Page 1 of 3

new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:33 pm
by tron
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... erges.html

A NEW theory has emerged claiming to give the REAL reason the Twin Towers fell after the 9/11 attacks.

Just before the two World Trade Centre skyscrapers crashed to the ground on September 11, 2001, a series of huge blasts were heard in the buildings.

And a leading scientist says they could have been the sound of molten aircraft metal reacting with water from sprinkler systems in the towers.

The sudden collapse of the towers after they were hit by two passenger jets has previously been blamed on over-heated steel beams.

But Norwegian expert Dr Christian Simensen believes the violent chemical reaction between molten aluminium from the aircraft and water is what actually ripped out the buildings' internal structure.

Explosions

Dr Simensen, from the SINTEF institute based in Trondheim, Norway, said: "Both scientific experiments and 250 reported disasters suffered by the aluminium industry have shown that the combination of molten aluminium and water releases enormous explosions."

Almost 3,000 people died after al-Qaeda terrorists flew two fuel-laden planes into the World Trade Centre in Manhattan.

The impacts triggered massive explosions and fires, but the subsequent collapse of each tower came as a shock to those watching the disaster unfold.

Blasts heard just before the buildings fell have led to conspiracy theories that explosives were set off inside the towers.

But Dr Simensen believes after crashing into the skyscrapers the two jets would have been trapped within an insulating layer of debris.

As a result, the aircraft hulls rather than the buildings absorbed most of the heat from the burning aviation fuel.

It is then claimed molten aluminium from the jets, flowing down through staircases and gaps in the floors, reacted with water from emergency sprinklers on the lower levels.

Dr Simensen, who presented his theory at an international materials conference in San Diego, California, said: "I regard it as extremely likely that it was these explosions that made the skyscrapers collapse by tearing out part of the internal structure, and that this caused the uppermost floors of the buildings to fall and crush the lower parts.

"In other words, I believe that these were the explosions that were heard by people in the vicinity and that have since given life to the conspiracy theories that explosives had been placed in the skyscrapers."

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:35 pm
by seemslikeadream
did building 7 have this molten aircraft metal?


Dr Simensen....do you realize NO AIRCRAFT HIT TOWER 7!!


Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:37 pm
by norton ash
aluminumfoil theory.

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:39 pm
by Project Willow
Thanks for the laugh Norton! :bigsmile

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:52 pm
by Luther Blissett
If anyone can find an email contact for him, I'll ask him that very question.

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:06 pm
by beeline
Luther Blissett wrote:If anyone can find an email contact for him, I'll ask him that very question.


info@sintef.no and info_mk@sintef.no (the materials and chemistry division) was the closest I could find, unless someone knows Norweigian and can translate SINTEF's page.

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:10 pm
by seemslikeadream
norton ash wrote:aluminumfoil theory.



tru dat :P

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:37 pm
by bardobailey
Bullshit!

Another trickle-down theory bites the dust.

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:35 am
by DrEvil

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:35 am
by barracuda

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:07 am
by Hammer of Los
I love that video 'Cuda. Well, the few minutes that I watched, anyway.

:basicsmile

From the comments, a good point;

When a bank robbery is called an 'inside job' it DOESN'T mean that everyone working for the bank were in on the job. It simply means that there had to be someone on the inside to assist the robbers.


"Inside Job," is the correct term here.

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:11 am
by Mars
Oh man, this is so funny! Now the debunkers have their own conspiracy theory :jumping:

Thanks a lot, it's been a while since I laughed this hard :thumbsup001:

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:07 am
by elfismiles

Twin Towers brought down by molten aluminum, says scientist Christian Simensen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryi2GCZQPEw

Uploaded by matroplex on Sep 22, 2011

A materials expert from Norway, investigating the collapse of the WTC twin towers, has come up with a new theory explaining why they collapsed in the spectacular fashion seen on 11th September (9/11), 2001. Christian Simensen, a material scientist in SINTEF, the largest independent research organisation in Scandinavia, has claimed that it all has to do with alumina coming in contact with sprinkling water.

Do you believe this theorie or not?

see video for the effect of water and alluminium




How NOT to Pour Aluminum Metal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A796N_YZTm8

Uploaded by ArmedAttraction on May 20, 2009

A little mishap while pouring aluminum metal into a cold ingot. So this had happened, which rarely does, maybe 1/1000 times at lab.

Always wear proper safety equipment! Like don't do what I did and not wear a face shield, I was lucky enough not to get the metal popped on my face. Thank God.

Features: Dimitri Serrano, Brandon Monaco, Dennis Ramos, and Mr. C




Molten aluminum accident in a lab
Added: Aug-30-2009

Small explosion while pouring molten aluminum in a mold.

Most likely this happened because of moisture in the mold.

When molten metal is poured over water, the water turns into steam, and expands in volume almost instantly. This causes a molten metal explosion.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=93a_1251647793



Not sure what processes are the cause in these examples ... electricity?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkOJh1bQ0Io

Go to the 3 min mark on this one...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd6p998WcAw#t=3m

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:19 am
by Searcher08
Thank you for that - great video!

Re: new twin tower theory

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:30 am
by elfismiles
Searcher08 wrote:Thank you for that - great video!


Yer welcome ... just trying to ascertain what level of explosive reaction this guy's theory could accommodate.