Thanks for the Wellstone links, that one still weighs heavy on me and does not get the attention it deserves. I think Wellstone and JFK Jr were both taken out before 9-11 because of the noise they would have made.
Re: Lucky Larry
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 2:52 pm
by zangtang
Shouldn't think apology necessary even if so. seems to have gotten away with possibly the least scrutiny of those whom we might see as integral players - & for what must be the largest (?) real estate insurance fraud (barrinbg foreknowledge/complicity of the whole shebang) - suffered some raised eyebrows over the tortuous semantics of saying 'pull it', asked to explain (badly) that on video, & thats about it.
The insurance 'double dipping' payout struck me as a pay-off in broad daylight.Not sure anyone cares anymore - but that must have required collusion amongst insurance companies. fly on the wall at the negotiations over the clauses for the insurance contracts would (eyes glazing over) throw out some er.....interesting minutiae.
I wasn't rigorous about Wellstone at all, at all - I just went ahead and assumed it was murder. I paused to note that they took out his wife & daughter (on top of the staffers & pilots) - but i guess that just enforces the message....bit like icing on the cake.
Re: Lucky Larry
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:17 am
by NeonLX
Weird how *some* of the mainstream liberal media are once again talking about how Bush, Condaleeza, etc. were warned about Bin Laden's threat to fly planes into buildings, but essentially ignored the warnings. Apparently, this is in response to the Benghazi/Clinton bidness.
Yesterday, I heard several people talking about the warnings during a call-in show with liberal leanings. One guy managed to get in a line about how the administration was complicit in the whole thing before the host talked over him and then hung up.
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 1:50 pm
