I respectfully ask the mods to allow this alternative thread to exist.

Perhaps a good place to start is from a Google search for the word Rothschild itself - the first page of returns appears to be 50% divided between Rothschild family and business interests and 50% far Right / Anti-Semitic sources. I appreciate that Google can personalise results, but it would be interesting to see if other people have similar results.
I had previously posted that on inital glance, the Rothschild family did not appear to have an involvement with the Bilderberg Group, the Council for Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission; when I searched the commonly available historical membership lists an interesting point was that the Rothschilds were absent.
Curiously, there was a consistent Rockefeller presence throughout all those organisations.
If we then go to Wikipedia, it seems that the there is a family who have been engaged in banking and finance for several hundred years, since at least the early 18th century. They have been involved in serious winemaking in France and have given their main 'seat' in England to the National Trust (not sure what the US equivalent would be??).
They have been involved in philanthropy for many generations and have donated large amounts of artwork to the nation.
They have had a large role in the creation of a Jewish state, going back to the late nineteenth century, and have been benefactors and supporters of the 19th Zionist project (creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Rothschild,_4th_Baron_Rothschild
I would say that from Wiki, it is reasonable to conclude that:
The Rothschilds are not a 'monolithic' block. They have / have had lots of internal rivalries - which on first look seem to reflect rather upmarket lifestyle but with Dallas / Dynasty forces at work across generations. At times there appear to have been greater cooperation than others. One force that created division was actually the degree of investment risk.
I would also say that it is reasonable to conclude that they are a 'very connected' group of people
- some into Hollywood 'royalty'
-some into the Whitehouse
-some into Russian oligarchs
-some into ecology and complimentary medicine(!)
Results of Wiki browsing indicate a very multi-faceted group of people - contrasting this with the Bush family is an interesting thought experiment - very different indeed.