bind.

Double bind theory was first described by Gregory Bateson and his colleagues in the 1950s.[1]

Double binds are often utilized as a form of control without open coercion—the use of confusion makes them difficult to respond to or resist.

A double bind generally includes different levels of abstraction in orders of messages, and these messages can be stated or implicit within the context of the situation, or conveyed by tone of voice or body language. Further complications arise when frequent double binds are part of an ongoing relationship to which the person or group is committed.[2][3]

Double bind theory is more clearly understood in the context of complex systems and cybernetics because human communication and also the mind itself function in an interactive manner similar to ecosystems. Complex systems theory helps us understand the interdependence of the parts of a message and provides "an ordering of what to the Newtonian looks like chaos."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind


Oh no, I was just kind of expanding what you were saying. Sometimes when I respond to someone, I'm more or less giving closing arguments in rhetorical fashion, it's not a slight against the poster.
Again, I defer to Peter Dale Scott's notion of the meta play. You definitely are correct, I mean shoot Kojima's Metal Gear Solid series or Shirows ghost in the shell tv series goes into that idea.

I called the Serbian situation a double bind. The Alex Jone's of the world make it to be some staged event where there were no massacres by Serbs...it was all Clinton's al Qaeda. I see it as deeper than that, such as my views of WW2 being manipulated by much deeper forces. In this respect, I have no trouble with the idea of 9/11 being both as the government says yet also a globalist conspiracy...since in my research I feel both the US and radical Islam is controlled by the same beast. But the double bind accounts for a lot.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 11137
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby Nordic » Sun May 22, 2011 2:14 pm

thatsmystory wrote:I think this explains the reason for the special:

Product Description for The Next Wave: On the Hunt for Al Qaeda's American Recruits by Catherine Herridge.

TERROR WALKS AMONG US. Born here, raised here, plotting here, the terrorists of al Qaeda 2.0 aim to kill Americans. And our government helps.

Who are the recruits for the next wave? They live next door.

A radicalized army major guns down forty-five, killing twelve soldiers and one civilian; an airport shuttle-bus driver plots a subway slaughter; a legal immigrant tries to blow up Times Square while another fanatic hopes to kill hundreds at a Christmas tree–lighting ceremony . . . and a radical Muslim born in New Mexico has a legion of fanatics in his web. The Next Wave reveals the shocking story of how that blood-crazed American, Anwar al-Awlaki—now hiding in Yemen—was treated to Pentagon pomp as a “moderate Muslim,” and how our Justice Department hid his movements from the 9/11 Commission . . . even though al-Awlaki aided the 9/11 hijackers.

The terrorists next door turn our tech against us, exploiting Facebook, Skype, and our outdated laws. Online terror recruiters are one of the Web’s greatest success stories—yet our government refuses to stop them. Activists howl about “inhuman” conditions at Guantánamo—while pampered inmates laugh at our weaknesses. The next wave of deadly terror is here and now. Washington shuts its eyes. And the next massacre in the name of Islam will be “Made in the U.S.A.”


Catherine Herridge is a national correspondent for FOX News covering homeland security, the Department of Justice and the intelligence community.

Bio




Wow. Now that's some:

Image

The Fox News "base" of viewers froths at the mouth over that stuff!

And wasn't it interesting how the whole Osama thing made him out to be "the terrorist next door"? Even having the CIA living right next to him for monoths without knowing who he was! Just a "suspicious" fellow!
"Whatever deceives men seems to produce a magical enchantment." -- Plato
User avatar
Nordic
 
Posts: 11222
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fox New's Secrets Of 9/11 Documentary

Postby agentbluescreen » Sun May 22, 2011 7:12 pm

Nordic wrote:

Wow. Now that's some:

Image

The Fox News "base" of viewers froths at the mouth over that stuff!

And wasn't it interesting how the whole Osama thing made him out to be "the terrorist next door"? Even having the CIA living right next to him for monoths without knowing who he was! Just a "suspicious" fellow!


No this is tainted abattoir scrapings glued together with acrylic resin and dyed red with food coloring!

this is the real "Terror that Leads Us Around By The Nose":

click on sig or this

http://tinyurl.com/greenairplane < Brief of Bush/Cheney Criminal Indictment

http://tinyurl.com/whathitpentagon < Detailed background and history of the new investigation of what actually hit the Pentagon of 9/11
User avatar
agentbluescreen
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 11:20 am
Location: Windsor/Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests