Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
JackRiddler » Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:58 pm wrote:norton ash » Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:48 pm wrote:Har har... I have a skep-dick friend who calls this site Vigorous Masturbation.
But he reads it!
JackRiddler » 25 Sep 2016 19:43 wrote:Belligerent Savant » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:38 pm wrote:.
In any event, this could be a 'power of suggestion' scenario. This "meme" (or whatever we want to call it, since the veracity of the Mandela Effect remains in dispute, for now) started with someone placing the suggestion/framing the scene to convey that she had braces in that scene, and so most played along because they recall braces AT SOME POINT in the movie, though not necessarily in that particular scene.
Nah, I now think the likeliest scenario to be that she did not have braces in the smile scene or any other, but we (a lot of people) later remembered that she did, because it makes sense when you recall the smile scene that way. And this would not be very unusual, especially with memories of fictions we consume. For years I was confusing characters from Catch-22 and Catcher in the Rye, because I'd read them in the same year of school, and only untangled it after reading one of these again.
Then again, elfismile's old VHS may yet show otherwise. (Sorry your getting it doesn't count - who says the VHS being sold now isn't doctored too?!)
dada wrote:I think the obsession with consumer culture artifacts is a type of displaced fear of mortality. Pop culture as watered down totemistic fetishization.
It's like we're addicted to a cheap rush of lower insectoid hive 'emotions.' Some of us.
Dust does some funny things.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests