Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:03 am


The Vertical Farm

Vertical Farming

Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

By Fabian Kretschmer and Malte E. Kollenberg

Agricultural researchers believe that building indoor farms in the middle of cities could help solve the world's hunger problem. Experts say that vertical farming could feed up to 10 billion people and make agriculture independent of the weather and the need for land. There's only one snag: The urban farms need huge amounts of energy.
Info

One day, Choi Kyu Hong might find himself in a vegetable garden on the 65th floor of a skyscraper. But, so far, his dream of picking fresh vegetables some 200 meters (655 feet) up has only been realized in hundreds of architectural designs.

In real life, the agricultural scientist remains far below such dizzying heights, conducting his work in a nondescript three-story building in the South Korean city of Suwon. The only thing that makes the squat structure stand out is the solar panels on its roof, which provide power for the prototype of a farm Choi is working on. If he and his colleagues succeed, their efforts may change the future of urban farming -- and how the world gets its food.

From the outside, the so-called vertical farm has nothing in common with the luxury high-rises surrounding it. Inside the building, heads of lettuce covering 450 square meters (4,800 square feet) are being painstakingly cultivated. Light and temperature levels are precisely regulated. Meanwhile, in the surrounding city, some 20 million people are hustling among the high-rises and apartment complexes, going about their daily lives.

Every person who steps foot in the Suwon vertical farm must first pass through an "air shower" to keep outside germs and bacteria from influencing the scientific experiment. Other than this oddity, though, the indoor agricultural center closely resembles a traditional rural farm. There are a few more technological bells and whistles (not to mention bright pink lighting) which remind visitors this is no normal farm. But the damp air, with its scent of fresh flowers, recalls that of a greenhouse.

Heads of lettuce are lined up in stacked layers. At the very bottom, small seedlings are thriving while, further up, there are riper plants almost ready to be picked. Unlike in conventional greenhouses, the one in Suwon uses no pesticides between the sowing and harvest periods, and all water is recycled. This makes the facility completely organic. It is also far more productive than a conventional greenhouse.

Choi meticulously checks the room temperature. He carefully checks the wavelengths of the red, white and blue LED lights aimed at the tender plants. Nothing is left to chance when it comes to the laboratory conditions of this young agricultural experiment. The goal is to develop optimal cultivation methods -- and ones that can compete on the open market. Indeed, Korea wants to bring vertical farming to the free market.

Nine Billion People by 2050

Vertical farming is an old idea. Indigenous people in South America have long used vertically layered growing techniques, and the rice terraces of East Asia follow a similar principle. But, now, a rapidly growing global population and increasingly limited resources are making the technique more attractive than ever.

The Green Revolution of the late 1950s boosted agricultural productivity at an astounding rate, allowing for the explosive population growth still seen today. Indeed, since 1950, the Earth's population has nearly tripled, from 2.4 billion to 7 billion, and global demand for food has grown accordingly.

Until now, the agricultural industry could keep up well enough -- otherwise swelling population figures would have leveled off long ago. But scientists warn that agricultural productivity has its limits. What's more, much of the land on which the world's food is grown has become exhausted or no longer usable. Likewise, there is not an endless supply of areas that can be converted to agricultural use.

By 2050, the UN predicts that the global population will surpass 9 billion people. Given current agricultural productivity rates, the Vertical Farm Project estimates that an agricultural area equal in size to roughly half of South America will be needed to feed this larger population.

Vertical farming has the potential to solve this problem. The term "vertical farming" was coined in 1915 by American geologist Gilbert Ellis Bailey. Architects and scientists have repeatedly looked into the idea since then, especially toward the end of the 20th century. In 1999, Dickson Despommier, a professor emeritus of environmental health sciences and microbiology at New York's Columbia University seized upon the idea together with his students. After having grown tired of his depressing lectures on the state of the world, his students finally protested and asked Despommier to work with them on a more positive project.

From the initial idea of "rooftop farming," the cultivation of plants on flat roofs, the class developed a high-rise concept. The students calculated that rooftop-based rice growing would be able to feed, at most, 2 percent of Manhattan's population. "If it can't be done using rooftops, why don't we just grow the crops inside the buildings?" Despommier asked himself. "We already know how to cultivate and water plants indoors."

With its many empty high-rise buildings, Manhattan was the perfect location to develop the idea. Despommier's students calculated that a single 30-story vertical farm could feed some 50,000 people. And, theoretically, 160 of these structures could provide all of New York with food year-round, without being at the mercy of cold snaps and dry spells.

The Power Problem

Despite these promising calculations, such high-rise farms still only exist as small-scale models. Critics don't expect this to change anytime soon. Agricultural researcher Stan Cox of the Kansas-based Land Institute sees vertical farming as more of a project for dreamy young architecture students than a practical solution to potential shortages in the global food supply.

The main problem is light -- in particular, the fact that sunlight has to be replaced by LEDs. According to Cox's calculations, if you wanted to replace all of the wheat cultivation in the US for an entire year using vertical farming, you would need eight times the amount of electricity generated by all the power plants in the US over a single year -- and that's just for powering the lighting.

It gets even more difficult if you intend to rely exclusively on renewable energies to supply this power, as Despommier hopes to do. At the moment, renewable energy sources only generate about 2 percent of all power in the US. Accordingly, the sector would have to be expanded 400-fold to create enough energy to illuminate indoor wheat crops for an entire year. Despommier seems to have fallen in love with an idea, Cox says, without considering the difficulties of its actual implementation.

Getting Closer to Reality

Even so, Despommier still believes in his vision of urban agriculture. And recent developments, like the ones in South Korea, might mean his dream is not as remote as critics say. Ten years ago, vertical farming was only an idea. Today, it has developed into a concrete model. About two years ago, the first prototypes were created.

In fact, the concept seems to be working already, at least on a small scale. In the Netherlands, the first foods from a vertical farm are already stocking supermarket shelves. The PlantLab, a 10-year-old company based three floors underground in the southern city of Den Bosch, has cultivated everything from ornamental shrubs and roses to nearly every crop imaginable, including strawberries, beans, cucumbers and corn. "We manage completely without sunlight," says PlantLab's Gertjan Meeuws. "But we still manage to achieve a yield three times the size of an average greenhouse's." What's more, PlantLab uses almost 90 percent less water than a conventional farm.

As a country which has limited land resources but which possesses much of the necessary technology, the Netherlands seems to be an ideal place to develop vertical farming. This is especially true now that its residents are increasingly demanding organic, pesticide-free foods -- and are prepared to pay more for it.

'The Next Agricultural Revolution'

Despommier believes that entire countries will soon be able to use vertical farming to feed their populations. The South Korean government, at least, is interested in exploring the possibility. At the moment, the country is forced to import a large share of its food. Indeed, according to a 2005 OECD report, South Korea places fifth-to-last in a global ranking on food security. Increasing food prices, climate change and the possibility of natural disasters can compound the problem.

These facts are not lost on the researchers in the vertical farming laboratory in Suwon. "We must be prepared to avert a catastrophe," Choi says.

Still, it will be some time before vertical farming is implemented on a commercial scale in South Korea. Choi's colleague Lee Hye Jin thinks that five more years of research are needed. "Only then will our vertical farm be ready for the free market," he says.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Nordic » Sun Jul 24, 2011 3:43 pm

interesting concept, but the article itself is idiotic. the problem from the very beginning is that high-rises, as we know them, are insanely stupid to begin with, basically glass solar ovens that can only be livable with a massive influx of emectric and gas based air conditioning systems. they are the most naturally uninhabitable structures ever constructed. but they don't have to be. knock those fucking sealed-shut windows out of them to start with.

the idea of vertical gardening has always fascinated me, but growing food in highrises isn't the way to go about it and isn't even worth consideration.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby alwyn » Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:20 am

on the other hand, hanging baskets off the sides of the high rises just might work; solves the light problem
question authority?
alwyn
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: Laytonville
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:10 pm

Image

How to Make Your Own Farm Fountain - 10,000 projects in one page:
http://www.farmfountain.com/howto/index.html

Permaculture Information Web:
http://www.permaculture.info/index.php/Main_Page

Acres USA's Reader Toolkit:
http://www.acresusa.com/toolbox/articles.htm

Plants for a Future:
http://www.pfaf.org/index.php

Australia's Permaculture Forum - insanely great. Massive.
http://forums.permaculture.org.au/index.php

Basically, the blueprints for Growing Power: "Our Community Food Center"
http://www.growingpower.org/headquarters.htm

Metawiki: "List of Useful Plants" -- actually a list of lists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_useful_plants

John Todd's "Eco Design Mandala"
http://www.oceanarks.org/EcoMandala.htm

The Modern Homestead: operational details like whoa
http://www.themodernhomestead.us/

Great contrarian perspective on home gardens from Alternet:
http://www.alternet.org/environment/86943

Suppose that half of the land on every one-acre-or-smaller urban/suburban home lot in the entire nation were devoted to food-growing. That would amount to a little over 5 million acres (pdf) sown to food plants, covering most of the space on each lot that’s not already covered by the house, a deck, a patio, or a driveway. (And in many places it couldn’t be done without cutting down shade trees and planting on unsuitably steep slopes).

That theoretical 5 million acres of potential home cropland compares with about 7 million acres of America’s commercial cropland currently in vegetables, fruits, and nuts, and 350 to 400 million acres of total farmland. The urban and suburban area to be brought into production would not approach the number of healthy acres of native grasses and other plants that are slated to be plowed up to make way for yet more corn, wheat, soybeans, and other grains under the newly passed federal Farm Bill.

A nationwide grow-your-own wave would send good vibes through society, ripples that could be greatly amplified by community and apartment-block gardening. But front- and backyard food, even if everyone grew it, would not cover the country’s produce needs, much less displace our huge volume of fresh-food imports.


The PDF being mentioned is available here and this is a goldmine:
http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/EIB14/eib14g.pdf

Can sustainable agriculture feed the world?
http://www.foodfirst.org/files/pdf/back ... 7final.pdf

Author discusses his findings here:
http://www.foodfirst.org/node/1778

From our food production estimate based on the 10 food categories and 160 cases in developed countries, we found that organic production could theoretically generate an amount of food equal to 92% of the current caloric availability (or a yield ratio of 0.92). This ratio is close to that found in a 1990 study by Gerald Stanhill of Israel's Agricultural Research Organization. However, looking at the 133 examples from the developing world, our team estimated food production equivalent to an overall yield ratio of 1.80—that is, 180% of current production in the developing world on a caloric basis.

From these regional results, researchers at the University of Michigan then constructed two models, a "conservative case" and a "realistic case." The "conservative case" applied the yield ratios of organic production to conventional production from the developed countries to worldwide agricultural production (production in both the developed and developing countries). As the yield ratios in the ten food categories were generally lower in the developed countries, applying them worldwide means that slightly fewer calories would be produced under a fully organic global system: 2,641 kcal/person/day instead of 2,786 kcal. However, this number is still above the suggested intake for healthy adults of 2200 to 2500 kcal/person/day, so even under this conservative estimate there would be sufficient food production for the current population. However, under more realistic assumptions—that a switch to organic agriculture would mean the relatively lower developed world yield ratios would apply to production in the developed world and the relatively higher developing world yield ratios would apply to production in the developing world—the result was an astounding 4,381 kcal/person/day, a caloric availability more than sufficient for today's population. Indeed, it would be more than enough to support an estimated population peak of around 10-11 billion people by the year 2100.


Having seen a Tilapia farm up close, I came to the terms with the fact I don't want to eat Tilapia, like, ever. Not pleasant creatures. Salmon are beautiful, Tilapia are gila monsters.

That said, I'm still very interested in aquaculture, mostly because:
1. Tilapia will eat anything, to the point of cleaning the tanks they're in for food
2. Tilapia convert that food into biomass like nobody's business, and
3. Fish make great fertilizer.

Although I do have vague moral quibbles about raising aquatic animals in tight spaces in order to use their bodies as compost enhancement, I also see the potential for a simple, effective project that would look awesome and provide hours of stoned entertainment.

Image

Some City Farmer datafeed about Tilapia Farming:
http://www.cityfarmer.info/tilapia-farming-at-home/

...and I'm still trying to find that magical master list of THE BEST CROPS for high-speed high yields. I saw Vinay Gupta refer to this as "emergency permaculture," but he didn't find the magical master list yet, either.

The book "Gardening When it Counts: Growing Food in Hard Times" is on google books as a limited preview:
http://books.google.com/books?id=lbohaJ ... +it+counts

I know I've got a lot of random notes floating around two of my journals...I guess it's time to start gathering them up.

Oh, and here's Plants For A Future on their "best" picks:
http://www.pfaf.org/leaflets/top20.php

Some excellent John Robb material:
http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/glo ... arden.html

"Victory gardens" are smart way to hedge against short term system failure and as a cost cutting measure. However, a longer term solution for decentralized agriculture needs to be much, much more productive than traditional gardening. Subscription plots/farming, low cost sensor networks (water, light, PH, etc.), high intensity plot plans, accelerated local composting systems, lawn garden entrepreneurs, tinkering networks, etc. will be needed to flesh out an innovative ecosystem that will drive the productivity curve. Given these innovations, its possible to see a situation were 80-90% of food consumption is locally derived and sold at a small fraction of current costs and at a much higher level of quality/freshness. Resilience needs to be productive/affordable to become dominant.


And a comment from Massachutsetts:

We've been building an alternative agricultural infrastructure and economic system since the 1970s in this state. It could very easily by maximized using many of the lessons that New Alchemy Institute pioneered during that time.

Gandhi said the heart of satyagraha was swadeshi, local production. Both the spinning of thread and, more famously, the salt march were economic as well as political acts and example of that local production, swadeshi principle. Gandhi's economics was based upon the revitalization of village (neighborhood) production and markets and its goal was full employment not larger GDP or more consumption.

I'm doing a directed reading on Gandhian economics and my raw notes are at
http://www.globalswadeshi.net/forum/top ... dations-of
http://www.globalswadeshi.net/forum/top ... j-swadeshi
http://www.globalswadeshi.net/forum/top ... ic-thought
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:11 pm

Source:
http://www.theglobaleducationproject.or ... d-soil.php

"Ninety percent of the world's food is derived from just 15 plant and 8 animal species." 2

"Biodiversity - and especially the maintenance of wild relatives of domesticated species - is essential to sustainable agriculture."1

75% of the genetic diversity of crop plants has been lost in the past century. 1


Image

Image

"Over the past 40 years, approximately 30% of the world's cropland has become unproductive."

"During the past 40 years nearly one-third of the world's cropland (1.5 billion hectares) has been abandoned because of soil erosion and degradation."

"About 2 million hectares of rainfed and irrigated agricultural lands are lost to production every year due to severe land degradation, among other factors."

"It takes approximately 500 years to replace 25 millimeters (1 inch) of topsoil lost to erosion. The minimal soil depth for agricultural production is 150 millimeters. From this perspective, productive fertile soil is a nonrenewable, endangered ecosystem."


Image
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:48 am

http://www.cityfarmer.info/2008/08/05/p ... s-urbanos/

Sometimes a pic tells words

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

And a bit more con text

http://www.gardening-experts.com/growin ... le-garden/

The easiest way to learn about Urban agriculture is to start growing stuff in whatever spaces are available to you.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Bruce Dazzling » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:24 am

Tangentially related.

Cops Raid Rawesome Foods; Owner James Stewart Arrested

The official word from the DA's office is that Stewart, Palmer & Bloch were arrested on criminal conspiracy charges stemming from the alleged illegal production and sale of unpasteurized goat milk, goat cheese, yogurt and kefir. The arrests are the result of a year-long sting. The 13-count complaint alleges that an undercover agent received goat milk, stored in a cooler in the back of Healthy Family Farms van, in the parking lot of a grocery store. While it's legal to manufacture and sell unpasteurized dairy products in California, licenses and permits are required. Rawesome may have violated regulations by selling raw dairy products to non-members.]

Milk, gallon after gallon of it, was poured down the drain today after an early morning raid on two of Southern California's most prominent raw milk providers. This morning at 7:15 a.m., officers raided Rawesome Foods, a "members only" raw foods club on Rose Avenue in Venice, arrested the store's owner, James Stewart, and began pulling product off the shelves. One volunteer estimated that 500 gallons of dairy were tossed.

​The authorities were still tossing out items three hours later at 12:30 p.m. when another volunteer, Danielle Fetzer, showed up for her regular Wednesday shift. (Rawesome is staffed entirely by volunteers.)

"I came in to make coconut cream like I do every Wednesday," Fetzer said. "[The cops] were pouring all the dairy down the drain, taking all the produce. It's been hours. They disconnected the surveillance cameras. This is the exact same thing as last time."

Fetzer is referring to a raid last summer by local, state and federal authorities who shut down Rawesome for selling raw milk, a persistent source of conflict between organic food advocates and government agencies. "In the case of Rawesome, regulators allege that the group broke the law by failing to have the proper permits to sell food to the public," reported the Los Angeles Times.

Natural News describes today's raid as "a multi-agency SWAT-style armed raid" conducted by "agents from the LA County Sheriff's Office, the FDA, the Department of Agriculture and the CDC (Centers for Disease Control)."

At the same time, a separate group of agents raided Healthy Family Farms in Ventura County and arrested owner Sharon Palmer. She is currently in jail on a $120,000 bond, reports Info Wars. Victoria Bloch, an L.A. county liaison for the Weston A. Price Foundation was also arrested.

Located in Santa Paula, Healthy Family Farms provides all the diary products for Rawesome, according to Fetzer. Like the store, it was targeted in last summer's raid.

This isn't the first run-in with the law for Palmer (a.k.a Sharon Palmer-Ross), who was featured in the documentary Farmageddon. In 2000, she and her partner, Edward Rostami of Polo Financial Services, were indicted on fraud, conspiracy, bank fraud and other charges in what authorities labeled a real estate swindle.

Rostami and Palmer fled the country to avoid charges but were captured near the U.S.-Mexico border in April of 2000. Rostami was sentenced to a year in federal prison, while Palmer received three years probation including four months of home detention, according to the LA Times.

Rawesome is a private membership club that sells raw and unpasteurized foods like nuts, honey, dairy products and other items to "pure foods" advocate. "You sign a waiver," Fetzer says. "It's your choice."

We'll follow this story as it develops.

"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
 
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Yes
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:50 am

Having worked professionally in the "Organic Food Chicken Little" industry, I recognize it as a paid creation of the major organic food corporations (essential link: http://www.cornucopia.org/wp-content/th ... T30J09.pdf ) and I agree with the Grace Lee Boggs approach to build solutions vs. track problems. These bizarrely anti-food law enforcement incidents are not discouraging, they're just an impetus for escalated action on the urban agriculture front, and like Joe said, the absolute best method of activism is simply participation.

As activism goes, beats the heck out of the whole signs/chanting paradigm.

That said, this guy is a real problem:

Image

Good summary: http://www.organicconsumers.org/article ... _15573.cfm

We need to be playing the same game that Think Tanks do: Normalize, Normalize, Normalize -- I'm always urging cats to disengage this topic from "political" action because of proximity effects. Backyard food should be American Idol type regular, not a "Green Revolution" and especially not another yuppie crusade.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Bruce Dazzling » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:55 am

Wombaticus Rex wrote:We need to be playing the same game that Think Tanks do: Normalize, Normalize, Normalize -- I'm always urging cats to disengage this topic from "political" action because of proximity effects. Backyard food should be American Idol type regular, not a "Green Revolution" and especially not another yuppie crusade.


:thumbsup
"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
 
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Yes
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:59 am

from another forum, another time


DID YOU KNOW:

The Natural Solutions Foundation built the largest health freedom grass roots/ grass tops organization in the US and elsewhere with more than 200,000 supporters, utilizing our web sites, our YouTube channel and similar electronic means.


really?

Kicked up a hornet's nest that connects all my old research with my new food obsession. This is a story that involves food, covert operations, professional disinformation, and aliens.

Remember that sooper-paranoid article about HR 875 that got everyone so spooked in the first place? That was from the Natural Solutions Foundation, written by Linn Cohen-Cole, who may or may not be real.

Natural health advocates have been questioning the NSF for several years now, and the criticism is universally the same: Why does the NSF keep turning out factually inaccurate, hysterically grim articles? Just as important, and even more worrying, Why does the NSF refuse to correct ANY of the hundreds of errors in their record?

The answers start with the NSF founders: husband-wife team Albert Stubblebine and Rima Laibow. Now, when I accuse these people of being disinformation professionals, let me qualify that carefully. I'm not saying that they're doing sloppy research, and I'm not saying that they're being overzealous. I'm saying they are working, for pay, to spread false information and make their organization look like a legitimate activist group.

Sadly, this is not uncommon -- several news cycles back, intrepid reporters uncovered dozens of "science foundation" fronts that were falsifying data and running multi-million dollar PR campaigns to discredit the concept of Global Warming. Personally, I remain agnostic on the consensus scientific explanation behind climate change, but disinfo is disinfo. Older readers might also recall all the "grassroots" organizations that sprung up to oppose Health Care reform during the Clinton years...and even older readers probably know about a hundred similar schemes stretching back decades.

Fortunately, Stubblebine and Laibow are an easy case to make: They've literally done it before and gotten caught. See, Laibow used to be into UFO abductions, and Stubblebine used to be...well, name it. From Remote Viewing to 9-11 conspiracies, Stubblebine has been active for decades:

Major General Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III was the commanding general of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command from 1981 to 1984, when he retired from the Army. He is known for his interest in parapsychology and was a strong supporter of the Stargate Project.

Stubblebine appeared in the 2006 documentary "One Nation Under Siege"[1] where he states that a Boeing 757 airplane could not have crashed into The Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Stubblebine
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/hambon ... tubblebine


Stubblebine used to work with Ed Dames, pushing Remove Viewing instructional videos called Psi Tech. If you're not familiar with UFOlogy, names like Stephen Greer will be meaningless, but these people are infamous liars and all associated with Stubby.

Implications

1. The military disinformation operatives have a lot of career options when they leave the ranks. I'm betting that the income for NSF is coming from pharma and agribiz, not the DoD or Air Force, which sponsored decades of UFO disinformation and weirdness.

2. There's never just one of these operations. I'm betting as we keep digging here, we'll start to unearth a lot of green-washing from tainted sources. For instance, Linn Cohen-Cole, who's been pushing HR 875 hysteria all over Teh Internets, leads to a "social network" called http://www.farmon.com -- and her articles are syndicated all over the place, including recent placement in Huffington Post.

3. We need to be really careful about our info. The payoff with these operations is debunking hysterical, overstated and flat-out fictitious claims. UFO coverups become elaborate fantasies about Greys with hidden moon bases and government treaties. MK-Ultra CIA research becomes Illluminati sex slave mind control rings. Agribusiness poisoning our food supply becomes an NWO genocide plot where everything is always Monsanto's fault.

We gotta take the narrative back.

First, a round-up of critical/investigation articles:
http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1029074


...and apparently, Rima likes to threaten bloggers with lawsuits (she's gonna love Skilluminati Research) like so:

Source: one very, very angry blogger
http://hatingautism.blogspot.com/2008/1 ... lying.html

I'll skip the diatribe + profanity and just quote Rima's email to the blogger:

No, you blogged disinformation which is actionable as both slander and liable. I am curious to know just what makes you think that what you have published IS the truth? Have you seen a single shred of information which substantiates a single one of those accusations? Please be advised that you might want to think again before you continue to present material which is, rather than the truth, blatant lies since that means that you, too, are engaging in slander and liable and are opening yourself to the same legal action that the perpetrators of these lies are. Before you make that mistake, why not write to the perpetrators and ask for the documentation that their absurd assertions rest upon. You will find that there are none.
I am so sorry that you have been misled by disinformation, but that is what has happened.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation


First law of disinformation: anything that contradicts you is disinformation. Also, it's hard to take legal threats seriously when they can't spell Libel, but hey, that's good news, right?

She's on TransitonUS, too: http://transitionus.ning.com/profiles/p ... aELaibowMD

Image

That's Stubby in the background rocking the huge jacket. Turns out they've got their own eco-village going, too:

am interested in learning more about the Transition movement. The Natural Solutions Foundation, http://www.HealthFreedomUSA.org, through its International Decade of Nutrition, http://www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org, has created the Valley of the Moon Eco Demonstration Community in the temperate, fertile Highlands of Panama and I am eager to learn more about the Transition movement.


More: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=715

Sponsoring Members

You now have an opportunity as a sponsor making a donation of $1000, $5,000, $10,000, and $50,000 up to $100,000 or more to assist the Foundation to make this important global dream a reality.

Silver sponsor members ($1,000) will receive one pound of our exceptional quality coffee per month for a year (retail value $24 per pound).

Gold members ($5,000) will receive our exceptional coffee and a three night stay at VOTMEC.

Platinum members ($10,000) will, in addition, also receive a discount for visits to the Clinic/Spa and an opportunity to bid on one of specified homesite perpetual leases within the community.

Diamond Sponsors ($50,000) will receive Gold level benefits and a homesite perpetual lease within the community.

Emerald Sponsors ($100,000) will receive Gold level benefits and one of the limited number of homesite perpetual leases in the first phase, transferable, should you desire, to a first choice site anywhere in the Valley (All donations are tax deductible).

Please contact Ralph Fucetola, ralph.fucetola@usa.net, for project overview, concept and pictures as well as questions you might have. Also , over the next two months we will be hosting visits to the site for our sponsor/donors (please put VOTMEC in the subject line).

Please - we need your assistance and your tax deductible donation will contribute to enable the Natural Solutions Foundation’s dream of a sustainable, zero emissions BeyondOrganic (TM) farm and farm school and an off the grid Eco Community with Beyond the State of the Art Health and Wellness Facility come true.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:09 pm

I re-posted the above because it indicates (that's like 2 years old) that there's already an ongoing effort from The Usual Suspects to move "Organic Food"/"Natural Health" issues into proximity with 9/11, UFO's, etc. Then again...we're doing exactly that by discussing it here! Shucks.

Anyways, it's all about wedges and magnets so while these topics get marginalized, Monsanto has been running the Department of Agriculture for years. They're a certified stripe of the American flag now, along with Lockheed and Goldman.

Sounds like a terminal diagnosis, but at the end of the day, all of these issues are about food and that's the biggest advantage. Food is universal and dumb simple, and it's going to be VERY hard to sell the American people on the notion that it's dangerous or wrong to grow your own veggies.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby hanshan » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:15 pm

Wombaticus Rex wrote:Having worked professionally in the "Organic Food Chicken Little" industry, I recognize it as a paid creation of the major organic food corporations (essential link: http://www.cornucopia.org/wp-content/th ... T30J09.pdf ) and I agree with the Grace Lee Boggs approach to build solutions vs. track problems. These bizarrely anti-food law enforcement incidents are not discouraging, they're just an impetus for escalated action on the urban agriculture front, and like Joe said, the absolute best method of activism is simply participation.

As activism goes, beats the heck out of the whole signs/chanting paradigm.

That said, this guy is a real problem:

Image

Good summary: http://www.organicconsumers.org/article ... _15573.cfm

We need to be playing the same game that Think Tanks do: Normalize, Normalize, Normalize -- I'm always urging cats to disengage this topic from "political" action because of proximity effects. Backyard food should be American Idol type regular, not a "Green Revolution" and especially not another yuppie crusade.


All good recommendations. As a friend once remarked: theory w/out practice: useless; practice w/out theory: dangerous


...
hanshan
 
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Bruce Dazzling » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:18 pm

There's quite an urban farming movement going on in Brooklyn and Queens these days.

Here are a couple of examples.

Red Hook Community Farm and the Farm at Governor's Island

On a late summer day in 2002, Ian Marvy and Ben Balcolm, an upstate farmer selling at the Red Hook Farmers’ Market went for a long stroll to see the harbor and have lunch. As they crossed the intersection of Columbia and Sigourney Streets Ben paused to consider an empty baseball field. Rather than seeing a broken fence, smashed bottles and a field of weeds, Ben saw a farm with great solar exposure, wind protection, and a chain link fence for security. The vision and foresight of this rural farmer inspired us to take action and work to build a vibrant urban farm right here in the heart of Red Hook.

Working in close concert with Partnerships For Parks, The New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, and our neighbors, we have begun to transform old Todd Memorial into Red Hook Community Farm.
In addition to being a working farm where produce is grown, the Farm serves as the primary platform for youth empowerment programs and our Farm Based Learning work. Through these programs Red Hook Community Farm has become a place where we can nurture a shared vision, develop the skills necessary to build a more sustainable world, address global warming by lessening the environmental impact of our community and improving access to healthy affordable food.

Since opening the Farm in the Fall of 2003 our demonstrable outcomes include:

Serving as a daily educational/work site for more the 115 teens through our youth programs,

Growing 12 tons of produce for donation, sale and consumption,

Creating $120,000 in local economic activity, and

Generating $70,000 in revenue for youth stipends.


On the Farm our staff and Youth Leadership team are sowing the seeds of change by:

Providing on-going, standards-based educational programming for more than 280 elementary school students,

Leading workshops for more than 1300 schoolchildren annually,

Conducting “In-Service Days” for more than 25 partner organizations,

Hosting service-learning and informational sessions for youth and adults from as close as Carroll Gardens and as far away as Columbia, South America, and

Creating opportunities for 3,850 people to volunteer, donating an average of 10 hours of service towards community improvement.


Partnering with the Governors Island Preservation and Education Corporation, Added Value has launched a three acre farm just across the water from Red Hook and under the gaze of the Statue of Liberty. The farm is located on the Governors Island Picnic Point, by the swings and the firehouse. As we build the Farm on the Island over time, it will add more educational opportunities for South Brooklyn’s youth. And eventually it will help bring the Island together as a community, with each person able to contribute to the Island’s sustainable development, whether resident, employee, student, vendor, or visitor, creating a proud legacy for the greater community to which Governors Island belongs.


and...

Rooftop Urban Farm: Brooklyn Grange
By Arielle Hartman

High above the bustling streets of Western Queens, there is a one-acre urban farm, planting, growing and harvesting its way to a more sustainable lifestyle. Brooklyn Grange Farm, located in Long Island City, is part of a slew of urban farms rapidly taking over New York City’s abandoned or unused lots, terraces and rooftops. At one-acre, in a city known for cramped spaces and crowded streets, Brooklyn Grange is a feat unto itself, turning the vacant office building roof they lease into a viable and successful urban farm – one of the biggest in New York City!

Launched in 2010, the brainchild of Ben Flanner, co-founder of Eagle Street Rooftop Farms in Brooklyn, Gwen Schantz, co-founder of the Bushwick Food Cooperative and CSA, Anastasia Plakias, New York City restaurant veteran-at-large, and Brandon Hoy and Chris Parachini, co-owners of Roberta’s restaurant, Brooklyn Grange is a commercial farm that aims to make urban farming a feasible career opportunity as well as providing those farmers with a livable and dependable income.

Hoping to foster a closer relationship between producer and consumer, Brooklyn Grange has become somewhat of a community center, with farmers and volunteers always willing to give impromptu tours to visitors, providing a wealth of knowledge of the various produce they grow as well as new and interesting ways to cook them. The Grange even offers open volunteer days, Saturdays from 10am-4pm, to everyone from experienced gardeners to first time growers who relish the outdoors. Just show up, ready to feel the dirt between your fingers and they’ll put you straight to work!

Through their sister company, City Growers, Brooklyn Grange offers educational tours and hands on activities for interested high schools and community groups, hoping to instill their passion for local and delicious food into this new, curious generation.

Additionally, Brooklyn Grange aims to combat the mechanization and wasted energy within the food industry by providing locally grown food to nearby restaurants and the eco-conscious community around them. Farm produce never usually travels beyond a five mile radius from the farm, cutting down fuel used for food transport, and Brooklyn Grange also collects and utilizes kitchen compost to provide essential nutrients for their soil, reducing the strain on the city’s garbage disposal system.

The benefits of Brooklyn Grange do not just stop at the environmental; in fact, housing a rooftop farm is also very economically feasible for many buildings. The greenroof insulates the structure underneath, reducing heating and cooling bills. Additionally, the greenroof blocks dangerous UV rays, which are harmful to our health and harmful to the structure. These benefits can extend the building’s functionality by up to 300%.

Furthermore, the farm collects almost 100% of the rainwater that falls for their plants, reducing their need for water while easing the stress on the city’s already overworked storm systems. With these prominent cost-efficient and eco-friendly advantages, Brooklyn Grange hopes to be a beacon of successful urban farming for aspiring farmers and the buildings that house them in the future.

Rooftop farms, such as Brooklyn Grange, have the potential to drastically change our city for the better. Providing much-needed jobs, fresh produce and outdoor activities for our city’s youth, Brooklyn Grange is a model for successful urban farming as well as living a sustainable and conscious life.

Visit Brooklyn Grange at 37-18 Northern Boulevard, at 38th Street, in Long Island City, Queens and get some of their delicious produce at their market on Wednesdays from 2pm-7pm or on Saturdays, at Brooklyn Flea’s Smorgasburg!
"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
 
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Yes
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Bruce Dazzling » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:28 pm

New York City legalized beekeeping last year, which ignited a growing movement.

In fact, my gal and I are looking into it.

The Beekeeper Next Door
New York Times
By KRISTINA SHEVORY
Published: December 8, 2010

MIKE BARRETT does not have much of a yard at his two-story row house in Astoria, Queens. But that fact has not kept him from his new hobby of beekeeping — he put the hive on his roof. When it was harvest time this fall, he just tied ropes around each of the two honey-filled boxes in the hive, and lowered them to the ground.

Eventually, Mr. Barrett loaded the boxes into his car, took off his white beekeeper suit and set off for a commercial kitchen in Brooklyn. There, along with other members of the New York City beekeeping club, he extracted his honey, eventually lugging home 40 pounds of the stuff.

He was happy with his successful harvest, but he also reaped something he did not expect. “I was surprised how much I really care about the bees,” said Mr. Barrett, 49, a systems administrator for New York University, in reflecting on his inaugural season as a beekeeper. “You start to think about the ways to make their lives better.”

Until last spring, Mr. Barrett would have been breaking the law and risking a $2,000 fine for engaging in his sticky new hobby. But in March, New York City made beekeeping legal, and in so doing it joined a long list of other municipalities, from Denver to Milwaukee to Minneapolis to Salt Lake City, that have also lifted beekeeping bans in the last two years. Many towns, like Hillsboro, Ore., have done the same, and still other places, like Oak Park, Ill., and Santa Monica, Calif., are reconsidering their prohibitions.

Nationwide, hives are being tucked into small backyards and set alongside driveways; even the White House has installed some. Beekeeping classes are filling up quickly, and new beekeeping clubs are forming at the same time that established ones are reporting large jumps in membership.

At Mr. Barrett’s club, for instance, membership has more than doubled, to about 900, in the last year. In Los Angeles, the Backwards Beekeepers club has 400 members — up from six members two years ago. And in Denver, a club that was formed last year already boasts a roster of 200.

“Everyone who teaches a beekeeping course is finding themselves popular all of a sudden,” said James Fischer, 53, an instructor at New York City Beekeeping.

One force behind this rise of beekeeping is the growing desire for homegrown and organic food. Another, more complex one is the urge to stem the worrisome decline in the nation’s bee population.

The number of bees has been falling since the end of World War II, when farmers stopped rotating crops with clover, a good pollen source for bees, and started using fertilizers. Pesticides and herbicides became common as well. In cities, native plants were ripped out in favor of exotic ones that were not good for bees.

Then, four years ago, honey bee colonies mysteriously started to die around the country. This drop-off, called colony collapse disorder, added to the mounting health problems, like mites and diseases, that bees are facing. About 30 percent of the country’s managed colonies have died; around a third of the deaths are related to colony collapse disorder, according to the Agriculture Department.

“We don’t know the primary cause, but we know the combination of poor nutrition, heavy pesticide use and bee diseases have put bees into a tailspin,” said Marla Spivak, an entomology professor at the University of Minnesota and a recipient of a MacArthur Foundation “genius” grant for her work on honey-bee health.

Whatever the cause of colony collapse disorder, “People want to feel that they are doing something to help,” said Dave Mendes, president of the American Beekeeping Federation in Atlanta. “Having a few beehives in your backyard can make you feel better.”

But beekeeping is forbidden in many places. Some of the bans arose after World War II. Cities, seeking to eradicate any traces of agriculture within their limits in order to show they were full-fledged municipalities, forbade the raising of livestock, chicken and other creatures used in food production. Another wave of prohibitions came 20 years ago with the arrival of “killer bees” from Mexico. “People thought, ‘Oh, my God, I’m going to die, my kids are going to die and my dogs are going to die,’ ” said Kim Flottum, editor of Bee Culture magazine in Medina, Ohio. “At the time, people didn’t know what killer bees would do because they kept moving.” (Fortunately, the bees turned out not to be the threat that people feared.)

Nurturing flowers, fruits and vegetables is another factor in the rise in beekeeping, and it ranks high for Marygael Meister, who runs the Denver Beekeepers Association. In 2008, when Ms. Meister took a beekeeping class and set up two hives in her backyard in Denver, her goal was to help her more than 300 rosebushes thrive.

Ms. Meister said she had initially called the city information line and had been told it was legal to keep bees. The information was incorrect, and she received a cease-and-desist order when a neighbor complained about her hives. But instead of giving up, Ms. Meister decided to fight, showing the zeal of the nation’s new crop of beekeepers.

“I was livid,” Ms. Meister said. “I really enjoyed my bees and it was not like I was keeping a mountain lion in my backyard. It was absurd to me that the city was perpetuating the idea that Denver is so green and we’re not.”

Ms. Meister spent the next five months urging city officials to legalize beekeeping. In November 2008, the Denver City Council did so, and shortly thereafter Ms. Meister started the city’s first beekeeping club.

But legalization does not give beekeepers free rein. Cities often impose conditions on beekeepers — an annual fee, a permit, a minimum required distance between hives and nearby structures.

The City of Minneapolis, which legalized beekeeping last year, has set particularly stringent restrictions. Besides paying a $100 annual fee per hive, beekeepers there must obtain signed permission from all the neighbors within a 100-foot radius of the hives, and for neighbors within a 300-foot radius, they need 80 percent of the signatures.

For Jacquelynn Goessling, having her neighbors sign off on her hives was hardly a problem. People in her Minneapolis neighborhood of Kingfield, which she calls a “hotbed of liberal politics,” were so supportive that some wanted to host one of her hives in their own yards, or to help by planting their gardens with the kinds of flowers bees like. “Power to the bees” became a rallying cry for many of her friends. A year later, she has 12 hives citywide.

Ms. Goessling has also forged new relationships with neighbors — including the grumpy ones. Since she became the neighborhood’s “bee lady,” people want to buy her honey, either with cash or in trade for things like raspberry jam. Grateful neighbors also tell her they are getting more apples on their trees and, for the first time, seeing fruit on their arctic kiwi plants.

Eventually, Ms. Goessling would like to become a full-time beekeeper. She will be working with a local business center this winter to draft a business plan.

“If I could make $50,000 from bees, I’d quit my job so I could spend more time with my kids and have the summers off,” said Ms. Goessling, 48, a database administrator.

As Ms. Goessling dreams of a new career, other bee lovers, like Daniel Salisbury of Santa Monica, are fighting for the same opportunity.

Santa Monica models itself as an environmentally conscious city, but it has long banned beekeeping. So when city inspectors found three hives in Daniel Salisbury’s backyard two years ago, they insisted he move them. He took the hives north to his mother’s house in San Luis Obispo County, where beekeeping is legal, but he also began a drive to legalize hives in Santa Monica.

He has become so well known that people at his city-owned trailer park call to alert him when exterminators, retained by the Santa Monica housing agency, are headed toward bee swarms.

“I would chase down the swarms and literally run with my clippers to get the branch before Orkin showed up,” said Mr. Salisbury, 47, an antiques dealer, referring to a large pest-control company.

Over the last two years, Mr. Salisbury has attended Santa Monica City Council meetings, recruited a Los Angeles beekeeping club to help, and launched an e-mail legalization campaign joined by hundreds worldwide. On Tuesday, the Santa Monica City Council is scheduled to reconsider the beekeeping ban, and supporters of legalization are optimistic.

Max Wong, a Los Angeles beekeeper who has been helping Mr. Salisbury with his drive, hopes to wield some of the same political techniques in a legalization push in her city. Beekeeping rules there are a patchwork, with the hobby legal on one side of a street and illegal on the other.

“We’re in trouble and the bees are in trouble,” said Ms. Wong, 42, a member of the Backwards Beekeepers club. “We need to do something.”

Ms. Wong, a film producer who started keeping bees a year ago, wants to legalize bees not just to help hobbyists like herself, but to help feed and employ others. She sees bees as the best way to increase vegetable pollination in local community gardens and thinks that some people, like a few members of her club, could even become professional beekeepers.

Like Mr. Barrett from Queens and other new beekeepers, Ms. Wong is developing a close relationship with her bees, and she wants to ensure that others can enjoy the hobby as much as she does.

“It’s like having 35,000 pets,” she said. “I’m hyperactive, so anything that shuts down my brain is a good thing. When I’m working at a hive, I’m quiet and meditative.”


"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
 
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Yes
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Can Urban Agriculture Feed a Hungry World?

Postby Gnomad » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:29 pm

Hey, growing anything yourself is good. For some stuff, growing yourself has long been the only option for the connoisseur, something I know quite a bit about. Also do grow herbs on the balcony, and last couple of summers have also been growing potatoes and such outside in the shared yard, in large buckets or boxes. Kind of practice for growing food plants, you won't get much in way of feeding people with the current input... Over here at least most people owning a house also have some yard space for a garden, it is still just a few decades back from when most people were getting their livelihoods from some form of agriculture or forestry. How clueless about simple realities some modern people are, never ceases to amaze me, anyhow.
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests