Just had major UFO Sighting

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby LilyPatToo » Sat May 17, 2014 11:52 am

BrandonD » 15 May 2014 15:11 wrote:
Luther Blissett » Thu May 15, 2014 12:22 pm wrote:Just to go on record offering a dissenting opinion against ufos consisting entirely of psychological phenomena. I've written about it before on here, but my entire extended family (consisting of both maternal grandparents, three uncles and my mother), family friends consisting of two parents and four or five boys, all had a close-proximity, daytime, half-hour plus sighting of a UFO during a camping trip in Montana in 1959. Both adult men were pilots, and my grandfather had thousands of hours of flight time by the time of the sighting and was an expert in flight technology and experimental craft. The UFO that they saw was solid, metallic, and had counter-rotating separate moving parts and visible fins.

We believe that in this instance, a tulpa can be reasonably ruled out for any number of reasons. And I believe that this was an exceptionally high-quality sighting, and if it was a nuts and bolts craft it be a reasonable assumption that there have been other nuts and bolts crafts sighted as well.


Thank you for that account, if you don't mind me asking how fast were the parts rotating on the craft?

It is my impression that what I saw were physical crafts as well.

This whole idea of tulpas occasionally strikes me like an elaborate and desperate attempt to dismiss UFOs as fictitious. Why do people feel inclined to replace one unbelievable theory with another equally unbelievable theory? Tulpas are apparently objects that we've magically conjured up from our subconscious and projected into physical reality - Isn't that 100% as outlandish, or even more so, than the idea of physical objects that in some way defy our modern conceptions of physics?

I'm not saying they're definitely NOT tulpas, when you get to this level of weirdness I do not rule anything out - but like I mentioned before these things definitely did not seem to be aware that I was watching, or connected to my consciousness in any way. I'm well-versed in all the UFO/abduction literature and was instinctively taking notes of the experience and how it compared to what I've read in the past. I've recently been listening to a lot of Richard Dolan's podcasts and he often tells his story of the bright UFO in the daylight sky and how it seemed to be aware that he was watching, and his strange sense of knowing that if he looked away then it would disappear. Well the first UFO actually did disappear from my view (obscured by trees) which is why I crossed the street over to the parking lot, and when I got over to the parking lot it was still floating there, along with a second craft.

This experience does not seem to share any of the qualities associated with those "consciousness interactive" UFO experiences that I've read about. It really seems better explained as 2 physical objects. Though I am certainly not ignoring the fact that there is a great deal of "grey area" in this subject with regard to what we think we know about our own minds and external reality.


My old bookmarks on the occurrence have vanished from the web, but there was a stunning tulpa generated by, of all people, a bunch of scientists at Lawrence Livermore Lab many years ago. IIRC, it was also mentioned in a book, but I can find no mention of it online now.

The UFO I saw one evening in Indiana, PA in the mid-60's was just of a glowing oval that rose in front of a dark, wooded hillside. But it turned out to have been a mass sighting shared by a houseful of people who were much closer to it. Still don't know wtf it was, though, because it was featureless, even up close. Large, though, the other witnesses said, so not a candle/balloon hoax, unless someone had access to a really giant balloon.

My home town was having a UFO flap then, with many sightings, but some really amazing reports came from credible people who couldn't believe no one else saw what they saw. I think it has a lot to do with how much attention you pay to the sky--I've found that even my astronomy-buff husband misses all sorts of things that I see because it's been a habit of mine to look up ever since my own sighting.

LilyPat
User avatar
LilyPatToo
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Oakland, CA USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sat May 17, 2014 8:32 pm

I've just a moment and have skipped several postings on the previous page to say this, Luther was the first to mention Tulpas and I was not referring to tulpas in my earlier remarks, but rather to yonis.

In no way does this diminish the experience of others nor is it in any way demeaning to those, like me, who believe in the existence of aircraft that fail human understanding.

I was going to joke that the mechanical counter-rotating bladed craft with fins was an old nazi craft piloted by aryans visiting from their Antarctic base.

I sincerely believe we're observing several different forms of vehicles of some sort, whether they are nothing more than discarnate beings from this plane or planet or elsewhere.

Some certainly appear to be ethereal, some appear to be nuts n bolts rigid, and many appear to be plastic. The rolling pyramid shaped craft truly blow my mind.

And those of you who have been abducted know full well, and far better than I, that all sorts of intelligent creatures can be found within some. And I'm truly sorry you have had such a terrifying experience.

Just because you do not believe in the reality of traveling thought forms or super corporal alien life forms does not they do no exist.

We all have had experiences beyond explanation that were unique to us.

Edited once to remove extraneous words from last sentence above and to add for clarification: I don't think anyone has suggested ufos believed by witnesses to be metallic are actually only mental manifestations, but some do suggest at least some of the shape shifting, self-dividing, color changing orb-types could be.
Last edited by Iamwhomiam on Sat May 17, 2014 11:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby Nordic » Sat May 17, 2014 10:41 pm

lillyPatToo wrote:

My old bookmarks on the occurrence have vanished from the web, but
there was a stunning tulpa generated by, of all people, a bunch of
scientists at Lawrence Livermore Lab many years ago. IIRC, it was also
mentioned in a book, but I can find no mention of it online now.


Well that's quite an eyebrow raiser for me, because the UFO I remember seeing, and I remember it quite well, was in Livermore, CA while sitting on the front step of my house. At the time my Dad was working at the Lawrence Radiation Lab.

I was between the ages of 4 and 6 at the time which would have put it between 1966 and 1969.

Any idea of when the above mentioned event took place?
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby jingofever » Sun May 18, 2014 12:04 am

LilyPatToo » 17 May 2014 15:52 wrote:My old bookmarks on the occurrence have vanished from the web, but there was a stunning tulpa generated by, of all people, a bunch of scientists at Lawrence Livermore Lab many years ago. IIRC, it was also mentioned in a book, but I can find no mention of it online now.


"You can't go home again":

One of the most fascinating accounts in Schnabel's book describes the "haunting" of Livermore Laboratory. Between it and Los Alamos, much of the US military's nuclear weapons R&D was conducted there. By the mid-70s, a number of Livermore personnel had learned of SRI's program, and become sufficiently alarmed by the security implications that they decided to investigate psychic phenomena for themselves. As Schabel tells it, "the Livermore group quickly found themselves involved in more strangeness than they could handle...they began to feel that they were collectively possessed by some kind of tormenting, teasing, hallucination-inducing spirit."

Both in the laboratory and at home, Livermore scientists and their families began experiencing visions. Sometimes in the middle of a room, an "almost comically stereotypical" image of a UFO would appear, "always about eight inches across, in a gray, fuzzy monochrome, as if it were some kind of hologram." (Interestingly, a similar phenomenon was observed by participants in the five-year "Scole Experiment", researching life after death. "On one occasion," writes Robin Foy, "we even witnessed a miniature UFO flying around the cellar where we held our sessions.")
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby Elvis » Sun May 18, 2014 12:33 am

Nordic » Sat May 17, 2014 7:41 pm wrote:lillyPatToo wrote:

My old bookmarks on the occurrence have vanished from the web, but
there was a stunning tulpa generated by, of all people, a bunch of
scientists at Lawrence Livermore Lab many years ago. IIRC, it was also
mentioned in a book, but I can find no mention of it online now.


Well that's quite an eyebrow raiser for me, because the UFO I remember seeing, and I remember it quite well, was in Livermore, CA while sitting on the front step of my house. At the time my Dad was working at the Lawrence Radiation Lab.

I was between the ages of 4 and 6 at the time which would have put it between 1966 and 1969.

Any idea of when the above mentioned event took place?



Could this have been the whole business of Lawrence Livermore scientists and a couple of psychics supposedly coming into contact with a group of entities called "The Nine" and the other seemingly connected weirdnesses? The overall picture included Jack Sarfatti, Uri Geller, Lawrence Livermore, the Esalen Institute, etc. etc.

I thought this had been covered by Jeff, I think in connection with Peter Lavenda's writing about it, but a cursory search finds only a mention. Nor in the forum did I find any details (I must be doing it wrong), but I know I've read a bit about it somewhere; does any of this ring a bell? -- it was in the 1970s but might have begun in 1952:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_cointelpro06.htm
1952

(A) As a child in 1952, Jack Sarfatti claims to have received phone calls from the mechanical voice of a conscious computer aboard a spaceship, recruiting him along with 400 others for some special project. These calls have similarities to the mechanical voice which talked to Andrijah Puharich via his tape recorder. Sarfatti was later associated with Puharich. Puharich first contacts "The Nine" -- a group of channeled being via a medium.

[...]

In the late 1970s, Esalen became involved with an Englishwoman named Jenny O'Connor, who claimed to be in psychic contact with 'the Nine' (probably the same "Nine" that Andriah Puharich claimed to be in contact with). Dick Price and other members of the Esalen staff became increasingly dependent on 'the Nine' to the point of listing them as program leaders and members of the Esalen Gestalt Staff in brochures. (Anderson, pg 302)



http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=34787.85;wap2

--- Quote ---Uri Geller had been invited to SRI for some informal tests of his abilities in 1972. By 1974, word of his prowess had leaked out around the world, and the nuclear weapons specialists at Lawrence Livermore were concerned that someone with psychic abilities—particularly psychokinesis, an ability Geller demonstrated by bending metal spoons, rings, and other objects with his mind—could detonate a nuclear weapon using only mental energy or could scramble the nation’s military computer systems, thus disabling the country’s missile defences. Therefore, in late 1974 and 1975 a select group of scientists and security officers began testing Geller at an off-site location. The tests showed that Geller could only affect metal objects, computer systems, and computer disks if he was in physical contact with them. There- fore, it was a reasonable assumption that PK was not a threat to the nation’s missile systems.

However, other developments took place that caused not only concern but hysteria among the Lawrence Livermore staff While technicians were listening to the audiotapes routinely made during the Geller PK sessions, they noticed a voice on the tape that had not been there during the tests. It was a “metallic voice” and was largely unintelligible, although the few words that were understood turned out to be top-secret codenames for intelligence operations, names that were unknown to the scientists at Lawrence Livermore. In addition, an infrared camera that had been used during the sessions showed patches of radiation on the laboratory walls where no such radiation should have been present. These were more than merely scientific anomalies. They were captured on tape and film under controlled circumstances. However, this would have been worth a few paragraphs in a report and not much more, were it not for the fact that personnel involved in the Geller experiments began to experi- ence exceedingly strange phenomena.

One of the recurring motifs was the appearance of a flying saucer in the laboratory: a hovering, hologram-like image that would float around and then disappear. And this “saucer” appear- ance was not restricted to the laboratory. Some of the scientists witnessed the phenomenon when they were at home with their families. There was no conceivable explanation for this, no way such a hologram could have been projected inside the secure laboratory environment without a lot of equip- ment and expensive electronics that could have easily been discovered. Since Geller was known to put out the story that he was in communication with extraterrestrial agencies aboard a spacecraft that hovered over the earth, the connection was obvious, but the reason or motivation behind the appari- tions was not.

In addition to the saucer, there were reports of appearances of strange and fantastic animals to the Lawrence Livermore personnel and their families, including very large black birds, ravens, that would appear from nowhere and wander across their lawns … or suddenly appear in the morning standing over their beds. This association of birds with Geller was something that the laboratory staff may have not recognized, for Geller’s supernatural experiences included that of a bird of prey, usually a hawk (symbol for the Egyptian god, Horus).

The appearance of fantastic animals is common in the literature of shamanism, and their purpose is usually totemic in nature; but what was happening to the scientists? As the personnel began to break down and exhibit signs of intense mental distress, the security officer in charge of the group broke down and contacted “Richard Kennett” of the CIA. As Kennett not only had security clearances but was also aware of the psychic research programs and had a doctorate in neurophysiology, he was the logical choice. Kennett listened to the men—some of whom broke down and wept in his presence—describe their symptoms. He was not convinced that this was simply a textbook case of hysteria. These men were scientists with no occult leanings; furthermore, they had all been psychologically vetted, as they were involved with classified government and military projects. It didn’t make sense. And then he listened to the audiotapes, and heard the secret codewords mentioned that none of the Lawrence Livermore staff could have known.

This was not the end of the story, however. One of the scientists received a phone call and heard the “metallic voice” that so often pursues researchers in this field, man and boy, and this time the voice told him to drop the Geller experimentation completely. The team was only too happy to do so, and the “hauntings” gradually stopped.
--- End quote ---

(Above, I took the liberty of breaking a long block of text into paragraphs)


And:

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=34787.85;wap2

--- Quote ---The Nine actually lectured at Esalen! Twenty years after the first appearance of The Nine to the circle around Andrija Puharich, they again manifested in the person of one Jenny O’Connor. Ms. O’Connor was “channeling” The Nine and came to the attention of Werner Erhard, the neo-fascist creator of a school of self-development known as “est,” for “Erhard Seminar Training,” and always printed in lower-case letters. (Erhard had famously changed his name from Jack Rosenberg to “give up Jewish weakness for German strength.”) Sarfatti himself had been a visitor to Arthur Young in the company of Puharich and Ira Einhorn, and had worked sporadically with Arthur Young’s Institute in Berkeley, California. Oddly enough, he seems not to have been aware of Young’s involvement with The Nine in its earliest incarnation. In the late 1970s, Jenny O’Connor was referred to Sarfatti by one of the est people, and Sarfatti was not impressed. Nonetheless, O’Connor became ensconced at Esalen, channeling messages from The Nine and having influence over some management decisions and organizational structuring at the Institute, at the same time that Esalen was being visited by Soviet officials as well as by Einhorn, various physicists, Stanislav Grof (who was “Scholar-in-Residence” from 1973 to 1987), and many, many others.
--- End quote ---
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7434
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby BrandonD » Sun May 18, 2014 5:19 am

Searcher08 » Sat May 17, 2014 5:50 am wrote:I was left wondering the same by an experience I had in the late 90s. It was the summer, and I was waiting on a 6 am bus. I heard a crackling / roaring sound like a mixture of tin foil in a microwave and jet afterburners. I looked up an saw a light about 1/4 the size of the full moon slowly make its way across the sky. It had what seemed like gobbets of light coming off it and the sound from it changed with the light changes. It took maybe a minute to cross the sky. It was REALLY noticeable at times with flashes / glare that were like an arc-welding torch. There were no colours associated with it, just silver-white.
For the next couple of days, it was constantly on my mind and I was as baffled as fuck that none of the sleepy local papers mentioned it (these would have had it as headlines for a month) . It was a disturbing sensation - as though for a few days, I was the only person who could see the colour purple.

I wonder if part of this is that the social trance that most people are in most of the time means that the locus of our attention is primarily either our own internal dialogue and imagery or our own body / kinaesthetic sense - in either case we are unconsciously looking down and in a state of foveal vision - very little of our attention is left for consciously visual scanning.

http://www.theinvisiblegorilla.com/gorilla_experiment.html
This experiment reveals two things: that we are missing a lot of what goes on around us, and that we have no idea that we are missing so much.


This reminds me of a sighting that I had a few years ago, which I did not report because I wasn't certain that it was something anomalous.

I was driving to a dinner appointment, and on the way I looked up and saw an object. I remember thinking to myself "Wow that helicopter has a lot of lights" and then I went back to driving. It wasn't until my girlfriend said "What the hell is that?" that I looked again and really gave it my attention.

I only saw it for a few seconds, but it appeared to be an egg-shaped object covered in lights, which quickly disappeared below the tree-line. I immediately shouted out "Screw the reservation!" (haha ridiculous but true) and turned the next left to follow where the object disappeared to.

I drove in the exact direction where it would have been but when we arrived in an area where we would've expected to see it, there was nothing in the sky. So we turned around and went back to the restaurant.

It could've been something conventional because I didn't get a good look at it and it didn't fly in a bizarre or erratic manner, but more important was the realization that if my girlfriend had not directed my attention at this object, then I would've totally disregarded it even though I had actually seen it. That event illustrated for me that even a person with an avid interest in UFOs like myself can just gloss over something anomalous in the sky if their attention is focused on something else.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
User avatar
BrandonD
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby justdrew » Sun May 18, 2014 6:33 am

this implies some sort of individualized selection criteria from the aliens.

why do they pick some people and not others to show themselves to? This should be fairly studiable, and surely has been by someone.

don't study the reports, study the reporters.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby Elvis » Sun May 18, 2014 3:32 pm

Elvis wrote:Could this have been the whole business of Lawrence Livermore scientists and a couple of psychics supposedly coming into contact with a group of entities called "The Nine" and the other seemingly connected weirdnesses? The overall picture included Jack Sarfatti, Uri Geller, Lawrence Livermore, the Esalen Institute, etc. etc.


I see now that Jingofever was posting while I was preparing my above post, and looks like he found Jeff's blogpost about it, which had eluded my search. That's what I'm talkin' about! Thanks.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7434
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby BrandonD » Sun May 18, 2014 7:06 pm

justdrew » Sun May 18, 2014 5:33 am wrote:this implies some sort of individualized selection criteria from the aliens.

why do they pick some people and not others to show themselves to? This should be fairly studiable, and surely has been by someone.

don't study the reports, study the reporters.


It does appear to imply this, it seems I've personally had a disproportional share of odd/paranormal events in my life.

But at the same time, I do have an intuitive sense that these things are happening to everyone, but the current of ordinary life directs our attention elsewhere. For example, I was listening to the Paratopia podcast and one of the hosts made the suggestion to sit down and make a list of all the strange things that have occurred in your life, and he said you will be surprised to discover that it's actually a lot more than you generally assume.

So I did this, I sat down and made a list of all the strange things that have happened to me, and I gave them each a number rating from 1-10, 1 being easily explainable through conventional means and 10 being totally unexplainable through conventional means.

It turned out that he was totally correct, quite a lot of weird things had happened to me, in fact just the process of sitting down and making the list brought up several old memories that I had forgotten.

I would be interested to have other people sit down and try this as well, and see if they have the same result. It is my hunch that most people would have this same result, to varying degrees.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
User avatar
BrandonD
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby BrandonD » Sun May 18, 2014 7:29 pm

justdrew » Sun May 18, 2014 5:33 am wrote:this implies some sort of individualized selection criteria from the aliens.

why do they pick some people and not others to show themselves to? This should be fairly studiable, and surely has been by someone.

don't study the reports, study the reporters.


One other thing - if I understand you correctly, you are saying that my previous story about seeing the object but thinking it was a helicopter implies individualized selection criteria from these hypothetical aliens - I think that this criteria may exist, but I don't think that is necessarily implied in this particular instance.

In my opinion, what took place in that event is an example of how we generally don't see a totally accurate picture of the world around us. We only actually "see" something if we direct our attention specifically to that thing, the remainder of our perception of the outside world is something like brain-generated symbols triggered by minimal perceptual cues.

So what happened is that I was paying attention to driving, and probably my own imagination at the time. My critical attention was directed there. My brain picked up a few visual cues of an object in the sky, it was about the size of a helicopter, it was fairly low to the ground and had lights on it, my brain filled in "helicopter". The large number of lights were apparently not enough to pull away my main focus of attention. I never actually directed my attention specifically at the object until my gf made that exclamation.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
User avatar
BrandonD
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby justdrew » Sun May 18, 2014 11:11 pm

well, I think by "this" I was referring to the whole set of sightings reports. A substantial subset seem to include the feeling of some psychic connection between the viewer and the thing. The sens that it'll vanish if one looks away, that it knows you're seeing it, etc.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby BrandonD » Mon May 19, 2014 12:36 am

justdrew » Sun May 18, 2014 10:11 pm wrote:well, I think by "this" I was referring to the whole set of sightings reports. A substantial subset seem to include the feeling of some psychic connection between the viewer and the thing. The sens that it'll vanish if one looks away, that it knows you're seeing it, etc.


Yea that element is certainly odd. It is my feeling that in these instances of a psychic connection, the witness was in an altered state of consciousness - whether he was aware of it or not.

I was going to use "heightened" state of consciousness but that might be making too much of an assumption, so maybe "altered" is best as a provisional term.

After returning from Peru, I listened to many of the early Paratopia podcasts. The 2 hosts are both "experiencers" of UFO abductions and that sort of thing. They described a state of heightened awareness or intensified reality while in the presence of these other beings, and I was surprised to note a great many similarities between their descriptions and my state while under the influence of ayahuasca in Peru. I contacted the hosts and we struck up a conversation about this topic, which eventually led to one of the hosts ingesting a psychedelic mushroom to test this theory of a connection between the two. It was only one mushroom so the effect was subtle, but his conclusion was that there was definitely a similarity between the psychedelic state and the state while in the presence of these beings. He was too afraid to take the experiment further than one mushroom, because the UFO experiences were not entirely positive for him.

I think that our consciousness can be altered in some way to cause/allow us to perceive things that are normally invisible while in an ordinary state, and since this state can be induced externally through ingesting substances, I wouldn't be surprised if there are also means of inducing this state through electromagnetic or other means. I suppose the jury is still out on the objective reality of these invisible things, but in my experience a tell-tale red flag that signifies an altered state of consciousness is if a person has a distinct feeling of connection between his mind and the outside world.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
User avatar
BrandonD
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby elfismiles » Mon May 19, 2014 8:41 am

Brandon, is this the same girlfriend in both sightings? Have you and she explored her own oneironautic terrains?

Also, on the TxUFOsight website, a local friend of mine had a similar site up for a while but its now gone. I have inquired with him as he was in contact with the person at said TxUFOsight website and they were both, I believe, using various page/feed scrapers to gather their data.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby Luther Blissett » Mon May 19, 2014 1:44 pm

justdrew » Sat May 17, 2014 1:01 am wrote:well, the "tulpa" thing - a tulpa could take any form, what are some of the other common forms people are generating? I can't really think of any. Seems like if that were something the human mind or collective mind of humanity could gin up, we'd know about it to some broader extent.

Anyway I know of zero reports of "tulpas" in the last century-plus not originating with Blavatsky. Of course I could well have missed them.

and if it's "extra dimensional" / "trans-brane" / "whatever spiritual" - how is that not also a form of tech? Tech is used to transport in the 3 common dimensions, why not in 8 or 9 more lesser-known ones too?

(I secretly love constructions like "more lesser-known" :wink: )


Thank you, you're absolutely right. I suppose that some form of psychic manifestation by an individual could and maybe even has presented itself to others.

I did jump to a bit of a conclusion by using the term tulpas. It was merely a shorthand that we would all "get." This is a good conversation.

BrandonD » Thu May 15, 2014 5:11 pm wrote:Thank you for that account, if you don't mind me asking how fast were the parts rotating on the craft?


Unfortunately I do not have any access to that. I hope that my mother kept my grandfather's last report on it. I have owed Elfismiles a message about this for many years but I am not close with my family and haven't had the time to get up to visit them in awhile.

I do know that my grandfather was convinced it was gyroscopic in nature and constructed a number of small experiments with gyroscopes. It is my impression (and this is delving into speculative territory, quite possible influenced by ufo lore) that there was an outer "band" rotating clockwise, while the bulk of the disk's body rotated counterclockwise (or vice-versa). It's also my impression that they were rotating slowly, but that's basically how I have always pictured it in my mind, possibly from growing up with the story or possibly from my own imagination.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just had major UFO Sighting

Postby justdrew » Mon May 19, 2014 3:53 pm

hey, maybe I should have said "djinn up" :wink

but you know, if there are aliens, then looking at everything, it is possible "the aliens" have an agenda for us that at least many of us would consider hostile. Also that their tech, while perhaps significantly more advanced than ours, is no where near the 'magic' level, such that they face significant limitations on their ability to force their will.

I'll circle backaround here and mention that the entire "nuclear power" industry looks rather a lot like a "civilizational deadmans switch" - and it was built with such seeming urgency to provide our off-planet friends a reason to leave us as alone as possible, or at least to slow their agenda. A scorched earth ultimatum more likely to be functional in the event of need than the ICBMs and such, and which could even have been built out while maintaining some deniability and the appearance of at least marginal compliance. Whether the agenda actually IS hostile or not, we can't be sure, could well be just some in power see it that way, but maintaining our own (imperfect) agency in our own development could well have been involved. and this senario would give sufficient reason to justify the bizarre "coverup" related actions of this and other governments.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests