Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Election

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:33 am

well this is kinda odd I wonder what's on trump's mind today?

implementing sanctions now...why now all of a sudden?


oh this is the US Treasury not the Congress sanctions


Todays US Treasury sanctions on 5 entities & 19 individuals in response [FINALLY] to malicious cyber attacks & US election interference includes Kremlin-linked troll farm The Internet Research Agency and Russian intelligence agencies the FSB & GRU.

Image

Image

Treasury sanctions 'Putin's chef,' Yevgeniy Prigozhin, and other Russians over 2016 election interference. Prigozhin is among the 13 individuals mentioned in the sanctions who were also indicted in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia's probe.

Image
Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 15, 2018 1:54 pm

Polly Sigh

Mueller Subpoenas Trump Organization, Demanding Documents About Russia – first known time that SC demanded docs directly related to Trump’s businesses. Not clear why SC issued subpoena instead of just asking for the docs.
Were they not cooperating?

Image
Image
Last edited by seemslikeadream on Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:10 pm

Polly Sigh

Two officials of the Trump inaugural committee have been convicted of financial crimes, Rick Gates & Elliott Broidy [a top Trump fundraiser now under scrutiny by Mueller]; the cmte treasurer was an unindicted co-conspirator in an accounting fraud.

Image
Image
Image
https://twitter.com/dcpoll
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 15, 2018 5:46 pm

see Broidy's name down there in red....yea it's that Broidy :)


Two controversial GOP fundraisers duking it out in court

By Kevin G. Hall And Ben Wieder khall@mcclatchydc.com bwieder@mcclatchydc.com
WASHINGTON
This screenshot of a social-media posting in August 2014 by California GOP fundraiser Yuri Vanetik (second from left) shows him with fellow fundraiser Elliott Broidy (second from right) and President George W. Bush. Broidy and Vanetik are now engaged in a nasty civil fraud lawsuit.
This screenshot of a social-media posting in August 2014 by California GOP fundraiser Yuri Vanetik (second from left) shows him with fellow fundraiser Elliott Broidy (second from right) and President George W. Bush. Broidy and Vanetik are now engaged in a nasty civil fraud lawsuit.
Call it the oil well that didn’t end well.

On one side of a bitter, long-running civil lawsuit over a failed Russian oilfield investment is Elliott Broidy, a top Trump fundraiser who faces questions raised by McClatchy and other news outlets about his work in Romania and with the United Arab Emirates, and about a possible contract to persuade the Justice Department to drop a probe involving Malaysia’s prime minister.

In spite of that, Broidy co-hosted an event in Beverly Hills Tuesday night that was projected to bring in $5 million for Trump and the Republican National Committee.

On the other is Yuri Vanetik, a Zelig-like Soviet émigré who has misrepresented his academic credentials, may have run afoul of foreign agent registration requirements when he took politicians from Ukraine and Georgia to a series of meetings on Capitol Hill and, with his father, has been ordered by the courts to pay at least $8 million in civil fraud judgments.

Yet Vanetik is frequently photographed with the Republican elite, including House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former President George W. Bush.

The escalating legal fight between the two Californians in the upper echelons of GOP fundraising sheds light on the network of shady characters – and shell companies – they did business with in connection with the oil deal. And it underscores the checkered pasts of both men, pasts that seem to have either been missed or ignored by politicians and rainmakers in the Republican Party.

Broidy, in fact, outdoes Vanetik when it comes to run-ins with the law.

He admitted in 2009 that he had paid nearly $1 million in bribes to pension officials in New York state in exchange for their investment with his Israel-focused Markstone Capital fund. His company was forced to forfeit $18 million in management fees, and Broidy avoided prison time by giving prosecutors information on the recipients of his payments.

He re-emerged during the 2016 presidential election as a top fundraiser for several Republican candidates and was named deputy finance chair for the RNC. A McClatchy investigation in February revealed that he’s now running a defense company and brought a Romanian politician facing corruption charges at home to President Trump’s inauguration, months before Broidy’s firm opened up shop in Romania. Subsequent reporting by the New York Times showed that the defense company has won contracts in the United Arab Emirates and that Broidy has advocated to the Trump administration on behalf of officials there.

yuri-broidy2
This social media posting from 2012 shows California GOP fundraisers Yuri Vanetik (far left) and Elliott Broidy (second from left) together with Republican Rep. Ed Royce (far right). Broidy and Vanetik are now fighting each other in a nasty civil fraud suit playing out in Golden State courts.
The contentious legal action brought by Broidy against his friend Vanetik has played out under the radar, in part because it is unfolding in the California state court system, where many records are not easily accessible online.

Broidy said that he was the victim of an elaborate scheme carried out by the Vanetiks.

"As a jury unanimously determined, Yuri Vanetik and his father Anatoly defrauded me in a sham deal about a supposed energy-related investment, which included shell companies created and/or operated by the Vanetiks, the collection of which was determined by the court to be a fraudulent scheme,” Broidy said.

Vanetik and his lawyer did not respond to requests for comment.

Friendship leads to litigation

Documents filed with California’s 4th Circuit Court of Appeals tell the sordid story behind a Russian oil deal gone wrong.

In an email on Dec. 7, 2010, Vanetik told Broidy — his friend of about eight years — he’d just been appointed to the board of a company that had a bombshell oil project: A deal to unlock and tap oil on 85,000 acres in the southwestern Russian republic of Kalmykia. Reserves on the land were estimated to be worth $11 billion.

The company, Terra Resources PLC — which, it turned out, had been set up by Vanetik and his father — needed more board members, Vanetik said. “Any recommendations?” he asked Broidy.

Broidy wound up investing $750,000 in the venture to help unlock the oil wells on the land. Even as he awaited sentencing in the New York pension case, he sank money into the Russian oil field, sending the funds to a Vanetik-controlled Nevada limited liability company, KLEL Funds LLC.

Broidy purchased his shares using an IRA that was administered by a trustee, Farmers Merchant and Trust Co.

Both Broidy and the Vanetiks are frequent users of shell companies, often limited liability corporations that partially shield them from litigation and afford them greater anonymity. According to records revealed in a 2016 court motion, the Vanetiks together or separately were officers or managers of 37 corporations or limited liability companies, most with a revoked status for nonpayment of taxes and fees; only eight were active as of that summer. One of them allegedly was formed to own luxury cars that both Vanetiks drive.

As far as Broidy knew, the project was on track. But less than a year after he bought in, Terra’s custodial bank in Germany liquidated much of its stock to recover some of the debts it was owed. Terra’s remaining stock collapsed was delisted.

Broidy implored the Vanetiks to return his money for months before accepting the help of a mutual friend, Steven J. Brown, who offered to intercede. Perhaps ironically, just a year later, Brown, a movie producer with whom Broidy joined on several ventures, and two of Brown’s co-conspirators were accused in a civil suit of defrauding an investor; the trio were later criminally charged with defrauding multiple investors. While his co-defendants have pleaded guilty, Brown still faces charges of defrauding nine victims. (There’s no indication of any wrongdoing on Broidy’s part in the matter.)

Finally, Broidy filed suit.

Farmers Merchant and Trust was the named plaintiff in the civil fraud case. Besides the Vanetiks, the defendants included Richard Weed, a lawyer for both Vanetiks and a major Terra shareholder himself.

The lawsuit alleged that Broidy ponied up money to make the wells productive but instead, the Vanetiks used the money to repay past debts and to support their lifestyle. Broidy, said the suit, only later learned his money never went to the intended purposes. Yuri Vanetik had sold his own stock, Broidy alleged, and fleeced his partner.

The suit went to trial, and in November 2015 jurors ordered Vanetik and his father Anatoly, to pay $3.25 million to Farmers Merchant and Trust, which included punitive damages for fraud.

(Weed was also ordered to pay restitution. But his portion of the verdict was overturned by a judge, in a decision now being challenged by Broidy. The Securities and Exchange Commission brought fraud charges against Weed in an unrelated case with similar allegations; he was found guilty and was sentenced to four years in prison.)

screencapture-yuribroidy
This screenshot of a social-media posting in August 2014 by California GOP fundraiser Yuri Vanetik (second from left) shows him with fellow fundraiser Elliott Broidy (second from right) and President George W. Bush. Broidy and Vanetik are now engaged in a nasty civil fraud lawsuit.
The Vanetiks tried to get a new trial, an effort dismissed in mocking tone by the Judge Ronald L. Bauer, who noted their use of a series of shell companies to “insulate themselves” from their misdeeds.

“They were the artful puppeteers who masterminded the scam that relieved the plaintiff of $750,000,” the judge wrote dismissively. “That money was used to personally enrich these defendants and enable them to travel the world trolling for more big fish.”

Unable to get a retrial, the Vanetiks appealed. And that’s when the secrets really started spilling out.

In a document submitted to the court in July 2017, lawyers for the Vanetiks argued that Yuri, who had raised money for GOP presidential candidates John McCain and Mitt Romney, and who earlier in 2017 was named to the GOP’s New York state finance committee, and his father didn’t have the money to make good on the civil penalties. The lawyers said Vanetik International had $9,600 in its bank account and that Yuri had just $282 in his own account.

They also disclosed that another Vanetik-linked company, Archer Resources, owed $62,428.74 on a 2008 Bentley that Yuri Vanetik drove around California’s Orange County. Documents introduced during the appeal showed that the American Express card Vanetik used for the oil venture was also used to purchase a $57,000 watch and pay almost $6,000 to a tailor. American Express has also sued Yuri Vanetik for nonpayment of bills totaling more than $181,000.

The appeal is ongoing, with extensions of time granted just this week.

Broidy’s foreign activities have increasingly attracted attention in recent months. McClatchy reported in February that Broidy invited as his guest to President Trump’s inauguration Liviu Dragnea, a Romanian politician who was scheduled to go on trial back home for corruption just weeks later. A defense company owned by Broidy opened up shop in Romania months after inauguration, and has formed partnerships with several state entities as it seeks to win millions in government contracts there.

Soon after McClatchy’s report, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reported on Broidy’s possible efforts in 2017 to influence the Trump administration on behalf of Malaysia and the United Arab Emirates.

As it happens, 2017 was also the year Broidy significantly increased his campaign contributions to the Republican Party and its candidates, giving more than $500,000 to GOP candidates and committees, according to federal records, with more than half of it going to the RNC. That total was more than triple what he'd given in any previous year, when accounting for inflation.

Trail of Trouble

Vanetik’s controversial past goes beyond résumé inflation.

Several of his business associates have been jailed, including an early partner named Hiep Trinh with whom the Vanetiks were issued a desist order by the California’s Division of Corporations because of fraud concerns. Trinh later went to prison in Michigan for fraud.

Other Vanetik associates dating back decades complain they were duped by the man who today posts photos rubbing shoulders with GOP glitterati.

“My impression of him was he had this aura of wealth and connections in Eastern Europe, and that’s why were like, ‘he has some connections to power,” said Geoffrey Fiala, a director of a company incorporated in 1999 by Vanetik in Nevada called OnePoint, Inc.

“Everything I was involved in with him went south,” Fiala told McClatchy in an interview.

The company was envisioned as a dating website, with computer programmers based in Russia, Fiala said; he and other investors put in money. But, said Fiala, money that went in never resulted in a finished product, and the project fell apart around the time many tech companies cratered in 2000 and 2001. Another director confirmed Fiala’s account but declined comment.

yuri-hunter
This social media posting in April 2016 by California GOP fundraiser Yuri Vanetik shows him with now-embattled Rep. Duncan Hunter. The Justice Department in early 2018 began looking at the campaign finances of the Southern California congressman.
With that project heading to ruin, Tony Vanetik suggested another investment, a shell company that the elder Soviet émigré had invested in, according to Fiala.

“There was no upside in it, I just lost a lot of money,” he said.

Alon Stivi is another partner who walked away from the Vanetiks. His bio calls him a former member of Israel’s elite forces that fought in Lebanon, and his current security consultancy Direct Measures International includes online training in active-shooter survival. An online video shows Stivi training Yuri Vanetik in tactical fighting with an assault rifle.

During their friendship, said Stivi, Vanetik took him to Broidy’s house for dinner. Stivi got involved in GOP fundraising, and said Vanetik introduced him to Gingrich. Vanetik was on Gingrich’s finance committee in California during his failed presidential bid in 2012.

Their business ventures went less smoothly. Stivi and Vanetik partnered in 2005 on a Vanetik-registered LLC called Fearless Unlimited, Inc., said Stivi.

“He did not follow up on his promises of promoting it and funding it. It was never active,” Stivi said. “I judge an individual by what they do. I found some inconsistency at the time, he wasn’t following through. I told him he needs to come clean.”

Another reason for the break, said Stivi, is that Vanetik surrounded himself “with questionable types of Russian guys, claimed to have them as a bodyguard.” Stivi, an experienced weapons handler, said these men were not security experts.

A last straw for Stivi’s relationship with Vanetik: Stivi armored a high-end Mercedes Benz for him, only to see it sold to someone else and exported to Russia. According to Stivi, Vanetik never paid him for the work, which was featured in a luxury lifestyle magazine article posted on Stivi’s website.

“He never paid me for any of that,” Stivi said.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation- ... 15779.html


Trump donor Elliott Broidy named in Ukraine criminal probe

Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy under scrutiny over alleged deal with sanctioned Russian bank VTB.

Will Thorne8 Mar 2018
In 2009, Broidy pleaded guilty for bribing New York state pension officials [Getty Images]
In 2009, Broidy pleaded guilty for bribing New York state pension officials [Getty Images]
The Prosecutor General of Ukraine has launched an investigation into claims surrounding an alleged multi-million dollar lobbying contract that names one of US President Donald Trump's most influential fundraisers, Elliott Broidy.

The 12-page document, which appears to have been signed by Broidy, outlines his role as providing "political advocacy" on behalf of a now sanctioned Russian bank, VTB.

The deal was apparently dated June 12, 2014, just weeks before VTB Bank was blacklisted by the United States and European Union as a key Kremlin asset following Russia's invasion of Crimea. Russian President Vladimir Putin is guest of honour at VTB Bank's investor conference every year.

The document raises serious questions about whether Broidy is in breach of the US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), a law that has gained prominence following the investigation of special counsel Robert Mueller into foreign meddling in the 2016 presidential election. Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his aide Rick Gates have both been charged as a result of their work in Ukraine.

The document, obtained by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit, also suggests that Broidy, a national deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee, would provide the same services to Investment Capital Ukraine (ICU), a Ukraine brokerage that has acted as financial advisors to President Petro Poroshenko.

"If this is a bonafide document, it is very troubling," says the Washington-based organisation Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

"Broidy appears to be an unregistered agent of a foreign principal in violation of federal law," says spokesman Jordan Libowitz.


The document obtained by Al Jazeera raises serious questions about whether Broidy is in breach of the US Foreign Agents Registration Act [Al Jazeera]

US law requires American citizens involved in lobbying on behalf of foreign governments or parties to register with the US Department of Justice on their Foreign Registered Agents (FARA) database. Al Jazeera found no evidence that Broidy is registered despite mounting evidence of multiple foreign clients.

Details of the alleged consultancy first emerged in Ukraine in January. The files were handed to Ukraine's Prosecutor General, who has ordered the Kiev Prosecutor's office to investigate further.

Ukraine's Institute of Law and Society submitted the documents to authorities, and the reform group is now calling for a thorough investigation in both Ukraine and the US.

The document outlines the work to be undertaken by Broidy, which includes "regular political and business analysis, political advocacy, investment advice, and money management" to VTB Bank and ICU.


Russian President Vladimir Putin is a regular guest of honour at the annual investor conference of VTB Bank, whose chairman is Yuri Soloviev [File: EPA]

The consultancy work was apparently to be paid in five annual payments of $2.5m from an offshore company, Quillas Equities SA, which is registered in the British Virgin Islands, but with an address in Dubai.  According to the Panama Papers, a massive leak of offshore documentation, Quillas Equities SA's shareholder is Yuri Soloviev, first deputy president and chairman of VTB Bank Management Board.

The document names Broidy as a consultant who has "many years of investment banking and money management experience." It goes on to detail his "expertise in international investments and American politics."

The alleged agreement outlines Broidy's background in Republican politics, describing how he served "as Finance Chair of the Republican Party and has access to US politicians and government agencies."

The business and lobbying activities of this prominent Republican are coming under increasing scrutiny beyond Ukraine.

Last week a group calling itself LA Confidential leaked emails that appeared to show Broidy and his wife Robin Rosenzweig, deputy finance chair of the Republican National Committee, asking for more than $75m to quash an investigation in the US into a multibillion-dollar fraud in Malaysia.

Further revelations came from The New York Times, which reported that Broidy has a lucrative defence contract with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and that he had lobbied President Trump to meet privately with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the leader of the UAE. The emails suggest he has direct access to the US President.

Romanian media have also reported Broidy's role in negotiating arms deals worth potentially millions of dollars.

In 2009, Broidy pleaded guilty in New York to bribing New York state pension officials with almost $1m in return for their $250m investment in an Israel-focused investment fund he helped to manage.

He and the firm paid over $30m in fines; however, the charges against Broidy were downgraded, and he avoided jail.

Now, Broidy claims he is the victim of a "hack" and smear campaign orchestrated by the state of Qatar in response to his criticism of the Gulf state's record against terrorism, a charge that Qatar denies.

Amid long-standing regional rivalries, the UAE, along with Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Bahrain, has imposed a nine-month-long siege on Qatar. Broidy has close financial ties to the UAE and its royal family.


Broidy is tipped to be a key part of President Trump's re-election campaign team in 2020 [Reuters]
Broidy's wider links with the Middle East are now reportedly of interest in the FBI's far-reaching probe into foreign influence in US politics, which are mostly focused on Paul Manafort. Breaches of the Foreign Agents Registration Act form a key part of this investigation.

'Confidential MOU'

A second document appears to expose further connections with the UAE. It outlines a plan for ICU and an Abu Dhabi based company to invest $40m into a fund to be managed by Broidy. The same group also handed what is described as a "Confidential Memorandum of Understanding" to prosecutors in Ukraine.

The Abu Dhabi firm and ICU apparently agreed to provide 80 percent of the investment, including an initial $3.5m payment.

It is unclear as to what the $40m was to be used for. This alleged MOU states that the deal was effective from December 2014, but omits specific details on how the money would be invested. It is also not clear if it was ever completed as the paperwork is unsigned.


This alleged MOU states that the deal was effective from December 2014, but omits specific details on how the money would be invested [Al Jazeera]
Broidy owns a security company, which is run by former US military personnel and provides services to governments in the Middle East. Its services include conducting "specialised operations, infrastructure protection and training."

Broidy, a Los Angeles-based financier and seasoned political operator, has raised millions of dollars in donations for the Republican Party. He is tipped to be a key part of Trump's campaign team for 2020.

In a response to these claims, ICU denies that the company, or its affiliates, has had any relationship with Broidy or his company and describes the contracts as being part of an elaborate forgery.

"We believe they are part of a malicious fraud against us," they told Al Jazeera in a statement.

VTB Bank also denied dealing with the Republican Party fundraiser. "Yuri Soloviev is not acquainted with Elliott Broidy and has never had any business dealings with him."

Al Jazeera also approached Broidy for comment during the preparation of this article. However, no response was received.


Al Jazeera obtained the documents as part of a one-year investigation into corruption involving Eastern European oligarchs, which also revealed a massive off-shore corruption network linked to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/03/ ... 32781.html



.......you can't sanction someone that has the goods on you
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:51 pm

FELIX SATER ....has been an FBI source for a long time :D

Donald Trump’s private company was “actively negotiating” a business deal in Moscow with a sanctioned Russian bank during the 2016 election campaign


WHITE HOUSE
Mueller Just Stepped Over Trump's Red Line

The president once warned the prosecutor to stay out of his family business. The reply: subpoenas.
By Timothy L. O'Brien

March 15, 2018, 3:56 PM CDT

You say lines, I say subpoenas. Photographer: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Last July, President Donald Trump warned the special counsel Robert Mueller that it would be a "violation" for him and his group of Justice Department investigators to examine the Trump family's finances. The president agreed with a New York Times reporter's question about whether doing so would amount to crossing a "red line."

Mueller apparently has decided to cross that line anyway. The Times reported on Thursday that Mueller's team has subpoenaed Trump's company, the Trump Organization, for records pertaining to a number of business deals -- including some related to Russia.

Trump and his lawyers have thrown down all sorts of gauntlets around Mueller's probe. They have argued for a tight deadline leading to its conclusion; negotiated for where, when and how the president might agree to an interview with investigators; and pointed to areas that they think are off-limits.

It would appear that Mueller, with the full force of the law and subpoena power behind him, intends to proceed as he sees fit.

Mueller has already made it clear that he wouldn’t hesitate to look at Trump's business transactions. My Bloomberg News colleagues reported last July -- just a day after Trump conversed with the Times about that red line -- that Mueller was expanding the scope of his investigation to Trump's commercial dealings.

Mueller's probe seems to be pursuing three primary questions. The first is whether Trump or his campaign worked with the Kremlin to tilt the 2016 election in Trump's favor. The second is whether Trump or his advisers obstructed justice to derail the federal investigation. The third involves the possibility of financial quid pro quos that Trump and his family members (especially his son-in-law, Jared Kushner) may have sought in exchange for public policy favors (like, for example, possibly lifting economic sanctions on Russia or shifting U.S. Ukraine policy).

The quid pro quo stuff is likely to be all about money ultimately, and that's why the Times's scoop on Thursday is significant. Mueller is venturing into the Trump Organization itself, the nexus of all of the president's business deals. He's collecting records from a company that's inseparable from the president himself. No major transactions have occurred at the Trump Organization without Trump's blessing, and his unwillingness and failure to separate himself from his company since entering the White House makes that reality even more apparent.


The president's intersection with Russian money is also a potential powder keg. The Times said that Mueller is examining a 2015 proposal by a Trump business partner, Felix Sater, to Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to orchestrate a real estate deal in Moscow. Sater claimed that he could get Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, to buy into the transaction and that doing so could help the president win the election.

Sater is, as they say in the trade, a character. And Cohen's efforts to contact the Kremlin about that deal relied on using a publicly available email address in the Kremlin's press office. That's not exactly the work of sophisticates who have contacts in the highest reaches of Russia's government.

Cohen has handled some of Trump's most sensitive matters, including payoffs to a porn star, Stormy Daniels, in exchange for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump.

And Sater is a career criminal with organized crime ties. Trump and his children worked closely with him on the launch of the Trump SoHo Hotel and other real estate projects in the U.S. long before he set himself on course for the White House.

As I noted in a series of columns in 2016 and 2017, some of the murkiest financial dealings with possible Russian ties that Trump engaged in may have taken place in New York, not Moscow.

Trump has repeatedly called Mueller's investigation a "witch hunt," and his lawyers have said that the last decade of Trump’s tax returns (which the president has declined to release) would show that he had no income or loans from Russian sources. Last year, Trump told NBC that he had no property or investments in Russia.

"I am not involved in Russia," he said.

But Trump's description of his dealings doesn't allow for the fact that national security problems and other quandaries might arise for the president if Russia is involved in him -- either through potentially compromising business transactions and relationships in the U.S., or because of funds that might have flowed into his wallet years ago.

Sater's company, the Bayrock Group, operated out of Trump Tower, just two floors beneath the Trump Organization's headquarters. A former partner of Sater at Bayrock claimed that the company was run as a money laundering operation. Bayrock also allegedly got some of its funding from Eastern Europe and from Iceland, and the company paid Trump to put his name on their projects.

Although Bayrock eventually went dormant, Sater never left the Trump team. He tried to engineer a diplomatic overture to Ukraine in early 2017, an effort he reportedly undertook with Cohen and which he tried to present to Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. And, of course, there is the 2015 Moscow deal he pitched to Cohen that Mueller is now examining.

I have some history with Sater. Trump sued me in 2006, alleging that my biography, "TrumpNation," had misrepresented his business record and his wealth. Trump lost the suit in 2011; my lawyers deposed him and Sater during the litigation.

Sater's intersection with the Trump Organization -- and the subpoena that landed on the company's doorstep -- probably should be reminders to the president, his family, and their lawyers that Mueller is content to draw his own lines in his investigation
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... s-red-line



Trump Organization 'negotiated with sanctioned Russian bank in 2016'

Claim is contained in memo by Democratic lawmakers investigating possible collusion between Trump campaign and Kremlin

Stephanie Kirchgaessner
Last modified on Thu 15 Mar 2018 18.00 EDT

Donald Trump’s private company was “actively negotiating” a business deal in Moscow with a sanctioned Russian bank during the 2016 election campaign, according to a memo by Democratic lawmakers investigating possible collusion between the campaign and the Kremlin.

The statement by Democrats on the House intelligence committee, who have had access to internal Trump Organization documents and interviewed key witnesses, raises new questions about the Trump Organization’s financial ties to Russia and its possible willingness to deal with a bank that had been placed under US sanctions.

Trump has personally denied that he ever had business dealings with Russia. In a tweet that was published shortly before his 2016 inauguration, he said he had “nothing to do with Russia – no deals, no loans, no nothing”.

But doubts about the veracity of that statement began to emerge last August, when the New York Times published emails from a longtime business associate of Trump called Felix Sater, who boasted that he had lined up financing for a Trump Tower in Moscow with VTB Bank, which is under US sanctions.

It is not clear from the Democrats’ memo whether the deal they are referring to is the same deal mentioned in Sater’s emails.

In another email obtained by the newspaper, Sater wrote that he would get “Putin on this programme and we will get Donald elected”.

Trump eventually signed a non-binding “letter of intent” for the project to go forward and his attorney, Michael Cohen, told the New York Times that they had discussed the project three times. The Moscow project did not go ahead.

Now the memo released by Democrats suggests investigators have confirmed that the Trump Organization was deeply involved in Moscow talks, and that the talks involved a bank that was under US sanctions. The Democrats did not indicate the source of their information.

The Democrats’ statement came days after Republicans on the House intelligence committee said they had concluded that Trump’s 2016 campaign had not colluded with Russian operatives and that the committee was nearing the end of its investigation.

Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the committee, called the decision a “capitulation” to the White House. The Democrats then released a 21-page memo detailing some of the committee’s findings, outstanding questions and a long list of witnesses that had yet to be questioned by the committee.

The memo stated that congressional investigators had – among many open questions – not yet determined whether Trump campaign officials had received advanced knowledge of or access to emails that had been hacked by Russians from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

The memo stated that there were “critical unanswered questions” about the sources of Trump’s personal and corporate financing, including his relationship with his biggest lender, Deutsche Bank.

It said it needed answers about whether the Russian government, through “business figures close to the Kremlin”, was seeking to launder funds through the Trump Organization, and whether Trump’s financial exposure – through his debt with Deutsche Bank – gave a point of leverage to Russia.

New questions about the Trump Organization’s possible dealings with a Russian bank came on Thursday as it was reported that Robert Mueller, the special counsel who is leading the criminal investigation into the Trump campaign and possible collusion, has issued a subpoena demanding that the Trump Organization turn over documents.

The subpoena, which was reported by the New York Times, included a demand for documents related to Russia, according to two sources cited by the newspaper. The Trump Organization did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The news was significant because it showed that Mueller is definitively including the president’s private business in his investigation and examining possible financial ties to Russia.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... are_btn_tw
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:15 pm

Businessman....... Russian mob connected.......father worked for Mogilevich........best friends with trump lawyer Cohen...... FBI source ...cooperating with Mueller investigation Felix Sater says Trump sent him to Russia to 'look after' his kids :P


"If it's found out Trump (or associates) were working with the Russians as they were interfering in our election, what would be your reaction."

"Send them to jail."

Felix Sater March 16 2018


Felix Sater is often referred to as the convicted felon and onetime stock scammer who promised to “get all of Putins team to buy in” on a plan to build “Trump Tower Moscow” during the presidential campaign.



Businessman says Trump sent him to Russia to 'look after' his kids

Ex-Trump associate talks about email to Cohen

(CNN)Felix Sater, the Russian-born onetime business associate of Donald Trump's who worked to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, says the then-business magnate asked him to "look after" his kids when they were pursuing business deals in Russia.

Sater told CNN's Chris Cuomo on "New Day" Friday that Trump had personally asked him to travel to Russia to be in Moscow with his children.

"The President asked me to be in Russia at the same time as them to look after them," Sater said, adding that Trump had asked him directly.

The Trump Organization's general counsel has said previously Sater was not accompanying the Trump children in Moscow. And Trump himself has downplayed his connections to Sater.
"Felix Sater, boy, I have to even think about it," Trump said in a December 2015 Associated Press interview. "I'm not that familiar with him."
Sater, a mob-linked felon turned FBI informant, is speaking out now after he has figured prominently amid questions about Trump's connections to Russia for his role in trying to land a Trump Tower in Moscow in late 2015 and early 2016, while the presidential campaign was underway.

Trump signed a letter of intent on the Moscow deal, which was a nonbinding agreement, but the venture was ultimately scuttled in 2016.

Sater worked with Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen on the deal, and emails exchanged between the two show that Sater thought the deal could "get Donald elected," according to The New York Times. Sater also suggested he could get Russian President Vladimir Putin to say "great things" about Trump if the deal went through, according to The Washington Post.
But Sater, who was born in the Soviet Union and moved to the US as a child, said Friday that he did not have connections to Putin's government — though he insisted his statements weren't just hype.

"At the end of the day, I'd start finding people that knew Putin," Sater said. "I'd start finding people that could get Donald on top of this project. I would have, believe me, turned over every rock to make sure everyone was involved."

Sater said he's now speaking out because of his longtime intelligence work on behalf of the US, as his name has continued to surface in the congressional and special counsel investigations into Trump and Russia. Sater said he has spoken with the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, but he won't say whether he's talked to special counsel Robert Mueller's team.

"I cannot answer about anything that may be on ongoing investigation," Sater said Friday when asked if he had spoken to Mueller.

"True, except you could say if you haven't spoken to the investigators. You could say that," Cuomo responded.

"I choose not to," Sater said.

Sater denied there was ever any money exchanged or any effort to build a relationship between Putin's allies and the Trump Organization as part of the project.

"To my knowledge and anything I was involved with, absolutely not," he said.





Alert (TA18-074A)

Russian Government Cyber Activity Targeting Energy and Other Critical Infrastructure Sectors

Original release date: March 15, 2018

Systems Affected
Domain Controllers
File Servers
Email Servers
Overview
This joint Technical Alert (TA) is the result of analytic efforts between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This alert provides information on Russian government actions targeting U.S. Government entities as well as organizations in the energy, nuclear, commercial facilities, water, aviation, and critical manufacturing sectors. It also contains indicators of compromise (IOCs) and technical details on the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by Russian government cyber actors on compromised victim networks. DHS and FBI produced this alert to educate network defenders to enhance their ability to identify and reduce exposure to malicious activity.
DHS and FBI characterize this activity as a multi-stage intrusion campaign by Russian government cyber actors who targeted small commercial facilities’ networks where they staged malware, conducted spear phishing, and gained remote access into energy sector networks. After obtaining access, the Russian government cyber actors conducted network reconnaissance, moved laterally, and collected information pertaining to Industrial Control Systems (ICS).
https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA18-074A


Cyberattacks Put Russian Fingers on the Switch at Power Plants, U.S. ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/us/p ... tacks.html
51 mins ago - Cyberattacks Put Russian Fingers on the Switch at Power Plants, U.S. Says. By NICOLE PERLROTH and DAVID E. SANGER MARCH 15, 2018 ... The Trump administration accused Russia on Thursday of engineering a series of cyberattacks that targeted American and European nuclear power plants and ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/us/p ... 43&gwt=pay



DHS and FBI warn Russia is behind cyberattacks on US infrastructure

Energy, nuclear, aviation and manufacturing sectors are among those affected.

Mallory Locklear, @mallorylocklear
2h ago in Security

The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI released a report today detailing Russian efforts to hack into US government entities and infrastructure sectors, including energy, nuclear, commercial, water, aviation and critical manufacturing sectors. The agencies said the cyberattacks have been ongoing since at least March 2016 and their report described the attacks as "a multi-stage intrusion campaign by Russian government cyber actors."

Those behind the cyberattacks are said to be targeting two types of entities. First, they go after groups that are linked to their ultimate targets, such as third-party suppliers with networks that are less secure than those of their main targets. Then after gathering useful information, they use it to stage malware and to conduct phishing campaigns in order to gain access into energy sector networks. "After obtaining access, the Russian government cyber actors conducted network reconnaissance, moved laterally and collected information pertaining to industrial control systems," the report said.

Reports surfaced last year that the US nuclear power industry had been the target of hackers, but while Russia was thought to be behind it, DHS and the FBI didn't name Russia as the source at the time. Ben Read, manager for the cybersecurity company FireEye Inc., told Reuters, "People sort of suspected Russia was behind it, but today's statement from the US government carries a lot of weight." The report didn't describe what sort of impact the attacks had on US infrastructure organizations.

Today's report comes the same day that the US Treasury Department issued sanctions on a number of Russian groups and individuals who have allegedly been involved in massive cyberattacks like NotPetya and efforts to sway the US presidential election.
https://www.engadget.com/2018/03/15/dhs ... erattacks/


YOU’LL JUST MAKE HIM ANGRY
House Intel Committee Screwed Itself—and the President It’s Trying to Save

In shutting down the Russia probe in such an obviously hackish way, the House Intel Republicans only managed to ensure that if and when Adam Schiff takes over—look out.

LIZ MAIR
03.16.18 5:19 AM ET

Earlier this week, the House Intelligence Committee formally closed its probe into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election, with the Republican majority issuing a report declaring that no collusion occurred between Russia and the Trump campaign.

On first glance, this looks like good news for Trump: It’s one less investigation running into his campaign’s alleged Russia ties.

It also gave the President some favorable headlines, a relatively uncommon thing. And he didn’t even have to sit in a room with Chuck and Nancy or piss off the NRA in order to earn them.

But despite all this, the committee ending its probe is actually bad news for Trump long-term. The manner in which it was done, and the report issued by Chairman Devin Nunes, look to all but the fiercest Trump backers to be hackish and focused on giving Trump cover, as opposed to providing actual clarity and answers. Set aside whether you agree with Nunes or not; the probe looks at best incomplete, the report like the political equivalent of a half-researched term paper—a half-researched term paper that has really, really enraged already very-enraged Democrats.

The best illustration of this is the report’s conclusion that Russia showed no preference whatsoever for Trump, when it is manifestly clear that Russia did—even if not to the degree, for the full period, or for the reasons the most ardent Russia conspiracy theorists or Hillary Clinton defenders might claim.

That group includes both voters and people like Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking member of the committee and a mainstay of cable news broadcasts nationwide. Pissing off your average DailyKos commenter may not matter much, but pissing off Schiff matters greatly. If Democrats retake the House this November—and the odds are they will—Schiff will take over Nunes’ job. Nunes and his colleagues just gave Schiff another huge, fat reason to aggressively investigate the entire topic of Trump and Russia on terms that will be far from neutral.


Not that Schiff would have failed to re-open the House Intelligence Committee probe anyway, but the actions of the majority, possibly excluding retiring Rep. Trey Gowdy, have pissed off and energized already pissed off and energized Democrats, who will be responding to, and benefiting from, an even more pissed off and energized base if they succeed in winning.

Trump Lawyer Received Inside Info From Russia Probe

Remember, a critical reason why Democrats will win, if they win, is the motivation of the party’s rabidly Trump-hating base to vote, volunteer, and donate—and therefore win elections even for centrist candidates who look more like Mitt Romney than Nancy Pelosi. Those people, of course, have wanted blood for a long time; in the wake of the closure of the Committee probe, and issuance of the Republican report, they’re baying for it even louder.

And Schiff, a longtime ally of the organs of government now collectively, and sometimes jokingly, referred to as the “Deep State,” wants it, too. Clearly, he sees the probe under Nunes as a sham. Clearly, he loves the limelight. Clearly, there’s political benefit in him aggressively investigating. Clearly, some of his key allies in government would love for him to do so, after all their hurt over Trump and his allies’ “Deep State” attacks.

So then clearly, if Schiff becomes chairman, he will hold a lot more hearings—with subpoena powers and a bigger staff—during which little further light may be shed on whether there was, or was not, collusion, but through which he can exact massive damage on Trump and anyone ever associated with or employed by him.

Legal fees. Embarrassing statements and events. Nasty little details concerning all manner of things, from the relatively mundane to the potentially important, becoming public. Contempt of Congress, perjury charges, or maybe evidence of dodgy financial or tax dealings. And that is assuming that no one other than the bad actors from Trump’s team already known to have been doing the bidding of Russia is outed as having looked out for Putin’s interests in 2016.

It will be ugly, and it will (further) hobble Trump’s ability to do basic things like staff his administration, which is key to even a modicum of governing. And without some modicum of governing, Trump could end up looking like a do-nothing impotent, even to some of his earliest and most enthusiastic supporters, when they thought they were voting for a tough guy, get-sh*t-done boss. That, in turn, might be when he starts looking like someone less worth appeasing to congressional Republicans, and more like someone worth replacing.

Yes, Schiff could overstep. Some Trump-neutral folks (yes, they exist) already feel he has, and has beclowned himself. There are others that could find hugely distasteful an aggressive investigation that catches junior staffers—the guys literally making the coffee, as opposed to the George Papadopouloses of the world—in the crosshairs. But in general, Congress investigating people doesn’t tend to work out well for the people being investigated, guilty or innocent. And that includes people not starting out with 37 percent approval ratings.

The bottom line is that Nunes may have put another nail in Trump’s political coffin. Yes, like something out of a classic horror film, the Trump presidency is a harder thing to kill off than Schiff & co would like—but Nunes might have handed Democrats a couple of crucifixes and cloves of garlic—all of which will likely soon be deployed.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/house-int ... e?ref=home
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 18, 2018 8:00 am

only 2 people trump will not personally critize Stormy Daniels and Putin .....I wonder why :D


Russia investigation may turn to Ivanka Trump as Mueller examines empire


Robert Mueller has issued a subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, where Ivanka Trump has played a leading role

Stephanie Kirchgaessner
Sat 17 Mar 2018 01.00 EDT Last modified on Sat 17 Mar 2018 11.00 EDT

Ivanka Trump is likely to face new legal scrutiny by Robert Mueller following reports that the special counsel has demanded documents from the Trump Organization, where she served as a senior executive.

Trump, who is married to Jared Kushner, a senior White House adviser who was recently stripped of his security clearance, has been described by her father as a “natural-born dealmaker” and was known to have played a leading role in deals between the Trump Organization and a Russian national who has come under scrutiny and bragged about his ties to top Kremlin officials.


'Hollowed out' White House: Trump is on a dangerous path toward no advisers

Mueller, the former FBI director who is leading an independent criminal investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin, has issued the Trump Organization with a subpoena for documents in recent weeks, including documents related to Russia, according to a report in the New York Times.

While it is not clear precisely what deal or deals Mueller is examining, Democratic congressional investigators this week claimed in a memo that they had learned that the Trump Organization was “actively negotiating” a deal in Moscow during the election campaign that involved a Russian bank that was under US sanctions. The deal never went through and it is not clear which bank the congressional investigators were referring to.

The president has repeatedly denied having had any business dealings with Russia when he has been asked about it by reporters, and has described the criminal investigation into his campaign as a “witch-hunt”.

Ivanka Trump served as a senior executive at the Trump Organization, with a special focus on acquisitions, before leaving her post to serve her father in the White House last year. By all accounts, including in flattering business profiles of the first daughter, she has been described as an integral part of her father’s empire.

That role has also led to legal trouble in the past.

In 2006, when she was 24 years old, Ivanka Trump and her brother Donald Trump Jr, signed a licensing deal to build the Trump SoHo with two businessmen who would go on to be close business partners of the Trump Organization, Felix Sater and Tevfik Arif. Sater and Arif ran a real estate group called Bayrock and were born in the former Soviet Union.

The SoHo deal is an area of focus for Mueller, according to Bloomberg. Sater, a felon who became an informant against the mafia, did not respond to requests for comment.

Last year, the New York Times published emails that showed the Russian emigre boasting in 2015 that he could arrange a deal for the Trump Organization to open a new property in Moscow with the help of Vladimir Putin. In the emails, Sater recalled how he had arranged for Ivanka Trump to “sit in Putin’s private chair” during a visit to Moscow that they took together in 2006.

The revelation was interesting in part because it showed that Sater had remained in the Trumps’ orbit even after Donald Trump said in a 2013 deposition that he barely knew Sater.

Ivanka Trump has said she was not involved in any discussions about a property deal in Moscow in 2015 – at the time of the presidential election – and has not commented on the claim that she once sat in the Russian president’s chair.

An attorney for the Trump Organization said the company was fully cooperating with Mueller’s subpoena request.

Although the Trump SoHo project was launched with fanfare and was meant to mark Ivanka Trump and her brother Donald Jr’s full entry into their father’s business, it has been heavily scrutinised by prosecutors and the press since it opened in 2010. A report by the New Yorker, ProPublica and WNYC in 2017 alleged that the Trump project was closely investigated by prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney’s office in 2012.

According to the New Yorker account, both Ivanka and Donald Jr were close to being indicted following an investigation into whether the pair misled investors about how well condos in the building were selling. The article alleged that prosecutors had evidence, including emails between the siblings, that showed they were aware they were using inflated figures to lure buyers to purchase condos. The issue also became a subject of a civil lawsuit by investors, which was settled by the Trump Organization.

Neither Ivanka Trump nor Donald Jr were ultimately indicted after the New York district attorney, Cy Vance, decided not to move ahead with the charges, according to the New Yorker account. It also described how, weeks after Vance’s office said it would drop the investigation, a top attorney for the Trump family, Marc Kasowitz, contacted Vance about hosting a fundraiser for the district attorney. The lawyer would later donate over $30,000 to Vance’s campaign.

“We did the right thing,” Vance told the New Yorker, defending his decision to drop the case. Trump SoHo went into foreclosure in 2014 and was taken over by a creditor.

There is no suggestion that Ivanka Trump is under criminal investigation.

A separate report by CNN early this month said that US counterintelligence officials were scrutinising one of Ivanka Trump’s other deals: the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Vancouver. Officials who spoke to CNN said that the scrutiny could be a hurdle for Ivanka Trump as she tries to obtain security clearance for her role in the White House. The Vancouver property is one of a few properties that have opened since Trump took office.

Alan Garten, executive vice-president and chief legal officer for the Trump Organization, told CNN that the company’s role in the property was limited to licencing and managing the hotel, but was not involved in financing.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... n-subpoena




Democrats May Seek Prosecution of Witnesses Who Misled House Intelligence Committee

Erik Prince, Carter Page, and Roger Stone are among their top targets.
DAN FRIEDMAN AND ANDY KROLLMAR. 16, 2018 2:13 PM

Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee are reviewing transcripts of interviews conducted during the panel’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and plan to refer any witnesses who lied to the panel to the Justice Department for prosecution.

“We’re gonna be going through the transcripts and analyzing them for any concerns we have with the greater body of information we have,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) tells Mother Jones. “We’ll discuss it with the majority and ask whether they’ll join us in a referral, or, if we think one is warranted, then we reserve the right to make a referral even if they don’t.”

According to a source close to the committee, Democrats firmed up their plans to pursue criminal referrals this past week after their Republican colleagues abruptly announced they were ending the panel’s investigation. Democrats would send the referrals to the Justice Department and potentially directly to special counsel Robert Mueller.

Schiff and other Democrats have recently questioned the truthfulness of the testimony provided by three witnesses: Erik Prince, the former head of the security firm Blackwater and the brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos; Carter Page, a former Trump campaign national security aide; and Roger Stone, a longtime Trump political adviser.

“As additional things come to light, if there are reports of witnesses saying things that are inconsistent with what has been said to the committee, that list could grow,” Schiff says.
Prince said during a November 30 committee interview that a United Arab Emirates-brokered meeting he had in the Seychelles with a Russian fund manager close to Russian President Vladimir Putin was unplanned. But recent reports suggest Mueller has information showing the meeting was part of an effort by Trump’s transition team to set up back-channel communications with the Kremlin.

In his testimony to the committee last fall, Page first denied and then downplayed meetings with Russian officials during a July 2016 trip he took to Moscow. In a memo last month, Schiff said the FBI has information that contradicts Page’s claims.

Stone, meanwhile, reportedly told the panel last September that he had no direct contacts with WikiLeaks during the 2016 election. But recent reports have cast doubt on Stone’s denial.

Prince, Page, and Stone maintain they testified honestly. “I never ever have represented as anyone from the Trump transition, and the only reason I went to the Seychelles was to see” Mohammed bin Zayed, the United Arab Emirates’ crown prince, Prince told Fox News last week. “No one from the Trump transition team knew I was going,” Prince added.

Members of Congress are granted no special power to send criminal referrals to the Justice Department. Anyone can make one. But a referral by lawmakers would draw public notice and perhaps extra attention in Mueller’s office. Prosecutors there have already used false statement charges to win cooperation from three witnesses: Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser; Dutch lawyer Alex Van Deer Zwaan; and former Trump campaign aide Rick Gates. Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort also faces charges of making false statements to the Justice Department.

In January, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a senior Judiciary Committee member, sent the Justice Department a referral letter suggesting the prosecution of former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, who authored the infamous memos alleging Trump was compromised by the Kremlin and that his campaign colluded with Russia. Grassley and Graham claimed that Steele had lied to the FBI about his contacts with the media, though critics say their referral is legally meritless and an act of political retribution.

Schiff says he is “not sure that any referral is necessary” for false claims that Prince and Page may have made. Transcripts of those interviews are public, so Mueller’s team already has the ability to review and assess those witnesses’ claims against information they have gathered. A transcript of Stone’s September 26, 2017, interview, however, has not been made public.

Committee Democrats have no specific timeline for issuing referrals, Schiff notes. Because Republicans did not force many witnesses to turn over banking, phone, and other records that might support or contradict their claims, he says, “we can’t tell who is telling the truth in many cases.”

But new reports that contradict the truthfulness of witnesses testimony could result in referrals down the road. “As additional things come to light, if there are reports of witnesses saying things that are inconsistent with what has been said to the committee, that list could grow,” Schiff says.

Democrats say they remain open to Republicans joining them in referrals to Mueller, though Republicans would likely oppose such efforts. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), a senior committee member, dismissed Democrats’ potential efforts to refer witnesses for prosecution: “Those guys just keep trying.”
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/20 ... committee/



So far this month, U.S. District Court for District of Columbia, Mueller’s primary venue, has handed down 7 sealed indictments:
1:18-cr-00051
1:18-cr-00052
1:18-cr-00053
4 this week >>
1:18-cr-00059
1:18-cr-00060
1:18-cr-00061
1:18-cr-00062
7 in 2 weeks seems very high


Retired four-star Army general: Trump, 'under the sway of Putin,' threatens national security

Jessica DurandoUpdated 11:35 a.m. ET March 17, 2018
A retired four-star Army general said that he thinks President Trump is a “serious threat to US national security” because the president "is refusing to protect vital US interests from active Russian attacks."

Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey tweeted Friday that “it is apparent that he is for some unknown reason under the sway of (Russian President Vladimir) Putin.”

Barry R McCaffrey
@mccaffreyr3
Reluctantly I have concluded that President Trump is a serious threat to US national security. He is refusing to protect vital US interests from active Russian attacks. It is apparent that he is for some unknown reason under the sway of Mr Putin.
3:46 PM - Mar 16, 2018


More: In war of words with Trump, fired FBI's McCabe says he will no longer be silent

McCaffrey, a military analyst for NBC News and president of his own consulting firm, BR McCaffrey Associates, was director of Office of National Drug Control Policy under President Clinton from 1996 to 2001.

He received three Purple Heart medals for injuries sustained during his service in Vietnam, two Silver Stars for valor, and two Distinguished Service Crosses.

Special counsel Robert Mueller is investigating Russian involvement in the 2016 elections and whether there was any collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.

Mueller has indicted several former Trump campaign aides and 13 Russian nationals as part of his ongoing probe into Russian interference in the presidential election.

AP Reporter Josh Lederman says fresh moves by the US to Punish Russia suggest that the Trump administration is giving "some credence' to the work of special counsel Robert Mueller. (March 15) AP

Trump's administration sanctioned several Russian organizations on Thursday for unsavory behavior, including attempts to alter the 2016 presidential election. The sanctions, though, are largely symbolic: A third or so existed under the Obama administration, and the individual-level sanctions likely won't hurt Russia's economy. Among the repeats are Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a Russian oligarch known as "Putin's chef."

Trump has also been criticized for not putting in place sanctions against Russia earlier, after Congress passed a bi-partisan bill last summer.

Last month, U.S. Cyber Command chief and National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael Rogers told the Senate Armed Services Committee that he had not received any new authority from Trump to strike at Russian cyber operations.

Regarding U.S. efforts to counter the Russian intrusions, Rogers said, “We’re taking steps, but we’re probably not doing enough.”

McCaffrey's remarks were echoed on MSNBC Saturday by retired United States Navy Admiral James Stavridis.

Asked by MSNBC host Alex Witt for his thoughts on McCaffrey's statement, Stavridis replied: “I know the general well. I have a lot of regard for his opinions, he does not state them loosely.”

“In terms of the current situation with Russia, our president needs to understand that Vladimir Putin is no friend to the United States, that Russia is actively seeking to undermine our nation not only domestically but our foreign policy as well,” he added. “I agree with Gen. McCaffrey that our president does not spend enough time focused on the threat that is emanating from Russia today.”

Meanwhile, tensions between U.S. ally Britain and Russia have reached Cold War-era levels of frostiness.

The diplomatic snit stems from the poisoning of Sergei Skripal, 66, and his daughter, Yulia, 33, who were found unconscious on a park bench in a shopping area in Salisbury, England, on March 4. They remain in a critical condition.

Britain's foreign minister Boris Johnson said Friday it was "overwhelmingly likely" Putin directly ordered the attack. British officials say military-grade nerve agent was used.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/wor ... 434811002/


FEC probes whether NRA got illegal Russian donations

Complaint alleges that the gun-rights group may have received contributions intended to help the 2016 Trump campaign.

JOSH MEYER03/16/2018 06:43 PM EDT

The Federal Election Commission has launched a preliminary investigation into whether Russian entities gave illegal contributions to the National Rifle Association that were intended to benefit the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election, according to people who were notified of the probe.

The inquiry stems in part from a complaint from a liberal advocacy group, the American Democracy Legal Fund, which asked the FEC to look into media reports about links between the rifle association and Russian entities, including a banker with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

A spokesman for the NRA and its lobbying arm, the Institute for Legislative Action, which together contributed $30 million to Trump’s presidential campaign, declined to comment on the FEC’s probe.

An FEC spokesman also declined to comment, saying the agency is prohibited by law from confirming or denying any investigations until they’re complete.

Under FEC procedures, the preliminary investigation is likely to require the NRA to turn over closely guarded internal documents and campaign finance records. Depending on what FEC investigators and lawyers find, the agency could launch a full-blown investigation, impose fines or even make criminal referrals to the Justice Department and Special Counsel Robert Mueller, people familiar with the probe said.

The preliminary investigation focuses on issues similar to those raised recently by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore), the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, as part of his investigation into possible collusion between the NRA, the Trump campaign and Russia.

Wyden is particularly interested in whether Russian-backed entities helped the Trump campaign by funneling contributions to the gun-rights group that “inappropriately and illegally influenced our election,” according to a Feb. 2 letter Wyden sent to the NRA.

In his letter, Wyden gave the NRA a Feb. 16 deadline to answer a series of questions and produce documents about its potential dealings with any Russian individuals or businesses or their intermediaries, including anything it has turned over to U.S. authorities.

“I am specifically troubled by the possibility that Russian-backed shell companies or intermediaries may have circumvented laws designed to prohibit foreign meddling in our elections by abusing the rules governing … tax exempt organizations,” Wyden wrote.

In response to that letter, an attorney for the NRA told the senator’s aides that the group was already “answering questions about possible Russian donations as part of an FEC inquiry,” according to a statement from Wyden’s office.

Brad Woodhouse, treasurer for the American Democracy Legal Fund, said he received confirmation from the FEC that it had launched a preliminary investigation into the group’s complaint.

While not confirming the probe, an FEC official said such investigations are launched after FEC lawyers determine that there is at least the potential that campaign finance laws were broken.

Woodhouse, a longtime Democratic Party activist, said the FEC inquiry is a significant step in getting to the bottom of a very complicated series of relationships between the NRA, the Trump campaign and Russian entities.

“This story sounds more like a Tom Clancy novel than a reality,” said Woodhouse. “But in the age of Donald Trump and possible collusion with Russia, not only is it possible that it’s true, but it’s possible enough that it needs to be fully investigated.”

Woodhouse said the FEC is not empowered to investigate whether Russian entities knowingly attempted to pass campaign donations through the NRA and its lobbying arm, which is not required to disclose details of its political donors.

“But it can look at whether or not the NRA is taking illegal foreign money to conduct political activity, and whether is money is passed on to support the campaign,” Woodhouse said. “They would have to investigate all of those linkages to determine whether there was any illegal election activity.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/ ... ion-468661


Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 18, 2018 9:29 pm

POLITICSMARCH 18, 2018 / 9:41 AM / UPDATED AN HOUR AGO

Exclusive: Sources contradict Sessions' testimony he opposed Russia outreach

Karen Freifeld, Sarah N. Lynch, Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ testimony that he opposed a proposal for President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign team to meet with Russians has been contradicted by three people who told Reuters they have spoken about the matter to investigators with Special Counsel Robert Mueller or congressional committees.

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the Justice Department on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., November 14, 2017. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas
Sessions testified before Congress in November 2017 that he “pushed back” against the proposal made by former campaign adviser George Papadopoulos at a March 31, 2016 campaign meeting. Then a senator from Alabama, Sessions chaired the meeting as head of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy team.

“Yes, I pushed back,” Sessions told the House Judiciary Committee on Nov. 14, when asked whether he shut down Papadopoulos’ proposed outreach to Russia. Sessions has since also been interviewed by Mueller.

Three people who attended the March campaign meeting told Reuters they gave their version of events to FBI agents or congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 election. Although the accounts they provided to Reuters differed in certain respects, all threes, who declined to be identified, said Sessions had expressed no objections to Papadopoulos’ idea.

However, another meeting attendee, J.D. Gordon, who was the Trump campaign’s director of national security, told media outlets including Reuters in November that Sessions strongly opposed Papadopoulos’ proposal and said no one should speak of it again. In response to a request for comment, Gordon said on Saturday that he stood by his statement.

Sessions, through Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores, declined to comment beyond his prior testimony. The special counsel’s office also declined to comment. Spokeswomen for the Democrats and Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee did not immediately comment.

Reuters was unable to determine whether Mueller is probing discrepancies in accounts of the March 2016 meeting.


The three accounts, which have not been reported, raise new questions about Sessions’ testimony regarding contacts with Russia during the campaign.

Sessions previously failed to disclose to Congress meetings he had with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, and testified in October that he was not aware of any campaign representatives communicating with Russians.

Some Democrats have seized on discrepancies in Sessions’ testimony to suggest the attorney general may have committed perjury. A criminal charge would require showing Sessions intended to deceive. Sessions told the House Judiciary Committee that he had always told the truth and testified to the best of his recollection.

Legal experts expressed mixed views about the significance of the contradictions cited by the three sources.

United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions visits families of opioid overdose victims at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Kentucky in Lexington, Kentucky, U.S. March 15, 2018. REUTERS/John Sommers II
Sessions could argue he misremembered events or perceived his response in a different way, making any contradictions unintentional, some experts said.

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, said Sessions’ words might be too vague to form the basis of a perjury case because there could be different interpretations of what the term pushing back means.

“If you’re talking about false statements, prosecutors look for something that is concrete and clear,” he said.

Other legal experts said, however, that repeated misstatements by Sessions could enable prosecutors to build a perjury case against him.

“Proving there was intent to lie is a heavy burden for the prosecution. But now you have multiple places where Sessions has arguably made false statements,” said Bennett Gershman, a Pace University law professor.

The March 2016 campaign meeting in Washington was memorialized in a photo Trump posted on Instagram of roughly a dozen men sitting around a table, including Trump, Sessions and Papadopoulos.

Papadopoulos, who pleaded guilty in October to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his Russia contacts, is now cooperating with Mueller.

According to court documents released after his guilty plea, Papadopoulos said at the campaign meeting that he had connections who could help arrange a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Papadopoulos continued to pursue Russian contacts after the March 2016 meeting and communicated with some campaign officials about his efforts, according to the court documents.

Trump has said that he does not remember much of what happened at the “very unimportant” campaign meeting. Trump has said he did not meet Putin before becoming president.

Moscow has denied meddling in the election and Trump has denied his campaign colluded with Russia.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... ium=Social



Trump required staff to sign nondisclosure agreements that last past his presidency: report
BY JACQUELINE THOMSEN - 03/18/18 04:29 PM EDT 161

Trump required staff to sign nondisclosure agreements that last past his presidency: report
© Getty Images
President Trump required senior White House staffers to sign nondisclosure agreements that extend past his presidency, according to a reported column in The Washington Post.

The Post’s Ruth Marcus reported on Sunday that the staffers were required to sign the agreements during the early months of Trump’s presidency, promising not to share confidential information at the risk of penalty.

One person who signed the agreement said it was similar to those signed during the campaign and transition.


“I remember the president saying, ‘Has everybody signed a confidentiality agreement like they did during the campaign or we had at Trump Tower?’” the individual told The Post.

That person also told The Post that the agreement was supposed to extend past Trump’s time in office, a move the newspaper described as “extraordinary.”

A draft of the agreement penalized staffers $10 million, to be paid to the federal government, for sharing confidential information.

That information was defined as “all nonpublic information I learn of or gain access to in the course of my official duties in the service of the United States Government on White House staff,” including “communications . . . with members of the press” and “with employees of federal, state, and local governments.”

The Post noted that the $10 million penalty was likely lowered in the final agreements, as sources did not recall the same figure.

The White House did not return The Post's multiple requests for comment.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... -last-past


Andrew McCabe might still be able to get his pension

Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) has offered fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe a temporary job working on election security in his office “so that he can reach the needed length of service” to retire and receive his government pension, according to the Washington Post. A spokeswoman for McCabe told the Post: "We are considering all options."

Would it work? It seems so. McCabe held a law enforcement position with the federal government for more than the required 20 years, meaning that he'd only need to work until his 50th birthday to receive his full retirement benefits. And, per the Post's conversations with a former federal official, "The job doesn't matter so much as the fact that he's working within the federal government with the same retirement benefits until or after his 50th birthday."
https://www.axios.com/mccabe-mueller-tr ... daa7a.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 19, 2018 1:41 pm

NYT: POTUS To Hire New Lawyer Who Has Pushed Theory That FBI Framed Trump
By Caitlin MacNeal | March 19, 2018 1:38 pm


President Donald Trump plans to hire a new attorney, Joseph E. diGenova, for his outside legal team handling the Russia investigations, the New York Times reported Monday afternoon, citing three people told about the decision.

DiGenova, a Washington, D.C. lawyer and former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, has pushed the conspiracy theory that FBI officials framed Trump. He told the Daily Caller in January that the FBI “created false facts so that they could get surveillance warrants.” DiGenova also served as independent counsel in the Bill Clinton passport investigation in the 1990s.

DiGenova will not play a leading role on Trump’s legal team but will be a “more aggressive player,” according to the New York Times.

Victoria Toensing, DiGenova’s wife, represents former Trump campaign co-chair Sam Clovis; Erik Prince, the Blackwater CEO and informal Trump adviser who reportedly met with a Russian businessman in the Seychelles early last year; and and an informant in the Uranium One conspiracy theory pushed by conservatives.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ ... legal-team
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Mon Mar 19, 2018 1:47 pm

seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 18, 2018 8:29 pm wrote:
POLITICSMARCH 18, 2018 / 9:41 AM / UPDATED AN HOUR AGO

Exclusive: Sources contradict Sessions' testimony he opposed Russia outreach

Karen Freifeld, Sarah N. Lynch, Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ testimony that he opposed a proposal for President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign team to meet with Russians has been contradicted by three people who told Reuters they have spoken about the matter to investigators with Special Counsel Robert Mueller or congressional committees.

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the Justice Department on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., November 14, 2017. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas
Sessions testified before Congress in November 2017 that he “pushed back” against the proposal made by former campaign adviser George Papadopoulos at a March 31, 2016 campaign meeting. Then a senator from Alabama, Sessions chaired the meeting as head of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy team.

“Yes, I pushed back,” Sessions told the House Judiciary Committee on Nov. 14, when asked whether he shut down Papadopoulos’ proposed outreach to Russia. Sessions has since also been interviewed by Mueller.

Three people who attended the March campaign meeting told Reuters they gave their version of events to FBI agents or congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 election. Although the accounts they provided to Reuters differed in certain respects, all threes, who declined to be identified, said Sessions had expressed no objections to Papadopoulos’ idea.

However, another meeting attendee, J.D. Gordon, who was the Trump campaign’s director of national security, told media outlets including Reuters in November that Sessions strongly opposed Papadopoulos’ proposal and said no one should speak of it again. In response to a request for comment, Gordon said on Saturday that he stood by his statement.

Sessions, through Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores, declined to comment beyond his prior testimony. The special counsel’s office also declined to comment. Spokeswomen for the Democrats and Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee did not immediately comment.

Reuters was unable to determine whether Mueller is probing discrepancies in accounts of the March 2016 meeting.


The three accounts, which have not been reported, raise new questions about Sessions’ testimony regarding contacts with Russia during the campaign.

Sessions previously failed to disclose to Congress meetings he had with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, and testified in October that he was not aware of any campaign representatives communicating with Russians.

Some Democrats have seized on discrepancies in Sessions’ testimony to suggest the attorney general may have committed perjury. A criminal charge would require showing Sessions intended to deceive. Sessions told the House Judiciary Committee that he had always told the truth and testified to the best of his recollection.

Legal experts expressed mixed views about the significance of the contradictions cited by the three sources.

United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions visits families of opioid overdose victims at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Kentucky in Lexington, Kentucky, U.S. March 15, 2018. REUTERS/John Sommers II
Sessions could argue he misremembered events or perceived his response in a different way, making any contradictions unintentional, some experts said.

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, said Sessions’ words might be too vague to form the basis of a perjury case because there could be different interpretations of what the term pushing back means.

“If you’re talking about false statements, prosecutors look for something that is concrete and clear,” he said.

Other legal experts said, however, that repeated misstatements by Sessions could enable prosecutors to build a perjury case against him.

“Proving there was intent to lie is a heavy burden for the prosecution. But now you have multiple places where Sessions has arguably made false statements,” said Bennett Gershman, a Pace University law professor.

The March 2016 campaign meeting in Washington was memorialized in a photo Trump posted on Instagram of roughly a dozen men sitting around a table, including Trump, Sessions and Papadopoulos.

Papadopoulos, who pleaded guilty in October to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his Russia contacts, is now cooperating with Mueller.

According to court documents released after his guilty plea, Papadopoulos said at the campaign meeting that he had connections who could help arrange a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Papadopoulos continued to pursue Russian contacts after the March 2016 meeting and communicated with some campaign officials about his efforts, according to the court documents.

Trump has said that he does not remember much of what happened at the “very unimportant” campaign meeting. Trump has said he did not meet Putin before becoming president.

Moscow has denied meddling in the election and Trump has denied his campaign colluded with Russia.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... ium=Social


It seems pretty clear to me that Papadopoulos can nail Sessions on at least a perjury or obstruction charge, if not both or more. The question then is: does Mueller want to do that before sealing Trump's fate? Indicting Sessions would give Trump an opening to put in Pruitt or some other flunky specifically to fire Mueller.
"Huey Long once said, “Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism.” I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
-Jim Garrison 1967
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: California
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:19 pm

maybe Sessions has already had his session with Mueller and decided to cooperate :)

Mueller already has him lying to a Congressional hearing

DiGenova and Toensing :P
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:35 pm

seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 19, 2018 1:19 pm wrote:maybe Sessions has already had his session with Mueller and decided to cooperate :)

Mueller already has him lying to a Congressional hearing

DiGenova and Toensing :P


Oh brother.

The names DiGenova and Toensing rung a bell, but I couldn't quite place it so I googled. Both Gingrich stooges, Toensing was also knee-deep in Plamegate. And now they want to get in bed with Trump. How lovely!
"Huey Long once said, “Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism.” I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
-Jim Garrison 1967
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: California
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 19, 2018 4:32 pm

:D

hottest take: trump’s new lawyer Joe diGenova writes how it could be a good thing for a special prosecutor to indict a sitting president, to show that “no one is above the law."

Indictments in the Executive Branch, by Joseph diGenova, Wall Street Journal, March 6, 1997:

Image

If you had to choose between Trump hiring Joe Di Genova, who will encourage Trump's worst instincts, but who will poison our discourse worse than it already is, OR Emmet Flood, who's the most qualified guy to actually help Trump (& maybe shut him up), who'd you chose?

Joe Di Genova :rofl: :rofl:
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:48 pm

funny that deGenova and Nadar sitting in a tree ....... :P

I think deGenova was Nadar's lawyer during the child porn charges in 1985....have to double check that
tomorrow

no not his lawyer ........now it's becoming more clear

can you say deGenova is behind discrediting a cooperating witnesses in the Mueller case against trump?

Interesting note re unexplained leaks about the criminal past of Mueller's latest cooperating witness, George Nader: the US atty who tried & failed to bring obscenity charges against Nader in 1985 was new Trump lawyer, Joseph DiGenova.


Nadar is wondering why all these bad stories are coming out now about him :)

I say ask deGenova

sounds like someone is sending a signal :)

Open Secret: George Nader, who frequented the WH in 2017 to meet w/ Bannon & Jared Kushner, was indicted in 1985 for importing photographs of nude boys. One source wanted to warn an Arab official to “keep his kids away from Nader.”

Image
Image

TRUMP WHITE HOUSE ASSOCIATE GEORGE NADER WAS CONVICTED ON CHILD PORN CHARGES IN VIRGINIA
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-nader-chi ... ler-849498


EXCLUSIVE: The secret yacht summit that realigned the Middle East
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/georg ... -867425259

Convicted pedophile a witness in Mueller's Russia probe
Associated Press

March 15, 2018

This 1998 frame from video provided by C-SPAN shows president and editor of Middle East Insight George Nader. Nader, a Lebanese-American businessman convicted of sexually abusing minors and who served time in a Czech Republic prison more than a decade ago is cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller. Prague's Municipal Court convicted Nader and sentenced him to a one-year prison term in 2003. (C-SPAN via AP)
http://canoe.com/news/world/convicted-p ... ssia-probe
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: NSA Chief Russia Hacked '16 Election Congress Must Inves

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Mar 21, 2018 6:09 pm

Cambridge Analytica is the Grand Central Station of the Trump conspiracy.


Special Counsel studies Trump campaign ties to Cambridge Analytica, sources say

By KATHERINE FAULDERS, JOHN SANTUCCI, MEGAN CHRISTIE BENJAMIN SIEGEL
Mar 21, 2018, 4:04 PM ET

PHOTO: Special counsel Robert Mueller leaves after a closed meeting with members of the Senate Judiciary Committee June 21, 2017 at the Capitol in Washington.Alex Wong/Getty Images, FILE

As questions have mounted about data firm Cambridge Analytica’s alleged misuse of Facebook data from up to 50 million user profiles, it has not only caught the eye of Congressional investigators but also the special counsel investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team for the last several weeks has had a growing interest to better understand the relationship between the campaign, the Republican National Committee, and Cambridge Analytica, sources tell ABC News.

The company is also under investigation by British officials for its use of Facebook users’ data.

Sources tell ABC News several digital experts who worked in support of Trump’s bid in 2016 have met with Mueller's team for closed-door interviews. The staffers, most of whom were employed by the RNC, served as key members of the 2016 operation working closely with the campaign and the data firm, the sources said. The company worked closely with the Republican candidate’s political team.

The Trump campaign declined to comment and the Republican National Committee has not responded to ABC News' request for comment.

Cambridge Analytica was brought on by then-Trump campaign digital advisor Brad Parscale in early June 2016, after the data science firm pitched him on its services, sources told ABC News. Three Cambridge Analytica employees, including two data scientists, immediately moved to San Antonio to embed with Parscale's firm and by August, the number of fulltime staffers in Texas ballooned to 13.

The team led by Matt Oczkowski, who served as the data firm's chief product officer, was divided into three groups focusing on data science, research and polling and marketing.

Parscale would eventually leave Texas to move into Trump Tower in September, and the data firm sent a mid-level employee with him to interpret daily polling reports, according to sources.

Cambridge Analytica was one entity involved in creating the voter information and fundraising database now known as Project Alamo, built jointly by staffers from the RNC, the Trump campaign and Parscale's firm with data supplied by the RNC and the campaign, sources said.

A spokesperson for the Trump campaign told ABC News in a statement that they “used the RNC for its voter data and not Cambridge Analytica. Using the RNC data was one of the best choices the campaign made. Any claims that voter data were used from another source to support the victory in 2016 are false.”

A source with direct knowledge who has met with the special counsel's team tells ABC News investigators have asked former senior level campaign staff about the digital operations, specifically how data was collected and used and how assets were targeted specifically in the battleground states. Mueller's team has asked witnesses about the process of "micro targeting" which is the process of using data to identify specific groups of individuals and thereby influence their thoughts and potentially their actions.

From the start, Trump and his top advisors have touted the campaign’s mastery of spinning pithy social media messages into votes.

"I understand social media. I understand Twitter, I understand the power of Twitter I understand the power of Facebook. Maybe better than almost anybody, based on my results," Trump said at a 2015 town hall in South Carolina.

Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, and Parscale are among those who credited the use of targeted Facebook advertising – a strategy developed by Cambridge Analytica.

“We found that Facebook and digital targeting were the most effective ways to reach the audiences. After the primary, we started ramping up because we knew that doing a national campaign is different than doing a primary campaign," Kushner told Forbes Magazine just after the election. "That was when we formalized the system because we had to ramp up for digital fundraising. We brought in Cambridge Analytica.”

The Trump campaign paid the data firm more than $5.8 million for “data management” during the 2016 election cycle, according to Federal Election Commission records.


Cambridge Analytica ex-employee agrees to interview with House Democrats

Overseeing that effort was Parscale, the Trump family confidante who has been tapped to run Trump’s 2020 reelection bid. Parscale coordinated work with Cambridge Analytica executives to identify voters who were undecided and use social media to motivate them to support Trump over Hillary Clinton.

"I think Donald Trump won, but I think Facebook was the method–it was the highway in which his car drove on," Parscale told 60 Minutes last year.

In an undercover video aired on the British television Channel 4, the managing director of Cambridge Analytica's political division, Mark Turnbull, appears to describe, the effort to a reporter posing as a potential client.

Turnbull said his firm created memes around the “Crooked Hillary” brand, not necessarily the name itself.

“The brand was ‘Defeat crooked Hillary,’” he said. “Sometimes you could use proxy organizations… charities, or activist group. We feed them the material and they do the work. We just put the information into the bloodstream on the internet and then watch it grow. Give it a little push every once in a while. .. it’s un-attributable. Untraceable.”

Cambridge Analytica in a statement said it deleted all the Facebook data and related information in cooperation with the social media company, and that such information was never used as part of the data firm's work with the Trump presidential campaign. The data firm has said it was unaware the data was improperly obtained by a third party and that is was destroyed as soon as they were made aware.

Aleksandr Kogan, the psychology researcher at Cambridge University, who developed the app to collect the data from Facebook users that Cambridge Analytica used told the BBC that he is “being basically used as a scapegoat” by the social media company and data firm.

"Honestly, we thought we were acting perfectly appropriately, we thought we were doing something that was really normal," he told the news outlet.

The Trump campaign has said they never used data from Cambridge Analytica.

On Tuesday, the data firm announced CEO Alexander Nix’s suspension, pending an investigation and the release of several undercover videos, aired by Channel 4, of him bragging about Cambridge Analytica’s use of sex workers and bribes to damage politicians for their clients.

In the video, Nix is also recorded as saying the company used a method of communicating with clients that ensure emails “disappear” after they have been read.

“You send them and after they’ve been read, two hours later, they disappear,” Nix said in the undercover Channel 4 News video. “There’s no evidence, there’s no paper trail, there’s nothing.”

ABC News has not verified Nix’s on camera claims in the Channel 4 reports.

The data firm has been under fire this week after reports that the company used data harvested from millions of Facebook users without consent beginning in 2014 through an app. The company claims the material was obtained by a third party and has denied wrongdoing.

“This Facebook data was not used by Cambridge Analytica as part of the services it provided to the Donald Trump presidential campaign; personality targeted advertising was not carried out for this client either. The company has made this clear since 2016,” the company said in a statement.

Lawmakers involved in congressional investigations into Russian election interference have renewed interest in Facebook, calling for top company leaders to testify on Capitol Hill and more scrutiny of safeguards meant to protect user data.

“I think it’s time for the CEO, Mr. [Mark] Zuckerberg, and other top officials to come and testify and not tell part of the story, but tell the whole story of their involvement -- not only with the Trump campaign but their ability to have their platform misused by the Russians,” Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told ABC News.

Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee may soon have the opportunity to question the former Cambridge employee who helped expose the company's use of millions of Facebook profiles without their knowledge to help its political messaging efforts during the 2016 presidential election.

Christopher Wylie, the former employee, told ABC News “one of the reasons why I’m speaking out is because I think that it’s really concerning that no one has really investigated Cambridge Analytica and its role in the 2016 election.”

Wylie confirmed to ABC News that he has accepted an invitation to appear for an interview with congressional investigators.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/special- ... d=53903252
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests