Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
So you are all sailing in frozen waters, and when you see an iceberg, you don't see it as the expression of how much is under the surface, but as a giant white plastic bag deployed by the Soros-Jews or whatever your imaginary construct impervious to detection is.
I'm not here to be nice.
‘Goebbels had less-biased articles’: Public slams MSM for Putin focus after Panama papers leak
Published time: 4 Apr, 2016 11:50
Edited time: 4 Apr, 2016 17:27
The world’s media has been pointing at one person following a massive documents leak from a Panama law firm. But that person, President Vladimir Putin, wasn’t even mentioned in the data leak. Sections of the public are not happy at the media coverage.
Pictures of President Putin could be found on the front pages of highly-respected news publications around the globe. The Guardian and the Mail Online were both at it, despite the fact that in the 11.5 million documents that were published; Putin’s name was not mentioned once.
READ MORE: Putinophobia hits boiling point: Kremlin says ‘insinuations’ in Panama leak don’t need response
Newspapers around the globe had plenty of world leaders to choose from: President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko managed to find his way on to the list, as did King Salman of Saudi Arabia. The father of British Prime Minister David Cameron was also among those mentioned. Despite these high-profile figures, the majority of the international media decided to accuse Putin of corruption. And even if the article itself was not about Putin, the cover picture suggested otherwise.
Nordic » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:01 pm wrote:I would hate to live in a world where no one was as smart as meeeee.
Let there be mutual ignore for everyone who can't deal with what I tell them.
"The Panama Papers are the exact kind of weaponized psyops posing as an 'activist leak' I wanted to see from hybrid warfare."
JackRiddler » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:31 pm wrote:Any stupidity and lie can be perpetuated on this board as long as it's said nicely.
JackRiddler » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:13 pm wrote:"The Panama Papers are the exact kind of weaponized psyops posing as an 'activist leak' I wanted to see from hybrid warfare."
This is a form of fundamentalist thinking. I've seen it applied to the "28 pages," anything about 9/11 that wasn't demolitions, Sibel Edmonds (who eventually threw the same at Greenwald), Assange, Kyriakou, etc. etc., now this. Panama Papers in fact is repeating the State Department cables pattern. (The gatekeepers also dug out Putin stuff first, no matter how minor, and then the rapid-response from the grand conspiracists is immediately a-ha! All psyops! No iceberg! Avert your eyes and listen to Wrong Way Wizard!)
JackRiddler » Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:13 pm wrote:"The Panama Papers are the exact kind of weaponized psyops posing as an 'activist leak' I wanted to see from hybrid warfare."
This is a form of fundamentalist thinking. I've seen it applied to the "28 pages," anything about 9/11 that wasn't demolitions, Sibel Edmonds (who eventually threw the same at Greenwald), Assange, Kyriakou, etc. etc., now this. Panama Papers in fact is repeating the State Department cables pattern. (The gatekeepers also dug out Putin stuff first, no matter how minor, and then the rapid-response from the grand conspiracists is immediately a-ha! All psyops! No iceberg! Avert your eyes and listen to Wrong Way Wizard!)
Editor of Süddeutsche Zeitung responded to the lack of U.S. individuals in the documents, saying "Just wait for what is coming next"
Fund run by David Cameron’s father avoided paying tax in Britain
Panama Papers reveal Ian Cameron hired Bahamas residents, including a part-time bishop, to keep offshore company exempt
• Global reaction to Panama Papers leak - live
• The $2bn offshore trail that leads to Vladimir Putin
• The hidden millions from Brink’s-Mat gold robbery
• Explained: what are the Panama Papers?
http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/ap ... ax-bahamas
One good thing here though is that more people will get a sense of the magnitude of the corrupt billions that float around in, and are enabled by this system.
What happened to Mossack Fonseca is exactly what happened to Lucky Luciano's network: they thought they were providing services to intelligence agencies in exchange for protection -- when in fact, they were training their own replacements.
I don't dislike sounder, whom I do not know, for any reason other than his activity on the board.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests