Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby compared2what? » Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:52 pm

Pele'sDaughter wrote:This has been floated a few places. Is there are quick explanation? Just a total hoax?

http://rmtowersconspiracy.wordpress.com ... soto-page/


There's a quick explanation.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=35841&p=487451&hilit=facebook#p487451
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Iamwhomiam » Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:22 pm

"The bump shooting could account for this grouping, bullets being sprayed around in grouped bursts and finding windows."

That's true. Another explanation would be if the gun fire three-round bursts each pull of the trigger.

I think some may not be aware of what happens to a bullet entering flesh. Their aft center of gravity changes, causing the slug to tumble. The tumbling is what causes most of the soft tissue damage. If a bullet, a tumbling bullet hits bone, aside from shattering the bone, it will more often than not burst into fragments, causing yet greater damage.

That they were frangible bullets suggests they were hollow-point, most likely, .223 calibre. It's also possible that he used a combination of 3 different types of bullets, plain ol' .223s, fully metal jacketed which may or may not be hollow points, and plain ol' hollow points.

Guess no one appreciated my putting forward that the school itself was a usap. A training ground.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:43 pm

compared2what? wrote:
Pele'sDaughter wrote:This has been floated a few places. Is there are quick explanation? Just a total hoax?

http://rmtowersconspiracy.wordpress.com ... soto-page/


There's a quick explanation.

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/view ... ok#p487451



Thanks! I have since seen something from dutchsinse that is very similar. They're crawling out of the woodwork. :roll:
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:44 pm

I'm surprised there's not more discussion on the Batman shooting, given all the facts coming out and the strange facts surrounding it. Which I find even more strange than the Sandy Hook case
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby justdrew » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:52 pm

8bitagent wrote:I'm surprised there's not more discussion on the Batman shooting, given all the facts coming out and the strange facts surrounding it. Which I find even more strange than the Sandy Hook case


personally I could go without hearing or seeing the word "shooting" again for about a hundred years, maybe forever. Raking these coals isn't going to do anything of value is my sense of the situation.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby barracuda » Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:50 am

8bitagent wrote:I'm surprised there's not more discussion on the Batman shooting, given all the facts coming out and the strange facts surrounding it. Which I find even more strange than the Sandy Hook case


The exact same thing happened during the trial phase of Breivik's case. Once actual facts come forth interest around here predictably peters out. I guess it's much more engaging to discuss what we don't know.
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:54 am

barracuda wrote:
8bitagent wrote:I'm surprised there's not more discussion on the Batman shooting, given all the facts coming out and the strange facts surrounding it. Which I find even more strange than the Sandy Hook case


The exact same thing happened during the trial phase of Breivik's case. Once actual facts come forth interest around here predictably peters out. I guess it's much more engaging to discuss what we don't know.


Drills, alleged second shooters, oh my! I literally get confused which shooting is which, or which we're discussing. Curious which 100 page worthy "event" is in the lower intestine ready to be pooped out for our consumption soon.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby lupercal » Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:47 am

8bitagent wrote:
barracuda wrote:
8bitagent wrote:I'm surprised there's not more discussion on the Batman shooting, given all the facts coming out and the strange facts surrounding it. Which I find even more strange than the Sandy Hook case


The exact same thing happened during the trial phase of Breivik's case. Once actual facts come forth interest around here predictably peters out. I guess it's much more engaging to discuss what we don't know.


Drills, alleged second shooters, oh my! I literally get confused which shooting is which, or which we're discussing. Curious which 100 page worthy "event" is in the lower intestine ready to be pooped out for our consumption soon.


8bit glad you're sticking with it. I've heard a few updates on NPR and yeah it's crazy, but about what I'd expect.

Brevik trial: that one got by me completely as endgames (when they happen) tend to do, at least partly I think by design: notice how the Holmes trial has been screened by Sandy Hook, and Sandy Hook is being screened by Steubenville, also I suppose the gun control kabuki and AJ's meltdown. Ahab asked me something about Brevik's trial once and so I went and looked it up and sure enough, it was exactly what I'd expect, a carefully controlled show trial with little evidence and a very predetermined outcome.

Anyway my point here is to suggest that you start a thread about the Holmes trial as I think trials are sufficiently different from shootings as to justify a separation. Also, the question of which perps get suicided like Lanza and Cho and which get trials, like Sirhan and Holmes, is one I've been thinking about and a trial thread would be a good place to discuss it. And keep on keepin' on 8bit, you're a true seeker! :thumbsup
User avatar
lupercal
 
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Sounder » Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:32 am

I normally stay as far as I can from talk of these ‘tragedies’ because I am forced to compare them with daily tragedies times one thousand that are inflicted all round the world. I tend to feel like a stupidly indulgent American when I let this resolve slip. What about those unfortunate 60,000 Syrians that our proxy fundamentalist forces have killed recently? It seems they are getting their asses handed to themselves even as we speak; embarrassing, no? What mayhem is currently being planned for South America?

WQhatever, as much as I might aspire to differ with mulebone in style, I do appreciate the ‘spread the blame around’ element of his voice.

jcivil
a few dozen Americans die and it is a big deal, millions are starved to death and raped and slaved and slaughtered each day and the "news" gives us shite.

I love me innocent little kids, enjoyed being one too, and the pain their families and communities now bear is frightful. Yet greater suffering is systematically ignored and even denied each day by the scum feeding us kid traumaporn.



Barracuda wrote….
It's become apparent that this killing, which is really a local news story, is now functioning as a sort of tarot card reading of its own distanced viewers. Each person is able to overlay their own, personal concerns and issues onto the event and derive a meaning which replicates and satisfies their own worldview in a highly fulfilling way. If you want gun control, it's a gun issue. If you're concerned about mental health, it's a mental health issue. If you're wary of video games, he's a gamer. If broken families cause you to fret, here's a divorced mother. If violence in movies is your nemesis, there's that. If you're worried about the state taking your weapons, here you go. If you sense a vast conspiracy manipulating the masses, there it is in the conflicting details. If you don't like rich people, here's a whole bunch.


So this is a gun issue then?

Mac wrote….
A very good and obvious question. I've already asked it myself, as have many other people on this thread and elsewhere. You ask the question because you are, like most people, a fairly sane, decent and honest human being, as opposed to a professional organiser or perpetrator of black ops.

However: Since everyone and his dog clearly feels free to worm his way into THE MIND OF ADAM LANZA, THE EVIL AUTISTIC WEIRDO LONER MASS-MURDERER, and since it's by now been established beyond all reasonable doubt* by the telly and the tabloids and the serious press that HE DUNNIT, perhaps you'll allow me to speculate for a moment on what it might be like to be an untouchable and anonymous organiser of black ops for the US government.

A possible answer to your question (and mine): They do it because they can. Because it's their idea of fun.** Because (this at least is uncontroversial) the perpetrators of any such crimes are heartless psychopaths. Perhaps, then, they -- or at least some of them -- get a thrill out of testing the waters and seeing how far they can go. Perhaps it's even of practical use to them, as an opportunity for research on a global scale. Or perhaps by now, since 9/11 at the very latest, they are perfectly confident that they can get away with literally anything, however absurd, brutal, implausible, unproven, or indeed blatantly dishonest and demonstrably untrue.

All this (perhaps) because they know -- through experience -- that any decent human being, however critical of his government and however suspicious of his nation's intelligence agencies, will be repelled by anything that smacks even vaguely of disrespecting the victims and will find it practically impossible to even countenance the thought that if Sandy Hook was a black op, they would either dare to have a guy doing "a really bad acting job"***, or be so incompetent as to let the cat out of the bag on CNN.

But that's all speculation, and in the worst possible taste, of course. As opposed to referring to Adam Lanza as "the killer" at length, in print and on TV, while offering reams of po-faced crackerbarrel psychology (and sociology) as to why He Dunnit. That's in good taste.

*What are you, a conspiracy nut?

**It's not unheard of for powerful people to get a thrill out of their own power and ruthlessness. It's not unheard of for brutal murderers to disrespect their victims and repeatedly taunt the public. Jack the Ripper, for instance, demonstrably did just that. And he was just one sadist among too many to list, and certainly not the most powerful or destructive one in history.

***It wasn't in fact "a really bad acting job". If it was (by any chance) an acting job, then he performed it highly competently, if you happen to like that kind of thing.


They do it because they can. Because it's their idea of fun.**


I imagine that the Roman Senators got quite a laugh out of throwing the ‘Christian’ victims of their psyops to the lions. ‘Shit man, the more you torture them, the more they believe in the psyop.’ What could be more fun than that? Well maybe having your progeny taking over the administration of those new kinds of ‘believers’ a few generations later through the “Holy Roman Empire”.

Yes Jack, loose I know.

The shits (element within the human mentality) that steal and corrupt the fire of the eternal or the wisdom gathered by true seekers will certainly be burned by that fire at some point. Enjoy your loot while you still can boys.


There is surprisingly little consideration of deep-state Gladio type actors on this thread. That seems odd for a site that calls itself Rigorous Intuition. But maybe that’s just me.

Mac wrote….
Jesus christ, I have only just realised that that video was recorded and broadcast only one day after the massacre. The father must literally have spent practically all of the intervening period answering phone calls from what he refers to as "people and agencies" (presumably he means news agencies), making arrangements with CNN, and writing his memorial speech, complete with the thanks and the forgiveness and the little joke about food.

Also (and this really does beggar belief): a Facebook page collecting money in the name of the dead child was set up by "close friends" of the father on the very day of the massacre, and it is still up there, with his express support. (https://www.facebook.com/EmilieParkerFund#) On the 14th (the day of the massacre), it already contained at least one photo of him and his wife actually at the scene of the massacre. By the 15th (the day of the CNN interview), it contained two more. It is an appalling spectacle.



Now to really step into the muck. Cuda posted these pictures awhile back. This first picture shows Emilie Parker on the right with a red polka dot dress. Please correct me if this is wrong.

Then the next picture has Emilie Parker in the same red polka dot dress positively beaming along with the rest of her family. All this, shortly after having been murdered.

Please correct me if this is wrong.

One may think the sister is wearing Emilie’s dress. Maybe that is the case.
Last edited by Sounder on Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby barracuda » Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:32 am

Image
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Sounder » Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:52 am

That was certainly a well considered response cuda.

Did you photoshop that yourself?

Come on, we're looking for 'facts' here.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby barracuda » Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:58 am

If we're looking for facts, why are you just repeating inanely stupid speculative bullshit that's all over the internet about how a family faked the violent bloody death and funeral of six year old girl on the basis of a picture of her sister wearing her hand-me-down dress? But thanks for putting the word "facts" in quotes. Boy, was that appropriate.
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby chump » Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:30 pm

We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors ... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.


Karl Rove
User avatar
chump
 
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Sounder » Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:40 pm

If we're looking for facts, why are you just repeating inanely stupid speculative bullshit that's all over the internet about how a family faked the violent bloody death and funeral of six year old girl on the basis of a picture of her sister wearing her hand-me-down dress?


It is pretty easy to win your point, although a bit cheap and cheesy, by asserting that your conclusions establish the ' inanely stupid speculative bullshit' of contrary opinions.

Your circular reasoning combined with the emotive attack does nothing to lend you credibility.

At any rate the next you-tube allows one to compare the Emilie photos.


http://youtu.be/xSnhYMaGYuY
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby barracuda » Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:48 pm

Look man, don't pretend you don't have google on your computer. You're just repeating shit you saw and read somewhere, written by some other moron, all on the basis of a dress. And now you want me to watch a YouTube video about how two sisters born less than a year apart bear a remarkable resemblance to one another, and how shocking that is. Why don't you watch it four or five times and report your conclusions?

But try coming up with an original thought about the matter, will ya? I know it's not beyond your capabilities.
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests