dada » Fri Jun 18, 2021 11:29 am wrote:Maybe we could unpack this a bit, I think it gets at what I see to be the basic "social dilemma" in mass culture. Our dear leader of the free world makes official statement displaying complete ignorance of historical fact. Now Russia can't reply officially, setting the record straight, because then it looks like saying, "our meddling is nothing compared to America's meddling."
Actually, at his press conference Putin went into a lot of this (not all) in detail.
But "setting the record straight" does have a home in mainstream media, in the mainstream alternative represented by corporate outfits like RT and offguardian.
Off-Guardian is corporate?
The question then is what will help most, reinforcing the social structure of mass culture, or staying out of it, letting mass culture unfold without a transgressive voice to rally against. So it's like a matter of a pushing of society, a kind of social accelerationism, or letting it go on its merry way without interruption. The dilemma is in figuring out which tactic to take at each moment, to help bring the society of mass culture to its ultimate and inevitable breakdown point sooner rather than later.
Usually the answer will have to be to attempt set the record straight, because otherwise it's an unassailable monopoly. True enough that the 'transgression' serves as sand to the making of more propaganda pearls. Also, I differ about which is likelier to accelerate the 'inevitable breakdown', or that it's inevitable.
As pathetic as it sounds, to quote Hedges on his interminable RT promo they've been running for years already: 'Squeak we must'.
.