Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Elvis » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:59 am wrote:page 59 right now
And just a note -- this book, so far, seems to connect so directly to my recent readings about "Western" thought, it's blowing my mind. It's as if some guiding hand is pointing to the next book I need to read to better understand the last one. (But thanks for sure to Brekin for pointing out this book.)
Elvis wrote:And just a note -- this book, so far, seems to connect so directly to my recent readings about "Western" thought, it's blowing my mind. It's as if some guiding hand is pointing to the next book I need to read...
This Book
THIS BOOK IS NEITHER FACT NOR FICTION. It 's about something stranger than both; and compared to that, what we call facts are just fiction.
It's not what it seems, just as the things around us aren't what they seem. If you read on you'll see it's all about deception—about the total deception of the world we live in and about what lies behind.
It might seem to be a story about things that happened a long time ago. But really it's about ourselves. The details will probably be unfamiliar, very unfamiliar. And yet their significance reaches to the roots of our own being.
This unfamiliarity is important. Usually something is unfamiliar because it has no relation to us and we have no relation to it. But what's most unfamiliar of all is what's closest to us, and which we've forgotten. It's like a limb that's been anaesthetized or that's been unused for a long, long time. When we start feeling it again it's so strangely unfamiliar just because it's such an essential part of us.
And that's the purpose of this book: to awaken something we've forgotten, something we've been made to forget by the passing of time and by those who've misunderstood or—for reasons of their own—have wanted us to forget.
It could be said that this process of awakening is profoundly healing. It is. The only trouble with saying this is that we've come to have such a superficial idea of healing. For most of us, healing is what makes us comfortable and eases the pain. It's what softens, protects us. And yet what we want to be healed of is often what will heal us if we can stand the discomfort and the pain.
We want healing from illness, but it's through illness that we grow and are healed of our complacency. We're afraid of loss, and yet it's through what we lose that we're able to find what nothing can take away from us. We run from sadness and depression. But if we really face our sadness we find it speaks with the voice of our deepest longing; and if we face it a little longer we find that it teaches us the way to attain what we long for.
And what is it that we long for? That's what this story is about.
Elvis » Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:04 pm wrote:If nothing else, Kingsley has me in suspense. Later I'll try to post a quote or two from Book 1 that especially intrigued or resonated with me. Going a little bit into into Book 2, I did find myself saying, "Oh gawd, I hope this isn't another Celestine Prophecy."
Resonance -- "symbolic resonance," "mythic resonance" -- is a theme popping up everywhere for me just lately, and seems to be an important motif of this book.
As a side note, I'm curious about any connection between Parmenides and the later Cynics.
Sargant's methods were simple: electric-shock treatment and insulin-induced comas leading to continuous narcosis, or deep-sleep therapy, complete with taperecorded 'brainwashing' orders being played at the patients from beneath their pillows.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests