Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
tapitsbo » Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:59 am wrote:Wait - I'm getting a very different reading from each of the two posts above although they do seem to complement each other
tapitsbo » Fri Oct 02, 2015 11:39 am wrote:A-ha, it read to me like you were endorsing an attempt to ban guns as a way to splinter/put an end to the USA.
So I should've read something like "better to do this sooner rather than later?"
General Patton » Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:08 am wrote:tapitsbo » Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:59 am wrote:Wait - I'm getting a very different reading from each of the two posts above although they do seem to complement each other
To clarify, I support banning all firearms at the Federal level and explosive products such as tannerite.
DrEvil » Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:43 pm wrote:I don't support banning all guns outright, but they should be strictly regulated - background checks, registration with the police/other agency, loss of the right to own guns if you're mentally unstable, have a violent criminal record etc. Guns should only be allowed for two reasons - hunting and sport.
tapitsbo » Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:20 pm wrote:It's interesting to ponder the idea of curbing proliferation of guns as has been done with nuclear weapons.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests