The Dark Enlightenment

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The Dark Enlightenment

Postby nomo » Mon Dec 30, 2013 1:13 am

http://www.vocativ.com/12-2013/dark-enl ... seriously/
The Dark Enlightenment: The Creepy Internet Movement You’d Better Take Seriously

They may believe in the Dark Side of the Force, but these Sith Lords aren't joking around

Blossoming on the Internet like a fetid rose, a mysterious new political movement has generated a serious and not un-terrifying critique of modern society. Its members are loud and growing in number, and they demand nothing less than the elimination of the democratic system. Mostly white, male and angry, they lie in wait for the imminent collapse of civilization.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Dark Enlightenment. The Empire is striking back.

Much as Christianity grew out of the cult-sodden ferment of the Roman-occupied Middle East, the Dark Enlightenment has sprouted from the hyper-anxious anti-liberalism precincts in the darker recesses of the Internet.

So we’ve dug deep into the Web, where the movement lurks. We’ve talked online to its philosopher king, Nick Land, and we’ve conversed with his faceless adherents.


Image

Here's a quick FAQ sheet on the nascent movement:

What is the Dark Enlightenment? As the term suggests, the Dark Enlightenment is an ideological analysis of modern democracy that harshly rejects the vision of the 18th century European Enlightenment—a period punctuated by the development of empirical science, the rise of humanist values and the first outburst of revolutionary democratic reform. In contrast, the Dark Enlightenment advocates an autocratic and neo-monarchical society. Its belief system is unapologetically reactionary, almost feudal.

Image

The many bloggers who constitute the movement style themselves as "Dark Lords of the Sith," self-described fearless truth-tellers, who—mixing their cinematic metaphors—offer Matrix-evocative "red pills" of awakening in the form of sulfurous conclusions about the state of the world. Indeed, questioning the prevailing Western narrative is typically a Dark Enlightenment writer's modus operandi, skewering the values of the liberal establishment.

Image

Image

Where does the term Dark Enlightenment come from? Inspired by the pugnacious writings of Mencius Moldbug, the prolific blogger who serves as the movement's unofficial center of gravity, the neologism is the creation of philosopher Nick Land. In 2012, Land wrote an impressively thorough manifesto titled simply The Dark Enlightenment, which boldly articulates the movement's central thesis: "For the hardcore neo-reactionaries, democracy is not merely doomed, it is doom itself. Fleeing it approaches an ultimate imperative." The essay continues, "[Neo-reaction] conceives the dynamics of democratization as fundamentally degenerative: systematically consolidating and exacerbating private vices, resentments, and deficiencies until they reach the level of collective criminality and comprehensive social corruption." No, this isn't your grandpa's conservatism. (Unless your grandpa was General Franco.)
Image

Image

As for Mr. Moldbug? Yes, he does exist, and no, that is not his real name. (That would be Curtis Yarvin.) You can find plenty of photos and video that document his many conference appearances. Mostly, though, Moldbug—who lives in the San Francisco area and works in the software industry—blogs and blogs and blogs.

Image

What do they believe? Post-red pill awakening, liberal progressivism is seen as a state religion, an unquestioned humanist ideology that determines all outcomes and silences dissenters through dismissal. It's a worldview generated and sustained by the mechanisms of the system itself. Moldbug has given that system the ecclesiastical label of the Cathedral. Seeing the Cathedral for what it is marks the first step to becoming darkly enlightened.
Image

What is the Cathedral? According to Land and Moldbug, the Cathedral is a complex ideology network built atop the university system, the media (run and operated by graduates of the former) and employees of the bureaucracy, all of whom grow ever more dependent on the perpetuation of the Cathedral. The leveling mechanisms of democracy—with its race-to-the-bottom vote begging (buying) and illusions of social empowerment—remove any possibility of inventive political solutions, or, eventually, rational analysis. Inside the Cathedral, any questioning of democracy's legitimacy is sacrilege. Before long, apostates will find penance by buying indulgences (like, say, Obamacare), whether they like it or not.

Image

Why pay attention to a niche movement of political extremists who pine for the good old days of European feudalism? Because these guys mean business. The Dark Enlightenment's desire to raze the democratic edifice of modern civilization opens the movement to darker and more subversive views. Nowhere is this more evident than its focus on human biodiversity, or HBD in insider parlance.
Image

What is HBD? Human biodiversity is the rejection of the "blank state" of human nature. Creepily obsessed with statistics that demonstrate IQ differences between the races, the darkly enlightened see social hierarchies as determined not by culture or opportunity but by the cold, hard destiny embedded in DNA. One blogger calls it “The Voldemort View” (adding Harry Potter to the Star Wars/Matrix mix), claiming that, “mean differences in group IQs are the most likely explanation for the academic achievement gap in racial and SES [socioeconomic status] groups.”

Image

Cue the adherents of The Bell Curve, eugenics enthusiasts, believers in white supremacy and sympathizers of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. In the Dark Enlightenment, we seem to have stumbled across a place where pseudo-intellectually grounded racism is flourishing in a way it hasn’t since before World War II.

In our discussion, Land was explicit in his view on this: "HBD, broadly conceived, is simply a fact. It is roughly as questionable, on intellectual grounds, as biological evolution or the heliocentric model of the solar system. No one who takes the trouble to educate themselves on the subject with even a minimum of intellectual integrity can doubt that."

Unsurprisingly, the Dark Lords of the Sith despise modernity's preoccupation with “equality,” viewing it as a triumph of democratic ideology over science.

Did I mention that almost all of the darkly enlightened are white men?

Is this fascism? Desire for genetically determined ruling classes, distrust of popular democratic reform, distaste for the aesthetic standards of mass culture, and nausea over the political correctness of modern life—the Dark Enlightenment does have all the markings of a true neo-fascist movement. It's here that the dangers of the Dark Enlightenment are hard to dismiss.

Image

I asked Land the fascism question, specifically. His response was illuminating: “The Dark Enlightenment is the only cultural space promising an intelligent discussion of fascism today. Even though this discussion remains very germinal, the best fascist and anti-fascist arguments are to be found within its environs.” But he adds, “Speaking entirely personally, I think the DE is the only coherent antidote to fascist thinking presently available.” While he didn't articulate how an anti-democratic, racially charged, anti-modern, authoritarian political movement could be, in any way, anti-fascist, he's a bright enough guy. I'm sure he has an answer.

What is their blind spot? My immersion into the hermetic truths of the Sith Lords left me wondering  what exactly they saw as so disastrous about modern society. The world is richer, healthier, less poor, less violent, and able to access more information than ever before. Even in the developed West, in America, the very Vatican of The Cathedral, poverty and economic turbulence cause less death and suffering than they did only decades ago. And Europe, despite its recent near-economic collapse and massive unemployment, looks more like a comfortable, retired continent than a truly suffering one. None of which is to deny or minimize the problems of modern society. It’s only to suggest that the solution may not be a return to monarchy and rigid racial castes. Anyone read much about how great things were in 14th century Europe?

Could the Dark Enlightenment become a major political movement? Probably not. To acquire momentum in the real world, the systems of modern democratic capitalism would have to suffer a blow far more damaging than any received so far. If it does, the members of the Dark Enlightenment believe they will be in position to take over.

For now, though, the Dark Enlightenment will remain an archipelago of diverse worldviews—Catholic fundamentalism, xenophobic ethno-Nationalism, techno-singulatarian futurism, neofascism—united mostly by their disavowal of modernity. And maybe a little alienation. White alpha-males aren't what they used to be.

But if the movement is diffuse and barely organized, its members are smart and riled up. And it's no coincidence that Dark Enlightenment advocates would be the ones to rule (again) should their philosophy become dominant.

Image

What's the verdict? In the end, the Dark Enlightenment should be taken seriously at least by anyone interested in contemporary political thought; its beliefs are reasonably argued and its leading writers can be an engrossing read. And it is becoming increasingly evident that major structural reform, maybe radical in nature, could be what America requires if it is to continue to flourish in the 21st century.

Still, something essential is always left out of the neoreactionary equation. Universal equality and classical democracy are not synonymous with an all-purpose, lowest-common-denominator leveling of mankind. Rather, they speak only to an existential fairness in which each of us has the right to value, direct and make meaning of our own lives.

May the Force be with you.
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby nomo » Mon Dec 30, 2013 1:56 am

Enlightenment is not only a state, but an event, and a process. As the designation for an historical episode, concentrated in northern Europe during the 18th century, it is a leading candidate for the ‘true name’ of modernity, capturing its origin and essence (‘Renaissance’ and ‘Industrial Revolution’ are others). Between ‘enlightenment’ and ‘progressive enlightenment’ there is only an elusive difference, because illumination takes time – and feeds on itself, because enlightenment is self-confirming, its revelations ‘self-evident’, and because a retrograde, or reactionary, ‘dark enlightenment’ amounts almost to intrinsic contradiction. To become enlightened, in this historical sense, is to recognize, and then to pursue, a guiding light.

There were ages of darkness, and then enlightenment came. Clearly, advance has demonstrated itself, offering not only improvement, but also a model. Furthermore, unlike a renaissance, there is no need for an enlightenment to recall what was lost, or to emphasize the attractions of return. The elementary acknowledgement of enlightenment is already Whig history in miniature.

Reasoning that the majority of humankind will not voluntarily accept qualitative population-management policies, Campbell points out that any attempt to raise the IQ of the whole human race would be tediously slow. He further points out that the general thrust of early eugenics was not so much species improvement as the prevention of decline. Campbell’s eugenics, therefore, advocates the abandonment of Homo sapiens as a ‘relic’ or ‘living fossil’ and the application of genetic technologies to intrude upon the genome, probably writing novel genes from scratch using a DNA synthesizer. Such eugenics would be practiced by elite groups, whose achievements would so quickly and radically outdistance the usual tempo of evolution that within ten generation the new groups will have advanced beyond our current form to the same degree that we transcend apes.

When seen from the bionic horizon, whatever emerges from the dialectics of racial terror remains trapped in trivialities. It’s time to move on.


Full text of Nick Land's "The Dark Enlightenment".
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby mulebone » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:14 am

Cool, more yahoos who want to run the world. That's fucking original.
Y'all should have coupled this thread with the one on the coming techno "meritocracy" and called it "The Real Revenge Of The Nerds."

Is there anyone, other than dorky white guys, who write "manifestos?" Better yet, is there anyone, other than dorky white guys, who think that sprinkling Star Wars & Harry Potter references throughout their "manifestos" make them look like anything other than dorky white guys having a tantrum?

I suppose that we can thank the Internet for shitheads like Nicky. In the past, he'd have been confined to a soap box, a sandwich board & maybe a badly mimeographed screed left at bus stops. But now he gets to lead a "movement." Fucking awesome. Ain't technology grand?

Hopefully Nick has an army of muscle bound buddies because he doesn't look like he'd last 3 minutes in a fist fight.

Although, I'm thinking that Nick's mom needs to take away his Star Wars action figure collection until he promises to make nice with the other children. The world will thank her in the end.

How does one present a screed-like "manifesto" in 3-D Land anyway? Maybe you're sitting at a bar & the guy next to you strikes up a conversation. You chat about sports for a bit...or maybe women...and he suddenly says, "Would like to read my ranting explanation of everything?"

Or ladies, maybe you're on your third date. Maybe dinner. You're thinking that you kind of like the guy but you're still not sure until, over dessert, he makes up your mind for you by insisting that you read his 7 part "manifesto." You quickly excuse yourself with the bathroom lie and quietly sneak out a side door, hail a cab & get as far fucking away from the creepy lunatic as you can possibly get, vowing to never ever ever date someone that you met on a conspiracy web forum again.
Well Robert Moore went down heavy
With a crash upon the floor
And over to his thrashin' body
Betty Coltrane she did crawl.
She put the gun to the back of his head
And pulled the trigger once more
And blew his brains out
All over the table.
mulebone
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby 8bitagent » Mon Dec 30, 2013 6:46 am

So a few 25-40 year old nerds decided to LARP mid 90's cyberpunk-esque usegroup tropes parred with Anders Brevik pan-anglo mumbo jumbo writings. It's like TED Talks for crypto libertarian fascists...using
the same masturbatory mouth flapping as their smarmy PC trendoid counterparts. "Hey I just found my older brother's Boyd Rice tapes, copy of 2600 magazine and Turner Diaries...just smoked a fat blunt
and watched The Matrix...I think I'll make a manifesto on tumblr...it'll be like the Men's Rights section on Reddit, mixed with a dash of 4chan and trans humanism fan fics"

snooze.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby Hammer of Los » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:57 pm

...

If that's the Sith, we ain't got nuthin' to worry about.

...
Hammer of Los
 
Posts: 3309
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby BrandonD » Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:35 pm

mulebone » Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:14 am wrote:Y'all should have coupled this thread with the one on the coming techno "meritocracy" and called it "The Real Revenge Of The Nerds."


That pretty much sums it up. The peanut butter of powerlessness coupled with the chocolate of entitlement.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
User avatar
BrandonD
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:12 pm

I like to read Menicius Moldbug, who has the virtue of being the most eloquent, well-read and flagrantly "problematic" of the bunch.

Most of the, uh, movement, such as it is, cannot even be caricatured; it is mere cracker trolling, sneering racism & sexism, and a Generation Z reboot for the odiously dumb work of Charles Murray.

Still: I would recommend Moldbug, who is even more offensive, to many of you here at RI. His work on "Cathedral" is richly useful stuff.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby 0_0 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:29 pm

This is the best christmas present ever
posted by Ray Walston, Luck Dragon at 9:39 PM on December 29 [4 favorites]


Is this the gibberish workshop? Sorry I'm late, parking was murder.
posted by Divine_Wino at 9:42 PM on December 29 [42 favorites]


such campers

very loa

much majick

wow
posted by emmtee at 9:49 PM on December 29 [79 favorites]


It helps that whenever I see a mention of this crap I always, always parse it as Dark Carnival, and I'm like oh yeah, that's the thing where Juggalos want to bring back feudalism.
posted by emmtee at 9:56 PM on December 29 [33 favorites]


via http://www.metafilter.com/135201/The-Dark-Enlightenment
playmobil of the gods
0_0
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 9:13 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby American Dream » Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:36 pm

The Darkness Before the Right

A right-wing politics for the coming century is taking shape. And it’s not slowing down.

by Park MacDougald September 28, 2015

Image


It’s hard to talk seriously about something with a silly name, and neoreaction is no exception. At first glance, it appears little more than a fever swamp of feudal misogynists, racist programmers, and “fascist teenage dungeon master[s],” gathering on subreddits to await the collapse of Western civilization. Neoreaction—aka NRx or the Dark Enlightenment—combines all of the awful things you always suspected about libertarianism with odds and ends from PUA culture, Victorian Social Darwinism, and an only semi-ironic attachment to absolutism. Insofar as neoreactionaries have a political project, it’s to dissolve the United States into competing authoritarian seasteads on the model of Singapore; they’re nebbish Nazis with Bitcoin wallets, and they’re practically begging to be shoved in a locker.


Continues at: http://www.theawl.com/2015/09/good-luck-to-human-kind
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:57 pm

Wombaticus Rex » Mon Dec 30, 2013 7:12 pm wrote:I like to read Menicius Moldbug, who has the virtue of being the most eloquent, well-read and flagrantly "problematic" of the bunch.


I've since moved on to Nick Land although, truly, he's barely occupying the NRx word cloud, being a far stranger specimen than your average Rhodesia cosplay fan. His horizons are too broad to accuse him of being remotely political.

I'm very interested in how 2nd generation NRx gets operationalized. You can already see, in group projects like The Future Primaeval, the growing undercurrent of "So what do we do now?" Moldbug's answer does not satisfy young men of action, since it boils down to "Become Worthy and Wait for Power to be Handed to You." (No, seriously.) This formulation has come to be known as Passivism, and it's a big part of why hand-wringing scare pieces about neoreaction as future uberfascist threat are so fucking hilarious to me.

Still, there's too much cognitive capital in NRx for it to amount to nothing. It will probably evolve into a vocabulary / conceptual set of tools for other movements entirely. I think one example of that is the group project at Mitrailleuse, which is pretty f'ing impossible to reduce to some single Ism or Ology -- just a polyglot mess of thoughtcrimes, historical essays, and surprisingly diverse contributors, geographically, racially, and even in terms of gender distribution, which is interesting because NRx is, uh...well, there's no polite way to describe the proverbial sausage fest, yeah?

Anyways. The current ecosystem of Thinkpieces About NRx is very incestuous, mostly based on one another's work rather than any real engagement with the alleged subject of the conversation.

If NRx emerges as the new face of American Fascism, that's kind of the best possible outcome. I'll take that over know-nothing theocrats or pedophile billionaires.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby General Patton » Sat Nov 07, 2015 8:10 pm

Wombaticus Rex » Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:57 pm wrote:I've since moved on to Nick Land


Image

I'm very interested in how 2nd generation NRx gets operationalized. You can already see, in group projects like The Future Primaeval, the growing undercurrent of "So what do we do now?" Moldbug's answer does not satisfy young men of action, since it boils down to "Become Worthy and Wait for Power to be Handed to You." (No, seriously.) This formulation has come to be known as Passivism, and it's a big part of why hand-wringing scare pieces about neoreaction as future uberfascist threat are so fucking hilarious to me.


NRx has been narrowed down to the following:

*Antidem trolling TheRightStuff's forums. Something something jews, something something IQ. No one has banned him, maybe he boosts the page refresh rate or something.

*Clarkhat indeterminately being for and not for NRx depending on the alignment of the planets

*Bryce the AnarchoPapist coming back after he finishes his sexchange

*Mike Anissimov sitting in a corner yelling after he shit on everyone with crazy rants and doxing attempts. Most of the movement went out of it's way to defend the crazy fucker for well over a year after it was apparent he is not all there. Enterprising trolls used creative fiction to illustrate his various insecurities.

*White Nationalists/Volkists who got "kicked" out of the movement but went on to get their hate tweets in the NYTimes and numerous other big name publications and catch the attention of GOP strategists who loathe them with a fiery passion. GOP strategists who make $1,000 an hour talking out of their ass actually browse various niche 8chan boards just to keep on eye on what they're doing. That's part of the reason Trump made them shit a brick.

*Nick B. Steve's Hestia society. Spoiler alert: It's very boring.

*Justine Tunney, who keeps on advocating for a corporate monarchy where Google is god of everything.

*SoapJackle, who was never really part of the group and spends his time in-between JackleHour hangouts slowly freezing to death in Alaska.

*The orcbrand group of orcs.

*Kantbot, who trolled everyone in NRx so hard that he was banned... from essentially everything. He now spends his days posting things like the following:

Decline and Fall is a great book because it's completely misappropriated by Conservatives who clearly have never read it.


I sort of agree with the official NRx position that sedituous groups should be suppressed, like the early Christians or NRx.


*Nick Land's group - full of devotees who are willing to overlook his previous explorations including cyber-feminism and shades of Marxism in favor of new territory involving, uh... stuff.

*Rachel Haywire, who actually managed to launch her own e-mag Trigger Warning and a few other things. Note that she is a Jew and TheRightStuff (a firmly white nationalist board), along with other ethno-nats despise her, in no small part because of the success she has had so far compared to some of them. She is a self-described "conservative", which is an extremely creative usage of the term, but she has given voice to people who would otherwise be in the wilderness.

Using B.J. Fogg's behavior grid I can scientifically determine that Rachel is the only person out of the bunch that does not suffer from extreme debilitating autism:

Image


(note that doing something out of your routine is a sign that you do not suffer from soul-crushing levels of autism)


Still, there's too much cognitive capital in NRx for it to amount to nothing. I

cognitive capital


:rofl2


it will probably evolve into a vocabulary / conceptual set of tools for other movements entirely. I think one example of that is the group project at Mitrailleuse, which is pretty f'ing impossible to reduce to some single Ism or Ology -- just a polyglot mess of thoughtcrimes, historical essays, and surprisingly diverse contributors, geographically, racially, and even in terms of gender distribution, which is interesting because NRx is, uh...well, there's no polite way to describe the proverbial sausage fest, yeah?


They are more creative than groups that came before them.
штрафбат вперед
User avatar
General Patton
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby tapitsbo » Sat Nov 07, 2015 8:24 pm

Who wants to live under a neoreactionary regime anyways? Seems like the worst excesses of the current system exaggerated and with the sugar coating ripped off.

In times when it's easy to find meaningless stimulation people are getting tired of hedonistic bribes for tech-gnostic/singularity agendas, or so I hope, at least.


In my wild fantasies our species has a lot of spiritual evolution left and can bypass Silicon Valley/Singapore nightmares. Here's to hoping that the preludes to full-blown Terran/Cosmist wars feature lots of destabilization, chaos, and loss of momentum for the worst of this stuff :lovehearts:
tapitsbo
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Sun Nov 08, 2015 12:02 am

Rachel Haywire is NRx? That is fantastic. Had no idea.

Aye, cognitive capital - I was working in state government when that first started making the rounds, and seeing it on Xenosystems yesterday cracked me up. As I typed that, I was thinking of Mises, which verily has vast stores of cognitive capital invested and it's just a bunch of hardbound editions of comment section rants. Or, you know, here at RI.

Anyways, I was hoping for bitcoin hedge funded RV farms by now. Let a thousand Andrija Puharichs bloom. Fanged Nuomena was sufficiently incomprehensible that I have no problem believing there was "cyber-feminism" in the mix. Always thought Deleuze & Guattari, de Landa, etc, were a similar species of word salad - fertile reading but not necessarily coherent writing.

NRx should get co-opted, stolen and manipulated as often as possible & as soon as possible. Worked for "Bob."

Image
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby General Patton » Sun Nov 08, 2015 12:12 am

Wombaticus Rex » Sat Nov 07, 2015 11:02 pm wrote:Rachel Haywire is NRx? That is fantastic. Had no idea.


She is but she isn't.
штрафбат вперед
User avatar
General Patton
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Dark Enlightenment

Postby Luther Blissett » Sun Nov 08, 2015 12:20 am

Wombaticus Rex » Sat Nov 07, 2015 11:02 pm wrote:NRx should get co-opted, stolen and manipulated as often as possible & as soon as possible. Worked for "Bob."


Say, that's a great idea.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests