Eric Davis wrote: Roger Glassel (a Swedish citizen) and Paul Dean are rank amateurs with no demonstrated professional record of success in scientific, intelligence, or forensic investigations/research into anything, much less the UFO phenomenon. And Mr. Glassel’s only professional experience is in information technology which doesn’t account for much as far as “investigations” and “research” experience goes. Glassel and Dean are nothing but hobbyist bloggers ( = an idiot with a computer and an opinion). Their attempt to smear TTSA, Luis Elizondo, the valiant DoD personnel working in the AATIP, and discredit the reality of the AATIP UFO program (no, it’s not a secret weapons program) by way of attacking the way that Luis Elizondo had gotten the Nimitz F-18 FLIR videos released is a total joke. Their attempt to FOIA the records will fail because non-exempt classified documents must be 25 years old before they can go through declassification review, there are also new FOIA exemptions, and the DoD has recent new authority to invoke exemptions to the Mandatory Declassification Review process. Mr. Glassel, not being an American citizen, simply does not know how the US government works internally...and neither does 98% of the American public. These gentlemen and their ilk simply cannot take “yes” for an answer when the US government finally provides the first official evidentiary confirmation that UFOs exist. The government’s educated and trained military personnel, military technicians, warfighters, and scientific advisors and contractors are not fools, idiots, blind, incompetent, dishonest, deceitful, nor gullible. The multi-sensor and radar platforms data fusion plus F-18 pilot and warship observers, all analyzed and synthesized into a forensic picture that Tic-Tac shaped craft are non-terrestrial because all other possible explanations were scientifically eliminated according to the scientific method. So which gullible choir is Glassel and Dean attempting to preach to?
Isaac Koi wrote: Hi Eric, I hope you and Hal are well and things aren't quite so busy for you guys at the moment (although they probably are...). I'm not really in the mood to defend Roger Glassel very much this week (and am currently enjoying gardening with my wife inglorious weather rather than focusing on ufology), but I think it is important to remember that he doesn't have the full context. He's one of the good guys really, in that he is willing to dig and change his mind if needed - which is considerably more than can be said about many in ufology. The points he posted this week just reinforce the need for Hal and others to dot their i's and cross their t's. Hal knows that I think this hasn't been done on some occasions in the last year, like the mylar balloon photo shown during the discussion of the Nimitz incident in the October telecast - which I mentioned to Hal a few days later but it took months for TTSA to acknowledge the error. Anyway, I hope you are well and that you take any challenges as a reason for explaining the work done more fully and, of course, with supporting evidence.
https://www.facebook.com/john.alexander ... 6478252585
Statement from a Senior Manager of BAASS
By: Caroline Bleakley Updated: May 04, 2018 05:28 PM PDT
One of the major successes of BAASS was in adopting the novel approach of utilizing the human body as a readout system for dissecting interactions with the UFO phenomenon. This novel approach aimed to circumvent the increasing evidence of deception and subterfuge by the UFO phenomenon in that multiple eyewitnesses co-located in the same vicinity frequently reported seeing widely different events. The evidence was multiplying that the UFO phenomenon was capable of manipulating and distorting human perception and therefore eyewitness testimony of UFO activity was becoming increasingly untrustworthy.
The BAASS approach was to view the human body as a readout system for UFO effects by utilizing forensic technology, the tools of immunology, cell biology, genomics and neuroanatomy for in depth study of the effects of UFOs on humans. This approach marked a dramatic shift away from the traditional norms of relying on eyewitness testimony as the central evidentiary arm in UFO investigations. The approach aimed to bypass UFO deception and manipulation of human perception by utilizing molecular forensics to decipher the biological consequences of the phenomenon.
The result of applying this new approach was a revolution in delineating the threat level of UFOs.
http://www.lasvegasnow.com/news/stateme ... 1160216617