Page 1 of 5

TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:49 pm
by Nordic
This started as a comment in the Occupy NY thread, but I realized it needs its own thread, so I don't accidentally derail that one.

Let's face it, for TIME magazine to declare "person of the year" to be "the protestor" seems like a good thing. But wait. We should take a closer look at the photo, and look at TIME's past covers.


TIME magazine is pure propaganda.

Interesting to analyze that photo ......

She strikes me as obviously Arab, and of course female. Why female?

And there's something about the eyebrows coming together .....

Notice the eyes!

Stars and crescents, turned on their side.

Image

Image

It's even red. I desaturated the area around it, but left the eye color alone. It's red.

And there's something about that forehead shape that's ominous. Can't put my finger on it.

But down on the neck and chest, there is some really weird imagery. I mean, what is this, if not a vagina?

Image

And this whole area around the neck and upper chest looks like it's suggestive of something else (besides a bunch of vaginas), maybe a smirking Satanic face of some kind:

Image


TIME is really good at visual propaganda, believe me.

Image

Image

Then of course there's this:

Image

and this:

Image

and this:

Image

And, most famously (to me anyway) this:

Image

And another:

Image

These images can be found here:

http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/20 ... -newsweek/

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:54 pm
by seemslikeadream
the very word is offensive

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:07 pm
by Nordic
seemslikeadream wrote:the very word is offensive


What word? "Protester?"

:shrug:

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:11 pm
by seemslikeadream
Nordic wrote:
seemslikeadream wrote:the very word is offensive


What word? "Protester?"

:shrug:



oh no sorry :oops:

Time

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:44 pm
by barracuda
The source for Shepard Fairey's illustration is a photograph from Occupy L.A. by LA Weekly photographer Ted Soqui.

ImageImage

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 6:32 pm
by Jeff
Actually, I do find "protester" offensive here. Might as well be Year of the Complainer.

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:07 pm
by Nordic
Thanks 'cuda, that's good to know.

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:10 pm
by Plutonia
Messaging opportunity?

This bit of spin today:

TIME Magazine names The Protester as its Person of the Year for 2011
Posted by David Wendt ⋅ December 14, 2011 ⋅
Filed Under The Protester

TIME Magazine’s Person of the Year for 2011 is The Protester, that problematic individual who has brought down governments across North Africa and set up protest camps in the heart of America’s cities, but who has also rioted in the streets of London and hacked the website’s of some of the world’s biggest corporations.

TIME’s definition of the protester is very safe and conservative. So there’s much talk of the protests of people in Tunisia and Libya, for example, but less talk about protesters who have represented a more dangerous trend in 2011. The likes of Anders Behring Breivik and Julian Assange could be seen as protesters too, in their own ways. Are they included in TIME’s celebration of the protester.

The term ‘protester’ has arguably been sullied in 2011 as governments seek to force protest groups to conform to rules about how they can stage their demonstrations. The idea of a ‘permit to protest’ might seem like ludicrous Orwellian double-speak, yet protest groups in many parts of the world have been allowed to operate only when they can be conveniently shunted into certain areas.

By naming The Protester as its Person of the Year for 2011, TIME comes dangerously close to legitimising disruptive forces within our society. But the magazine does not quite go through with such a move. For many, The Protestor is still the kind of person who toppled Muammar Gaddafi or who camps out in Zuccotti Park. The rest – the people who rioted in London and Birmingham, for example – are just hooligans looking for free stuff. Aren’t they?

https://100gf[DOT]wordpress.com/2011/12/14/time-magazine-names-the-protester-as-its-person-of-the-year-for-2011/


Ergh! Though the tone seems sympathetic the overall message is "Protestors are dangerous."

It'll be interesting to see if this becomes a "popular" take.

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:31 pm
by seemslikeadream
Time is not a reality, but a concept

- Antiphon the Sophist


Image

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:40 pm
by seemslikeadream
Image

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:49 pm
by Nordic
Meant to put this in the OP, they got busted for this one:

Image

TIME made the black man BLACKER.

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:50 pm
by Nordic
Image

Upper left, apparently the words "Ivory Tower".

Yes, protesters are the "ivory tower" intellectuals, the college kids, the elites.

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:48 pm
by seemslikeadream
Image

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:09 pm
by DrVolin
I was quite shocked when I saw the cover on the news this morning. Now that I see the source photograph, I am even more shocked.

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:13 pm
by Nordic
Yeah funny how the woman looks clearly arabic now.