Page 5 of 5

Re: Rockefeller consensus- the good, the bad and the ugly

PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 8:29 am
by Sounder
Thanks for the vid Grizzly.

The senior Rockefeller reportedly said that he cheats his children to show how the world works, -presumably.

As the vid illustrates, that fortune and power at every step was and is built on cheating.

It does not seem likely for Maurice Strong to be made the head of Petro Canada at age 25, unless he could parrot Mr. Rockefellers value set back at him in a fairly effectively way.

Surely Maurice Strong was a cheater also.

Re: Rockefeller consensus- the good, the bad and the ugly

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:40 am
by Sounder

Re: Rockefeller consensus- the good, the bad and the ugly

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2020 6:58 pm
by Sounder ... es/5711818

.....He went to his buddy Andrew Carnegie – another plutocrat who made his money from monopolizing the steel industry – who devised a scheme. From the prestigious Carnegie Foundation, they sent a man named Abraham Flexner to travel around the country and report on the status of medical colleges and hospitals around the country.

This led to the Flexner Report, which gave birth to the modern medicine as we know it.

Needless to say, the report talked about the need for revamping and centralizing our medical institutions. Based on this report, more than half of all medical colleges were soon closed.

Homeopathy and natural medicines were mocked and demonized; and doctors were even jailed.

To help with the transition and to change the minds of other doctors and scientists, Rockefeller gave more than $100 million to colleges and hospitals, and founded a philanthropic front group called “General Education Board” (GEB). This is the classic carrot and stick approach.

In a very short time, medical colleges were all streamlined and homogenized. All the students were learning the same thing, and medicine was all about using patented drugs.

Scientists received huge grants to study how plants cured diseases, but their goal was to first identify which chemicals in the plant were effective, and then recreate a similar chemical –but not identical — in the lab that could be patented.

A pill for an ill became the mantra for modern medicine.

And you thought Koch brothers were evil?

So, now we are, 100 years later, churning out doctors who know nothing about the benefits of nutrition or herbs or any holistic practices. We have an entire society that is enslaved to corporations for its well-being.

America spends 15% of its GDP on healthcare, which should be really called “sick care.” It is focused not on cure, but only on symptoms, thus creating repeat customers. There is no cure for cancer, diabetes, autism, asthma, or even flu.

Why would there be real cures? This is a system founded by oligarchs and plutocrats, not by doctors.

As for cancer, oh yeah, the American Cancer Society was founded by none other than Rockefeller in 1913.

Yeah, oh boy, the miracles of modern medicine. Stolen from the plant world while demonizing those that knew the particulars of their benefits. That is what the Doctor supports.

Re: Rockefeller consensus- the good, the bad and the ugly

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2020 4:34 pm
by Sounder
The plan has been in the works for awhile. This a talk with Harry Vox from 2014