Project Willow wrote:From the comments to his article Albarelli addresses the issue.
http://www.truthout.org/cries-from-past-tortures-ugly-echoes59738
Quote:
Mon, 05/24/2010 - 13:33 — H.P. Albarelli Jr.
I researched the CIA's programs for over 17 years.
As far as I could see and find, there is/was no Monarch
project. Indeed, I was told by the fellow who first wrote about it that it was a fabricated project on his part and that
he has regretted the creation for years. It is not necessary to make MKULTRA and Artichoke any worse than they were. They were absolutely horrible programs and the attempts to embellish them with made-up projects is not helpful or needed. In fact, it readily serves the Agency's disinformation objectives to scatter this fabricated disinfo dust over the real story. Ms. Van Bergen is correct: victim accounts are helpful and needed. These are forthcoming in additional articles that will be posted on Truthout. As expected, victims are quite afraid and apprehensive about coming forward. The victim identified as Sally Hartman in my book is the best evidenced account I have seen. The harm done to this woman by the CIA is hard to fathom. Perhaps we will post that section form the book somewhere on the net so that more people can see and read it. HPA/
RIer's who've paid attention to this topic can probably figure out that regretful source, but let us now put to rest finally the question as to whether it's a bonafide project name. Interestingly, it doesn't appear to be deliberate disinfo either. Can one retract a meme?
Project Monarch
Actually, if you listen to the radiation committee testimony, one of the vics quotes Gottlieb telling her she "Is ripe for the big A", Artichoke. So perhaps TBMC activity fell under that project name. Hopefully one day we shall find out for certain what label they used for their horrendous work on kids.
here: http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=28321
I did not use that strike-out based solely on the quote from Albarelli.
- I did a survey of survivors. Those who spoke to the issue admitted that they had adopted the label because of its common usage. They had no direct memory of the term being used in the labs or on documents. Some did say that either butterfly or monarch symbolism was part of their programming, but these pertained to general vernacular within their cult tradition, or had some other cultural connection, rather than being the name of a government funded project.
I've witnessed, over the past 3 years, what I can only describe as an Internet-based disinformation campaign, centered around Project Monarch. By all appearances, it was created by a person or persons with professional level graphic design, web development, and search engine manipulation expertise. These sites on mind control appear and disappear in fairly regular patterns, all of them associating Monarch with the most outrageous and discrediting claims. Many of them are embedded with triggers.
I still make a habit of inquiring with survivors about this issue, and it came up for conversation again recently in a group setting. Some of the other survivors spoke to having "monarch imagery" as part of their programming, although the symbol didn't have the same meaning for all of them, and didn't refer to a government project name. One however, gave me this (quoted with permission):
Cheryl Hersha wrote:Well, when my father-monster was murdered by his own, we found many clues to "why us" since we had free reign in his trailer after "they" swept it. 1. my f-m's family had been a human gene-pool family tracked by the gov. since the 1880's. 2. F-M's father had died in a drunk-driving collision when my f-m was 5 yrs old. Our step-grandpa turned out to be OSS. 3. Our step-grandpa allegedly worked for and gave lectures for Civitan (?), I hope I remember that correctly...but that "work" never existed. He did odd jobs, mostly as a chef or cook. 4. This man also received checks, starting back right after the war, @ $400.00 mo. from The Monarch Life Ins. Co. Think of how much that $400.00 really equaled back then!!! And they INCREASED over time with inflation. My f-m was multiple, and I do believe he was programmed as we were too. I believe step-grandpa set him up, then us...Step-Grandpa "Bompa", was the love of my life until he raped me when I was 9 - and he knew well who to call out and how to keep it secret. From that day on, I never spoke another word to him, and would never even approach him, and damn sure not stay alone with him again. At least my mom can recall my abrupt change. I had two experiences with J. Mengele that I recall. The one in my hometown, yes drugs and torture, I overheard him and the others emphatically speaking in high hopes of "Project Monarch" success. They didn't know I was awake. I wasn't NASA kid, never heard about ...
Ms. Hersha is a coauthor of Secret Weapons: Two Sisters' Terrifying True Story of Sex, Spies and Sabotage
http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Weapons-Sisters-Terrifying-Sabotage/dp/0882821962/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1343330584&sr=8-1&keywords=secret+weapons+hersha
She is also my friend.
One other prominent survivor spoke to the issue, but I don't have permission to quote her. She can always join the conversation here if she wishes.
Getting back to the Albarelli quote, it isn't quite accurate, according to Hank himself. It's not that the journalist made it up, he was given the wrong information, and he couldn't have made it up because Hammond uses the term in his Greenbaum speech (1992) and O'Brien/Phillips in their writings (1993), both of which precede the journalist's publication. A special big prize for anyone who can find an earlier reference to Project Monarch.
Whatever its history or origins, Monarch has been made into a PR albatross, one I won't willingly wrap around my neck in the public sphere, and I have no memory of it in connection with my own experience. Now my choice not to proliferate it is personal, rather than one based on what I thought was a pretty clear case of disinformation.