new twin tower theory

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

new twin tower theory

Postby tron » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:33 pm

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... erges.html

A NEW theory has emerged claiming to give the REAL reason the Twin Towers fell after the 9/11 attacks.

Just before the two World Trade Centre skyscrapers crashed to the ground on September 11, 2001, a series of huge blasts were heard in the buildings.

And a leading scientist says they could have been the sound of molten aircraft metal reacting with water from sprinkler systems in the towers.

The sudden collapse of the towers after they were hit by two passenger jets has previously been blamed on over-heated steel beams.

But Norwegian expert Dr Christian Simensen believes the violent chemical reaction between molten aluminium from the aircraft and water is what actually ripped out the buildings' internal structure.

Explosions

Dr Simensen, from the SINTEF institute based in Trondheim, Norway, said: "Both scientific experiments and 250 reported disasters suffered by the aluminium industry have shown that the combination of molten aluminium and water releases enormous explosions."

Almost 3,000 people died after al-Qaeda terrorists flew two fuel-laden planes into the World Trade Centre in Manhattan.

The impacts triggered massive explosions and fires, but the subsequent collapse of each tower came as a shock to those watching the disaster unfold.

Blasts heard just before the buildings fell have led to conspiracy theories that explosives were set off inside the towers.

But Dr Simensen believes after crashing into the skyscrapers the two jets would have been trapped within an insulating layer of debris.

As a result, the aircraft hulls rather than the buildings absorbed most of the heat from the burning aviation fuel.

It is then claimed molten aluminium from the jets, flowing down through staircases and gaps in the floors, reacted with water from emergency sprinklers on the lower levels.

Dr Simensen, who presented his theory at an international materials conference in San Diego, California, said: "I regard it as extremely likely that it was these explosions that made the skyscrapers collapse by tearing out part of the internal structure, and that this caused the uppermost floors of the buildings to fall and crush the lower parts.

"In other words, I believe that these were the explosions that were heard by people in the vicinity and that have since given life to the conspiracy theories that explosives had been placed in the skyscrapers."
User avatar
tron
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:34 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:35 pm

did building 7 have this molten aircraft metal?


Dr Simensen....do you realize NO AIRCRAFT HIT TOWER 7!!

Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby norton ash » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:37 pm

aluminumfoil theory.
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby Project Willow » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:39 pm

Thanks for the laugh Norton! :bigsmile
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby Luther Blissett » Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:52 pm

If anyone can find an email contact for him, I'll ask him that very question.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby beeline » Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:06 pm

Luther Blissett wrote:If anyone can find an email contact for him, I'll ask him that very question.


info@sintef.no and info_mk@sintef.no (the materials and chemistry division) was the closest I could find, unless someone knows Norweigian and can translate SINTEF's page.
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:10 pm

norton ash wrote:aluminumfoil theory.



tru dat :P
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby bardobailey » Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:37 pm

Bullshit!

Another trickle-down theory bites the dust.
bardobailey
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:35 pm
Location: Hard to say
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby DrEvil » Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:35 am

"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4158
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby barracuda » Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:35 am

The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby Hammer of Los » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:07 am

I love that video 'Cuda. Well, the few minutes that I watched, anyway.

:basicsmile

From the comments, a good point;

When a bank robbery is called an 'inside job' it DOESN'T mean that everyone working for the bank were in on the job. It simply means that there had to be someone on the inside to assist the robbers.


"Inside Job," is the correct term here.
Hammer of Los
 
Posts: 3309
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby Mars » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:11 am

Oh man, this is so funny! Now the debunkers have their own conspiracy theory :jumping:

Thanks a lot, it's been a while since I laughed this hard :thumbsup001:
Mars
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:14 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby elfismiles » Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:07 am


Twin Towers brought down by molten aluminum, says scientist Christian Simensen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryi2GCZQPEw

Uploaded by matroplex on Sep 22, 2011

A materials expert from Norway, investigating the collapse of the WTC twin towers, has come up with a new theory explaining why they collapsed in the spectacular fashion seen on 11th September (9/11), 2001. Christian Simensen, a material scientist in SINTEF, the largest independent research organisation in Scandinavia, has claimed that it all has to do with alumina coming in contact with sprinkling water.

Do you believe this theorie or not?

see video for the effect of water and alluminium




How NOT to Pour Aluminum Metal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A796N_YZTm8

Uploaded by ArmedAttraction on May 20, 2009

A little mishap while pouring aluminum metal into a cold ingot. So this had happened, which rarely does, maybe 1/1000 times at lab.

Always wear proper safety equipment! Like don't do what I did and not wear a face shield, I was lucky enough not to get the metal popped on my face. Thank God.

Features: Dimitri Serrano, Brandon Monaco, Dennis Ramos, and Mr. C




Molten aluminum accident in a lab
Added: Aug-30-2009

Small explosion while pouring molten aluminum in a mold.

Most likely this happened because of moisture in the mold.

When molten metal is poured over water, the water turns into steam, and expands in volume almost instantly. This causes a molten metal explosion.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=93a_1251647793



Not sure what processes are the cause in these examples ... electricity?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkOJh1bQ0Io

Go to the 3 min mark on this one...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd6p998WcAw#t=3m
Last edited by elfismiles on Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby Searcher08 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:19 am

Thank you for that - great video!
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: new twin tower theory

Postby elfismiles » Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:30 am

Searcher08 wrote:Thank you for that - great video!


Yer welcome ... just trying to ascertain what level of explosive reaction this guy's theory could accommodate.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests