Jerky » Thu May 28, 2015 8:49 pm wrote:Aside from the colossal Todashev fuck-up by the FBI,
You would, wouldn't you? You would call it a "fuck-up" ("Oops!"), to protect your Authorities. Of course you would, because that's what they tell you to do.
It was a brutal and blatantly obvious murder by your Authorities. Yet another murder-by-cop. The murder of a witness who had already expressed his fear that the FBI would kill him.
I have seen nothing to indicate that what went down in Boston on that day isn't what it so obviously seems to be.
What is this information worth? Jerky has seen nothing. So what? Why should it interest anyone what you have not seen, or claim not to have seen? There your "argument" ends, i.e. before it even begins.
How, in any case, could you see anything to indicate anything, with your head so firmly buried where it is so firmly buried? How could light even begin to penetrate the inner sanctum of Jerky?
Nor have I seen any evidence that the court case was a fascist kangaroo court.
See above. Once again you inform us your fascinating inability to see. Thanks for that, we might have missed it first time. And it constitutes your entire "argument" (again). In any case, how could it possibly be "a fascist kangaroo court" when it is the court of your Authorities? Contradiction in terms, for you. Case closed, for you. Nothing to see. Ergo, move on.
And you haven't followed a single link posted here, have you? You engage with precisely nothing.
It's all just hot air billowing out of Mac's rather prodigious blow-hole.
What a hero you are. In there fighting the good fight, fearlessly engaging in vigorous and honest debate, questioning the Authorities and your own prejudices, posting loads of relevant information to back up your claims, rebutting and refuting the work of (say) Russ Baker and Rick Raznikov with your fine analytical mind and your sharply-honed argumentative ski Seeing nothing because you refuse to look, then boasting about that repeatedly as if it were a rather prodigious achievement.