Aaron Swartz

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:21 pm

July 23, 2013
MIT admits Secret Role in Aaron Swartz Death
July 23, 2013. Washington. The details surrounding the death of the young genius inventor Aaron Swartz get more bizarre by the day. Days before the Obama administration was to release its secret files covering the persecution and prosecution of Swartz, the government and MIT sued to stop it. The university insists its employees will be in danger once the world finds out the role MIT played in the death of Aaron Swartz


Subscribe to Whiteout Press. It's FREE and you can unsubscribe at any time. Just 5 emails per month.
It’s only been six months since the tragic death of internet pioneer Aaron Swartz. The 26 year-old inventor of the RSS feed and a co-owner of the popular site Reddit killed himself in January of this year. His family, as well as millions of others across the country, accuse federal authorities of terrorizing the young man so much, they caused him to take his own life to end the constant persecution.



Aaron Swartz
What was once considered an open-and-shut case, considering Aaron Swartz was reportedly cooperating with federal prosecutors, has suddenly become a real-life who-done-it right out of a Sherlock Holmes story. It’s not so much the facts of the case that are so controversial, as much as the government’s, and now MIT’s, insistence that the facts remain sealed and secret from the American people.

Aaron Swartz wasn’t some common criminal. His crime consisted of hacking into a multi-university digital library and releasing thousands of works of literary genius. The books, journals and other publications created one of the largest and most advanced collections of human intelligence in existence. But it was only available to the world’s wealthy or those connected to the most prestigious universities. Aaron Swartz was a crusader for open and free access to knowledge and reading materials. He understood that knowledge is power.

Aaron Swartz didn’t do it for money, ego or any other selfish reason. The statement released by his family immediately after his death sheds some light on his possible motives, ‘Aaron’s insatiable curiosity, creativity, and brilliance; his reflexive empathy and capacity for selfless, boundless love; his refusal to accept injustice as inevitable—these gifts made the world, and our lives, far brighter. We’re grateful for our time with him, to those who loved him and stood with him, and to all of those who continue his work for a better world.’

On January 11, 2013, Aaron Swartz took his own life to put an end to the non-stop threats, terror and intimidation at the hands of government agents and prosecutors.

Kevin Poulsen and Wired.com

When Aaron Swartz passed away, government agents and university officials thought the story was over. But his family, friends and former co-workers wanted to know the truth. Among them was Kevin Poulsen, Editor of Wired.com. He filed a Freedom of Information Act request asking for the release of all the documents relating to the government’s investigation and prosecution of Aaron Swartz.

With an alphabet soup of government agencies persecuting Swartz, Kevin Poulsen cast a vast net and sued the Department of Homeland Security. As it turned out, it was the Secret Service that had initiated the criminal investigation of Aaron Swartz in 2011 after he illegally downloaded the contents of MIT’s JSTOR university library. A sub-agency of DHS, the Secret Service none the less refused the FOIA request and insisted the government’s investigation needed to remain secret.

Two weeks ago, a federal judge ruled against the Executive Branch and ordered the Obama administration to release the documents in the Aaron Swartz case. As detailed by Poulsen and Wired.com, US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled, “Defendant shall promptly release to Plaintiff all responsive documents that it has gathered thus far and shall continue to produce additional responsive documents that it locates on a rolling basis.”

Secret Service requests delay

Days before Judge Kollar-Kotelly’s order, the Secret Service petitioned the court for a stay in its ruling. The agency alleges that it just discovered another large collection of files relating to the Swartz case at a facility outside Washington DC. Agency attorneys insist the Secret Service needs a large extension of time in order to collect and review the just-discovered documents.

In its petition to the court three weeks ago, the Secret Service wrote, ‘Defendant has exercised diligence in processing these records. As part of that effort, it undertook an additional search for responsive records in certain agency files, including files located outside agency headquarters in the Washington, D.C. area. Based on this additional search, it learned yesterday, July 2, of files located outside the agency’s headquarters that contain several thousand additional pages that may be responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request...The agency’s review of those files will require a substantial amount of additional time.’

The court granted the federal agency a brief delay to allow it to investigate its latest discovery. The Secret Service now has an August 5 deadline, not to release the Aaron Swartz files, but to release a timetable showing when they think they might finally be able to release them. Kevin Poulsen and others who’ve submitted FOIA requests for the same information aren’t optimistic. Government officials blew right through a May 23 deadline and the plaintiffs wouldn’t be surprised if the Obama administration simply ignored the newest deadline as well.


MIT – working for Homeland Security?

Perhaps the most curious and surprising revelation over the past few days has been MIT University’s legal filing asking to be a party to Poulsen’s lawsuit against the Dept. of Homeland Security. But rather than join the Wired.com Editor as a Plaintiff in the FOIA case against DHS, MIT voluntarily joined Homeland Security as a Defendant in the lawsuit.

After the initial surprise wore off, critics of the government’s actions began submitting their own theories. The only facts confirmed by MIT officials involved the admission by the University that it feared for the lives and safety of some of its employees and staff if the government’s files on the Swartz investigation were made public. But what could MIT staff have done in the persecution and prosecution of Aaron Swartz that was so bad that those same individuals are in fear for their lives?

According to the latest account from Wired.com, ‘MIT claims it’s afraid the release of Swartz’s file will identify the names of MIT people who helped the Secret Service and federal prosecutors pursue felony charges against Swartz for his bulk downloading of academic articles from MIT’s network in 2011. MIT argues that those people might face threats and harassment if their names become public. But it’s worth noting that names of third parties are already redacted from documents produced under FOIA.’

Showing how America’s legal system truly works, a non-party like MIT gained access to a federal judge and arranged a secret conference call with attorneys for Kevin Poulsen, attorneys for DHS and the judge herself. MIT requested an emergency stay in the court’s order to release the Aaron Swartz documents. MIT notified the judge that they intended to file a legal motion later that day, but wanted to take advantage of their privileged access and sit down and talk to the judge in an admittedly “off the record” setting.

Judge delays Aaron Swartz documents yet again

In response to what the federal judge described in her ruling as, ‘an off-the-record conference call’, she was ordering yet another stay in the court’s order for the Secret Service and the Dept. of Homeland Security to release all the documents it has regarding the Aaron Swartz tragedy. The judge wrote (from Wired.com):

‘Based upon an off-the-record conference call with the parties’ counsel and counsel for non-party Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”), the Court understands that MIT intends to file a motion to intervene later today, which will include a request for relief relating to the Government’s production of certain documents to Plaintiff. In view of the impending motion, the Court hereby STAYS the obligation of the Government to promptly release to Plaintiff all responsive documents that it has located on a rolling basis, see Min. Order (July 5, 2013), until further order of the Court. Once the Court has had the opportunity to review MIT’s motion to intervene, and has considered the positions of the Plaintiff and the Government as to the motion, it shall order a schedule for further proceedings.’


Again, showing how the US justice system works, MIT and the Secret Service were granted another delay based on a secret conference call between their attorneys and the federal judge. The judge then granted the stay well before MIT even filed its motion. As a follow-up to the incident, Wired.com published all seven of the legal motions MIT eventually submitted to the court.

The main filing from MIT states ‘The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) moves to intervene and participate fully in this action as defendant pursuant to Rule (24)a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum of points and authorities. MIT has an interest relating to the records that are subject of the action and is so situated that disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede MIT’s ability to protect that interest, in light of the fact that MIT’s interest is not adequately protected by the existing parties.’

MIT requested that the judge force the Obama administration to allow MIT officials five days to review all documents prior to their release and give the University the authority to black-out and redact any names or details that expose the levels of involvement of MIT employees working on behalf of government agents.

Kevin Poulsen, Wired.com, the Plaintiff’s attorney, and a host of others are in shock at MIT’s requests and level of urgency. They wonder just what it is that University officials are so desperate to hide. Poulsen closes his latest report explaining, “I have never, in fifteen years of reporting, seen a non-governmental party argue for the right to interfere in a Freedom of Information Act release of government documents. My lawyer has been litigating FOIA for decades, and he’s never encountered it either. It’s saddening to see an academic institution set this precedent.”

For more information and to view the MIT emergency court filings, visit Wired.com.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:16 pm

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15988
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby fruhmenschen » Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:15 am

see link for full story
http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/30/45713 ... mment_form

MIT denies targeting Aaron Swartz, but admits 'neutral' stance gave FBI the upper hand

"MIT didn't do anything wrong; but we didn't do ourselves proud."

July 30, 2013


MIT has finally released a report on its role in the prosecution of hacktivist Aaron Swartz — a legal battle that's been blamed for spurring his suicide in January of 2013. In an open letter, president R. Rafael Reif said that the report would show that MIT "did not seek federal prosecution, punishment or jail time" for Swartz after finding that he had used MIT's network to access and mass-download articles from academic repository JSTOR. The report, compiled by Professor Hal Abelson and others, finds that MIT didn't actively aggravate the case that would consume Swartz's life, saying there was no "silver bullet" that could have prevented the tragedy of his death. However, it also raises questions about the stance that the university should have taken, and the strength of the case against him.

"If the Review Panel is forced to highlight just one issue for reflection, we would choose to look to the MIT administration's maintenance of a 'neutral' hands-off attitude that regarded the prosecution as a legal dispute to which it was not a party," it reads. "This attitude was complemented by the MIT community's apparent lack of attention to the ruinous collision of hacker ethics, open-source ideals, questionable laws, and aggressive prosecutions that was playing out in its midst." Later, it quotes one source as saying "MIT didn't do anything wrong; but we didn't do ourselves proud."

"MIT may never have actually said whether Swartz's network access was 'unauthorized'"

That neutrality, says the report, meant that MIT limited its involvement in the case (hiring outside counsel and responding to subpoenas but not asking for criminal prosecution) and made no public statements regarding Swartz or his case. It says that before Swartz's suicide, this prompted little criticism. "Few students, faculty, or alumni expressed concerns to the administration," it reads. "In preserving MIT's stance of neutrality and limited involvement, MIT decision makers did not inquire into the details of the charges until a year after the indictment, and did not form an opinion about their merits." MIT did "inform the US Attorney's Office that the prosecution should not be under the impression that MIT wanted jail time for Aaron Swartz," though it did not actively oppose jail time for Swartz either.

MIT's worst actions are described as sins of omission that indict the Justice Department more than the university. "Among the factors not considered were that the defendant was an accomplished and well-known contributor to Internet technology; that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is a poorly drafted and questionable criminal law as applied to modern computing, one that affects the Internet community as a whole and is widely criticized; and that the United States government was pursuing an overtly aggressive prosecution," the reviewers write. MIT, they say, categorically did not set out to make an example of Swartz, but it's implied that the FBI may well have done so.

"MIT says it denied Swartz access to documents because it assumed the government would hand them over"

Longtime online law authority Larry Lessig points out what may be a particularly tragic and infuriating point: that the "unauthorized" network access that made Swartz so vulnerable to prosecution under the CFAA may not have been unauthorized at all. "MIT was never asked by either the prosecution or the defense whether Aaron Swartz's access to the MIT network was authorized or unauthorized - nor did MIT ask this of itself." Swartz had hooked up his laptop to an MIT ethernet cable in a network closet, and the investigation points to a cat-and-mouse game as employees tried to stop Swartz from downloading articles, but the report says that Swartz arguably had authorized "guest" access through the entire process.

Despite its ongoing claims to neutrality, the report cites instances where MIT's actions helped the prosecution more than the defense. It notes that some information was turned over to the government without a subpoena, contrary to early information given to Aaron Swartz's father Robert. It also admits that Swartz's defense attempted to contact MIT multiple times but got only slow replies. However, it calls the explanations for these delays largely mundane. It also touched on a major criticism leveled by Swartz's partner Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman: that the prosecution was given broader access to witnesses and evidence than the defense.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby elfismiles » Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:52 pm


Documents show Secret Service kept tab of Swartz
Posted: Aug 13, 2013 11:42 AM CDT
Updated: Aug 13, 2013 11:43 AM CDT

Aaron SwartzBOSTON (AP) — U.S. Secret Service documents show that the agency played a key role in the investigation of free-information activist Aaron Swartz and watched his case closely until he committed suicide.

Swartz died in New York City in January as he faced trial on charges he hacked into a Massachusetts Institute of Technology archive of scholarly articles with the aim of making the information freely available.

The documents, released under the Freedom of Information Act, show the Secret Service field office in Boston secured documents and electronic devices seized during a search of Swartz's home and research office at Harvard University.

Agents also joined local police who interviewed Swartz's associates, including a San Francisco woman who told them that he called her and asked her to call his lawyer to arrange bail.

A co-founder of Reddit and activist who fought to make online content free to the public, his death prompted an outpouring of grief from prominent voices on the intersection of free speech and the Web.

Aaron Swartz, 26, hanged himself in his Brooklyn apartment weeks before he was to go on trial on accusations that he stole millions of journal articles from an electronic archive in an attempt to make them freely available. If convicted, he faced decades in prison and a fortune in fines.

http://www.myfoxny.com/Story/23124440/d ... -of-swartz
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby elfismiles » Sat Dec 21, 2013 10:31 pm

From October but I missed it ...

https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/securedrop


Freedom of the Press Foundation takes over Aaron Swartz's whistleblower project

Published time: October 15, 2013 19:35
Edited time: October 16, 2013 12:07
Image

Whistleblowers, rejoice! The Freedom of the Press Foundation is taking the helm of a secure document-submission service co-created by late computer prodigy Aaron Swartz, and wants to make it more accessible than ever.

The foundation — launched less than a year ago “to crowd-source funding for cutting-edge, independent journalism and publishing outlets” lacking mainstream support — announced early Tuesday that it has taken charge of the DeadDrop project, an endeavor announced earlier this year after the death of Swartz, a transparency advocate who co-created the system with Wired journalist Kevin Poulsen.

DeadDrop was unveiled this past May and touted at the time as being a secure-way of submitting sensitive documents to a single publication: The New Yorker. But only five months after its debut, the Freedom of the Press Foundation said it has now inherited the project from Poulsen and will try to bring it to more media outlets needed to communicate securely with sources.

In a blog post authored by the foundation's Trevor Timm and Rainey Reitman on Tuesday, they wrote that the project has been re-named SecureDrop, and within a matter of weeks it will be available to a number of journalistic outlets who've already expressed interest in getting involved.

The foundation has published the open-source instructions for SecureDrop on its website and claims “Any organization can install SecureDrop for free and can make modifications” now - not just the New Yorker.

When operating accordingly, the SecureDrop system works when an anonymous source accesses a website anonymously and provides documents to the news outlet that are encrypted and only available to select employees. Journalists and sources communicate using code words, and documents are deciphered using an air-gap computer that is never connected to the Internet.

Image
Aaron Swartz (Photo by Phillip Stearns / flickr.com)

That isn't to say it's easy to someone without a deep computer and security knowledge to get the system and up and running, however, and that's what the foundation is offering to find help for organizations who want to use SecureDrop but might need assistance.

“Freedom of the Press Foundation will also help organizations install SecureDrop and train its journalists in security best practices to ensure the best protection for sources,” the group announced on their website.

A group of independent experts, including Jacob Appelbaum of the Tor Project and security guru Bruce Schneier, audited SecureDrop in August and have since released their findings. Their initial report revealed a number of flaws that caused concern, though, and the foundation has reportedly since begun correcting those errors.

Even before revamping the system to fix those issues, though, the security experts said the system was still “technically decent” for allowing anonymous communication between sources and journalists. Since then, the foundation says it “has made a number of updates to SecureDrop based on these findings and will be making a significant investment in continually improving the system.”

“We’ve reached a time in America when the only way the press can assure the anonymity and safety of their sources is not to know who they are,” foundation co-founder John Perry Barlow said in a statement released this week. “SecureDrop is where real news can be slipped quietly under the door.”

Timm, the group's executive director, added in a statement that “A truly free press hinges on the ability of investigative journalists to build trust with their sources.”

When the foundation was unveiled last year, it initially began processing donations and contributions to whistleblower-related groups including WikiLeaks and the Center for Public Inquiry. When the military court-martial of WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning was conducted in de-facto secrecy, the foundation raised over $100,000 to hire stenographers so that the press could have transcriptions of proceedings that otherwise would not necessarily be made public.

http://rt.com/usa/swartz-press-securedrop-project-236/
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby jlaw172364 » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:47 am

That's funny. They still keep trumpeting the "fact" that he "killed himself." Yet there were no witnesses. They just found his body. I think they should just keep putting "allegedly" in front of the "killed himself" part, just for purposes of journalistic integrity. It's kind of like the articles that keep trumpeting the "fact" that Gary Webb killed himself, him being so sad and depressed from having his entire life turn to shit. Yet there were no witnesses, so nobody knows for sure, except the facts that he shot himself in the head twice. And then there is Hunter S. Thompson, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. . . . . etc. etc. etc. etc. . . . . etc. etc. etc. No witnesses = no certainty of suicide.
jlaw172364
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby FourthBase » Fri Apr 04, 2014 7:10 pm

At almost exactly the same time, late September of 2010, Aaron Swartz was also sneaking around MIT, also trespassing. Somewhere in the MIT security office archives, probably in close proximity time-wise to a report on Swartz, is a report of a Harvard punk who arrogantly slept like a slob in an MIT student lounge and had to be woken up by a security guard and removed. See, they thought I was a Harvard student because I had a bunch of Harvard pamphlets on me from wandering around that campus also, and they figured I was just disrespecting MIT by hoisting my feet up on their student lounge couch, a little like Rick James in that Dave Chappelle sketch.


Here's an interesting possibility I hadn't pondered before:
I had been shedding fat like crazy, and, well, I look a little like Swartz*?
The security guard who woke me and tossed me said something weird.
When I asked him, "Dude, what did I do wrong?" he said, "Don't pretend you don't know."
He said it in a way that was far more serious than appropriate for the occasion.
And, realize, I was hardly the only vagrant-looking student there.
Originally thought it was some school rivalry angle.
I wonder if he mistook me for Swartz?
I'd love to see those files now.

Image

*A busted, older, pastier version of him. I ain't that handsome.
“Joy is a current of energy in your body, like chlorophyll or sunlight,
that fills you up and makes you naturally want to do your best.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby Laodicean » Wed Jul 02, 2014 9:34 am

A great documentary over at Internet Archive. Link below.

The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz

The Internet's Own Boy depicts the life of American computer programmer, writer, political organizer and Internet activist Aaron Swartz. It features interviews with his family and friends as well as the internet luminaries who worked with him. The film tells his story up to his eventual suicide after a legal battle, and explores the questions of access to information and civil liberties that drove his work.


https://archive.org/details/TheInternet ... aronSwartz
User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby chump » Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:02 am

https://archive.org/details/TheInternet ... aronSwartz



”How long shall they kill our prophets while we stand aside and look?”—Bob Marley


I cried like a baby watching Aaron when he was a kid. He wears a smile in every picture I've seen of him. That kid turned into a wonderful human being - smart, principled and wa-ay ahead of the rest of us, and did so much in such a short amount of time. Every time I think about him the tears well up.

I was vaquely aware of the government's vendetta against Swartz, but never comprehended his situation. Of course, I wonder if he really killed himself; but the documentary doesn't mention any controversy, and instead focuses on his optimistic spririt and the good things he did while he was alive. We lost a great thinker who was helping to explain the world to us - and did what he could to make it a better for all. If we're lucky, he won't fade into obscurity.

Thanks for posting. Excuse me while I find a paper towel for my tears.

http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/dying
A Moment Before Dying

There is a moment, immediately before life becomes no longer worth living, when the world appears to slow down and all its myriad details suddenly become brightly, achingly apparent.

For Alex, that moment came after exactly one week of pain, seven days of searing, tormenting agony that poured forth from his belly. Alex never liked his belly. Growing up he was always fat, surrounded by a family of bellowing, rotund Americans, who had a room in their house with wall-to-wall, floor-to-ceiling cabinets, all entirely filled with bags and boxes of various pre-processed semi-organic assemblages, which they used to stuff their faces at all hours of the day.

Alex had body image issues. He’d avoid mirrors because he couldn’t bear to look at himself, his large bulbous cheeks obscuring his fine features. He avoided photos, covering his face or ducking out of the way when the click of the camera came, for the same reason: he didn’t want to be confronted with the physical evidence of his disgusting nature, thought he could not go on living if he had to face the truth.

It wasn’t until he got away from his family that he discovered his weight was not an immutable characteristic, like the fingerprints he often mused about burning off, like the dental records which had caused him so much adolescent anguish, like the DNA he’d heard so much about in school. He would take off his shirt and stare at his stomach in the full-length mirror. It was there, of course, hideous as ever, but also appreciably smaller. Its size, he realized, could change.

So Alex starved himself. Cut down from three meals a day to simply two and then to only one. And even that became superfluous most days. Alex simply wasn’t hungry.

He watched his stomach dwindle, monitored his progress on the electronic readout of his at-home scale, charted the numbers on his computer, admired the plunging trendlines.

He was doing so well. He told all his friends. The secret to losing weight, he would explain, is simply not eating. You just get used to it after a while. He looked at the beggars outside his window and refrained from giving them change so that they too could experience this miracle. He changed the channel when the radio began speaking about starvation in Africa. “Starvation isn’t so bad,” he scoffed. “You get used to it after a while.” He wondered whether the USDA thrifty food budget could be further reduced.

He stopped going out. His friends always wanted to meet him for meals, or for drinks, events in which Alex simply wasn’t interested anymore. Before long, Alex’s friends were no longer interested in him.

Alex started eating in cafés, ordering a small pastry, sitting in a comfortable chair, listening to the music play over the loudspeakers. Soon he stopped doing even that.

Alex read on the Internet about death. There was a theory, increasingly well supported, that eating is what killed you. They found that rats on extremely restricted diets, rats who ate very few calories, lived impressively long. They saw the same results with other animals, up to and including chimpanzees. They suspected, but could not prove, the same was true of humans. Every little bite of food was another step towards death.

Alex started eating again. His appetite grew as slowly as it had declined but within months he was back to eating three meals a day. Food suddenly gave him pleasure again. He savored the tastes on his tongue.

One night he and his friends decided to try a new restaurant. But when the food came, Alex couldn’t eat it. He thought it smelled funny. He let it sit there, his plate lying on the table, his food seething, untouched.

The next night Alex couldn’t sleep. He’d wake up, feeling searing pains in his stomach, as if the food winding its way through his gut had spikes and was tearing apart the walls of his intestine.

He suffered like this for days, rolling on the floor in agony, unable to resist eating but every bite he ate causing him unimaginable pain. And still, he could not stop.

Five days in, it seemed like the worst had passed. The pains came less frequently, the pains were less intense. He actually slept that night.

The day Alex killed himself, he was awoken by pains, worse than ever. He rolled back-and-forth in bed as the sun came up, the light streaming through the windows eliminating the chance for any further sleep. At 9, he was startled by a phone call. The pains subsided, as if quieting down to better hear what the phone might say.

It was his boss. He had not been to work all week. He had been fired. Alex tried to explain himself, but couldn’t find the words. He hung up the phone instead.

The day Alex killed himself, he wandered his apartment in a daze. The light streaming through the windows gave everything a golden glow, which had the odd effect of making the filth he’d become surrounded with seem cinematic.

Alex wanted to go outside for one last meal, but he had trouble making the appropriate connections. Jacket, shoes, pants, wallet. Each lay in a different spot upon the floor. Alex knew they went together, he drew lines connecting them in his mind’s eye, but it didn’t see to fix anything, his eyes just kept bouncing from one item to another.

Finally, he summoned the intelligence to put them on. The world seemed funny afterwards. He noticed the way the key turned in the lock, like a hand rotating in front of his face, an interplay of light and shadow, objects in space. He noticed the packages sitting at his doorstep, begging him to open them, but their labels insisting that they were addressed to someone else. He noticed the frail old ladies who refused to obey the walk—don’t walk signs and instead walked slowly, backs hunched, across a major intersection.

He went to a new café across the street, the one place he hadn’t been to yet. Light streamed in through the huge picture windows, making the whole place seem bright and airy. So much light, in fact, that the outside seemed a glow, as if the café was suspended in the middle of a powerful white light. People held lowered, indistinct conversations. People on his left, people on his right, people behind him. But one conversation seemed to be coming from the ceiling. It might have been a trick of the acoustics. He looked up and saw two speakers staring back at him and listened closely.

The café was not playing music. It was playing a recording of two people’s lowered, indistinct conversation.

The day Alex killed himself, he had a sudden, powerful craving for a Key Lime Sugar Cookie. It was odd the power the Key Lime Sugar Cookie had over him. Alex did not particularly like limes of any sort. In fact, the idea of an actual actual, as with all fruits, thoroughly disgusted him. He hated how when he ordered sparkling water at fancy restaurants they would place a lime wedge on the top of his glass, how he had to confront the disgusting object every time he tried to take a sip, how touching the lime, even to remove it, was so digusting as to be simply out of the question.

And yet, here it was, this cookie, with the lime flavor baked into the center and large transparent grains of sugar embedded in the top, begging for him, begging for one last taste. The cookie was sold exclusively by a publicly-traded chain of cafés that tried hard to seem international, giving itself a foreign-sounding title and printing the names of major world cities on every door, even though it had not expanded much beyond the eastern half of the United States. Alex purchased the cookie.

He noticed the way he couldn’t quite form the words to request it, simply presented the cookie in front of the cashier and twitched his head, assuming (correctly) that in context the request would be understood. He noticed the way his hands moved haphazardly to remove the appropriate amount of money from his wallet. He noticed the way his change spilled out onto the counter as he tried to find the quarter with which to complete the transaction. He noticed the way he wobbled as he walked as he took the now-purchased cookie outside.

The day Alex killed himself, he savored his one remaining cookie, the sweetness of the embedded sugar grains, the bizarre flavor of what must have been lime. He used his tongue to wipe the remaining crumbs from his teeth, tossed the now-empty bag it had come in into the trash, and stepped out into the middle of the street.

You should follow me on twitter here.

January 18, 2007
User avatar
chump
 
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby 8bitagent » Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:03 am

Just saw the "Internet's Own Boy" Aaron Swartz documentary film. Wow...I hadn't known too much about him. What a great mind, tragic loss. So this kid created the original prototype wikipedia page, created RSS, co-created Reddit.com, created open library, and from what it seems really created the infrastructure of so much of today and tomorrow's activism. And he became friends and mentor-student with the only reason I can type right now to you: Tim Brenners Lee, creator of the internet as we know it. I had no idea how instrumental he was in stopping SOPA.

He seemed like he may have had aspergers? I wonder if that plus the pressure from the justice department did him in? People laud how wonderful the Obama government has been, and yes the Obama administration has done a lot of extrordinary things Bush and Clinton sure never did social rights wise. However, I can't remember a time in modern history where so many good guys were sought after, jailed or met mysterious deaths. Aaron Swartz, Barnaby Jack and Michael Hastings all dead. Chelsea/Bradley Manning in prison for 35 years. Barret Brown. Hammon, etc. What a waste.

It's interesting they didn't hide their intentions of making an example out of Swartz...to me it's clear it wasn't about making an example or even the so called crime....it was the fact that like many revolutionaries before him, the SYSTEM saw him as a future threat. That's why they always go after revolutionaries. MLK, Lennon, Viola Luizzo, Fred Hampton, RFK, Wellstone, Manning, Hastings, etc. Either by assassination or hardcore maddening pressure.

It was remarkable at the end hearing about that visionary 14 year old medical science genius and the early pancreatic cancer screening all because of Swartz concept of freeing up journalistic knowledge.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Mon Jul 07, 2014 7:47 pm

Laodicean » Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:34 am wrote:A great documentary over at Internet Archive. Link below.

The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz

The Internet's Own Boy depicts the life of American computer programmer, writer, political organizer and Internet activist Aaron Swartz. It features interviews with his family and friends as well as the internet luminaries who worked with him. The film tells his story up to his eventual suicide after a legal battle, and explores the questions of access to information and civil liberties that drove his work.


https://archive.org/details/TheInternet ... aronSwartz


Thanks for the heads-up! I will certainly check that out.
"Huey Long once said, “Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism.” I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
-Jim Garrison 1967
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: California
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby elfismiles » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:08 pm

PDF link at the source...

http://www.theblackvault.com/m/articles ... ron-Swartz

FOIA Document Archive
Aaron Hillel Swartz (November 8, 1986 – January 11, 2013) was an American computer programmer, writer, political organizer and Internet Hacktivist.


Swartz was involved in the development of the web feed format RSS, the organization Creative Commons, the website framework web.py and the social news site, Reddit, in which he became a partner after its merger with his company, Infogami. Swartz's later work focused on sociology, civic awareness and activism.

He helped launch the Progressive Change Campaign Committee in 2009 to learn more about effective online activism. In 2010 he became a research fellow at Harvard University's Safra Research Lab on Institutional Corruption, directed by Lawrence Lessig.

He founded the online group Demand Progress, known for its campaign against the Stop Online Piracy Act. On January 6, 2011, Swartz was arrested by MIT police on state breaking-and-entering charges, after systematically downloading academic journal articles from JSTOR. Federal prosecutors later charged him with two counts of wire fraud and 11 violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, carrying a cumulative maximum penalty of $1 million in fines, 35 years in prison, asset forfeiture, restitution and supervised release.

Swartz declined a plea bargain under which he would serve six months in federal prison. Two days after the prosecution rejected a counter-offer by Swartz, he was found dead in his Brooklyn, New York apartment, where he had hanged himself.

In June 2013, Swartz was posthumously inducted into the Internet Hall of Fame. (Special thanks to Wikipedia for the above details on Swartz' life.)

Originally, this page was setup to house the FBI File of Aaron Swartz - however, the Secret Service also released a cache of records pertaining to the internet activist.

Below, you will find the original story published by The Black Vault, along with the FBI File, and the records released by the Secret Service thus far.
FBI Records

FBI File of Aaron Swartz [ 25 Pages, 1.77MB ]

FBI File on the case against Aaron Swartz (Case #288A-WF-238943) [ 87 Pages, 4.71MB ]

FBI File on the PACER system being compromised, Case #288A-WF-238943 [ 221 Pages, 6.9MB ]
Secret Service Records

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 1 [ 104 Pages, 4.38MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 2 [ 26 Pages, 1.4MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 3 [ 379 Pages, 22.59MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 3 - Spreadsheet [ 4,067 Pages, 7.71MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 3 - Photographs [ 190 Pages, 29.81MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 4 [ 1 Page, 131kb ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 5 [ 1 Page, 121kb ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 6 [ 1 Page, 128kb ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 7 [ 7 Pages, 450kb ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 8 [ 237,397 Pages, 424.35MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 9 [ 90 Pages, 4.21MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 10 [ 259 Pages, 21.54MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 11 [ 17 Pages, 930kb ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 12 (Not yet released by the Secret Service)

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 13 [ 254 Pages, 19.76MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 14 [ 9 Pages, 0.7MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 15 [ 13 Pages, 1.2MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 16 [ 547 Pages, 21.64MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 17 [ 403 Pages, 12.69MB ]

Secret Service Response to Request for Aaron Swartz' Records Part 18 [ 2 Pages, 0.15MB ]

http://www.theblackvault.com/m/articles ... ron-Swartz
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby Grizzly » Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:27 pm

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/30 ... n_founder/

Debian GNU/Linux founder Ian Murdock has died. He was 42.

Murdock, who lived in San Francisco, is best known for creating the open-source distro in 1993. He had just last month started working for tech startup Docker in the city.

Debian guru ... Ian Murdock

On Monday afternoon, he posted a string of distressing and erratic tweets, revealing he had been arrested near his home by police, accused of assaulting an officer, and taken to hospital. He also threatened to kill himself. After people reached out to him, Murdock appeared to calm down, and vowed instead to clear his name. Murdock died that evening. His Twitter account has since been disabled.



https://voat.co/v/technology/comments/756941

Excerpts:

i'm committing suicide tonight.. do not intervene as i have many stories to tell and do not want them to die with me #debian #runnerkristy67

I'll write more on my blog later. But the police here beat me up for knowing on my neighbor's door.. they sent me to the hospital.

My bail for "assault against a police officer" are all that: $25,000.

They still don't have cameras on all police so I'm going to use my somewhat celebrity to hopefully stop this.

Quote: "We're the police, we always win."

My career is over now, so I'll be gone soon.

Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.

they followed me home

then they pulled me out of my house and did it again

This was right after the female officer ripped off my underwear.. I guess that's not considered rape if you're not a woman being raped.

I am a white male, make a lot money, pay a lot of money in taxes, and yet their abuse is equally doned out. DO NOT CROSS THEM!



Ian Murdock, founder of Debian, has died. His twitter feed suggests he was having issues with police abuse and was planning to report on the subject immediately before his demise. He claims to have updated his blog, but his blog shows no updates.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/com ... _died_his/

The way the has unfolded is complete bullshit, none of his posts were erratic. Angry, yes, pithy, yes, not erratic well, not until the last one which I suspect he didn't write... emphasis mine in bold above. Welcome to jackboot Merica.
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby elfismiles » Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:20 pm

:tear
W-T-F?
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Aaron Swartz

Postby Rory » Fri Jan 08, 2016 1:06 pm

Was just reading about Murdoch today - did he die in police custody? Seems very shady..
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests