Islamophobia American Style

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:06 am

MINNESOTA
Minnesota DPS apologizes for issuing 'offensive' license plates
Published February 24, 2016 FoxNews.com
Image
The Minnesota Department of Public Safety said Tuesday a license plate that read “FMUSLMS” should never have been issued and the plates would be revoked immediately.

According to Fox 9, a Snapchat photo of the license plate was shared over the weekend on the Facebook page of Somali community activist Haji Yusuf. Yusuf told Fox 9 the photo was taken by a St. Cloud high school student. Fox 9 confirmed the plates were ordered by a man from Foley, northeast of St. Cloud.

Yusuf is a member of Unite Cloud, an advocacy group that seeks to eliminate discrimination against Muslims and other groups.


The Department of Public Safety said the license plates were issued in June 2015 and the custom license plate application was processed in Foley and reviewed by the state’s Driver and Vehicle Services.

“This personalized license plate should never have been issued; it is offensive and distasteful,” DPS said in a statement. “We are in the process of revoking and taking possession of the plates today. The Department of Public Safety apologizes for this error. The Driver and Vehicle Services Division is reviewing its process for approving personalized license plates today and will immediately provide additional review and oversight of applications.”

Gov. Mark Dayton expressed his displeasure that the plates were allowed.

“I am appalled that this license plate was issued by the State of Minnesota,” he said in a statement. “It is offensive, and the person who requested it should be ashamed. That prejudice has no place in Minnesota.

“I have instructed the Commissioner of Public Safety to retrieve this plate as soon as possible and re-review agency procedures to ensure it does not occur again,” he added.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:54 am

In this updated 100-minute documentary feature film available in full exclusively on AlterNet for one week


Watch Valentino's Ghost: Powerful Documentary Explores How US Foreign Policy in the Middle East Drives Islamophobia at Home
Experts ranging from Robert Fisk to John Mearsheimer and Melani McAlister explain how the U.S. media and govt are the source of fear and loathing of Arabs, Muslims and Islam.
By Michael Singh, Catherine Jordan / AlterNet March 1, 2016


Valentino’s Ghost lays bare the truths behind taboo subjects that are conspicuously avoided, or merely treated as sound bites by the mainstream American media: “Why do they hate us?” “Why do we hate them?” What were the events that led to the 9/11 attacks? What are the politics behind the U.S.-Israeli relationship? Why is there a robust debate about these subjects in Europe, the Arab World and in Israel itself, but not in the United States?

In this updated 100-minute documentary feature film available in full exclusively on AlterNet for one week, a dozen commentators elucidate the reasons behind the lack of a serious national dialogue on these topics, and reveal how the U.S. media and government perpetuate the storylines that create many Americans’ fear and loathing of Arabs, Muslims and Islam.

The updated version of Valentino’s Ghost addresses four current topics that weren’t in existence at the film’s premiere in 2012, offering radically different views from those of our national narrative, addressing such questions as: were the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists engaging in cultural bullying of the weakest ethnic minority in France? Did the 2014 Israeli assault on Gaza seriously damage Israeli’s image abroad when Palestinians were able to upload phone videos of the bombings to the Internet? Are American Armed Forces’ killings and torture more barbaric that that of groups like ISIS? Is the movie American Sniper’s inherent racist viewpoint one reason for its phenomenal popularity?

The foreign correspondents reporting from the front, and academics in history and political science, include:

Late American essayist and historian Gore Vidal; political scientist and award-winning book author John Mearsheimer, author of The Israel Lobby; celebrated British war correspondent Robert Fisk, historian and media expert Melani McAlister, TV star Tony Shalhoub, media analyist Jack Shaheen and Hollywood writer Alan Sharp, along with biting commentary in performances by comics Maz Jobrani, Aron Kader and Ahmed Ahmed.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:43 am

GRAYZONE PROJECT
Across New Jersey, Bands of Local Islamophobes Crusade to Drive Islam Underground
Grassroots campaigns attempt to prevent Muslims from practicing their religion in their own neighborhoods.
By Leslie Scott / AlterNet March 6, 2016

People protested for and against the plan for a Muslim community center in Bayonne in front of City Hall at 630 Ave. C on Jan. 19, 2016.
Photo Credit: Jonathan Lin | The Jersey Journal

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump made international headlines when he vowed to shutter mosques and ban Muslims from entering America. Even the GOP establishment favorite, Senator Marco Rubio, suggested closing not only mosques, but any place where Muslims gather, while Senator Ted Cruz declared that if he was elected president, he would allow only Christian refugees to enter the country, excluding all Muslims.

The Islamophobic bluster of Republican presidential candidates mirrors campaigns taking place at the grassroots level and often away from the national media’s gaze. In northern New Jersey, just a few miles from New York City, local residents incited into a rabid anti-Muslim frenzy are banding together to stop mosque construction. From Bayonne to Bernards, they have devoted their energy and resources to preventing Muslims from practicing their religion in their own neighborhoods.

In the city of Bayonne, residents gathered outside the municipal building on January 19 to protest the application of a group called the Bayonne Muslims to convert an abandoned industrial property into a mosque. Waheed Akbar, who volunteers as a secretary for Bayonne Muslims, said that about 25 to 30 anti-Muslim demonstrators crowded outside the municipal building, chanting and holding signs, prior to the first evening of testimony the group would present to the city’s zoning board. Akbar said one of the signs read, “Donald Trump help us stop the mosque,” and protesters chanted, “Mosque comes, mayor goes!”

Several Bayonne residents couched their Islamophobic politics behind concerns about the traffic a new mosque would supposedly bring. According to Akbar, anti-mosque protesters would often follow concerns about traffic with statements like, “September 11 happened right in our backyard,” exposing their bigoted agenda.

“There are some ignorant people,” Akbar said. “It’s not just the majority of the town. It’s just a very, very small minority. We felt that it is best to just leave them and ignore them, because people see through them. An educated person can see exactly what they are doing.”

The street Bayonne Muslims is eyeing is among the most blighted in the city, a short, dead-end block with little greenery. There are three residential homes there, along with three vacant industrial properties, two of which are used to dump refuse. When asked why some residents would be opposed to seeing the area improved, Akbar pointed to an obstinate local culture. “The people have been here for a long time and they just don’t want anything changed,” he said.

The rancorous discussion at City Hall continued throughout the evening. During the meeting one resident demanded to know if he would be able “to come to the mosque and pray to Jesus Christ.” Another asked if the mosque would practice “Sharia law,” echoing one of the most popular fears of anti-Muslim forces. A few protesters claimed their Muslim neighbors were “moving into” their city to build a mosque, as if they were invading from the outside, when in fact the mosque members are not new to the community at all. Although the group formed in 2007, Bayonne Muslims members have always lived in the city: they own homes, go to the schools, support local businesses and pay taxes. Bayonne Muslims have held services out of two rooms rented in a school in the city for the past seven years. Now the group just wants a space of their own in the community where they live and serve.

The outpouring of hatred has sent a chill through the local Muslim community. “You feel left out because you think that you are part of the community; and we have been and we are law-abiding citizens, we love charity, and we love community service and we’ve done that; even in this city for the last seven years we have participated in food drives and can drives and feeding the poor, and even when the hurricanes hit we were volunteering,” Waheed Akbar said.

Bernards Township declares a mosque “environmentally sensitive”

Bayonne is not the only place in New Jersey where Muslims face discrimination as they attempt to open a place to worship. In December 2015, after a four-year application process, the planning board in the township of Bernards denied a proposal from the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge (ISBR) to build a mosque in its picturesque, upper-class community.

During the process, many township residents presented bitter arguments to dissuade the planning board from approving the ISBR application. The street ISBR wanted to build on is busy, with multiple types of properties including homes, a school, a Presbyterian church and a fire house, yet one resident argued that a mosque wasn’t compatible with anything that was already there. Another person insisted that building a mosque would erase the community’s historic character, while another said a mosque would ruin the community’s tranquil character. One objected to ISBR’s goal of improving relations between Muslims and members of other faiths on the grounds that building a mosque would only increase social friction.

As they ramped up their campaign, local anti-Muslim forces formed a group called the Bernards Township Citizens for Responsible Development and hired an attorney to argue that the mosque wasn’t in fact a “house of worship,” but an “institution.” The argument was so bizarre that the planning board refused to consider its final decision. The members of Islamic Society of Basking Ridge are currently weighing their options on whether or not they will sue the township of Bernards for denying the application and declined to comment on their experience.

When it sought to construct a mosque in Wayne Township in northern New Jersey, the Albanian Associated Fund was plunged into a byzantine four-year application process between 2002 to 2006. In the end, Wayne Township suddenly decided to initiate eminent domain proceedings on the property it wanted to construct a mosque on and discontinue the application. The Albanian Fund successfully sued Wayne Township for violating the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, which protects religious institutions from discriminatory zoning practices. In its decision, the court showed how the township broke longstanding practices, including prolonging the hearing process to thwart approval. The township held more than 20 meetings and cost the Albanian Fund $200,000 to $300,000 in additional expenditures to perform studies, modify the proposal and provide expert testimonies only to decide to take the land.

During the hearing process, NJ Assemblyman Scott Rumana, the township mayor at the time, suddenly and inexplicably classified the property that was to be converted into a mosque as “environmentally sensitive,” and said it should be protected. However, prior to the Albanian Fund submitting its building application, the township heard two proposals to build on the site, and in neither case was the property deemed environmentally sensitive. The court said Wayne’s claim that it commenced eminent domain proceedings to preserve the land, “rings hollow,” and that in reality Wayne was, “simply trying to keep the mosque out of the township.”

Like the residents in Bernards, a group of objectors from Wayne formed a coalition called the Property Protection Group and hired a lawyer to help them flight the application. During the hearing process, PPG members posed as classic not-in-my-backyard activists, disguising their Islamophobic agenda by claiming that the construction of a mosque in their community would be a “public nuisance.” At another point, they demanded a list of all the members of the mosque, creating an air of suspicion around the local Muslim community.

One member of the Albanian Fund testified in court to the hostility of the PPG: “The cold hatred in the faces of the neighbors, the palpable tension in the hearing room, the snide remarks and the people jumping out of their seats when we would describe our prayer rituals and religious practices made it very clear. There was also lots of sarcasm directed at us by the large group of objectors who were in attendance at every hearing on our application. None of this is evident from the dry words of the transcripts, but it was palpable during the hearings.”

The court demonstrated with cold, hard evidence that the religiously motivated hostility of the residents influenced the township to commence eminent domain proceedings. Following the lawsuit, the Albanian Fund postponed its plans to build in Wayne. The group remained at its original location, miles away in Paterson, until it moved to another location in a drab office park in Riverdale in 2015.

Zoning complaints

The township of Bridgewater didn’t get the memo about Wayne’s mistakes. This township made similar spur-of-the-moment changes to its zoning rules on land a Muslim group called Al Falah Center owned that essentially invalidated the type of application it submitted to construct a mosque. Bridgewater Township was sued and had to pay out $5 million in damages to Al Falah Center. A court found that Bridgewater violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and the group’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, among others. The court also ruled that the application must be heard without the new zoning rules.

Bridgewater didn’t waste any time trying to disrupt Al Falah’s plans to construct a place to worship. The group submitted its application on Jan. 6, 2011 and by March 14, 2011, after only a handful of meetings, zoning rules were arbitrarily changed to stifle the process. During one of the few hearings held on the application, more than 400 residents showed up. When the crowd was told the meeting was rescheduled to find a location suitable to fit everyone, one person was overheard saying, “Just gives us more time to plan a strategy to stop this thing.” When Al Falah’s supporters spoke during hearings, they were hectored by audience members who repeatedly barked, “Get out of Bridgewater!”

The residents of Bridgewater were far from alone in their resentment of their Muslim neighbors. According to the court that ruled on the case of Al Falah, one township official insisted that the proposed mosque be built elsewhere and declared that even if the application was approved, any future requests to add onto the site would be “heavily scrutinized.”

According to Faiza Patel, co-director of the Liberty & National Security Program for the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, “The legal system is and always has been critical in protecting rights. The problem is that litigation is expensive, burdensome and time-consuming. Al Falah was fortunate to have excellent, pro bono attorneys from the law firm of Arnold & Porter, who took on the case with zeal and took it through to a successful conclusion.”

Patel added, “The Bridgewater case involved both constitutional claims as well as claims under a law passed by Congress specifically to protect religious institutions. The court found that the Al Falah had provided enough indication of discrimination in the change of zoning rules that it was entitled to a preliminary injunction that led to settlement discussions and eventually to an agreement between the parties.”

Al Falah, like the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge, the Bayonne Muslims and the Albanian Associated Fund were all renting space that was declared inadequate, thus limiting what they could do to serve the members of their community. They chose to find homes in these respective locations because they were central to where the members lived. In the end, each encountered bands of bigots cloaking their anti-Muslim resentment behind a wall of arbitrary bureaucratic complaints.

More often than not, applications to build or open mosques are approved, but when the bigots come out they can exhibit the worst parts of America. In 2008, when Rockaway Borough in northern Jersey approved an application to convert an office building into a mosque, a group of residents suddenly filed a lawsuit to reverse the town’s decision. Fortunately for Rockaway’s Muslim community, the suit was thrown out of court.

Blizzard of misinformation

According to the Pew Research Center, the opposition to constructing churches and commercial spaces generally centers on concerns about traffic, noise, parking and property values. However, the tone of those opposed to mosque construction applications is tinged with fears about Islam, the phantom threat of Sharia law and terrorism. From 2004 to 2012, Pew found 53 cases where mosques and Islamic centers encountered community resistance. In 2013, the Pew Forum found that a majority of Americans agreed with opponents of a proposed Islamic cultural center near the former site of the World Trade Center.

The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act was passed unanimously by both the House and the Senate just a year before the 9/11 attacks. In the decade that followed, the Department of Justice documented a 14 percent increase of RLUIPA investigations involving Muslims.

This racist rhetoric did not come out of thin air, as the 2011 report Fear, Inc. by the Center for American Progress outlined. As the Brennan Center’s Patel explained, “Anti-Muslim sentiment has been at high levels for some time. This is manifested both in spurious objections to mosques [of the type we saw in Al Falah], the anti-Sharia movement, which tries to solve a problem that doesn’t exist, and tarnishes Muslims by increasing levels of discrimination and violent hate crimes. These issues also generally become prominent during elections because they identify an ‘other’ for people to focus their grievances. The attacks in Paris and San Bernardino and the conflict in Syria have only exacerbated these tendencies.”

Those protesting at these town meetings are the products of a blizzard of misinformation. They are at once ordinary citizens of increasingly diverse communities and the frontline warriors of a well-funded political network dedicated to intimidating and marginalizing Muslims in America. Their prevalence shows that organized crusades of racism and religious bigotry can occur anywhere, even in communities in a Democratic-heavy state just a few miles from one of the most international, multicultural cities in the world.

Even as the Constitution is described by Republican politicians and grassroots conservative activists in terms normally reserved for the Bible, laws like RLUIPA had to be passed to protect its most hallowed amendment from them. Those driving the campaigns against mosque construction in New Jersey and beyond seem determined to rewrite the First Amendment so it applies to some of the people, some of the time
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:51 am

$206 Mn. to Hate Groups to Promote anti-Muslim Sentiment
By Juan Cole | Jun. 22, 2016 |

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –
The UC Berkeley Center for Race and Gender and the Council on American Islamic Relations have jointly produced a new study on hatred of Muslims in the United States.
As The Guardian notes, it finds 74 organizations promoting hatred of Muslims in the US, with 33 of these institutions having been founded and having their primary purpose the spread against this religious group. Those 33 have had access to $208 million from donors in the past 8 years.
The report’s top 4 key findings:
Key Finding 1: Seventy-four (up from sixty-nine in 2013) groups are identi- fied as comprising the U.S. Islamophobia network.
Key Finding 2: The U.S.-based Islamophobia network’s inner core is cur – rently comprised of at least thirty-three groups whose primary purpose is to promote prejudice against, or hatred of, Islam and Muslims.
Key Finding 3: Between 2008 and 2013, inner-core organizations had access to at least $205,838,077 in total revenue.
Key Finding 4: An additional forty-one groups whose primary purpose does not appear to include promoting prejudice against or hatred of Islam and Muslims, but whose work regularly demonstrates or supports Islamophobic themes, make up the network’s outer core.
As The Guardian notes, the end result of the activities of groups like Abstraction Fund, Clarion Project, David Horowitz Freedom Center, Middle East Forum, American Freedom Law Center, Center for Security Policy, Investigative Project on Terrorism, Jihad Watch and Act! for America, is an increase in attacks on mosques and attacks on Muslim individuals.
Some of them, such as the Middle East Forum, are part of the Israel lobbies, and apparently they believe the best way to go on keeping Palestinians stateless and without rights is to convince Americans that all Muslims are wicked and deserving of any abuse visited on them by the Likud Party. But that Jews should be assiduously spreading hatred of a religious minority is past shameful (and also very unwise, since once you get white people hating one exotic religious minority, they may go after others; and we’ve seen some of this blowback among the Trumpists).
Another key finding (no. 7):
“In 2015, there were 78 recorded incidents in which mosques were targeted; more incidents than ever reported in a single year since we began tracking these reports in 2009. Incidents in 2015 have more than tripled compared to the past two years ”
To underline that the report focuses on hate speech, it carries a caveat:
“Caveat: Questioning Islam or Muslims is Not Islamophobia
It is not appropriate to label all, or even the majority, of those who question Islam and Muslims as Islamophobes. Equally, it is not Islamophobic to denounce crimes committed by individual Muslims or those citing Islam as a motivation for their actions.”
The report advises Muslims to get involved in high-profile philanthropic work and in politics and community service– to demonstrate that they are actively helping people in their community. (Many already do, but the high percentage of first-generation immigrants in the community, perhaps half, leads to their being shy about sticking their heads up, or to their not knowing avenues for fruitful involvement).
It also advises Americans that they need to realize that being prejudiced against Muslims is just as bad as being bigotted toward Jews or toward African-Americans.
If we had 33 influential organizations funded to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars whose express purpose was to spread hatred of Jews, there’d be a big outcry. But this is no different.
There has also been a rash of anti-Muslim legislation in state legislatures, all of which is either redundant or will eventually be struck down as unconstitutional. (The cookie cutter laws forbid the use of Islamic law in the US court system, which hasn’t, like, ever happened). The legislation is just to mark millions of Muslim Americans as second class citizens.
Image


Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby 82_28 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:48 pm

From this month's Harper's Index:

Percentage of young Iraqis who regard the United States as their enemy : 93
Rank of the United States among countries that Arabs aged 18 to 24 regard as the best country to live : 2

:shrug:
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:17 pm

Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby elfismiles » Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:46 am

Metro
Queens imam and his assistant executed in broad daylight
By Megan McGibney, Georgett Roberts, Larry Celona and Stephanie Pagones
August 13, 2016 | 3:18pm | Updated
http://nypost.com/2016/08/13/2-wounded- ... -shooting/
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Dec 04, 2016 4:33 pm

Published on
Saturday, October 15, 2016
byCommon Dreams
With Islamophobia on Rise, Right-Wing Militias Threaten Communities in Kansas, Georgia
As white nationalist and Islamophobic rhetoric gains prominence in election, threats of anti-Muslim violence rise sharply
Image
byNika Knight, staff writer

Islamophobic graffiti on a mosque in Bayonne, New Jersey.
Islamophobic graffiti was also discovered on a mosque in Bayonne, New Jersey, on Friday. (Photo: Bayonne Muslims)
Two separate armed right-wing militias have threatened violence against Muslims in small towns in Georgia and Kansas, respectively, as xenophobic rhetoric fuels Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's campaign.

"We ask our nation's political leaders, and particularly political candidates, to reject the growing Islamophobia in our nation."
—Nihad Awad, CAIR
In Kansas, three men claiming to be members of a right-wing militia called the Crusaders were arrested and charged on Friday for allegedly plotting to plant bombs in a Garden City, Kansas, apartment complex that is home to over 100 Somali immigrants.

The bombing was scheduled for November 9 so as not to impact the presidential election, officials told the Wichita Eagle, which also reported that one apartment in the complex served as a mosque.

"It is very concerning and very disheartening," Hussam Madi, spokesman for the Islamic Society of Wichita, said of the planned attack to the Wichita Eagle. "I thank God that they were able to be caught before anything can happen. We don't need such actions here within our community and within our country."

Another armed militia has also terrorized a rural community in Georgia, the Guardian reported Thursday, with repeated threats of violence that have derailed efforts to construct a mosque in Newtown County, Georgia.

Newtown County is "solid Trump country," the newspaper notes.

The militia's members call themselves the "Three Percenters" (claiming that only three percent of American colonists fought against the British in the Revolutionary War; the real proportion is far higher, according to the Guardian).

"They are training to fight both the U.S. government and enemies of the U.S. government," the Guardian writes, "they wave both the American flag and the southern Confederate battle flag; they say they support the U.S. constitution but not the right of Muslims to express religious freedom."

In a now-removed video posted online, militia members posed with guns across the street from the site of the proposed mosque and claimed the congregation "had ties to Isis training, the September 11 attacks, the Boston marathon bombing, the Fort Hood shooting and more. Its members, [a militia leader] said, followed the antichrist. Another man hung an American flag on what appeared to be the mosque’s future site, an act which would have required trespassing."

Other video footage posted to a local Facebook group called "Stop the Mosque" reportedly showed armed and masked men detonating explosives and shooting guns in the woods.

County officials have temporarily banned construction of any mosque or church in response to the threats, and the local sheriff told the Guardian that he is investigating the group.

Additionally, on Friday two other instances of Islamophobic threats were reported: a woman allegedly threatened to bomb a mosque in Dearborn, Michigan, and anti-Muslim graffiti appeared on a mosque in Bayonne, New Jersery.

The Washington-based Muslim civil rights organization Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has reported that 2016 is "on track to be one of the worst years ever for anti-mosque incidents."

"The majority of the 2016 incidents have been violent in tone, characterized by intimidation, physical assault and property damage, destruction or vandalism," the organization wrote.

In the group's recent survey of Muslim voters, "86 percent of respondents believe that Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. has increased in the past year," CAIR noted. "Moreover, 30 percent of respondents say they have experienced discrimination or profiling in the past year."

"Given this alleged plan to attack a Kansas mosque, the two other hate incidents reported today against Islamic institutions in Michigan and New Jersey, and the overall spike in anti-mosque incidents nationwide, state and federal authorities should offer stepped-up protection to local communities," said CAIR national executive director Nihad Awad on Friday.

"We ask our nation's political leaders, and particularly political candidates, to reject the growing Islamophobia in our nation," Awad added.
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/1 ... as-georgia


Donald Trump and the Rise of Anti-Muslim Violence
Research suggests that extreme political rhetoric can contribute to a spike in hate crimes.

CLARE FORAN SEP 22, 2016 POLITICS

Subscribe to The Atlantic’s Politics & Policy Daily, a roundup of ideas and events in American politics.
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton tell very different stories about who belongs in America and who doesn’t. Trump describes a country under siege from refugees and immigrants, Mexicans, and Muslims. Clinton talks about a nation made stronger by diversity. The narrative each campaign creates matters. It may even influence the way Americans treat their fellow citizens.

Trump's Rigged Game

A new report from California State University-San Bernardino’s Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism suggests that political rhetoric may play a role in mitigating or fueling hate crimes. The report shows that anti-Muslim hate crimes in the U.S. rose sharply in 2015 to the highest levels since the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. It also suggests that Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric could have contributed to this backlash against American Muslims.

“There’s very compelling evidence that political rhetoric may well play a role in directing behavior in the aftermath of a terrorist attack,” Brian Levin, the author of the report said in an interview. “I don’t think we can dismiss contentions that rhetoric is one of the significant variables that can contribute to hate crimes.”

The report from the non-partisan center examined the incidence of hate crimes in the aftermath of two reactions to terrorism from political leaders. First, George W. Bush’s speech following the 9/11 attacks declaring: “Islam is peace” and “the face of terror is not the true faith of Islam,” and the second, Trump calling for a ban on Muslims entering the U.S. after the San Bernardino terror attack. The report found a steep rise in hate crimes following Trump’s remarks and a significant drop in hate crimes after Bush’s speech, relative to the number of hate crimes immediately following the initial terror attacks.

“Trump has seized on people’s fears and anxieties.”
A wide array of factors contribute to the incidence of hate crimes. Ignorance and isolation may play a role; most Americans say they do not personally know any Muslims, although those who do report positive views of Muslims in general. The nature of the threat groups of people are perceived to pose can also be a factor; prejudice catalyzed by a terrorist attack, for example, may be particularly likely to inspire hate crimes. Political rhetoric is only one ingredient in that mix, and the many messages in circulation after an attack can make it harder to determine the impact of any one particular reaction from a political leader. Before Trump’s call for a ban on Muslims entering the country, President Obama delivered a speech to the nation on the San Bernardino attack stressing tolerance.

Still, the report looked at daily data following terrorist attacks, and found that “a tolerant statement about Muslims by a political leader was accompanied by a sharp decline in hate crime, while a less tolerant announcement was followed by a precipitous increase in both the severity and number of anti-Muslim hate crimes.” It notes that “there have been very few incidents of actual hate crime where Mr. Trump’s name was uttered since his candidacy,” but adds that “the increase of 87.5% in anti-Muslim hate crime in the days directly following his announcement is a troubling development and worthy of concern.”

Aside from calling for a ban on Muslims entering the the United States, Trump has said that “Islam hates us,” and accused American Muslims of protecting terrorists. The research does not demonstrate a direct causal link, nor can it rule out the role of other factors. It’s possible that the documented increase reflects an increase in hate-crime reporting due to heightened awareness of Islamophobia, which has become a topic of discussion during the presidential race. Nevertheless, the research does raise the possibility that Islamophobic political rhetoric may have devastating consequences.

A Georgetown University report released in May similarly found that threats, intimidation and violence against Muslim Americans have surged over the course of the presidential election. Engy Abdelkader, the author of the report, believes that trend is linked to Trump’s political rise. “Trump has seized on people’s fears and anxieties,” Abdelkader said. “I think that has translated in a number of instances not just to hostility, but acts of violence.”

Islamophobia existed in America long before Trump. Muslims have long been particularly vulnerable to backlash driven by negative stereotypes in part because they make up a relatively small slice of the overall U.S. population. But when a major-party nominee endorses and reinforces those stereotypes, researchers warn, American Muslims face serious risk of increased marginalization and outright violence.

When Trump called for a ban on Muslims entering the country, Clinton called the idea “shameful” and “inconsistent with our values as a nation” in a message on her campaign website. She has denounced Islamophobia and made clear that “Islam is not our adversary.” At a town hall in Iowa, Clinton said that “one of the most distressing aspects of this campaign has been the language of Republican candidates, particularly the frontrunner, that insults, demeans, denigrates different people.” She went on to say that “American Muslims deserve better,” adding “we cannot tolerate this and we must stand up and say every person in this country deserves to be treated with respect.”

Still, some Muslim Americans have their frustrations with Clinton. When she condemned Trump’s call for a Muslim ban, she emphasized that it would play into the hands of “radical jihadists.” Advocates caution that political leaders must be careful not to inadvertently amplify potentially stigmatizing associations between Muslim Americans and terrorism. Political leaders should also make clear, they argue, that Islamophobia must be condemned because it denigrates and threatens the lives of American citizens, and not on the grounds that it threatens national security.

“Muslims cannot just be presented as pawns in this global security game, and that’s how many Muslim Americans feel,” said Laila Abdelaziz, the director of legislative and government affairs for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Florida. “A lot of the rhetoric coming from the Democratic nominee and Democrats in general is absolutely well-intentioned but it’s important to draw out the problematic and reductionist aspects of it as well.”

Most national-security experts agree with Clinton that Islamophobia can undermine security. “If anti-Muslim rhetoric from Trump and his allies is left unchecked it breeds mistrust and mutual suspicion,” said John Horgan, an expert on terrorist psychology at Georgia State University. “That’s hugely problematic and corrosive to our national security strategy.”

Trust between American Muslims and law enforcement has been strained as a result of surveillance and ethnic profiling, and anti-Muslim rhetoric from political leaders stands to further erode trust. Muslim American communities play a crucial role in alerting law enforcement to terrorist threats, making trust integral to prevention.

The father of Ahmad Khan Rahami, the man charged in connection with bombings in New York and New Jersey, told reporters he contacted the FBI two years ago, though there have been conflicting reports as to whether he contacted the agency directly.

The irony of Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric is that the candidate who promises to be tough on terror may be making America not only less safe for American Muslims, but for all Americans.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... me/500840/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Dec 04, 2016 4:35 pm

Trump's Islamophobic rhetoric means a public health crisis for Muslims
According to research, Islamophobia is associated with poor psychological outcomes among Muslims and can adversely affect physical health

Hina Tai and Winn Periyasamy
Wednesday 30 November 2016 12.51 EST

Sarah Zaffar was stopped at a red light near Huntington Beach, California – a predominantly pro-Trump town – when a truck pulled up beside her.

“Hey, hey!” bellowed a white man in a wife-beater and a buzz-cut, trying to get her attention.

“Call it women’s intuition,” Zaffar said, but she refused to acknowledge the aggressive male voice.

“Hey! You’re kind of cute. Why don’t you give me your number so I can send you the fuck out of this country,” he said. Zaffar continued to ignore him.

It was Thursday afternoon, barely two days after the election. Ironically, the 29-year-old psychology graduate student was on her way home from a class on multiculturalism, where they often discussed ways of effectively integrating minorities into the education system. That day Zaffar was wearing a tank top with her hair down – nothing about her indicated that she was a Pakistani Muslim American except the brownness of her skin.

“Hey, look what I have!” the man said. Zaffar finally glanced over and in his hand was some kind of weapon. Silver and shiny. She assumed it was a gun and quickly rolled up her window. As soon as the traffic light turned green, Zaffar sped away. Terrified, she kept checking to make sure she was not being followed until she reached her apartment.

The next day, Zaffar went to the police station to report the incident.

“I have never experienced something like this before,” Zaffar said. “I’m still a little shaken up about it. It plants a seed of fear in you.”

•••

Throughout his campaign, Donald Trump utilized rhetoric laced with xenophobia to attack minorities while feeding on white America’s growing economic distress. Following the election, Trump reaffirmed his support of policies that unequivocally target Muslims – such as denying entry to refugees escaping humanitarian crises from “terror-prone regions”. The Council on American-Islamic Relations has recorded more than 100 incidents against Muslims since election day. In New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo was forced to create a special police unit to address the spike in hate crimes statewide.

As fear grows in response to the escalating hate crimes and discrimination, Trump’s presidency signals an impending public health crisis for Muslims, said Bob Fullilove, professor and associate dean for community and minority affairs at Columbia University.

Decades of research on minority communities has documented how stress associated with stigma, intimidation and discrimination is detrimental to physical and mental health. These health effects are especially concerning for Muslims given Trump won the elections on a platform of Islamophobia.

According to research, Islamophobia is associated with poor psychological outcomes among Muslims. A study assessing discrimination among Arab Americans in Detroit post-9/11 found discrimination increased psychological distress, reduced levels of happiness and worsened overall health for Muslims.

Islamophobia can also adversely affect physical health. Research on Iraqi refugees living in the US after 9/11 found that race-related stressors were correlated with neurological, respiratory, digestive and blood disorders.

We need to talk about Donald Trump's plans for Muslims
Moustafa Bayoumi
Read more
Health is expected to further deteriorate if Trump follows through on his proposed Muslim registry. Prejudicial surveillance of Muslim Americans has been found to increase negative mental health outcomes, particularly subclinical paranoia and anxiety.

Constant stress, such as from religiously biased surveillance, can cause health to deteriorate prematurely, a phenomenon known as the weathering effect, said Merlin Chowkwanyun, assistant professor of sociomedical sciences at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.

“To be constantly worried that you might have to register, put your name in a database or that some sort of connotation is going to be ascribed to you based on name and look is going to cause some wear and tear [on your body],” Chowkwanyun said.

Further studies found that both Muslim patients and providers face religious discrimination within the healthcare system. As the Trump administration continues to target and stigmatize Muslims, it will undoubtedly negatively affect how these communities interact with the healthcare system and providers.

“People are afraid to go to a clinic, a doctor’s appointment, an emergency room because somehow their identity will be questioned, their immigration status will be held up for some sort of interrogation,” Fullilove said. “All things that will keep people away from accessing the services we know to be enjoyable to health.”

In addition, stigma surrounding mental health continues to be a significant barrier to accessing services among many Muslim and immigrant communities. And many clinicians may not be adequately equipped to treat mental illness arising from Islamophobia.

“Most psychologists and psychiatrists are trained in a very kind of narrow clinical way to think about a diagnostic category and what’s necessary to alleviate them, but much less about social context and how it can impact mental health,” said Chowkwanyun.


Spokesman claims Donald Trump never called for Muslim registry despite video evidence
Read more
If Trump follows through on his promises to repeal or reform the Affordable Care Act (ACA), these health effects will be further compounded. The ACA was a revolutionary public health act that allowed millions of people who never had health insurance before to access preventive care. Removing public health-friendly provisions will make it difficult for medical professionals to implement the necessary interventions, programs and policies to improve population health.

“This is part of what I see as the crisis,” Fullilove said. “This is the moment when we should be sending out messages that we understand the nature of the crisis we are all in. That we are committed to maintaining the principles of a democratic society, that we stand with people in their fight for dignity and human rights. Those are the kinds of conditions that promote public health at its best.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/ ... lth-crisis


Donald Trump: The Islamophobia president
Trump rose to power with an Islamophobic campaign and Islamophobia now will become his official policy.
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinio ... 55945.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Dec 04, 2016 4:41 pm

Islamophobia In US: California Mosques Receive Letters Threatening Muslim Genocide
http://www.ibtimes.com/islamophobia-us- ... de-2451315


Donald Trump is ready to bring Islamophobia into the White House

http://mondoweiss.net/2016/11/donald-tr ... QdDuD.dpuf


Donald Trump’s Pick For National Security Adviser Loves To Stoke Islamophobia
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/don ... ce7aaaa440


Donald Trump 'appoints Islamophobic conspiracy theorist to transition team'
Frank Gaffney, described as 'one of America's most notorious Islamophobes', is reportedly helping President-elect select national security advisers
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 20241.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:23 am

Frank Gaffney Is Behind New Anti-Muslim Interfaith Group

by Eli Clifton

The day before Donald Trump’s inauguration, a new interfaith coalition of clergy announced their launch with a press conference urging the new president to designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. Such a designation might allow the government to expand its surveillance and targeting of American Muslims. Earlier this week, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-FL) introduced legislation calling on the State Department to report to Congress on “the designation of the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization.”

Urging a crackdown on American Muslims seems more like the policy arena inhabited by anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist Frank Gaffney, who helped advise Cruz’s presidential campaign. Gaffney’s baseless accusations about the Muslim Brotherhood have included claims that Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist, and former George W. Bush appointee Suhail Khan were part of a vast plot to infiltrate the U.S. government.

As it turns out, similarities to Gaffney’s brand of anti-Muslim advocacy aren’t just a coincidence. The group, Faith Leaders for America, was apparently started by Gaffney’s organization, the Center for Security Policy (CSP), a fact the coalition never acknowledges on its website or press releases.

LobeLog reviewed domain name registration filings for the group and found that, despite an apparent effort to anonymize the registration, Center for Security Policy staff members Adam Savit and Christine Brim submitted the initial registration.

When contacted about CSP’s ownership of the group’s domain name and potential involvement in the interfaith coalition’s work, Gaffney acknowledged to LobeLog that his group was playing a behind-the-scenes role in shaping the group’s work. Gaffney said:

The Center for Security has provided some initial administrative support and counsel to the informal Faith Leaders for America coalition, and may continue to do so if asked by the Faith Leaders.
Indeed, the group’s positions have consistently fallen in line with Gaffney’s laser focus on promoting conspiracy theories about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. government reframed in the context of an interfaith movement (the group includes one rabbi and no Imams). In a prayer delivered at the group’s press conference, Jerry Johnson, president of National Religious Broadcasters, said:

President-Elect Trump, tomorrow you will become the president of the United States. We, Faith Leaders for America, want you to know you have our prayerful support as you begin to counter jihad and protect Americans from Islamic terrorism.
When you label the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, we support you.
When you call Islamic terrorism what it is, Islamic extremism, we support you.
When you stop the mass importation of unvetted immigrants from areas that harbor, train, and send out jihadists, we support you.
When you require appropriate extreme vetting for those who do enter the USA from these same areas, we support you.
In other words, President-Elect Trump, we’ve got your back. Some religious leaders falsely contend that these actions would violate religious freedom. Actually, we know these steps are proper, legal, and necessary to protect our First Amendment freedoms of religion, speech, press, and assembly.
Indeed, singling out a single religious group for scrutiny, as Trump appears to be doing with his forthcoming executive order excluding refugees from Muslim majority countries, is almost certainly going be challenged in court as a violation of religious freedom.

The American Civil Liberties Union responded to the forthcoming order yesterday, urging Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) to cancel the pending committee vote on the confirmation of Trump’s pick for attorney general, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL). The ACLU called on Grassley to hold a second hearing at which “the Senate should vigorously question the role of Senator Sessions in developing [Trump’s executive orders] and proposals and his plans to implement and execute them.”

Gaffney’s formation of what appears to be an Astroturf interfaith group, which seems to exist exclusively to promote CSP’s anti-Muslim agenda to the new president and his supporters, seems like an odd strategy. But the group has gotten positive write ups, with no mention of Gaffney’s involvement, in right-wing publications, including: ConservativeHQ, Religion News Service, National Religious Broadcasters, and the Christian Broadcasting Network.

Gaffney even reported on the group, while failing to acknowledge his own role in their formation, in a column for Family Security Matters titled “Courageous Christian and Jewish clerics announce ‘Faith Leaders for America.’” He wrote:

I wanted to share with you a most extraordinary experience I had today. At the National Press Club in Washington, nine courageous Christian and Jewish clerics announced the formation of a new group, Faith Leaders for America. The mission they have undertaken, together with more than sixty-five other influential clergy of different faiths and denominations, is to promote and protect our constitutional freedoms increasingly under assault—in this country, as well as overseas—from adherents to the totalitarian Islamic doctrine known as Sharia.
Gaffney’s efforts to influence Trump would be hard to take seriously—he once claimed that the Missile Defense Agency logo “appears ominously to reflect a morphing of the Islamic crescent and star with the Obama campaign logo”—if he had not already played a significant role in influencing Trump’s policy positions.

Over a year ago, Trump cited a CSP-sponsored poll that allegedly showed that “25% of [American Muslims] agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad” and 51% “agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Shariah.”

The poll was an online opt-in survey of 600 Muslim, a fact that CSP had not initially disclosed. The American Association for Public Opinion Research, which sets ethical standards for pollsters denounces opt-in surveys as misleading and inaccurate. “The pollster has no idea who is responding to the question,” it warned, noting that such surveys lack a “‘grounded statistical tie’ to the population. As a result, estimates from self-selected volunteers are subject to unknown error that cannot be measured.”

Trump referenced the poll to justify his campaign’s commitment to a “complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”

Yesterday, Trump took the first steps to fulfill that campaign promise.
http://lobelog.com/frank-gaffney-is-beh ... ith-group/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby Elvis » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:06 pm



Thanks SLAD. In that article, anyone notice this:



Police and town officials later apologized for the incident, calling it "very regrettable." But such an incident is hardly surprising amid growing alarm in the wake of the recent mass terrorist attacks in Orlando and San Bernardino, Calif., in which the Muslim attackers pledged loyalty to the Islamic State.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wor ... ad79025c27



How does this happen? How do so many national level reporters keep repeating this lie? Is it deliberate?

More questions here: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39367&p=629211#p629211
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7432
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jan 31, 2017 8:21 am

How Islamophobes and “Alternative Facts” Shaped Trump’s Muslim Ban

by Eli Clifton

The White House’s temporary ban on visitors from seven Muslim majority countries threw the Trump administration into its first constitutional conflict over the weekend when multiple federal judges blocked parts of the executive order. Media attention has justifiably focused on the legal proceedings underway to release travelers from detainment at airports across the country and prevent deportations. But it’s worth reexamining the deeply flawed and unscientific polling that inspired Trump’s targeting of Muslim travelers.

The roots of Trump’s Muslim ban go back to his embrace of non-existent Pew Research data and an unscientific poll undertaken by one of his top advisors (who claims that she disseminates “alternative facts”) and commissioned by a renowned anti-Muslim conspiracy theorist with close ties to Trump strategist Steve Bannon.

Yesterday, apparently in response to protests across the U.S., Trump issued a statement claiming that his executive order was misinterpreted as a ban on Muslims entering the country. He said:

To be clear, this is not a Muslim ban, as the media is falsely reporting. This is not about religion—this is about terror and keeping our country safe.
But Trump explicitly called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on” back on December 7, 2015.

In that statement, Trump cited polling by Pew Research and the Center for Security Policy to back up his statement that “there is great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population.”

Trump didn’t link to a specific Pew Research poll but none of their polls appears to support that conclusion.

Pew’s 2011 report on Muslim Americans concluded there are “no signs of growth in alienation or support for extremism” and found that only 21% of Muslim Americans say there is either a “great deal” (6%), or a “fair amount” (15%) of support for extremism in their communities.

The study also found that Muslim Americans were by and large happy with their lives in the U.S. The authors concluded:

[…] Muslim Americans have not become disillusioned with the country. They are overwhelmingly satisfied with the way things are going in their lives (82%) and continue to rate their communities very positively as places to live (79% excellent or good).
Pew’s vice president for global strategy, James Bell, responded to Trump’s statement, saying, “The statement released by Mr. Trump’s campaign does not specify a data point, so we can’t identify the report that he may be referencing.”

Although the Pew research cited by Trump simply doesn’t exist, the Center for Security Policy poll certainly does. But the poll’s origins and methods are highly suspect.

The poll, according to Trump’s statement, showed that: “25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad” and 51% of those polled, “agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Shariah.”

The polling was a highly unscientific online opt-in survey of 600 Muslims, a fact that the Center for Security Policy did not initially disclose. The American Association for Public Opinion Research, which sets ethical standards for pollsters, cautions that opt-in surveys can be misleading and inaccurate. “The pollster has no idea who is responding to the question,” it warns, noting that such surveys lack a “‘grounded statistical tie’ to the population. As a result, estimates from self-selected volunteers are subject to unknown error that cannot be measured.”

The Center for Security Policy and the pollsters they commissioned, Polling Company/Woman Trend, are also questionable sources for research used in forming public policy.

The Center for Security Policy is a hawkish think tank largely dedicated to combating efforts to reduce defense spending (they have received funding from Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Raytheon, and General Electric) and promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about Muslim Americans.

The group’s president, Frank Gaffney, has claimed, without evidence, that Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist, and former George W. Bush appointee Suhail Khan were part of a vast Muslim Brotherhood plot to infiltrate the U.S. government. He also claimed that the Missile Defense Agency logo “appears ominously to reflect a morphing of the Islamic crescent and star with the Obama campaign logo.”

Gaffney maintained a close public relationship with Trump’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon, before Bannon joined the Trump campaign, appearing 29 times on Bannon’s radio show and regularly contributing as a columnist on Breitbart.com, where Bannon served as chairman.

Last week, LobeLog revealed that Gaffney was playing a behind-the-scenes role in the formation of a new interfaith group that supports Trump’s anti-Muslim agenda.

Gaffney’s choice of polling firm, Polling Company/Woman Trend, is interesting as well. Its president is Trump advisor Kellyanne Conway, who recently made headlines last week when she described the administration supplying the media with “alternative facts,” leading to comparisons to the totalitarian regime in George Orwell’s novel 1984.

Following Trump’s campaign announcement proposing a ban on Muslim immigration, an unnamed representative of Conway’s firm told New York magazine that the poll was statistically unreliable and that Trump was misusing the data. They said:

As this poll was conducted among an online group of opt-in respondents, we did not publish a margin of error or otherwise advise our client that the data were statistically representative of the entire US Muslim population. In addition, Mr. Trump’s premise and policy proposal has no backing in the survey.
In other words, the chaos unleashed over the weekend by Trump’s executive order banning the entry of citizens from seven Muslim majority countries may very well be rooted in Trump’s acceptance of Kellyanne Conway’s “alternative facts” and the anti-Muslim conspiracy theories espoused by Washington’s most infamous Islamophobe.
http://lobelog.com/how-islamophobes-and ... uslim-ban/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Islamophobia American Style

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:54 am

Militia members sentenced in Garden City bomb plot

This combination of Oct. 14, 2016, file booking photos provided by the Sedgwick County Sheriff's Office shows from left, Patrick Stein, Curtis Allen and Gavin Wright, three members of a Kansas militia group sentenced in a plot to bomb an apartment building filled with Somali immigrants in Garden City.
Three militia members convicted of taking part in a foiled plot to massacre Muslims in southwest Kansas were sentenced Friday to decades in prison during an emotional court hearing in which one of the targeted victims pleaded: “Please don’t hate us.”

U.S. District Judge Eric Melgren sentenced Patrick Stein, the alleged ringleader, to 30 years in prison and Curtis Allen, who drafted a manifesto for the group, to 25 years. Gavin Wright, who authorities said helped make and test explosives at his mobile home business, was sentenced to 26 years. The plot was foiled after another militia members alerted authorities.

U.S. District Judge Erin Melgren dismissed defense attorneys’ request that he take into the account the divisive political atmosphere in which the men formed their plot to blow up a mosque and apartments housing Somali immigrants in the meatpacking town Garden City, about 220 miles west of Wichita, on the day after the 2016 election.

“We have extremely divisive elections because our system is to resolve those through elections and not violence,” Melgren said.

Stein’s attorneys have argued that Stein believed then-President Barack Obama would declare martial law and not recognize the validity of the election if Donald Trump won, forcing militias to step in. Stein’s attorneys noted that during the 2016 campaign, all three men read and shared Russian propaganda on their Facebook feed designed to sow discord in the U.S. political system.

Attorney Jim Pratt told Melgren that for years Stein had had immersed himself in right-wing media and commentators, whom he said have normalized hate. But Melgren was openly skeptical, telling Pratt: “Millions of people listen to this stuff – whether it comes from the left or the right.”

Prosecutors presented video testimony from some Somali immigrants who were the targets of the bombing. In one clip, Ifrah Farah pleaded: “Please don’t kill us. Please don’t hate us. We can’t hurt you.”

Allen choked up as he addressed the judge, prompting his attorney to step in and finish a prepared statement in which Allen offered “my sincere apologies” to anyone who was frightened and asked for their forgiveness. But Stein apologized only to his family and friends, and the judge noted when sentencing him that, unlike Allen, he had shown no remorse.

Melgren sentenced Stein to 30 years for conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction and 10 years for conspiracy against civil rights. He sentenced Allen to 25 years for conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction and 10 years for conspiracy against civil rights. The sentences will run concurrently.

Prosecutors were seeking life sentences for Allen, Stein and Wright, all of whom are white.

The plot was thwarted when militia member Dan Day tipped off authorities to escalating threats of violence. He testified at the men’s trial last year that Stein started recruiting others to kill Muslim immigrants after the June 2016 mass shooting at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, by a gunman who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group.

Recordings that prosecutors played for jurors last April portrayed a damning picture of a splinter group of the militia Kansas Security Force that came to be known as “the Crusaders.”

The sentencing hearings for the men came a day after two members of an Illinois militia known as the White Rabbits pleaded guilty in the 2017 bombing of a Minnesota mosque , admitting they hoped the attack would scare Muslims into leaving the U.S. No one was injured in that attack.

Stein, Wright and Allen were convicted of conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction and conspiracy against civil rights. Wright was also found guilty of lying to the FBI.
https://www.kansas.com/news/local/article225109195.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests